Minnesota becomes 12th state to OK gay marriage

There are 1605 comments on the Fox News story from May 14, 2013, titled Minnesota becomes 12th state to OK gay marriage. In it, Fox News reports that:

As a crowd of thousands roared from the lawn of the state Capitol, Minnesota Gov.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Fox News.

Orem

Durham, NC

#912 May 25, 2013
NorCal Native wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you have some evidence to back up this BULL SHIET claim?
Frankly, a Child Molester regardless of sexual orientation should be punished to the highest allowed by law!!!
Listen you defender of sexual predators you need to STFU Dyke.

Whoop Whoop
Orem

Durham, NC

#913 May 25, 2013
NorCal Native wrote:
<quoted text>
!!!
Whoop Whoop.

Every poster is the doc to you and that make you one sick biotch.

“HHhhhoooowwwlll”

Since: Feb 08

Craigville

#914 May 25, 2013
Bud Longneck wrote:
<quoted text>Post a link buttercup
You have the internet, look it up yourself lazy longneck

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#916 May 25, 2013
YAWN
Bud Longneck

Cambridge, IL

#919 May 25, 2013
40for60 wrote:
<quoted text>
You have the internet, look it up yourself lazy longneck
No

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#920 May 25, 2013
From the article: "Ayer never wrote or spoke of this conversation with the doctor who saved his lifeónot to his wife, nor to Nicholas his adult son."

So no, he didn't.

Feel free to french a cobra, idiot.
Bigfoot Silva wrote:
<quoted text>
The patient wrote about it in the press.
Just shut up.
Whoever posted that article is very intelligent and probably doesn't want to fight. You don't even know who Ayer was or how important the article is.
The Coal Handlers Son

Commiskey, IN

#921 May 25, 2013
NorCal Native wrote:
<quoted text>No, not true, just old, worn out and been debunked!!!
And true!

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#923 May 25, 2013
OMG ! LOOK!

Minnesota is STILL the 12th State!
Orem

Durham, NC

#926 May 25, 2013
Pepper wrote:
<quoted text>
I take everything back, you're not in the rare 3%. You're just another homo taking up for another homo regardless that they're guilty.
No1. First off.....we don't have the entire story about Kaitlyn Hunt.
They have all they need to prosecute. An 18 yr old having sex with a 14 yr old. That's statutory rape.
No2. the reality is that freshmen in high school find it cool to be dating a senior, regardless of age.
Not sure she was a freshman at 14 yrs old. Most 14yr olds are in the 8th gr. but either way, the problem isn't the dating, it's the having sex. Most seniors would get laughed at for dating a 14 yr old.
No3. You say ......the law is NOT being equality applied and the only time it is applied is when the parents of the younger party want to control the situation and invoke the law.
That's the way it ALWAYS is. The only time something gets investigated is when the parents of the younger party press charges.
No4. why aren't you and others upset that an illegal sting operation was set up in order to provide the necessary evidence to arrest Kaitlyn......and why did the younger girl's parents wait until AFTER Kaitlyn turned 18 to have her arrested?
They waited till she was 18 because legally they couldn't do anything sooner. They couldn't keep them away from each other. They tried. The older girl would not back down. She was warned.
The illegal sting operation, which you call it, actually WAS legal. It was set up because the parents pressed charges and they had to get proof of the crime.
That NorCal Native defends them even if they are sexual predators.
WHOOP WHOOP
Orem

Durham, NC

#927 May 25, 2013
Pepper wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks, just found it out. As I've stated before, they lie soooo much, it's hard to know when they actually tell the truth.
Yes they do

Whoop Whoop
Orem

Durham, NC

#928 May 25, 2013
Pepper wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you defending the 18 yr old also?
If it is ahomo sexual predator they are.

Whoop Whoop

“REMEMBER TO THANK ”

Since: Aug 08

A VET FOR YOUR FREEDOM!

#929 May 25, 2013
Pepper wrote:
So, you're saying that the Smith's couldn't have gone to Kaitlyn's parents before Kaitlyn turned 18 to convince her parents that they wanted the relationship to cease? Wow, and I thought they had control over at least that much!!!

Let me ask you this, how many 17 year old young men are dating a 14 year old girls in High School? Do you believe that NONE of them are having sex? Do you believe that when the young man turns 18 years old that the relationship ceases all together? Do you seriously live in reality or some delusional world?

“REMEMBER TO THANK ”

Since: Aug 08

A VET FOR YOUR FREEDOM!

#932 May 25, 2013
Pepper wrote:
<quoted text>
Not many, but if they do and have sex, the same rules applies to them. It's just not publicized like this is. This made the news because you ho:mos wanted it that way. You ho:mos claim you want equal rights but what you really want is to be able to pick and choose what laws apply to you all. Special conditions. If you can't stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen.
Do you have a mouse in your pocket or something? I didn't know about this before the news broke......I'm still not certain of all the details except what is being reported and I was under the impression that one was innocent until PROVEN guilty......but according to you idiots......Kaitlyn has already been convicted......and yes, I would say the same thing if it had involved a heterosexual teen couple as well!!!

I guess if Kaitlyn is truly guilty, then she will have to face the consequences of her actions!!!

“REMEMBER TO THANK ”

Since: Aug 08

A VET FOR YOUR FREEDOM!

#933 May 25, 2013
Pepper wrote:
<quoted text>
Contrary To belief, most seniors will not be caught dead with a 14 yr old.It's embarrassing, they would be made fun of. You ho:mos are the ones that like the underage kids.
Maybe you wouldn't do such a thing......but that doesn't mean others wouldn't do it.......there are many factors that go into these relationships and none of them are just because of age!!!

Again, you keep making false allegations about the GLBTQI Community and that's slander.......most Gays, Lesbians, straights, Bisexuals that I know are attracted to ADULTS not children!!!

“REMEMBER TO THANK ”

Since: Aug 08

A VET FOR YOUR FREEDOM!

#936 May 25, 2013
Pepper wrote:
<quoted text>
you said it.......there are many factors that go into these relationships and none of them are just because of age!!!
Doesn't matter what the reasons are, if you have sex with underage kids, it's illegal and against the law. If you get caught, like in most crimes, you have to suffer the consequences.
You said : Again, you keep making false allegations about the GLBTQI Community and that's slander.......most Gays, Lesbians, straights, Bisexuals that I know are attracted to ADULTS not children!!!
Really?? Since this story has come out, you Ho:mos have proved me right over and over again. You all have condoned and defended the actions of an 18 yr old having sex with a 14 yr old child. Over and over again, so many on here have stated that there's nothing wrong with having relations with kids as young as 13. It's very sad but obvious that a lot of homosexuals like their partners very young.
Then PROSECUTE EVERYONE NO EXCEPTIONS.......sound good to you? My advice is make sure your child doesn't make this mistake........I'd hate for you to turn out to be a hypocrite!!!

No, like other idiots.....you tend to take our comments and twist them.......frankly, if Kaitlyn is found guilty, she should pay the consequences. I'm not sure how I can be any more clearly on my position regarding this issue!!!

Again, there is a difference between young and a child......you want to infer that young means something that it's not.........but hey......it is pretty disgusting in the first place to do what you do and that is accuse people of preying on children strictly because of their sexual orientation.......especially when it is straight men who commit more harm and crimes against children.....all ya have to do is read:
http://www.childmolestationprevention.org/pag...

“REMEMBER TO THANK ”

Since: Aug 08

A VET FOR YOUR FREEDOM!

#937 May 26, 2013
Pepper wrote:
<quoted text>
Innocent until proven guilty huh.
That's what our law says, whether is obvious or not. Just like Jodi Arias or Sandusky, even they were presumed innocent until they were proven guilty, even though everyone knew they were guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt.
Really.....that's what you consider being innocent......hell, Sandusky was convicted LONG before his court trial, as was Joe Paterno........and there are countless others who once they are accused......it matters not if they are actually innocent of the charges.......and again.....you know little about my position regarding this entire issue......maybe you should do some research on the issue before making an azz out of yourself by ASSuming!!!

“REMEMBER TO THANK ”

Since: Aug 08

A VET FOR YOUR FREEDOM!

#939 May 26, 2013
Pepper wrote:
<quoted text>
LMFAO Are you saying Sandusky was innocent?? He had his day in court. So will the lDlOT in Cleveland that held the three young girls captive for ten years. Even though we KNOW they're guilty as heII, they still have to be proven guilty in a court of law. A waste of time and money, but that's the law. Seems like, since you have no argument anymore, you're forcing yourself to PRETEND to go along with the fact that they're probably guilty, but you really hate to admit it. If anyone is making an A.SS out of themself, it's you.
Funny how that's all ya got from my post.......but then what can one truly expect when one can't see things in a realistic manner!!!

Well, that's obviously your problem......I know how I feel about those who harm children and how I feel about the laws that don't protect a)our children and b)punish the person who commits harm against the child more severely!!!

And you can continue to twist my words to justify your idiotic comments......but again, I know how I feel about those who are truly sexual predators and harm our children!!!

“"W.T.F."”

Since: Aug 12

Tempe, AZ

#940 May 26, 2013
Pepper wrote:
<quoted text>
LMFAO Are you saying Sandusky was innocent?? He had his day in court. So will the lDlOT in Cleveland that held the three young girls captive for ten years. Even though we KNOW they're guilty as heII, they still have to be proven guilty in a court of law. A waste of time and money, but that's the law. Seems like, since you have no argument anymore, you're forcing yourself to PRETEND to go along with the fact that they're probably guilty, but you really hate to admit it. If anyone is making an A.SS out of themself, it's you.
And pray tell,again what does any of this to do with the topic of this thread? The true fact remains that the majority of child molestations are committed by heterosexuals on girls! 1 out of EVERY 5 girls are molested in their youth,are you condemning all heterosexuals for this statistic? I highly doubt it! Now,isn't it great that Minnesota passed marriage equality in that state,making it the 12th with more on the way in the coming year? I can't wait to hear you whine next month when marriage equality is once again restored in California the most populous state in the union! So get on topic or go to the hetero molestation thread where you obviously belong! Ciao!
Orem

Durham, NC

#942 May 26, 2013
NorCal Native wrote:
<quoted text>
Then PROSECUTE EVERYONE NO EXCEPTIONS.......sound good to you? My advice is make sure your child doesn't make this mistake
Yes

Whoop Whoop
Orem

Durham, NC

#943 May 26, 2013
Pepper wrote:
<quoted text>
you said it.......there are many factors that go into these relationships and none of them are just because of age!!!
Doesn't matter what the reasons are, if you have sex with underage kids, it's illegal and against the law. If you get caught, like in most crimes, you have to suffer the consequences.
You said : Again, you keep making false allegations about the GLBTQI Community and that's slander.......most Gays, Lesbians, straights, Bisexuals that I know are attracted to ADULTS not children!!!
Really?? Since this story has come out, you Ho:mos have proved me right over and over again. You all have condoned and defended the actions of an 18 yr old having sex with a 14 yr old child. Over and over again, so many on here have stated that there's nothing wrong with having relations with kids as young as 13. It's very sad but obvious that a lot of homosexuals like their partners very young.
Whoop Whoop

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News SoCal Rep Wants to Outlaw Gay-to-Straight "Conv... 39 min EdmondWA 100
Stop heterosexual hatred today... 47 min SupportAlanandfra... 3
News Is Polygamy the Next Gay Marriage? (Sep '14) 1 hr Brian_G 5,571
News 60 Percent: Record Number Of Americans Support ... 1 hr Brian_G 98
News Pediatrician Won't Treat Baby With Lesbian Moms 1 hr Brian_G 1,375
News Homosexuality and the Bible (Aug '11) 2 hr Robin 32,991
News The right therapy for LGBT youth 2 hr zyondra 292
News Judge: Gay couples across Alabama have right to... 3 hr Novus Ordo Seclorum 40
News Josh Duggar apology not enough? Fallout from mo... 3 hr Nose basher 38
More from around the web