Gay marriage

Gay marriage

There are 61395 comments on the Los Angeles Times story from Mar 28, 2013, titled Gay marriage. In it, Los Angeles Times reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court is considering two controversial cases involving whether same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry: Proposition 8, California's 2008 ban on gay marriage, and the Defense of Marriage Act, which since 1996 has defined marriage for federal purposes as a union between a man and a woman.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Los Angeles Times.

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#6029 Sep 30, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, it is. You simply have no reasoned response. It is so solid, you don't even try. Everyone knows it~!
Marriage is a miraculous union of two genders,
a union so profound,
it is described as the union of Mars and Venus.
It reunites humanity to the roots of life,
while at the very same time
hosting the best and natural
birth place of future human life.
It is the blend of masculinity and femininity.
The wisdom of logic and intuition united.
Strength and delicacy perfectly balanced.
Protection and nurture combined as one.
A complimentary merging that multiplies the unbiased blend of humanity's genders.
A ss couple cannot equate to a single one of these distinctions.
Repeating your idiocy does not make it anymore valid or true, it just makes you look foolish, unintelligent, and immature.

Well played, captain clueless.

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#6030 Sep 30, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
However, this is still valid;
Marriage is a miraculous union of two genders,
a union so profound,
it is described as the union of Mars and Venus.
It reunites humanity to the roots of life,
while at the very same time
hosting the best and natural
birth place of future human life.
It is the blend of masculinity and femininity.
The wisdom of logic and intuition united.
Strength and delicacy perfectly balanced.
Protection and nurture combined as one.
A complimentary merging that multiplies the unbiased blend of humanity's genders.
A ss couple cannot equate to a single one of these distinctions.
That could cause a diabetic coma.
Marriage is also the beautiful union that ends in divorce 50% of the time.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#6031 Sep 30, 2013
gay rights wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you afraid of change? You keep telling me the definition of what a marriage is, but here's a news flash I know what marriage is. What I am explaining is why we should change and allow gay marriages. You simply just repeat what a marriage is and provide no reason why we should not change and allow gay marriage. Actually you have one point that you think is right. You believe that just because we cannot have children we cannot have marriages. I find that absurd and lets say a woman cannot have children because of medical reasons, are you going to say that she cannot get married because she cannot reproduce. Lets say for example you cannot have children because you cannot produce enough sperm, your recent attempt at trying to prove gay marriage is not right now goes for you too. You cannot reproduce, so why have a marriage sill?
You are like salt demanding to be called sugar. They simply are not the same. It would be nothing less than a lie.

Your attempt to equate a rare medical issue to the inherent barrenness of ss couples fails. Not to mention the attempt to ignore all the other vast differences my commentary only touches on.

ss marriage is and always will be an oxymoron.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#6032 Sep 30, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, it is. You simply have no reasoned response. It is so solid, you don't even try. Everyone knows it~!
Marriage is a miraculous union of two genders,
a union so profound,
it is described as the union of Mars and Venus.
It reunites humanity to the roots of life,
while at the very same time
hosting the best and natural
birth place of future human life.
It is the blend of masculinity and femininity.
The wisdom of logic and intuition united.
Strength and delicacy perfectly balanced.
Protection and nurture combined as one.
A complimentary merging that multiplies the unbiased blend of humanity's genders.
A ss couple cannot equate to a single one of these distinctions.
sure they can. this has been proven to you time and time again yet you still post this lie and this crappy poem...
well

Round Lake, IL

#6033 Sep 30, 2013
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
Repeating your idiocy does not make it anymore valid or true, it just makes you look foolish, unintelligent, and immature.
Well played, captain clueless.
He is getting manic again, best to ignore him!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#6034 Sep 30, 2013
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
KiMare, you inept assertion gains no more validity with repetition.
The simple fact remains that you can't offer any compelling governmental interest served by denying same sex couples equal protection of the law to marry that would render such a restriction constitutional.
No one gives a flying rip about the government, especially tonight.

You have nothing to discount this;

Marriage is a miraculous union of two genders,
a union so profound,
it is described as the union of Mars and Venus.
It reunites humanity to the roots of life,
while at the very same time
hosting the best and natural
birth place of future human life.
It is the blend of masculinity and femininity.
The wisdom of logic and intuition united.
Strength and delicacy perfectly balanced.
Protection and nurture combined as one.
A complimentary merging that multiplies the unbiased blend of humanity's genders.

A ss couple cannot equate to a single one of these distinctions.

Can't answer can you lides. POWERLESS.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#6035 Sep 30, 2013
Lawrence Wolf wrote:
<quoted text>That could cause a diabetic coma.
Marriage is also the beautiful union that ends in divorce 50% of the time.
The failure of those who break their vow discounts those who keep it???

Then why would you be interested in imposing an imposter relationship???

Smirk.

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#6036 Sep 30, 2013
KiMare wrote:
You are like salt demanding to be called sugar. They simply are not the same. It would be nothing less than a lie.
Your attempt to equate a rare medical issue to the inherent barrenness of ss couples fails. Not to mention the attempt to ignore all the other vast differences my commentary only touches on.
ss marriage is and always will be an oxymoron.
You are like an idiot demanding to be called intelligent.

They don't need to be the same. No two marriage are equal, but all people are entitled to equal protection of the laws, and marriage is one such protection. You seem to lack the intellect to offer a compelling governmental interest served by denying same sex couples the right to marry that would render such a restriction constitutional; or to offer any way in which allowing same sex marriage adversely impacts the rights of anyone who wouldn't enter into such a union.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#6037 Sep 30, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>sure they can. this has been proven to you time and time again yet you still post this lie and this crappy poem...
Well Woody, then just post one of those 'countless' times.

Snicker.
gay rights

Centereach, NY

#6038 Sep 30, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You are like salt demanding to be called sugar. They simply are not the same. It would be nothing less than a lie.
Your attempt to equate a rare medical issue to the inherent barrenness of ss couples fails. Not to mention the attempt to ignore all the other vast differences my commentary only touches on.
ss marriage is and always will be an oxymoron.


Listen I'm truly not trying to be rude right now, but maybe you need to look up a few things. It's not a rare medical disease to not being able to have children, it's actually quite common. And what about people who get married and choose never to have children? Are you going to suggest the government take away their marriage licence? Like I said I'm really trying not to be rude to you in this post because I feel like you don't notice that not all people have children. And feel free to tell me what other questions I did not answer of yours. I will gladly answer all of them and I'm sorry to say that marriage is going to be legal for all one day for everyone. It's only a matter of when they will allow it.

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#6039 Sep 30, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
No one gives a flying rip about the government, especially tonight.
You have nothing to discount this;
Marriage is a miraculous union of two genders,
a union so profound,
it is described as the union of Mars and Venus.
It reunites humanity to the roots of life,
while at the very same time
hosting the best and natural
birth place of future human life.
It is the blend of masculinity and femininity.
The wisdom of logic and intuition united.
Strength and delicacy perfectly balanced.
Protection and nurture combined as one.
A complimentary merging that multiplies the unbiased blend of humanity's genders.
A ss couple cannot equate to a single one of these distinctions.
Can't answer can you lides. POWERLESS.
Too stupid to see that the poem you ripped off is wrong, I see.

Are same sex couples composed of people?
Is marriage a protection of the law?
Are you an idiot?

Here's a hint, the answer to all three is yes.

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#6040 Sep 30, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
However, this is still valid;
Marriage is a miraculous union of two genders,
a union so profound,
it is described as the union of Mars and Venus.
It reunites humanity to the roots of life,
while at the very same time
hosting the best and natural
birth place of future human life.
It is the blend of masculinity and femininity.
The wisdom of logic and intuition united.
Strength and delicacy perfectly balanced.
Protection and nurture combined as one.
A complimentary merging that multiplies the unbiased blend of humanity's genders.
A ss couple cannot equate to a single one of these distinctions.
And not a bit of your oft-repeated opinions here have anything do do with marriage, or the law.

I know you like to read your writings, but that doesn't make them relevant or logical.

Try again.

Back to a rational state interest in denying gay couples legal marriage. No self-serving pseudo poetry - just simple facts and proof.
anonymous

Absecon, NJ

#6041 Sep 30, 2013
gay rights wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes remember me as a good person who did not have a choice to be gay. And are you still stuck on that dog thing again? We are not dogs, even though you act like one. If it's a choice then according to you, you can just like men or women like an on and off switch. Well I'm sorry I am not you and I do not have this magical switch to switch the people I am attracted to. And never ever compare me to Nazi's. I am not trying to kill a whole race of people, I am simply fighting for my rights
I'll likely not remember you at all. And PLEASE, really, really don't start talking about your sex organ again!

You made a choice. You chose to be gay. You are essentially a pack animal like a dog so don't bother me if you feel insulted.

Tell us more about how you have no choice. OBEY YOUR MASTER!
anonymous

Absecon, NJ

#6042 Sep 30, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
No one gives a flying rip about the government, especially tonight.
You have nothing to discount this;
Marriage is a miraculous union of two genders,
a union so profound,
it is described as the union of Mars and Venus.
It reunites humanity to the roots of life,
while at the very same time
hosting the best and natural
birth place of future human life.
It is the blend of masculinity and femininity.
The wisdom of logic and intuition united.
Strength and delicacy perfectly balanced.
Protection and nurture combined as one.
A complimentary merging that multiplies the unbiased blend of humanity's genders.
A ss couple cannot equate to a single one of these distinctions.
Can't answer can you lides. POWERLESS.
You're getting a bit maniacal with the repetition.

All I'm getting from it is some strange images, probably not the mysticism you were looking for.

1. Charlie Chaplain balancing on his clenched butt cheeks at a piano, singing about love, LOVE, Love, LOve, yada...yada!

2. Led Zeppelin singing "I can't stop talking about love", kind of a Charlie Manson/date-rape image comes to mind there!

3. Fred Flintstone learning to dance, sticking his nasty bare feet at everything in view.

Shakespeare isn't needed and isn't wanted here. Everyone on this board, including YOU, is only concerned but where the gubbermint money is going. Don't be a fancy-pants!
Greg Kirschmann

Chicago, IL

#6043 Sep 30, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Why you did.
That's right, and that's my intellectual property.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>

Why do you call something prose that you know was written only as statements of fact?
These were merely opinions on a blog. They were never intended as "facts".
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>

Why would you diss your own writing?
To see if you'd man up and admit where you copied them from.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>

It makes you sound like a desperate idiot gay troll imposter...
That's your schtick; you've been doing it for years.

SecretSmile

“Headline already in use”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#6044 Sep 30, 2013
The People of California voted twice to define marriage as one man and one woman; that's why same sex marriage is antidemocratic.

“A JOURNEY OF A THOUSAND MILES”

Since: Aug 08

MUST BEGIN WITH A SINGLE STEP!

#6045 Sep 30, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
The People of California voted twice to define marriage as one man and one woman; that's why same sex marriage is antidemocratic.
The Legislators passed marriage equality twice in this State only to have a Governor veto it twice.........and what is anti-democratic is a proposition being placed on the ballot to eliminate a right from one group of individuals simply because some Religious group DOESN'T like who they are or who they love!!!

“Headline already in use”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#6047 Sep 30, 2013
NorCal Native wrote:
The Legislators passed marriage equality twice in this State only to have a Governor veto it twice.........and what is anti-democratic is a proposition being placed on the ballot to eliminate a right from one group of individuals simply because some Religious group DOESN'T like who they are or who they love!!!
The Governor's veto is part of the democratic process. Courts overturning elections isn't the same thing at all.

That's why same sex marriage is antidemocratic, California voted twice to define marriage as one man and one woman.

“Headline already in use”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#6048 Sep 30, 2013
Same sex marriage has nothing to do with who you love, it has to do with marriage laws for everyone.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#6049 Oct 1, 2013
gay rights wrote:
<quoted text>
Listen I'm truly not trying to be rude right now, but maybe you need to look up a few things. It's not a rare medical disease to not being able to have children, it's actually quite common. And what about people who get married and choose never to have children? Are you going to suggest the government take away their marriage licence? Like I said I'm really trying not to be rude to you in this post because I feel like you don't notice that not all people have children. And feel free to tell me what other questions I did not answer of yours. I will gladly answer all of them and I'm sorry to say that marriage is going to be legal for all one day for everyone. It's only a matter of when they will allow it.
No, sterility is rare and often treatable.

However, whatever happens, this will always remain;

A ss couple will only ever be a mutually sterile pointlessly duplicate gendered half of marriage.

And there is not one damn thing you can do about it, is there?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News 'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15) 9 min Terra Firma 16,168
News Gay club lube dispenser filled with acid 38 min Frankie Rizzo 28
News Parade kicks off Erie's pride festival 52 min Gov Corbutt of th... 33
News Juan Gabriel was Mexico's gay icon a " but he n... 1 hr david traversa 1
News Court: Gays can seek parental rights for nonbio... 1 hr david traversa 1
News Transgender Ken doll cake triggers outrage afte... 1 hr Rose_NoHo 60
News Study: Children Of Same-Sex Parents More Likely... 1 hr Rose_NoHo 160
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 2 hr Lohan 38,912
More from around the web