When someone makes a conclusion based on the ASSumption, "Are you claiming...", you know that is not what is being claimed and there is a gay twirl diversion occurring to avoid the truth.<quoted text>
Where is the lie?
Are you claiming a married opposite sex couple who doesn't have sex will somehow conceive a child if they don't use protection?
Or are you claiming a same-sex couple can't have sex without using protection?
Sorry, but in the real world neither of those is true. Immaculate conceptions only occur in fairytales- unless you have documented proof otherwise.
You are playing games because you don't want to face reality. Let me make it simple for an idiot;
~Marriage requires protection to NOT have children (that would mean intercourse is occurring). Making children a requirement would be idiotic based on that fact.
~Gay couples require protection to have anal intercourse, the closest imitation to natural sex a gay can manufacture. Albeit a harmful, unhealthy and demeaning imitation.