Pa. Sues To Stop Issuance Of Gay Marr...

Pa. Sues To Stop Issuance Of Gay Marriage Licenses

There are 1086 comments on the CBS Local story from Jul 30, 2013, titled Pa. Sues To Stop Issuance Of Gay Marriage Licenses. In it, CBS Local reports that:

State officials in Pennsylvania are asking a court to stop a rogue county from issuing marriage licenses to gay couples.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBS Local.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#796 Aug 15, 2013
DNF wrote:
<quoted text>Yes and Dr. Sheldon Cooper's mom had him tested as well.
So what?
You both should have gotten that second opinion. But why look for truth when you can shop for doctors that will tell you what you want to hear.
You keep bringing up your 'genetic defect' idea. Following that logic, infertile couples should be banned from marriage. Men should all be tested for Alzheimer's and other genetic diseases and those who have the defect should also be denied their Constitutional Rights, despite the Americans with Disabilities Act.
You've twirled yourself into such a state you're so dizzy you can't even make sense anymore.
But hey, I hope you and your letter have a long and happy union.
I brought up no genetic defect idea. You are panicking. It's making you stupid and desperate.

At its most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.

SS coues are a defective failure of mating behavior.

You have nothing but gay troll attacks in response.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#797 Aug 15, 2013
Wondering wrote:
<quoted text>
It does.
Straight, get 30 days leave.
Gay, get up to 40 days leave.
Ask lides, 40 doesn't equal 30.
Nope, wrong again.

Anyone who is unable to get married in the state they are stationed in gets up to 7 days leave (10 days if overseas) to travel to a state where they are allowed to marry.

Applies the same for straight or gay service members.

Straight service members who are banned from marrying in the state they are stationed in can get the leave, just like gay service members.

Gay service members who are allowed to marry in the state they are stationed in WON'T get the leave, just like straight service members.

Equal.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#798 Aug 15, 2013
DNF wrote:
<quoted text>Care to provide proof of your "facts"?.
From what I have read SSC's get 10 days to get this all done, not 40.
Like most who've never served, he's confused about the military leave policy.

“Marriage Equality”

Since: Dec 07

Lakeland, MI

#799 Aug 15, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope, wrong again.
Anyone who is unable to get married in the state they are stationed in gets up to 7 days leave (10 days if overseas) to travel to a state where they are allowed to marry.
Applies the same for straight or gay service members.
Straight service members who are banned from marrying in the state they are stationed in can get the leave, just like gay service members.
Gay service members who are allowed to marry in the state they are stationed in WON'T get the leave, just like straight service members.
Equal.
You just INSIST on staying in the world of reality, don't you? They hate that, you know. They rely on people buying into their personal fantasy worlds in order to have a point.

Yer meen!!

:)

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#800 Aug 15, 2013
eJohn wrote:
<quoted text>
You just INSIST on staying in the world of reality, don't you? They hate that, you know. They rely on people buying into their personal fantasy worlds in order to have a point.
Yer meen!!
:)
Yeah, I saw all these complaints coming the moment the policy was announced. You should read the crap people are posting over on the Stars & Stripes website. Of course almost everyone posting negative crap is an old retired geezer. Most of the active duty posters- gay or straight- support the policy.

Oh crap, I just realize I officially qualify as an "old retired geezer" now!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#801 Aug 15, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope, wrong again.
Anyone who is unable to get married in the state they are stationed in gets up to 7 days leave (10 days if overseas) to travel to a state where they are allowed to marry.
Applies the same for straight or gay service members.
Straight service members who are banned from marrying in the state they are stationed in can get the leave, just like gay service members.
Gay service members who are allowed to marry in the state they are stationed in WON'T get the leave, just like straight service members.
Equal.
Hardly.

Heterosexuals are segregated in housing. Homosexuals are not.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#802 Aug 15, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Hardly.
Heterosexuals are segregated in housing. Homosexuals are not.
Really?

That would come as new to all the married heterosexual men & women who live together in base housing.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#803 Aug 15, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Hardly.
Heterosexuals are segregated in housing. Homosexuals are not.
If you're referring to single service members, then gay AND straight are segregated in housing by gender.

Still equal.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#804 Aug 15, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
If you're referring to single service members, then gay AND straight are segregated in housing by gender.
Still equal.
You knew that was what I was referring to.

I referred specifically to orientation.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#805 Aug 15, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You knew that was what I was referring to.
I referred specifically to orientation.
And service members aren't segregated by orientation either.

Care to try again?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#806 Aug 15, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
And service members aren't segregated by orientation either.
Care to try again?
Oh, but heterosexuals are.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#807 Aug 15, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, but heterosexuals are.
That's because the pregnancies aren't convenient.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#808 Aug 16, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
That's because the pregnancies aren't convenient.
1. That does not justify discrimination.

2. You said all things were equal. They are not. I exposed just one, you just brought up another.

lides

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#809 Aug 16, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You knew that was what I was referring to.
I referred specifically to orientation.
Have you noticed that your posts have become shorter and less relevant. It looks like someone is on the ropes, as it were.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#810 Aug 16, 2013
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
Have you noticed that your posts have become shorter and less relevant. It looks like someone is on the ropes, as it were.
Have you noticed that you switched from a myopic focus on law to gay troll attacks?

lides

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#811 Aug 16, 2013
KiMare wrote:
Have you noticed that you switched from a myopic focus on law to gay troll attacks?
You clearly aren't up to a discussion of the law based upon your inability to address simple and direct questions.

Are you ready to grow up and offer a big boy argument?

Can you indicate a state interest served by limiting marriage to opposite sex couples that would render such a restriction constitutional?

I don't think you are, and I think your posts prove as much.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#812 Aug 16, 2013
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
You clearly aren't up to a discussion of the law based upon your inability to address simple and direct questions.
Are you ready to grow up and offer a big boy argument?
Can you indicate a state interest served by limiting marriage to opposite sex couples that would render such a restriction constitutional?
I don't think you are, and I think your posts prove as much.
My aren't we getting pissy. I'm simply stating the reality that your relationship is simply a mutually sterile duplicate gendered half of marriage.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#813 Aug 16, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, but heterosexuals are.
Nope, heterosexuals live with homosexuals; no segregation.

Married men & women live together in housing; no segregation.

And now married men & men or women & women will live in housing together; no segregation.

Maybe you should learn something about the military and come back to try again.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#814 Aug 16, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
1. That does not justify discrimination.
2. You said all things were equal. They are not. I exposed just one, you just brought up another.
No one is being discriminated against; at least not anymore.

Single men live with single men.
Single women live with single women.
Married opposite-sex couples live in on-base housing.
Married same-sex couples will now live in on-base housing.

Nope, no discrimination.

Just equality.
well

Round Lake, IL

#815 Aug 16, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>

Maybe you should learn something about the military and come back to try again.
When ones mind is closed like KiMare...they are incapable of learning!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Spectrum Cafe (Dec '07) 8 min NE Jade 27,994
News Kansas teacher moves after receiving threats fo... 13 min NE Jade 28
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 1 hr Wondering 60,837
News School textbook with gay maths problem go viral 1 hr Wondering 10
News What would Jesus say about same-sex marriage? (Jul '15) 6 hr dollarsbill 19,229
News California Lawmakers Move to Limit Gay Conversi... 7 hr Frankie Rizzo 7
News Lesbian mum told baby won't be legally register... 11 hr Murphy 1
News 'Roseanne' Star Recalls Fight to Air Controvers... Apr 20 Frankie Rizzo 103