GLAAD slams Duck Dynasty's Phil Rober...

GLAAD slams Duck Dynasty's Phil Robertson for anti-gay remarks

There are 613 comments on the WLLR-FM Davenport story from Dec 18, 2013, titled GLAAD slams Duck Dynasty's Phil Robertson for anti-gay remarks. In it, WLLR-FM Davenport reports that:

Phil Robertson has issued an apology of sorts for the anti-gay comments he made in the January issue of GQ .

Join the discussion below, or Read more at WLLR-FM Davenport.

Xstain Mullah Fricassee

Philadelphia, PA

#572 Jan 2, 2014
Jumper The Wise wrote:
<quoted text>Hey 'Mullah'!(if thats what you're going by now) I think you're projecting your sexual frustrations over the concent law.
pervert.
Nice try cretin. No, I'm correcting the fundie trash's claim that the Duck filth didn't advocate anything illegal.

It's the Duck trash who appears to have the problem with the "concent" laws.

I am the one here condemning the Duck trash for his advocating marriage to underage girls.
Xstain Mullah Fricassee

Philadelphia, PA

#573 Jan 2, 2014
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>
Your research skills are lacking....If younger than 16, applicant must have both parents' consent and permission from a Judge in the form of a court order.
I was saying what a sick and backwards state that is. I wonder how many judges have okayed marriages between adult men and 15 year old girls.

And "homosexual judge" has nothing to do with it: I the one criticizing the Duck trash for his love of marrying young girls. You are apparently defending the Duck trash on this point.

“Antisocialistic”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#574 Jan 2, 2014
Xstain Mullah Fricassee wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh right, you have multiple degrees. You couldn't even get multiple degrees from Liberty Baptist University [sic].
No, educated persons don't get into debates about the earth being billions, not thousands, of years old. This isn't deflection. This is a simple standard of quality...pretend-fundie trolls or not.
And again you post opinion as fact. Redundancy doesn't eventually yield truth, contrary to Democrat belief.

“Antisocialistic”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#575 Jan 2, 2014
Xstain Mullah Fricassee wrote:
<quoted text>
I was saying what a sick and backwards state that is. I wonder how many judges have okayed marriages between adult men and 15 year old girls.
And "homosexual judge" has nothing to do with it: I the one criticizing the Duck trash for his love of marrying young girls. You are apparently defending the Duck trash on this point.
Lmao!!!
Of course you were. Louisiana doesn't allow homosexual marriage. You conveniently left out a reply to your being proven wrong once again.
Again, Phil was referring to a BOY marrying 15 or 16 year old girls, which you conveniently avoid addressing.

Phil doesn't want to marry a young girl, he has been happily married to Kay for decades. He married her when she was 16 btw. Hmmmm. He's been married to her for decades when the US has a greater than 50% divorce rate. Imagine that, he must know something that others should consider.
Jumper The Wise

Morgantown, KY

#576 Jan 2, 2014
Xstain Mullah Fricassee wrote:
<quoted text>
Nice try cretin. No, I'm correcting the fundie trash's claim that the Duck filth didn't advocate anything illegal.
It's the Duck trash who appears to have the problem with the "concent" laws.
I am the one here condemning the Duck trash for his advocating marriage to underage girls.
I don't know why you gay people get so upset.
Xstain Mullah Fricassee

Philadelphia, PA

#577 Jan 2, 2014
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>
And again you post opinion as fact. Redundancy doesn't eventually yield truth, contrary to Democrat belief.
There's no "facts" about your alleged degrees.

If you want to post your imaginary name and "site" the imaginary institution where you got your imaginary degrees from then I can imagine imaginarily verifying your astounding education.

But the stupidity of your posts precludes your having any advanced degree, and that's true even if you're just another freeek who's jeeesus-trolling.
Xstain Mullah Fricassee

Philadelphia, PA

#578 Jan 2, 2014
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>
Lmao!!!
Of course you were. Louisiana doesn't allow homosexual marriage. You conveniently left out a reply to your being proven wrong once again.
Again, Phil was referring to a BOY marrying 15 or 16 year old girls, which you conveniently avoid addressing.
Phil doesn't want to marry a young girl, he has been happily married to Kay for decades. He married her when she was 16 btw. Hmmmm. He's been married to her for decades when the US has a greater than 50% divorce rate. Imagine that, he must know something that others should consider.
I'm not discussing marriage equality in LA at this time. I am sure the state will always be at the very back of the pack on this and on every social issue.

I'm just relieved that after four days of demanding "a link" to the disgusting videos by the Duck trash that you seem to have learned how to read a second topix thread and thus discover on your own, eventually, the 2010 video.(Maybe some day you'll accidentally wander onto a reputable science "cite" and lern the urth is moor than 10000 yeers ole.)

I acknowledged your additional information: I said I wonder how many of these under 16 year old girl marriages have been approved by LA judges.(Such a judge would be regressive, not in favor of marriage equality, therefore.)

The Duck trash clearly says that these girls are rotten in some way by the time they're 20. That's misogynistic whether he was talking about equally underage boys marrying the underage girls or not. But apparently his and Ted Nugent's marriages suggest that he was talking about men marrying girls, in practice.
Xstain Mullah Fricassee

Philadelphia, PA

#579 Jan 2, 2014
Jumper The Wise wrote:
<quoted text>I don't know why you gay people get so upset.
I don't know why you str8 men keep violently raping women in such high numbers.

Oh wait, I do know why that happens, you stupid, violent misogynist.

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#580 Jan 2, 2014
Same sex marriage law by court order is about ignoring the consent of the governed and the left imposing its morality without having to win a vote.

“Antisocialistic”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#581 Jan 3, 2014
Xstain Mullah Fricassee wrote:
<quoted text>
There's no "facts" about your alleged degrees.
If you want to post your imaginary name and "site" the imaginary institution where you got your imaginary degrees from then I can imagine imaginarily verifying your astounding education.
But the stupidity of your posts precludes your having any advanced degree, and that's true even if you're just another freeek who's jeeesus-trolling.
Your frustration and inability to prove your case is showing. When you resort to this kind of pathetic, immature babble, your hand has been played.

lides

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#582 Jan 3, 2014
Brian_G wrote:
Ann Coulter writes the most biting satire conservatives like to read.
If you think Ann Coulter is a satirist, then you are even dumber than I thought.
Brian_G wrote:
The issue isn't just religious freedom, those who would shut down Phil's freedom to answer the press by having him locked out of his workplace are wrong.
Brian, words have consequences. Phil should be personally accountable for his speech. Aren't conservatives supposedly all about personal responsibility?
Brian_G wrote:
You don't have to agree, but you don't have to try to take away his livelihood either.
So, speech should have no consequences and an employer has no right to limit their liability from the bigoted rantings of their employees? Why do you hate freedom and personal accountability, Brian?
Brian_G wrote:
If you want to be able to express your opinions without fear of a lockout or worse; keep marriage one man and one woman.
Brian, words have consequences, and honorable people take responsibility for their actions.

You are an idiot, much like Phil.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#583 Jan 3, 2014
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure it makes sense, it's been taught as fact. The earth being flat made sense when it was the accepted "fact".
The Earth being flat was never based on science. Tell me, Prep, why do scientists use radiometric dating?
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
How is it proven? If you do not have a sample from 25,000 years ago that was exposed to whatever environment existed at that time, if that time existed, to use the dating equipment on, it is not a proven technique.
Most of the dating techniques are not environment dependent. For example, zircons are chemically inert and will not allow any of the daughter isotope in for Uranium-Lead testing.
The environment can affect carbon dating, but comparisons with tree rings as well as knowledge of what environmental attributes affect carbon-14 levels (eg magnetic field changes) allows for calibration.
Your objections are garbage. That's why they're made by Creationists, and not real scientists.
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
So because one aspect of science is based on theory and educated guess, all science should be thrown out? You are grasping at straws and utilizing the typical liberal all or none mentality.
I was mocking your mentality.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#584 Jan 3, 2014
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>
That's what I thought. Basically, because you said so.
Lmao!
What part are you disagreeing with? That Phil Robertson is a hardline fundamentalist Christian?
Or that hardline fundamentalist Christians would favor a patriarchal view of marriage?
KKKafeteria KKKristains

Philadelphia, PA

#585 Jan 3, 2014
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>
Your frustration and inability to prove your case is showing. When you resort to this kind of pathetic, immature babble, your hand has been played.
No, fundie troll, you claim to have multiple advanced degrees. Of course that's an absurd claim to make over the internet and an equally absurd possibility given the way you think and write.

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#586 Jan 3, 2014
lides wrote:
If you think Ann Coulter is a satirist, then you are even dumber than I thought.
Ann Coulter "has been compared to Clare Boothe Luce, one of her idols, for her satirical style."
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ann_Coulter

.
lides wrote:
Brian, words have consequences. Phil should be personally accountable for his speech. Aren't conservatives supposedly all about personal responsibility?
Phil is accountable, he spoke of his faith. He has the right to speak about his religion.

And most of us agree with Phil, or our disagreement is minor compared to heavy handed defamation from GLAAD and a mealy mouth apology from A&E.

.
lides wrote:
So, speech should have no consequences and an employer has no right to limit their liability from the bigoted rantings of their employees? Why do you hate freedom and personal accountability, Brian?
I love freedom of speech; I don't want employers to fire employees because they answer a question from the press, or anyone else. A&E caved because what lides and GLAAD defame as "bigoted rantings" is scripture, the Pope has spoken about sin in terms similar to Phil Robertson's and most of us see nothing wrong with what he said.

.
lides wrote:
Brian, words have consequences, and honorable people take responsibility for their actions. You are an idiot, much like Phil.
I don't call my political opponents idiots because they disagree; even if true it isn't the honorable way to write. Fortunately, we have records. Nothing you write on the internet can be deleted from the record.

Thanks for your opinion, but I disagree. I believe the tide has turned against fascist bullies like GLAAD, Judge Shelby, Obama and A&E. The rest will fall like dominoes.
Jumper The Wise

Morgantown, KY

#587 Jan 3, 2014
Xstain Mullah Fricassee wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sorry for lashing out at you Jumper.You have always seen past my ignorance and vanity and tried to protect me by changing the subject so I don't make a fool of myself and the gay cause.
Its ok buddy.
You see the world though the eyes of a child,and that is a gift few people have these days.

“Antisocialistic”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#588 Jan 3, 2014
Xstain Mullah Fricassee wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not discussing marriage equality in LA at this time. I am sure the state will always be at the very back of the pack on this and on every social issue.
I'm just relieved that after four days of demanding "a link" to the disgusting videos by the Duck trash that you seem to have learned how to read a second topix thread and thus discover on your own, eventually, the 2010 video.(Maybe some day you'll accidentally wander onto a reputable science "cite" and lern the urth is moor than 10000 yeers ole.)
I acknowledged your additional information: I said I wonder how many of these under 16 year old girl marriages have been approved by LA judges.(Such a judge would be regressive, not in favor of marriage equality, therefore.)
The Duck trash clearly says that these girls are rotten in some way by the time they're 20. That's misogynistic whether he was talking about equally underage boys marrying the underage girls or not. But apparently his and Ted Nugent's marriages suggest that he was talking about men marrying girls, in practice.
Yes, it's very apparent when you get shut down, you aren't discussing the subject, and you move on to your limited talking points. Most of which are not even relevant, but implied to be.
Phil and Ted were married before finding God. Phil and Kay were high school sweethearts, and had her parents' blessing to get married when she was 16 in 1966. So what?

“Antisocialistic”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#589 Jan 3, 2014
The_Box wrote:
<quoted text>
The Earth being flat was never based on science. Tell me, Prep, why do scientists use radiometric dating?
<quoted text>
Most of the dating techniques are not environment dependent. For example, zircons are chemically inert and will not allow any of the daughter isotope in for Uranium-Lead testing.
The environment can affect carbon dating, but comparisons with tree rings as well as knowledge of what environmental attributes affect carbon-14 levels (eg magnetic field changes) allows for calibration.
Your objections are garbage. That's why they're made by Creationists, and not real scientists.
<quoted text>
I was mocking your mentality.
It was considered so at the time.

So what? It is still based on modern concepts that may or may not have been constant throughout time.
You are not grasping my point about not having the ability to calibrate carbon dating with an object or substance of known age over say 30,000 years old. Any object or substance thought to be that old is based on testing of objects from much more recent history. Therefore dating of objects or substances from before historical record is theoretical.

I'm aware you are mocking my mentality. That's what people without a legitimate answer do.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#590 Jan 3, 2014
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>
It was considered so at the time.
No, it wasn't.
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
So what? It is still based on modern concepts that may or may not have been constant throughout time.
Radioactive decay rates are highly precise. Scientists have subjected these elements to extremes of heat, cold, pressures, chemical environment, electric fields, magnetic fields, and gravity and found that they stay the same.

You're making up a problem with no evidence of its existence.
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
You are not grasping my point about not having the ability to calibrate carbon dating with an object or substance of known age over say 30,000 years old.
No, you're not grasping that your objection has been dealt with before many times. You also somehow are not grasping carbon dating has nothing to do with dating the age of the Earth.
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
I'm aware you are mocking my mentality. That's what people without a legitimate answer do.
I've given you legitimate answers and you've provided nothing but Creationist clap-trap that has been debunked over and over.

Again, why do scientists use radiometric dating, Prep?
Wondering

Tyngsboro, MA

#591 Jan 3, 2014
Bottom line here is that GLAAD can have all the tantrums it wants to. No one cares.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Jade's Bouncy House 5 min Horace 3
News Lyft driver in Indianapolis orders gay couple o... 6 min Frankie Rizzo 49
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 20 min cpeter1313 61,672
News Gay man wants to challenge clerk who denied mar... 28 min cpeter1313 18
Rainbow Pride 1 hr Eddy 2
News Westboro Baptist Church to picket Broomfield gr... 1 hr Broomfield Parent 1
News Kim Davis challenger: Man whose marriage licens... 2 hr Wisdom 12
The Spectrum Cafe (Dec '07) 6 hr Frankie Rizzo 28,166