Survey: Same-sex couples create own r...

Survey: Same-sex couples create own rules in wedding planning

There are 39 comments on the The Washington Post story from Nov 19, 2013, titled Survey: Same-sex couples create own rules in wedding planning. In it, The Washington Post reports that:

When the Rev. Susan Russell and Lori Kizzia marry next June, they will have a small Episcopal wedding complete with traditional vows and the exchange of rings.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Washington Post.

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Listen to the Word

Topock, AZ

#1 Nov 20, 2013
They say they are having "traditional vows." "Traditional vows" are, "Do you take this woman to be your wife?" and "Do you take this man to be your husband?" I can't imagine that the both don't realize that neither one of them is a man. So I can only assume that they do not know what "traditional vows" are. Do they really think the general public - straight or gay -- is that stupid? Or are they just showing their own stupidity?
Gremlin

Louisville, KY

#2 Nov 21, 2013
Listen to the Word wrote:
Or are they just showing their own stupidity?
You are certainly showing yours. This is 2013, and things are changing.
Coo Coo Ca Choo

Amherst, MA

#3 Nov 21, 2013
Gremlin wrote:
<quoted text>You are certainly showing yours. This is 2013, and things are changing.
For the worse.

Richie T

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#4 Nov 22, 2013
Rick not in Kansas yet

Salina, KS

#5 Nov 22, 2013
Richie T wrote:
www.scribd.com/doc/176864901.. .
So you pray, good luck with that.
george

Anonymous Proxy

#6 Dec 7, 2013
Gremlin wrote:
<quoted text>You are certainly showing yours. This is 2013, and things are changing.
Yes indeed things are getting a little queer if I must say.
Take your perversion back to the closet and stay there.
Traditional indeed.
Hoyt

Germany

#7 Dec 7, 2013
Queers create their own rules for everything. They refuse to live and abide by society's rules.
Wondering

Tyngsboro, MA

#8 Dec 7, 2013
Gremlin wrote:
<quoted text>You are certainly showing yours. This is 2013, and things are changing.
A date doesn't change anything. You were gay in 1950 and you're still gay. You couldn't make babies with your partner in 1950 and you still can't. Nothing of any significance has changed.

Since: Apr 11

Panorama City, CA

#9 Dec 7, 2013
And still, not one rational argument against gay marriage!
Natural Law

Amherst, MA

#10 Dec 7, 2013
Hoyt wrote:
Queers create their own rules for everything. They refuse to live and abide by society's rules.
One of the most hateful things any woman can say to a man is "Sorry, I'm a lesbian".
Natural Law

Amherst, MA

#11 Dec 7, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
And still, not one rational argument against gay marriage!
Public health.
Endangerment of the nations blood banks.
Denying a child the basic human rights to a female mother.
Incurring more debt.
Heterophobia.
Child abuse.
Cincinnati turtle poke.
Kentucky tractor pull.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#12 Dec 7, 2013
Natural Law wrote:
<quoted text>
Public health.
Endangerment of the nations blood banks.
What do gay marriages do to blood banks and public health?
Be specific.
Natural Law wrote:
Denying a child the basic human rights to a female mother.
Incurring more debt.
Heterophobia.
Child abuse.
Cincinnati turtle poke.
Kentucky tractor pull.
Rose's Law:
Morons with no real argument scream, "But what about the children!?"

Since: Oct 13

Location hidden

#13 Dec 7, 2013
Wondering wrote:
<quoted text>
A date doesn't change anything. You were gay in 1950 and you're still gay. You couldn't make babies with your partner in 1950 and you still can't. Nothing of any significance has changed.
You will always be a retard
george

Anonymous Proxy

#14 Dec 8, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
What do gay marriages do to blood banks and public health?
Be specific.
<quoted text>
Rose's Law:
Morons with no real argument scream, "But what about the children!?"
Fortunately rose hoho you don't/can't make the laws.
Second the rate of AIDS floating around in the gay lesbian comunity is a serious health problem and you know it.
George's Law: get your perverted act straight before it is too late---if it isn't already too late.
Something queer going on here.

Since: Aug 09

Location hidden

#15 Dec 8, 2013
george wrote:
<quoted text>
Fortunately rose hoho you don't/can't make the laws.
Second the rate of AIDS floating around in the gay lesbian comunity is a serious health problem and you know it.
George's Law: get your perverted act straight before it is too late---if it isn't already too late.
Something queer going on here.
George,

The sexual transmission of disease has been going on for eons.

It isn't limited to either or both HIV or same-sex behaviors.

The list of bacterial and viral infections that can be transmitted through sexual behavior is considerable and many of the diseases are not only debilitating, some are often enough lethal to be a very serious concern. Milions have died and many millions more are threatened with HIV worldwide and these infections, for the very most part, have absolutely nothing to do with same-sex relationship.

HIV, specifically, can be transmitted either heterosexually or homosexually. It can also be contracted by accepting a blood transfusion from a donor carrier who may be either hetero- or homo- sexual.

GET OFF of this hugely, blatantly discriminatory effort using misinformation!

If you are really a lawyer, as you have regularly professed to be on these threads, you know that such slandering is highly unethical. Put a stop to your use of statistics to promote an uneducated view.

The transmission of sexual disease is a product and function of the bacterial or viral agent. Promiscuity and ignorance are its facilitators, not the sexual orientation of the individual.

Rev. Ken
george

Anonymous Proxy

#16 Dec 8, 2013
RevKen wrote:
<quoted text>
George,
The sexual transmission of disease has been going on for eons.
It isn't limited to either or both HIV or same-sex behaviors.
The list of bacterial and viral infections that can be transmitted through sexual behavior is considerable and many of the diseases are not only debilitating, some are often enough lethal to be a very serious concern. Milions have died and many millions more are threatened with HIV worldwide and these infections, for the very most part, have absolutely nothing to do with same-sex relationship.
HIV, specifically, can be transmitted either heterosexually or homosexually. It can also be contracted by accepting a blood transfusion from a donor carrier who may be either hetero- or homo- sexual.
GET OFF of this hugely, blatantly discriminatory effort using misinformation!
If you are really a lawyer, as you have regularly professed to be on these threads, you know that such slandering is highly unethical. Put a stop to your use of statistics to promote an uneducated view.
The transmission of sexual disease is a product and function of the bacterial or viral agent. Promiscuity and ignorance are its facilitators, not the sexual orientation of the individual.
Rev. Ken
Problem is these people in the gender confused community have a higher possibility of contracting these things, they won't admit when they are infected and yes it gets into the blood that is then donated and that in turn infects others.
"HIV Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men
Fact Sheet
Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) are more severely affected by HIV than any other group in the United States. Read more about prevention challenges for MSM and what CDC is doing to address them in HIV Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men."
And pererts like you un rev say there is nothing wrong with anal sex.
Misinformation??? That comment about me being a lawyer---maybe you can give us all the post where I claimed this? No you can't liar because I never have.
Just part of the nature of an athiest going around posting under
rev anything to lie and spread the perverted life style you have chosen.
Now the post------I can wait liar un rev.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#17 Dec 8, 2013
george wrote:
<quoted text>
Fortunately rose hoho you don't/can't make the laws.
Second the rate of AIDS floating around in the gay lesbian comunity is a serious health problem and you know it...
What do gay marriages do with AIDS?
Be specific.
george

Anonymous Proxy

#18 Dec 8, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
What do gay marriages do with AIDS?
Be specific.
Read my last post ho ho, stop acting stupid. Oh you are not acting.

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#19 Dec 8, 2013
george wrote:
<quoted text>
Fortunately rose hoho you don't/can't make the laws.
Second the rate of AIDS floating around in the gay lesbian comunity is a serious health problem and you know it.
..
Really? What percentage of lesbians contract HIV?

And do you REALLY think that legal marriage increases HIV transmission? Can you prove this?
Carlos

San Jose, CA

#20 Dec 8, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
What do gay marriages do with AIDS?
Be specific.
Most queers have AIDS. Do the math.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News DeGeneres says her show is no place for anti-ga... 2 min Rainbow Kid 300
News Trump's victory has unleashed a wave of same-se... 12 min Donnelly 8
News 'Will & Grace' returning to TV 37 min Rainbow Kid 7
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 1 hr tbird19482 44,066
News UNC president: Job candidates say no, citing ba... 1 hr Holy Guacamole 22
New President of the US 1 hr Donnelly 1
News 'I believe in the American people': Obama upbea... 1 hr Imprtnrd 22
News 'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15) 5 hr Big C 23,996
More from around the web