Gay, Latino groups forge immigration alliance

Feb 2, 2013 Full story: KWQC-TV Davenport 22

4, 2012 file photo, Bradford Wells, left, and Anthony John Makk pose together at their home in San Francisco.

Full Story
First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Stairway to Hell

Pittsfield, MA

#1 Feb 2, 2013
So they too sold out as Judas did as well. Decadent pigs runnin round eVeRyWhErE.
ronnie

Brigham City, UT

#2 Feb 2, 2013
So illegals in America get treated special right? Well now every gay american and gay American Attorney will push their directive's to allow all gay illegals to be treated just as equally in their plight to get their citizenship as well. Great!!! Now we'll have millions of National's wearing purple and pretending they're gay so that it might expedite their paperwork for citizenship. Any loop hole or reason they can find to cheat the United States and steal our tax dollar's, they're going to try. WTF

Since: Oct 12

Coolidge, AZ

#3 Feb 2, 2013
NO immigration to the United States by ANYONE at ANYTIME for ANY REASON should be allowed by ANYONE.

Let them go to one of the "Worker's Paradise"es known as Cuba, or the Demokratik Socialist People's Republik Of Kanada if they want to come to America.

And btw, why aren't millions of illegal immigrants smashing down the doors to get into those two Paradises ?

There is no RIGHT to immigrate into the United States !

We should have at LEAST a 400 year moratorium on immigration to the U.S.!

And as far as gay people are concerned I believe that those 2 "Worker's Paradise"es give gay people MORE rights than the U.S. does. SO GO THERE !

NO MORE IMMIGRATION INTO THE U.S.!

From my cold dead hands.....
Stairway to Hell

Pittsfield, MA

#4 Feb 2, 2013
Stairway to Hell wrote:
So they too sold out as Judas did as well. Decadent pigs runnin round eVeRyWhErE.
It's above obumma, it's above Bush, it's above Clinton, a star a star high above the hills.
Befree

Fremont, CA

#5 Feb 2, 2013
ronnie wrote:
So illegals in America get treated special right? Well now every gay american and gay American Attorney will push their directive's to allow all gay illegals to be treated just as equally in their plight to get their citizenship as well. Great!!! Now we'll have millions of National's wearing purple and pretending they're gay so that it might expedite their paperwork for citizenship. Any loop hole or reason they can find to cheat the United States and steal our tax dollar's, they're going to try. WTF


You sound like a total racist fat cow!!!
You will have a gay son

Since: Dec 08

Toronto, ON, Canada

#7 Feb 3, 2013
Cal In AZ wrote:
NO immigration to the United States by ANYONE at ANYTIME for ANY REASON should be allowed by ANYONE.
Let them go to one of the "Worker's Paradise"es known as Cuba, or the Demokratik Socialist People's Republik Of Kanada if they want to come to America.
And btw, why aren't millions of illegal immigrants smashing down the doors to get into those two Paradises ?
There is no RIGHT to immigrate into the United States !
We should have at LEAST a 400 year moratorium on immigration to the U.S.!
And as far as gay people are concerned I believe that those 2 "Worker's Paradise"es give gay people MORE rights than the U.S. does. SO GO THERE !
NO MORE IMMIGRATION INTO THE U.S.!
From my cold dead hands.....
1. Immigrants are trying to smash down doors to get here too and we have loads of them. They just don't happen to be Mexican, for the most part.
2. Of course no one wants to go to Cuba because there are no jobs. Cuba is in bad shape for three reasons: 1. The days of large-scale money-flow from the Soviets are long gone. 2. The Castro family has pilfered tons of money from the people - one can hardly call them model communists. The problem with their government is not communism, it is corruption via absolute power. 3. The continued and politically unwise US embargo cuts into a lot of potential revenue for them.

Since: Dec 08

Toronto, ON, Canada

#8 Feb 3, 2013
Befree wrote:
<quoted text>
You sound like a total racist fat cow!!!
You will have a gay son
He is an asshole but inside his rantings is actually a valid point. In Toronto, we do have a large number of people (mostly African) pretending to be gay to try to gain refugee status. It hurts the real gay refugees (most as from Middle Eastern countries and are educated people who could well contribute to the economy). The phonies don't usually get through but just handling their cases is expensive. The question is how to tell if someone is gay without sticking a rectal probe in them and measuring sexual response to porn.

“Luke laughs at hypocrites!”

Since: Sep 10

Palm Springs, California

#10 Feb 3, 2013
Cal In AZ wrote:
NO immigration to the United States by ANYONE at ANYTIME for ANY REASON should be allowed by ANYONE.
Let them go to one of the "Worker's Paradise"es known as Cuba, or the Demokratik Socialist People's Republik Of Kanada if they want to come to America.
And btw, why aren't millions of illegal immigrants smashing down the doors to get into those two Paradises ?
There is no RIGHT to immigrate into the United States !
We should have at LEAST a 400 year moratorium on immigration to the U.S.!
And as far as gay people are concerned I believe that those 2 "Worker's Paradise"es give gay people MORE rights than the U.S. does. SO GO THERE !
NO MORE IMMIGRATION INTO THE U.S.!
From my cold dead hands.....
Unless you are Native American, you have some gall to complain about immigrants.

too bad your grand or great grandparents were allowed into the USA, since you don't like anyone not at least here for 500 years. With your BLOND pony tail, I doubt if you have much Native American blood in you.
freebird

Long Beach, CA

#11 Feb 3, 2013
Just remember, you voted for him.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/03/us-...

Obama encourages Boy Scouts of America to end ban on gays

(Reuters)- President Barack Obama on Sunday encouraged the Boy Scouts of America to end its ban on gay members and leaders, days before the group is expected to vote on the controversial and long-standing rule.
Lobster Farts

Pittsfield, MA

#12 Feb 3, 2013
So now there will be more gays in the boy scouts than blacks?
been here for 10 years

Torrance, CA

#13 Feb 3, 2013
ronnie wrote:
So i
ls in America get treated special right? Well now every gay american and gay American Attorney will push their directive's to allow all gay illegals to be treated just as equally in their plight to get their citizenship as well. Great!!! Now we'll have millions of National's wearing purple and pretending they're gay so that it might expedite their paperwork for citizenship. Any loop hole or reason they can find to cheat the United States and steal our tax dollar's, they're going to try. WTF
For your information NOT all illegals here are America is stealing your tax money. I was initially sponsored to work here and happened to have a legal SS#. At some point of my work visa process failed so I became to be out of status. But guess what? I have been paying every penny of your tax dollar here with the deduction of $1400 a month from my paycheck that's supposedly for pension in the future. But since I am considered illegal here. There's no way I would benefit from it or would even see a single centavo of my contribution to your tax pool.

Since: Oct 12

Coolidge, AZ

#14 Feb 3, 2013
Curteese wrote:
<quoted text>Unless you are Native American, you have some gall to complain about immigrants.
too bad your grand or great grandparents were allowed into the USA, since you don't like anyone not at least here for 500 years. With your BLOND pony tail, I doubt if you have much Native American blood in you.
I approach the issue of immigration form a purely environmentalist viewpoint. The land can only support so many people and there are already over 300,000,000 people in the U.S. now. That's already FAR TOO MANY HUMANS occupying our LIMITED amount of land and consumimg our LIMITED amount of resources. You have to draw teh line SOMEWHERE !

Or would you prefer 500,000,000 people ? Or 800,000,000 PEOPLE ? Or how about 1,000,000,000 people in teh U.S.? Is that fine with you ?

I think it should be rolled back to no more than 200 million to 250 million people in the U.S. But there only a small number of ways to do that, some of which are not morally acceptable.

So I draw my line exactly where it is here and now. And that is NOT unreasonable. Unless of course you prefer 800,000,000 to 1,000,000,000 here in the U.S. in the foreseeable future.

NO MORE IMMIGRATION TO THE U.S.!

The GREAT PEOPLE'S DEMOKRATIK SOCIALIST REPUBLIKS OF CUBA AND KANADA AWAIT THE PEOPLE WHO WANT TO COME TO AMERIKA !

“Rico's Are Everywhere”

Since: Dec 09

Gangland, North America

#15 Feb 3, 2013
Cal In AZ wrote:
<quoted text>
I approach the issue of immigration form a purely environmentalist viewpoint. The land can only support so many people and there are already over 300,000,000 people in the U.S. now. That's already FAR TOO MANY HUMANS occupying our LIMITED amount of land and consumimg our LIMITED amount of resources. You have to draw teh line SOMEWHERE !
Or would you prefer 500,000,000 people ? Or 800,000,000 PEOPLE ? Or how about 1,000,000,000 people in teh U.S.? Is that fine with you ?
I think it should be rolled back to no more than 200 million to 250 million people in the U.S. But there only a small number of ways to do that, some of which are not morally acceptable.
So I draw my line exactly where it is here and now. And that is NOT unreasonable. Unless of course you prefer 800,000,000 to 1,000,000,000 here in the U.S. in the foreseeable future.
NO MORE IMMIGRATION TO THE U.S.!
The GREAT PEOPLE'S DEMOKRATIK SOCIALIST REPUBLIKS OF CUBA AND KANADA AWAIT THE PEOPLE WHO WANT TO COME TO AMERIKA !
If population is a concern then you should support abortions.

Since: Oct 12

Coolidge, AZ

#16 Feb 3, 2013
Rico from East Los II wrote:
<quoted text>
If population is a concern then you should support abortions.
I don't support abortion because according to my religious beliefs, abortion is murder.

I DO support preventing pregnancy thru birth control such as condoms and other means.

Zero population growth for the entire population of the world IS possible in the forseeable future IF enought time, money, and effort are put into the countries with high birth rates.

MOST of the advanced nations of the world, such as the European countries, Russia, Japan, and Austalia, already have zero population growth or actually have negative population growth.

The U.S. WOULD HAVE REACHED zero population growth some years ago if it were NOT for immigration to the U.S., MOST OF WHICH IS ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION.

The ONLY two areas of the world with very high rates of population growth are Asia and Africa. And MOST of the countries on those 2 continents, are poor countries where people lack education, lack access to plentiful condoms and other birth control devices, and whose culture subjugate women where they don't have control over their own reproduction. Time, money, and effort in making birth control available to women in Asia and Africa, could substantially reduce their population growths in very short order, probably in only 2 - 3 decades.

Since many of the advanced countries have reached zero population growth far sooner, and wth far smaller populations, than many demographic experts predicted, there is no reason that the less advanced countries cannot do the same, in relatively short order, if they are given all of the resources to do so. And it's not as simple as just dumping billions of free condoms out of C-130's all over Asia and Africa.

Carefully tailored programs for each country and region must be implemented which must include education, heatlhcare, and material resources.

Malthus was wrong. But we should work to prove he was wrong sooner rather than later.

“Luke laughs at hypocrites!”

Since: Sep 10

Palm Springs, California

#17 Feb 4, 2013
Cal In AZ wrote:
<quoted text>
I approach the issue of immigration form a purely environmentalist viewpoint. The land can only support so many people and there are already over 300,000,000 people in the U.S. now. That's already FAR TOO MANY HUMANS occupying our LIMITED amount of land and consumimg our LIMITED amount of resources. You have to draw teh line SOMEWHERE !
Or would you prefer 500,000,000 people ? Or 800,000,000 PEOPLE ? Or how about 1,000,000,000 people in teh U.S.? Is that fine with you ?
I think it should be rolled back to no more than 200 million to 250 million people in the U.S. But there only a small number of ways to do that, some of which are not morally acceptable.
So I draw my line exactly where it is here and now. And that is NOT unreasonable. Unless of course you prefer 800,000,000 to 1,000,000,000 here in the U.S. in the foreseeable future.
NO MORE IMMIGRATION TO THE U.S.!
The GREAT PEOPLE'S DEMOKRATIK SOCIALIST REPUBLIKS OF CUBA AND KANADA AWAIT THE PEOPLE WHO WANT TO COME TO AMERIKA !
So you ARE Native American and were here originally then? Congrats! No wonder YOU can decide who can come and who can stay. Good for you.

Since: Oct 12

Coolidge, AZ

#18 Feb 4, 2013
Curteese wrote:
<quoted text>So you ARE Native American and were here originally then? Congrats! No wonder YOU can decide who can come and who can stay. Good for you.
The U.S. has had immigration laws for more than a century saying who can come and who can stay here. do you deny that ? We have immigration laws now that say who can come and who can stay but they're completely ignored, and The Obamaniac refuses to enforce the immigration laws that Congress wrote.
Happy Anniversary

Pittsfield, MA

#19 Feb 4, 2013
If so many weren't drawn away from the household so long ago at the behest of slaves to the dollar, tax code, corporate profiteers, and federal reserve bank we would be a self sustaining nation without the many problems across the board that we have today.
When are you people going to get it into your numb skulls that the federal reserve bank MUST go.
new hammer time

Richmond, VA

#20 Feb 4, 2013
this gay crap is spinning way out of control. lock the borders down and use thousands of bit bulls to guard it.

“Luke laughs at hypocrites!”

Since: Sep 10

Palm Springs, California

#21 Feb 4, 2013
Cal In AZ wrote:
<quoted text>
The U.S. has had immigration laws for more than a century saying who can come and who can stay here. do you deny that ? We have immigration laws now that say who can come and whoy can stay but they're completely ignored, and The Obamaniac refuses to enforce the immigration laws that Congress wrote.
Still awaiting to hear about your ancestors and how you came to be the ultimate voice of who stays and who is welcome.

Since: Oct 12

Coolidge, AZ

#22 Feb 4, 2013
Curteese wrote:
<quoted text>Still awaiting to hear about your ancestors and how you came to be the ultimate voice of who stays and who is welcome.
My ancestors came here before there was even the first federal immigration law (from Germany, Ireland, and England in the 17th, 18th, and 19th centuries). Take it up with members of the 44th Congress.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Anti-gay Tenn. billboard stirs religion debate 7 min KiMerde 2,872
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 11 min KiMerde 51,252
Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 12 min Rick in Kansas 5,589
The gay cafe for GLBT, friends and family (Oct '09) 29 min Quincy 68,513
Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) 51 min Joe fortuna 201,171
Same-sex marriage is just the beginning 56 min String bean 43
Obama calls on women only at news conference 1 hr Hooogle It 11
Homosexuality and the Bible (Aug '11) 1 hr hal 26,731
Next gay marriage fight: religious exemptions 2 hr well 5,024
Supreme Court won't stop gay marriages in Florida 9 hr WeTheSheeple 18
More from around the web