FRC's Tony Perkins Would Love His Gay Child, But Always Demean Them

Sep 13, 2012 Full story: lezgetreal.com 23

Family Research Council President Tony Perkins was asked after speaking to the National Press Club whether or not he would disown any of his children if they came out as gay.

Full Story
First Prev
of 2
Next Last
disgusted american

Philadelphia, PA

#1 Sep 13, 2012
I Hope when Tony Perkins Time is UP - Its Extremely Slow and VERY Painful!
Brian

Houston, TX

#2 Sep 13, 2012
His response is proof that he's not a fit parent.
hi hi

Philadelphia, PA

#3 Sep 13, 2012
Not only is he not a fit parent, but he denies fact because it is extremely convenient to his prejudice and hatred that he do so.

Why is his reaction to any gay rights issue to be treated as more than vomit and garbage? If he cannot get the *FACTS* correct, his responses are utterly valueless.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#4 Sep 13, 2012
When is Tony Perkins going to come out as gay?!

That man is a major closet case if I ever did see one.
hi hi

Philadelphia, PA

#5 Sep 13, 2012
WeTheSheeple wrote:
When is Tony Perkins going to come out as gay?!
That man is a major closet case if I ever did see one.
I'll buy it in a nanosecond. There is literally!, no!, reason!, that the guy never stops talking about anything but this stuff.
Junior Esquire

El Segundo, CA

#6 Sep 13, 2012
hi hi wrote:
<quoted text>
I'll buy it in a nanosecond. There is literally!, no!, reason!, that the guy never stops talking about anything but this stuff.
That criteria fits you as well.
hi hi

Philadelphia, PA

#7 Sep 13, 2012
Junior Esquire wrote:
<quoted text>
That criteria fits you as well.
Illogical; as I'm seeing with increasing frequency, you *don't* seem logical and you *don't* seem to employ the tenets of logic in your posts. Perkins is *antigay*; I am *pro-gay*. This destroys what you just said.

I have a reason. He doesn't. Please tell me you're trolling, and not this lacking *in basic knowledge of sensibility*. Seriously.

Because you're rapidly looking like a troll, in my eyes, and absolutely nothing more.
Doris

Minneapolis, MN

#8 Sep 13, 2012
I don't think Tony Perkins homosexual kid should be having sex with children anymore.
Junior Esquire

El Segundo, CA

#9 Sep 13, 2012
hi hi wrote:
<quoted text>
Illogical; as I'm seeing with increasing frequency, you *don't* seem logical and you *don't* seem to employ the tenets of logic in your posts. Perkins is *antigay*; I am *pro-gay*. This destroys what you just said.
I have a reason. He doesn't. Please tell me you're trolling, and not this lacking *in basic knowledge of sensibility*. Seriously.
Because you're rapidly looking like a troll, in my eyes, and absolutely nothing more.
How does Perkins being *antigay* and you being *progay* make it more likely that Perkins is gay and you are not?*Logically*, that seems backwards.
You accused Perkins of being gay because he met your stated criteria.*Logically* then, would you not be subject to the same criteria, which fits you as well as Perkins? "hi hi", you are rapidly looking like a *nutcase*.
Brian

Attleboro, MA

#10 Sep 13, 2012
Doris wrote:
I don't think Tony Perkins homosexual kid should be having sex with children anymore.
He can have all the sex he wants with all the children he wants, boys and girls, until he/she turns 18.
Brian

Attleboro, MA

#11 Sep 13, 2012
WeTheSheeple wrote:
When is Tony Perkins going to come out as gay?!
That man is a major closet case if I ever did see one.
I'd like to be the first one to pop his cherry!! Ha, ha!
Woody

Brenham, TX

#12 Sep 13, 2012
I agree with Tony, turning gay is not a good lifestyle choice.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#13 Sep 13, 2012
Brian wrote:
<quoted text>
I'd like to be the first one to pop his cherry!! Ha, ha!
Oh I'm sure you're WAY to late for that!

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#14 Sep 13, 2012
Hypotheticals are worthless.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primetime:_What_...

This is a bit more helpful.
hi hi

Philadelphia, PA

#15 Sep 13, 2012
Junior Esquire wrote:
<quoted text>
How does Perkins being *antigay* and you being *progay* make it more likely that Perkins is gay and you are not?*Logically*, that seems backwards.
To someone antigay, sure. Way to blow your cover, especially because anyone seeing you as antigay opens *you* to the charge that you are *gay*, which seems to be

something

you're focusing on

quite intently

right now,

no?
Junior Esquire wrote:
You accused Perkins of being gay
The second I saw this, I knew you were full of shit. I know my own style through and through.

Indeed, I scanned up the thread. Dear mendacious one, I *agreed with* another poster who originally made the claim.

So "sorry" if you think your claim still stands; word it better. Because if you're being so nitpicky about every last thing I write on the boards, then *logic suggests you know* there's a vast difference between making a claim and agreeing with it.

Right?

Right.
Junior Esquire wrote:
because he met your stated criteria.
No,*YOU* are making this connection. Christ almighty, how mendacious are you? You are disturbing, to be fantastically blunt. You just attempted to attribute *YOUR* conclusion to *ME*.
Junior Esquire wrote:
*Logically* then, would you not be subject to the same criteria, which fits you as well as Perkins? "hi hi", you are rapidly looking like a *nutcase*.
No, because all you *really* like to do is vomit nonsense and then try to "win." In fact, I was explicit; I couldn't have been more so:

If Perkins is antigay,*he has no reason to obsess over this*. Last time I checked, people against eating vegetables didn't go around *talking about it* all the livelong day. Last time I checked, people who disliked their experience in a certain country and thus hated the country didn't go around *talking about it* all the livelong day.

All of which you knew full well.

But for a *pro-gay* person, there's *reason* to *counter* the antigay as virulently as they sling falsehoods.

It is beginning to baffle me how you think you're "winning" anything when my every response to you is an *explicit-as-day* discourse upon how you just were not sensible or logical. Far be it from me to make empty claims and then rush off; I *diagram* in each post how you're nonsensical.

If that bothers you, find someone *stupid* on these boards who won't see through what you're doing the nanosecond they read it.

I was not born yesterday, sir/ma'am. I know *exactly* who you are (in archetypal terms). You *will not* convince me that I don't have exceptionally noble and righteous points to make. You've already messed up way too much.
hi hi

Philadelphia, PA

#16 Sep 13, 2012
I just realized something. I'm babysitting again.

Because I answer you back and because I make excellent points, you are now "determined to win" and you are basically (so it appears) FOLLOWING ME AROUND the topix boards in order to score a point.

I wish I had not realized that because my patience will now ebb so rapidly that I may stop *reading* what you write altogether; I simply don't have the patience for babysitting. Seriously.

But please, deny that, because if you think this through, the *other most logical* conclusion is that you actually deem me a "worthy opponent," which could at least make your posts somewhat funny (in a good way).

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#17 Sep 13, 2012
fr Woody:

>I agree with Tony, turning gay is not a good lifestyle choice<

Nobody "turns" gay, and it is NOT a "choice". You are BORN gay or straight.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#18 Sep 14, 2012
Parents who bully their children is called child abuse. The notion that a parent is capable should immediately make them ineligible for raising children at all.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#20 Sep 15, 2012
Woody wrote:
I agree with Tony, turning gay is not a good lifestyle choice.
Fortunately it's impossible.
rdg1234

Minneapolis, MN

#21 Sep 15, 2012
snyper wrote:
<quoted text>
Fortunately it's impossible.
How do you explain the supposed existence of so-called bi-sexuals, who sometimes choose to molest children of their opposite sex?
Or are they just born to molest kids, be held blameless due to lack of choice/control, then be celebrated by queers/Democrats for their 'diversity' and 'bravery'?
$100 says Obama will pardon Sandusky.
Even if he didn't want to, he almost has to.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Why I'll be voting 'No' to same-sex marriage, e... 38 min Rosa_Winkel 1,201
Homosexuality and the Bible (Aug '11) 1 hr RevKen 29,915
Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) 2 hr HitMan 201,447
Mormon church backs Utah LGBT anti-discriminati... 2 hr raider4life 30
Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 2 hr Joy Division 16,214
Which QUEER is the BIGGEST SNITCH? 2 hr Joy Division 13
Is Jeb Bush 'evolving' on same-sex marriage and... 2 hr serfs up 280
Wall Street pushes SCOTUS on gay marriage 3 hr david 66
Biggest Gay Lies (May '14) 4 hr Confusious 3,249
Religious objection to gay marriage leads to bi... 10 hr WeTheSheeple 96
More from around the web