Lesbian couple in gay marriage case p...

Lesbian couple in gay marriage case prepares for Supreme Court decision

There are 1581 comments on the Fox News story from Mar 24, 2013, titled Lesbian couple in gay marriage case prepares for Supreme Court decision. In it, Fox News reports that:

Big change is coming to the lives of the lesbian couple at the center of the fight for same-sex marriage in California no matter how the Supreme Court decides their case.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Fox News.

“You Get My Truth Here!”

Since: May 09

Nonya!

#981 Apr 24, 2013
Nobody wrote:
<quoted text>The problem is you don't see whats going on. Just like GTF said you guys are openning a whole new can of worms.
Oh they see it..they just don't admit it...

“A JOURNEY OF A THOUSAND MILES”

Since: Aug 08

MUST BEGIN WITH A SINGLE STEP!

#982 Apr 24, 2013
Get That Fool wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, they do...and polygamists are 'very' grateful to you...
Sorry, they are separate issues.......why? Because Gays and Lesbians just want to be INCLUDED in an already defined institution called "MARRIAGE".......pol ygamist want to change the definition of marriage from 2 to an infinite number of participates..........and again, only fools like yourself hang on to this issue to try and make some point that isn't going to be made and it could have been done before now!!!

I'm not worried about folks who want to marry more than one other person......not my business and doesn't have an affect on my marriage......besides, if they can handle more than one other husband or wife......more power to them!!!

“A JOURNEY OF A THOUSAND MILES”

Since: Aug 08

MUST BEGIN WITH A SINGLE STEP!

#983 Apr 24, 2013
Get That Fool wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh they see it..they just don't admit it...
Sorry, there's NOTHING to admit........polygamist have their own fight and if they win.....it matters not to anyone but folks like yourself!!!
Nobody

Irving, TX

#984 Apr 24, 2013
NorCal Native wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, they are separate issues.......why? Because Gays and Lesbians just want to be INCLUDED in an already defined institution called "MARRIAGE".......pol ygamist want to change the definition of marriage from 2 to an infinite number of participates..........and again, only fools like yourself hang on to this issue to try and make some point that isn't going to be made and it could have been done before now!!!
I'm not worried about folks who want to marry more than one other person......not my business and doesn't have an affect on my marriage......besides, if they can handle more than one other husband or wife......more power to them!!!
yeah we thought that to about you guys.same senerio.

“A JOURNEY OF A THOUSAND MILES”

Since: Aug 08

MUST BEGIN WITH A SINGLE STEP!

#985 Apr 24, 2013
Nobody wrote:
<quoted text>yeah we thought that to about you guys.same senerio.
Sorry, it's not the same issue......polygamist already have a right to marry the ONE other person of their choosing.......Gays and Lesbians are fighting just for that right to choose the ONE person they want to marry......not the same fight......polygamist want to definitely REDEFINE marriage to include an INFINITE number of participates.....and they could have been fighting for what they supposedly have wanted long before now!!!
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#986 Apr 24, 2013
Get That Fool wrote:
<quoted text>
Personal insults don't count as responding to the truth..
TRUTH? You mean your opinion. NOT the same thing.
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#987 Apr 24, 2013
Get That Fool wrote:
<quoted text>
The Browns are the beginning...they are contesting Utah's 'bigamy' laws...
Really? Are they asking for the right to be married? No, they aren't.
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#988 Apr 24, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
What a stupid lie.
When you dumb down marriage to 'two people in a committed relationship', you have immediately created a discriminatory privilege that will certainly be contested in court.
Smile.
Discriminatory privilege? hahahahahahah yet another meaningless sound bite from our resident crack-pot wacko!
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#989 Apr 24, 2013
Get That Fool wrote:
<quoted text>
They don't...a wedding is a ceremony...'marriage' is an institution...get it??
Yes. I get that you're dumber than a rock. Marriage isn't being destroyed by ANYTHING except divorce.
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#990 Apr 24, 2013
Get That Fool wrote:
<quoted text>
So it's never been about 'equality'???
It's about equal protection, dumbass.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#991 Apr 24, 2013
Get That Fool wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh they see it..they just don't admit it...
Exactly.

Notice tricky dicky Ricky didn't address the discrimination issue. The blonde from NorCal is just dumb.

Smile.

“You Get My Truth Here!”

Since: May 09

Nonya!

#992 Apr 24, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>Really? Are they asking for the right to be married? No, they aren't.
Are they asking for polygamy to be legal?? Yes they are...

“You Get My Truth Here!”

Since: May 09

Nonya!

#993 Apr 24, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes. I get that you're dumber than a rock. Marriage isn't being destroyed by ANYTHING except divorce.
That's simply not true...marriage can be destroyed by changing the foundation of it...

Since: Feb 13

Honolulu, HI

#994 Apr 24, 2013
Lawrence Wolf wrote:
<quoted text>Then why do you watch the dudes more often?
to see you getting pounded azz

Since: Feb 13

Honolulu, HI

#995 Apr 24, 2013
Lawrence Wolf wrote:
<quoted text>Walmart just called. Bigpoi has just been promoted to first urinal.
sorry you're mom got it.not me

Since: Feb 13

Honolulu, HI

#996 Apr 24, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>why would we need them? we've had the same ones all along and we have always had gays and lesbians...
because they want everything else why not thier own head.you head

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#997 Apr 24, 2013
Get That Fool wrote:
The Browns are the beginning...they are contesting Utah's 'bigamy' laws...
Yes dear, they are challenging Utah's bigamy laws because of how that law defines "bigamy".

76-7-101. Bigamy -- Defense.
(1) A person is guilty of bigamy when, knowing he has a husband or wife or knowing the other person has a husband or wife, the person purports to marry another person or cohabits with another person.

The "purports to marry" and "cohabits with" provisions makes their "spiritual marriages" a third degree felony.

Here's how Kansas and most other states define "bigamy":

Statute 21-3601: Bigamy.(a) Bigamy is any of the following:
(1) Marriage within this state by any person who shall have another spouse living at the time of such marriage;
(2) marriage within this state by an unmarried person to a person known to such unmarried person to be the spouse of some other person;
(3) cohabitation within this state after marriage in another state or country under circumstances described in subsection (a)(1) or (a)(2).

I'll bet even you can spot the very significant differences between the two.

The Brown families can move to most other states and their relationships would be perfectly legal.

What they will likely get is a knife taken to the offending provisions and leaving the idea of one legal marriage per person at a time, bigamy and/or any other plural relationship, not legally recognized.

“From a distance...”

Since: Apr 08

Planet Earth

#998 Apr 24, 2013
Get That Fool wrote:
<quoted text>
Are they asking for polygamy to be legal?? Yes they are...
No, you stupid c*nt, they aren't. Asking for co-habitation by consenting adults and/or calling a relationship "marriage" when there's no civil marriage license involved to be decriminalized is NOT the same as asking for legal recognition of polygamy. You've been given the legal brief of the Brown lawsuit which proves you a liar.

Now make yourself useful and get back to your street corner and "service" homeless people.
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#999 Apr 25, 2013
Get That Fool wrote:
<quoted text>
Are they asking for polygamy to be legal?? Yes they are...
No, they are not. Geez, lady. Don't even bother to fact check... just make up whatever suits your agenda.
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#1000 Apr 25, 2013
Get That Fool wrote:
<quoted text>
That's simply not true...marriage can be destroyed by changing the foundation of it...
More meaningless babble from the low-information voter crowd.... how exciting.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News 'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15) 42 min Frankie Rizzo 14,712
Maybe god is gay! (Dec '09) 48 min June VanDerMark 10,956
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 56 min Frankie Rizzo 38,461
News Excited by Trump, gay Republicans struggle with... 1 hr Frankie Rizzo 120
News NBA Moves All-Star Game Out of North Carolina O... 1 hr Xstain Mullah Aroma 48
News Doritos makes rainbow chips in support of gay r... (Sep '15) 2 hr guest 178
Is Fa-Foxy a Catholic? 2 hr Wally 423
More from around the web