Homosexuality and the Bible

Homosexuality and the Bible

There are 36053 comments on the www.smh.com.au story from Aug 15, 2011, titled Homosexuality and the Bible. In it, www.smh.com.au reports that:

Given the ongoing debate about same-sex marriage, it is time I looked at the two Testaments to remind myself why belief is so hard for me to embrace.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.smh.com.au.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#21012 Oct 13, 2013
KiMare'a wrote;

Real marriage has always been and will always be a committed relationship between one man and one woman. Demanding it ain't so doesn't make it so.

It is the only relationship that reproduces naturally, a father and mother raising their children.

It is the only relationship that is the birthing place of every single other type of relationship.

It is the only relationship that reunites two completely unique parts. A complimentary union, instead of a duplicated half.

It is the only relationship that sexually fit together by design. There is no abusive violation of design.

It is the only relationship that restores a male and female to the very original roots of our creation, pre-gender.

It is the only union that blends two different genders bringing perfect balance. A same gender union lacks diversity and is off balance.

All this says nothing about the cultural, historic and religious distinctions that marriage wholly embraces.

It clearly has, needs and deserves a special and unique definition. It is absurd and sacrilegious to equate ss couples.
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
That's your opinion. The federal government, as well as millions of people, agree that we have a real marriage.
Why can't you answer the question about your opinions and the effect that they have had on our marriage?
Still impotent, greggy.
You are seriously in denial. There is not one item that is 'opinion'.

That is why you censored the post.

Smile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#21013 Oct 13, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
VOTES are irrelevant, Gregory Dale. The majority does not get to deny rights to the minority via a popular vote. Were that the case, we could vote on a law to disallow marriage to chimeras.
Only under tyranny are votes irrelevant.

Only under a despot is the law perverted like this situation and so many more by ObamaNation.
Rosa Winkel

Australia

#21014 Oct 13, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
You're going to have to talk to the federal government, Mr. Whiny Pants, because we're not listening to ashpoles like you anymore.
FYI, reproduction is not required in order to be married. Further, millions of people, like your mom, reproduce outside of marriage.
Still legally married and you and KiMerde are powerless to do anything about it (other than whine like a couple of cry-babies). Waa, waa.
Their whining is certainly entertaining tho. Not to mention the bad poetry.

LMAO!

Since: Jun 13

Anchorage, AK

#21015 Oct 13, 2013
SHADOW wrote:
<quoted text>
Marriage between ss just takes away from a real marriage. You pervs need to go find your own ceremony, one that is not already taken.
Taken? You are wrong. It is given by the grace of God. It is given by the grace of the denomination or church. Otherwise, all marriage is, is a civil contract.

Since: Jun 13

Anchorage, AK

#21016 Oct 13, 2013
SHADOW wrote:
<quoted text>
You can't share what you don't have.
Marriage is between 1 man and 1 woman--nothing more.
Your same sex mess is only in your mind. That perverted union can't even produce children.
Wrong again, SHADOW. If you are depending on God defining marriage then produce the passage that says God's precept for marriage. You cannot. A union is no longer necessary to produce children besides, as adoptive parents they fill a large need in society.

Since: Jun 13

Anchorage, AK

#21017 Oct 13, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah, you dream. Ss couples lost most votes across the country. Only by manipulation of the legal system is there the depraved desecration of marriage on the table in a few places.
That is like saying your Dad is stronger than my Dad. Call it what you like. Reality is what it is, not what you say it is. Your god is not mankind's God.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#21019 Oct 13, 2013
akopen wrote:
<quoted text>
That is like saying your Dad is stronger than my Dad. Call it what you like. Reality is what it is, not what you say it is. Your god is not mankind's God.
I wasn't speaking of God.

At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.

Ss couples are a defective failure of mating behavior. SS marriage is an oxymoron.

“ WOOF ! ”

Since: Nov 12

Coolidge, AZ

#21020 Oct 13, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I wasn't speaking of God.
At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Ss couples are a defective failure of mating behavior. SS marriage is an oxymoron.
Civil marriage is a legal contract. No more. No less.

Since: Jun 13

Anchorage, AK

#21021 Oct 13, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>

It clearly has, needs and deserves a special and unique definition. It is absurd and sacrilegious to equate ss couples.
Sacrilegious means that irreverent to what you conceive as sacred, not what God considers sacred.

Since: Jun 13

Anchorage, AK

#21022 Oct 13, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Only under tyranny are votes irrelevant.
Only under a despot is the law perverted like this situation and so many more by ObamaNation.
Whose tyranny?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#21023 Oct 13, 2013
Fa-Foxy wrote:
<quoted text>
Civil marriage is a legal contract. No more. No less.
Do you even have a clue what you are saying?

Smirk.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#21025 Oct 13, 2013
akopen wrote:
<quoted text>
Sacrilegious means that irreverent to what you conceive as sacred, not what God considers sacred.
Except that every culture and religion agrees that calling ss couples married is sacrilegious.

And evolution dictates ss marriage is an oxymoron.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#21026 Oct 13, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Only under tyranny are votes irrelevant.
Only under a despot is the law perverted like this situation and so many more by ObamaNation.
akopen wrote:
<quoted text>
Whose tyranny?
If you were not so bigoted, you would be terrified about the tyranny you are accepting and supporting right now.

Since: Jun 13

Anchorage, AK

#21028 Oct 13, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Only under tyranny are votes irrelevant.
Only under a despot is the law perverted like this situation and so many more by ObamaNation.
<quoted text>
If you were not so bigoted, you would be terrified about the tyranny you are accepting and supporting right now.
Did you rewrite the Webster Dictionary?

“ WOOF ! ”

Since: Nov 12

Coolidge, AZ

#21029 Oct 13, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you even have a clue what you are saying?
Smirk.
Yup !:)

“ WOOF ! ”

Since: Nov 12

Coolidge, AZ

#21030 Oct 13, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Except that every culture and religion agrees that calling ss couples married is sacrilegious.
And evolution dictates ss marriage is an oxymoron.
What you say is UNTRUE. For one thing, civil marriage, by definition, cannot be sacrilegious.

And secondly, many churches, Christian denominations, and other religious groups, permit, and even celebrate same-sex marriages.

Stick to something you are knowledgeable about, instead of marriage and religious matters.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#21031 Oct 13, 2013
Fa-Foxy wrote:
<quoted text>
Civil marriage is a legal contract. No more. No less.
Only a gay would describe marriage that way.

Get a lawyer if you want a contract.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#21032 Oct 13, 2013
Fa-Foxy wrote:
<quoted text>
What you say is UNTRUE. For one thing, civil marriage, by definition, cannot be sacrilegious.
And secondly, many churches, Christian denominations, and other religious groups, permit, and even celebrate same-sex marriages.
Stick to something you are knowledgeable about, instead of marriage and religious matters.
1. See my previous post to you.

2. Very few religious groups or cultures accept ss couples as married. Witness the recent demonstration in France.

3. You are welcome to test me on marriage and religion.

Smile.

Since: Jun 13

Anchorage, AK

#21033 Oct 13, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I wasn't speaking of God.
At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Ss couples are a defective failure of mating behavior. SS marriage is an oxymoron.
What defines marriage as an "evolutionary mating behavior?"

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#21034 Oct 13, 2013
akopen wrote:
<quoted text>
What defines marriage as an "evolutionary mating behavior?"
Nothing does.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News 12-year-old girl comes out to her Mormon congre... 8 min No Surprise 546
News Church accused of offering to 'cure homosexuali... 22 min Charles P 8
40 years ago today 25 min BMW 2
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 27 min Gay Messiah 53,541
News UK's first lesbian interfaith wedding 37 min Dunbar 1
News Ten Commandments judge faces runoff in Alabama ... 52 min Deloris 7
Wednesday Archives 1 hr Big Stinky NE 2
News What would Jesus say about same-sex marriage? (Jul '15) 6 hr Freedomofexpression 8,337
News Gay Pride should be about protest, not just cor... 21 hr The Troll Stopper 76
More from around the web