No dear, the atom was never the smallest particle that existed to science, it was merely the smallest known. There were always smaller particles.<quoted text>
At one time the atom was the smallest particle that existed to science.
No dear, because science never published a book claiming it to be the end all be all of information. Only your ridiculous bible does that.<quoted text>
Shall we approach that topic the way you have approached people calling a bat a bird 2500 years ago? Are you that pathetically ignorant?
No, you made an excuse as to why they called it a bird.<quoted text>
I explained why they called it a bird.
Yes, it is an excuse. Bats have never been birds. Your bible gets things wrong. Sorry you are in denial of that. It got bats wrong, and it got homosexuality wrong.<quoted text>
It had wings and flew like a bird. To them 2500 years ago that made it a bird. There is no excuse in what I stated.
No, what is down right pathetically ignorant and stupid is anyone claiming that the bible is some sort of tome of authority.<quoted text>
But what is down right pathetically ignorant and stupid, is your insinuating that 2500 years ago people should have known that the bat wasn't a bird.
It doesn't equate that at all. I'm well aware that the bible is nothing but a bunch of fairy tales. It's you fundies that seem to think it's a book of authority.<quoted text>
That equates to you thinking people shouldn't have thought the earth was flat, or that they shouldn't have thought they were the center of the universe.
You mean like pretending you know something about homosexuality when in fact your simply a bible thumping idiot? The only one here making an ass of themselves is you dear.<quoted text>
Hindsight is great but don't allow it to make an *ss of yourself as you have let it be done to yourself, just saying :)