Homosexuality and the Bible

Homosexuality and the Bible

There are 36050 comments on the www.smh.com.au story from Aug 15, 2011, titled Homosexuality and the Bible. In it, www.smh.com.au reports that:

Given the ongoing debate about same-sex marriage, it is time I looked at the two Testaments to remind myself why belief is so hard for me to embrace.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.smh.com.au.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#19055 Jul 30, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
In the meantime, did you want to take a stance on Leviticus 18:22 not applying to Christians (and only to the Jews)?
How about the preceding passage? The original text had no punctuation or chapter and verse distinction.

21 “‘Do not give any of your children to be sacrificed to Molek, for you must not profane the name of your God. I am the Lord.

What this means is the original intention was against Canaanite practices and worship. Pew warmers don't really know the Bible. They are empty headed parrots.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#19056 Jul 30, 2013
SHADOW wrote:
<quoted text>
Why should they have to prove it? Now you are just being picky.
The homosexual community never "proves" anything except the lengths they will go to try to prove their perverted lifestyle is just misunderstood.
Your constant condemnations are the perverted rants of a typical pew warmer.
SHADOW

Canyon Lake, TX

#19057 Jul 30, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
Try to prove the being homosexual is a lifestyle.
Then try to prove that a homosexual lifestyle is perverted.
In the end, you'll only have your opinion because you can't prove either.
Well dusty when a woman gets a divorce and turns to other women for sex and companionship that my little friend is chosen. As in chosen lifestyle. You and your kind prove that everyday
When you lie with a same sex partner son you are a preversion.
I have proven both so you see little guy it is you with nothing but perverted opinion.
Thanks for playing. hahahaheheheh
well

Round Lake, IL

#19058 Jul 30, 2013
SHADOW wrote:
<quoted text>
Well dusty when a woman gets a divorce and turns to other women for sex and companionship that my little friend is chosen. As in chosen lifestyle. You and your kind prove that everyday
When you lie with a same sex partner son you are a preversion.
I have proven both so you see little guy it is you with nothing but perverted opinion.
Thanks for playing. hahahaheheheh
Oh now I get it...your wife left you for a woman! I can't say I blame her...

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#19059 Jul 30, 2013
well wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh now I get it...your wife left you for a woman! I can't say I blame her...
B I N G O ! I think you got it!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#19060 Jul 30, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
I have no interest in the matter; I was merely pointing it out for your amusement.
Too funny.

Here is the study;

http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/
wp-content/uploads/Goldberg-an d-Smith-2013-JFP1.pdf

It studies 120 couples (lesbian/gay/hertero) who adopted children under 1.5 years old.

The study ended 2.25 years later when the oldest child was under 3.5 years old.

I was laughing so hard at this point, I couldn't read more (I will later...).

This is definitive proof that the children will end up equal???

Unbelievably deceitful and idiotic.

Homosexuals and professionals use this BS to put children at risk for political correctness???

Diabolically criminal!

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#19061 Jul 30, 2013
SHADOW wrote:
<quoted text>
Well dusty when a woman gets a divorce and turns to other women for sex and companionship that my little friend is chosen. As in chosen lifestyle. You and your kind prove that everyday
When you lie with a same sex partner son you are a preversion.
I have proven both so you see little guy it is you with nothing but perverted opinion.
Thanks for playing. hahahaheheheh
The only lesbians I know who used to be married to men were ALWAYS lesbians. They simply got married for a number of reasons (family, religion, society). After their divorce, they began to live honest lives.

Yes, I lie with the same sex, but you didn't prove that it's perverse. For YOU, it might be perverse. For me, lying with the opposite sex would be perverse because of the lack of attraction.

You proved nothing, just as I stated you would.

Thanks for playing.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#19062 Jul 30, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Too funny.
Here is the study;
http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/
wp-content/uploads/Goldberg-an d-Smith-2013-JFP1.pdf
It studies 120 couples (lesbian/gay/hertero) who adopted children under 1.5 years old.
The study ended 2.25 years later when the oldest child was under 3.5 years old.
I was laughing so hard at this point, I couldn't read more (I will later...).
This is definitive proof that the children will end up equal???
Unbelievably deceitful and idiotic.
Homosexuals and professionals use this BS to put children at risk for political correctness???
Diabolically criminal!
Better to leave them in foster care right?

Moron.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#19063 Jul 30, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Too funny.
Here is the study;
http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/
wp-content/uploads/Goldberg-an d-Smith-2013-JFP1.pdf
It studies 120 couples (lesbian/gay/hertero) who adopted children under 1.5 years old.
The study ended 2.25 years later when the oldest child was under 3.5 years old.
I was laughing so hard at this point, I couldn't read more (I will later...).
This is definitive proof that the children will end up equal???
Unbelievably deceitful and idiotic.
Homosexuals and professionals use this BS to put children at risk for political correctness???
Diabolically criminal!
Well the part that you missed (or ignored) was, essentially, this:

It's long been known that gay couples will foster or adopt marginalized children that NOBODY else will care for.

Gay/lesbian couples absolutely can parent children every bit as well as anyone else. Your assertion that children are being put at risk is a joke.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#19064 Jul 30, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Too funny.
Here is the study;
http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/
wp-content/uploads/Goldberg-an d-Smith-2013-JFP1.pdf
It studies 120 couples (lesbian/gay/hertero) who adopted children under 1.5 years old.
The study ended 2.25 years later when the oldest child was under 3.5 years old.
I was laughing so hard at this point, I couldn't read more (I will later...).
This is definitive proof that the children will end up equal???
Unbelievably deceitful and idiotic.
Homosexuals and professionals use this BS to put children at risk for political correctness???
Diabolically criminal!
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Better to leave them in foster care right?
Moron.
Yeah, that's the ONLY option.

But you belie the point. The article claimed there was no difference between outcomes. The study has no basis to make any such claim.

Why does a legitimate cause need such deceitful tactics???

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#19065 Jul 30, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
Well the part that you missed (or ignored) was, essentially, this:
It's long been known that gay couples will foster or adopt marginalized children that NOBODY else will care for.
Gay/lesbian couples absolutely can parent children every bit as well as anyone else. Your assertion that children are being put at risk is a joke.
That's funny, in the Church I pastored, we had scores of families that adopted and fostered at risk children. My wife and I foster parented over ten children, most were teens.

Again you belie the point YOU brought up. The claim of the study was bogus.

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#19066 Jul 31, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Too funny.
Here is the study;
http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/
wp-content/uploads/Goldberg-an d-Smith-2013-JFP1.pdf
It studies 120 couples (lesbian/gay/hertero) who adopted children under 1.5 years old.
The study ended 2.25 years later when the oldest child was under 3.5 years old.
I was laughing so hard at this point, I couldn't read more (I will later...).
This is definitive proof that the children will end up equal???
Unbelievably deceitful and idiotic.
Homosexuals and professionals use this BS to put children at risk for political correctness???
Diabolically criminal!
<quoted text>
Yeah, that's the ONLY option.
But you belie the point. The article claimed there was no difference between outcomes. The study has no basis to make any such claim.
Why does a legitimate cause need such deceitful tactics???
Kimare claims that when he was still a fetus he absorbed a female twin and is now a sexual chimera. Kimare has also REPEATEDLY claimed that the female fetus was a lesbian.

I have asked every time this nightmare shows up to provide scientific studies that prove it's claims.

Does he understand what such a claim tells us about him?

Does he see what his refusal to provide the study and methodology used to determine his claim says about his character?

Balls in your court stud.

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#19067 Jul 31, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
That's funny, in the Church I pastored, we had scores of families that adopted and fostered at risk children. My wife and I foster parented over ten children, most were teens.
Again you belie the point YOU brought up. The claim of the study was bogus.
So you ran away again. I guess on the New study shows thread I can expect you to claim you had signed off. You said you debunked the study. I challenged you to name the 7 family groups and you ran here.
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/gay/TH6FC2NTH...

Why does a legitimate cause need to use such deceitful tactics???

Folks look at this thread and see what a fraud KiMare is:

as soon as I challenged him to name the 7 family grpoups he jumps to another thread.

http://www.topix.com/forum/news/gay/TH6FC2NTH...

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#19070 Jul 31, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
That's funny, in the Church I pastored, we had scores of families that adopted and fostered at risk children. My wife and I foster parented over ten children, most were teens.
Again you belie the point YOU brought up. The claim of the study was bogus.
I am a gay Christian. I also don't like to lie. I made a mistake about information in the KY lesbian story. I then posted that error on many threads. KY does NOT have a civil unions law as I claimed.

I am embarrassed that I failed to do the research I so often criticizes others for not doing.

I sinned and now repent that sin. I regret this mistake deeply.
SHADOW

Canyon Lake, TX

#19072 Jul 31, 2013
Selecia Jones- JAX FL wrote:
<quoted text>B I N G O ! I think you got it!
Bingo I think you got "it". Isn't that what the doctors said?
But then everyone here says you ain't got it.
Oh those poor dried up lesbians contracting deadly STDs and refuse to admit it.
You chose the wrong chosen lifestyle.
See ya-hehehehahaha
SHADOW

Canyon Lake, TX

#19073 Jul 31, 2013
DNF wrote:
<quoted text>I am a gay Christian. I also don't like to lie. I made a mistake about information in the KY lesbian story. I then posted that error on many threads. KY does NOT have a civil unions law as I claimed.
I am embarrassed that I failed to do the research I so often criticizes others for not doing.
I sinned and now repent that sin. I regret this mistake deeply.
Can you say oxymoron, moron? Christian queer?????
Now we know what the Bible says about lying with another of the same sex
How do you intend to repent when you continue to live in sin? You are a joke.
Just like here if you really feel you lied and need to "repent" that is good. It is not good if you just continue to lie and when caught simply repent?
How do you do that?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#19076 Jul 31, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Too funny.
Here is the study;
http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/
wp-content/uploads/Goldberg-an d-Smith-2013-JFP1.pdf
It studies 120 couples (lesbian/gay/hertero) who adopted children under 1.5 years old.
The study ended 2.25 years later when the oldest child was under 3.5 years old.
I was laughing so hard at this point, I couldn't read more (I will later...).
This is definitive proof that the children will end up equal???
Unbelievably deceitful and idiotic.
Homosexuals and professionals use this BS to put children at risk for political correctness???
Diabolically criminal!
<quoted text>
Yeah, that's the ONLY option.
But you belie the point. The article claimed there was no difference between outcomes. The study has no basis to make any such claim.
Why does a legitimate cause need such deceitful tactics???
\
Yea, I'm laughing really hard at your constant stupidity. Here is the opening of the study.

"Family type is not a predictor of a child’s psychological adjustment among early placed adopted children with lesbian, gay or heterosexual parents. An estimated 16,000 same-sex couples are raising more than 22,000 adopted children in the U.S., and these findings indicate that these children will likely fare no differently, as a result of their family type, than those being raised by heterosexual parents. "

The joke is on you moron.

http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#19077 Aug 1, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Too funny.
Here is the study;
http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/
wp-content/uploads/Goldberg-an d-Smith-2013-JFP1.pdf
It studies 120 couples (lesbian/gay/hertero) who adopted children under 1.5 years old.
The study ended 2.25 years later when the oldest child was under 3.5 years old.
I was laughing so hard at this point, I couldn't read more (I will later...).
This is definitive proof that the children will end up equal???
Unbelievably deceitful and idiotic.
Homosexuals and professionals use this BS to put children at risk for political correctness???
Diabolically criminal!
<quoted text>
Yeah, that's the ONLY option.
But you belie the point. The article claimed there was no difference between outcomes. The study has no basis to make any such claim.
Why does a legitimate cause need such deceitful tactics???
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
\
Yea, I'm laughing really hard at your constant stupidity. Here is the opening of the study.
"Family type is not a predictor of a child’s psychological adjustment among early placed adopted children with lesbian, gay or heterosexual parents. An estimated 16,000 same-sex couples are raising more than 22,000 adopted children in the U.S., and these findings indicate that these children will likely fare no differently, as a result of their family type, than those being raised by heterosexual parents. "
The joke is on you moron.
http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/
And my point?

That conclusion is based on a 2.25 year span of time BEFORE any of the 75 children in ss couple homes reached 4 years old.

The test size is tiny.

The time period is extremely short.

The conclusion is ridiculously early.

Those points don't even begin to look at HOW they obtained information and WHO they used in the study.

You ought to be embarrassed to publish such garbage.

Since: Aug 09

Location hidden

#19078 Aug 1, 2013
DNF wrote:
<quoted text>I am a gay Christian. I also don't like to lie. I made a mistake about information in the KY lesbian story. I then posted that error on many threads. KY does NOT have a civil unions law as I claimed.
I am embarrassed that I failed to do the research I so often criticizes others for not doing.
I sinned and now repent that sin. I regret this mistake deeply.
Don't dwell on it. It's not a problem and we all know you work at personal integrity and we appreciate your efforts.

As for Kentucky, they won't be likely to pass civil union law that permits same-sex marriage without a swift kick in the arse from the Supreme Court, anyway.

Rev. Ken

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#19079 Aug 1, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Too funny.....
You ought to be embarrassed to publish such garbage.
Ironically, the authors of the study have undergone none of the scrutiny that your sainted Regnerus did. Perhaps it's because their methodology is legit, whereas Regnerus skewed his result to please his patrons.

Troll on, Hunty.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Boy Scouts suffer a setback in Supreme Court ov... (Oct '06) 4 min RecoveringRacist 322
News Richard Page, from Headcorn, loses case after b... 1 hr Abrahammock Relig... 1
News Oregon city council sorry after member says he'... 2 hr Abrahammock Relig... 3
News The gaydar machine: a backlash 2 hr Abrahammock Relig... 7
News What would Jesus say about same-sex marriage? (Jul '15) 3 hr old_moose 13,219
Transgender "woman" convicted of raping 10-year... 3 hr Travis Turbil 3
News Australians embarrassed to be shown up by NZ on... 3 hr Frankie Rizzo 3
News Supreme Court To Hear Arguments In Case Of Bake... 4 hr Abrahammock Relig... 359
News College to offer sensitivity training after ant... 11 hr Abrahammock Relig... 9
News Stopping hate crimes against transgender Americans 16 hr Lewis 14
More from around the web