Homosexuality and the Bible

Homosexuality and the Bible

There are 35863 comments on the www.smh.com.au story from Aug 15, 2011, titled Homosexuality and the Bible. In it, www.smh.com.au reports that:

Given the ongoing debate about same-sex marriage, it is time I looked at the two Testaments to remind myself why belief is so hard for me to embrace.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.smh.com.au.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#17477 Apr 4, 2013
I bite wrote:
<quoted text>
The story of David and Jonathan is a love story if I ever read one, start there.
Two idiots.

David was confronted for adultery with Bathsheba, but excused for homosexuality with Jonathan?

The only thing you said that made sense, is equating kissing Goliath with a stone to inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning anal sex.

Are you girls ever stupid.

Smile.
hahahaha

Waikiki, Australia

#17478 Apr 4, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Two idiots.
David was confronted for adultery with Bathsheba, but excused for homosexuality with Jonathan?
The only thing you said that made sense, is equating kissing Goliath with a stone to inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning anal sex.
Are you girls ever stupid.
Smile.
Subtext people. Read between the lines...

If you look close enough, there are even elements of Mein Kampf in the "stories"

Smiling back at you with a massive sh*t eating grin

:-D

“The Kingdom of God Begins NOW!”

Since: May 07

The Mountain Empire

#17480 Apr 4, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Steve nailed it. If you truly were an atheist, you wouldn't bother with Believers. You are trying to convince yourself, and you only look stupid doing it. Your presence, words and caps shout anger.
Like you said, "The proof is there for all to see."
Smile.
You and David, er I mean 'steve', make a perfect couple.

LOL....

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#17481 Apr 4, 2013
hahahaha wrote:
My bad. Third paragraph should read as follows:
They never mentioned the homosexual aspect of his struggle so that his alleged womanizing could be used as a smokescreen for preachers etc to molest young boys.
If you molest the same sex, it is homosexual.

Are you suggesting that no homosexual ever used religion to take advantage of the innocent?

Smirk.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#17482 Apr 4, 2013
MiddleWay wrote:
<quoted text>
You and David, er I mean 'steve', make a perfect couple.
LOL....
Yeah, we both know stupid when we see it.

Snicker.

“It's a bathroom”

Since: Jul 07

Get over it, already

#17483 Apr 4, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
If you molest the same sex, it is homosexual.
Then why is when a man diddles a young girl they don't call it a heterosexual act?
You're just being a Kuntmary.
hahahaha

Adelaide, Australia

#17484 Apr 4, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
If you molest the same sex, it is homosexual.
Are you suggesting that no homosexual ever used religion to take advantage of the innocent?
Smirk.
Wow. You must have been dropped on your head many times as a child.

Good luck with your book of fairytales.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#17485 Apr 4, 2013
Marengo Jon wrote:
<quoted text>
Then why is when a man diddles a young girl they don't call it a heterosexual act?
You're just being a Kuntmary.
1. Not all molestation of younger victims is pedophilia. It can also be a orientation taking advantage of the young and helpless.

2. The adamant distinction of pedophilia from orientation leaves children vulnerable.

You are in denial at the expense of children.

Seriously sick.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#17486 Apr 4, 2013
hahahaha wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow. You must have been dropped on your head many times as a child.
Good luck with your book of fairytales.
Wow, another amazing ad homoan gay troll attack.

And even more amazing, you found a way to include the Bible when I never mentioned it. Kind of side track focused there, aren't you???

Snicker.
Vick Torre

Philadelphia, PA

#17487 Apr 4, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
1. Not all molestation of younger victims is pedophilia. It can also be a orientation taking advantage of the young and helpless.
2. The adamant distinction of pedophilia from orientation leaves children vulnerable.
You are in denial at the expense of children.
Seriously sick.
Way wrong. Molestation is pedophilia. In the realm of law. Orientation is not an indiccator. Hetero and gay have been predetors. Parents have victimized their children. 2 streets from me parents caught abusing their own kids and some of their kids friends. Human trafficking big buisness mostly involving young girls,the world over.
hahahaha

Adelaide, Australia

#17488 Apr 4, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow, another amazing ad homoan gay troll attack.
And even more amazing, you found a way to include the Bible when I never mentioned it. Kind of side track focused there, aren't you???
Snicker.
Cool. Then you know that the bible is a book of fairytales then.

Glad we've established that.

Smiles

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#17489 Apr 4, 2013
hahahaha wrote:
<quoted text>
Cool. Then you know that the bible is a book of fairytales then.
Glad we've established that.
Smiles
I just wondered how this got in there, perhaps you could explain???;

Exodus 33:18-23 (NASB)
18 Then Moses said, "I pray You, show me Your glory!"
19 And He said, "I Myself will make all My goodness pass before you, and will proclaim the name of the LORD before you; and I will be gracious to whom I will be gracious, and will show compassion on whom I will show compassion."
20 But He said, "You cannot see My face, for no man can see Me and live!"
21 Then the LORD said, "Behold, there is a place by Me, and you shall stand there on the rock;
22 and it will come about, while My glory is passing by, that I will put you in the cleft of the rock and cover you with My hand until I have passed by.
23 "Then I will take My hand away and you shall see My back, but My face shall not be seen."

Note;
-Seeing God was a life-threatening danger.
-God used three forms of protection for the radiation;
Behind a rock
Shielded with His hand
Only allowed a partial view (back)

Exodus 34:29-35 (NASB)
29 It came about when Moses was coming down from Mount Sinai (and the two tablets of the testimony were in Moses' hand as he was coming down from the mountain), that Moses did not know that the skin of his face shone because of his speaking with Him.
30 So when Aaron and all the sons of Israel saw Moses, behold, the skin of his face shone, and they were afraid to come near him.
31 Then Moses called to them, and Aaron and all the rulers in the congregation returned to him; and Moses spoke to them.
32 Afterward all the sons of Israel came near, and he commanded them to do everything that the LORD had spoken to him on Mount Sinai.
33 When Moses had finished speaking with them, he put a veil over his face.
34 But whenever Moses went in before the LORD to speak with Him, he would take off the veil until he came out; and whenever he came out and spoke to the sons of Israel what he had been commanded,
35 the sons of Israel would see the face of Moses, that the skin of Moses' face shone. So Moses would replace the veil over his face until he went in to speak with Him.

Note; The effect of radiation.

Please explain how a accurate description of radiation's danger, affect and protection appeared in a story about a Alien visiting humans in a fiction book written by numerous authors, distorted by time and translation occurred.

Smile.
hahahaha

Clearview, Australia

#17490 Apr 4, 2013
That happened to me the other night...:-D

I know it's an account of man's dealings with other races...
Shabomaniquanayn ay

Croydon, UK

#17491 Apr 4, 2013
I wonder what jesus would say if he were around today...?
hahahaha

Clearview, Australia

#17492 Apr 4, 2013
Shabomaniquanaynay wrote:
I wonder what jesus would say if he were around today...?
Not much. Probably just stroke his beard, smoke some weed, and shake his head at all the madness in the world that is going on in the name of god.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#17493 Apr 4, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
1. Not all molestation of younger victims is pedophilia. It can also be a orientation taking advantage of the young and helpless.
You're just nucking futs, Azzwipe. The fact that you fostered children is truly frightening.

As a mandated reporter, I have to consider any improper sexual activities with a minor to be pedophilia.

Your attempts to label some acts of pedophilia as "homosexual"are vile and disgusting. Hell has a special place for your sort.

The UCC, on the other hand, has no place for you, Kuntmary.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#17494 Apr 4, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>

Note; The effect of radiation.
Please explain how a accurate description of radiation's danger, affect and protection appeared in a story about a Alien visiting humans in a fiction book written by numerous authors, distorted by time and translation occurred.
Smile.
Bat shit crazy, Biblical radiation party of ONE, your table is ready.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#17495 Apr 4, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
Bat shit crazy, Biblical radiation party of ONE, your table is ready.
You don't believe in Biblical radiation? LMAO

How did Moses get sunburned?
Anal Sex Lover

Santa Cruz, CA

#17496 Apr 4, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/06/anal...
A Dec. 22, 2011 piece by Hugo Schwyzer, a professor of gender studies and history at Pasadena City College, implied that anal sex (which he calls "the most selfless of common sexual acts" given the amount of pain the "bottoming" partner endures in its practice) could be on the rise due to its frequent appearance in both heterosexual porn and mainstream media as well as an increased pressure from heterosexual male partners. He also cited several sources who seemed to cast doubt on how pleasurable the act was for women.
Though there's no telling what he'd say about the implications of the practice between heterosexual partners, Paul Angelo, a Miami-based "gay matchmaker," reportedly called for a 60-day moratorium on anal sex among gay couples last month, saying the act diminishes self-confidence and self-esteem while causing relationship confusion among partners. "The worse part about this destruction of self-esteem is that it's on the subconscious level. A person will not feel anything during the act," he writes. "And the pleasure derived from the act will override the logic necessary to correct the behavior. In addition, there is a delay between the act of anal intercourse and the reduction of self-esteem of the person."
It doesn't have to be painful. It can be really enjoyable.

“Trolls are Clueless”

Since: Dec 07

Aptos, California

#17497 Apr 4, 2013
Anal Sex Lover wrote:
<quoted text>
It doesn't have to be painful. It can be really enjoyable.
I suppose so.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Elephants perform for final time at Ringling Bros. 14 min An NFL Fan 40
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 30 min Terra Firma 34,620
News What would Jesus say about same-sex marriage? (Jul '15) 49 min Knowledge- 4,061
News North Carolina's rush to bigotry 1 hr Time again 2,774
The NE Jade Wednesday Thread 1 hr Friend of Jade 3
News Cyprus' first public gay wedding takes aim at p... 2 hr Democracy 8
News Anti-Gay Jehovah's Witness Cartoon Tells Kids T... 2 hr aadrivers 17
Maybe god is gay! (Dec '09) 5 hr June VanDerMark 9,845
More from around the web