Homosexuality and the Bible

Homosexuality and the Bible

There are 36044 comments on the www.smh.com.au story from Aug 15, 2011, titled Homosexuality and the Bible. In it, www.smh.com.au reports that:

Given the ongoing debate about same-sex marriage, it is time I looked at the two Testaments to remind myself why belief is so hard for me to embrace.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.smh.com.au.

“”

Since: Sep 09

Location hidden

#12636 Oct 30, 2012
Kesla15 wrote:
It's surprising how the supposed "die-hard" christians who are meant to be expressing love and forgiveness and constantly preaching Hell and damnation, even though it's mentioned very little in the Bible.
Agree.
I would simply like to meet one who practiced what they preached.
Some areas in the south are full of them .
They are good for some laughs but after 10 minutes you wind up mentally exhausted.

“The Kingdom of God Begins NOW!”

Since: May 07

The Mountain Empire

#12637 Oct 30, 2012
RevKen wrote:
<quoted text>
In your first post,#12623 above, you began your concordance-driven diatribe, listing Matthew 22:37. You then continued to quote scripture after scripture, passage after passage, through three more lengthy posts.
Then, proud of yourself, you thought it necessary to ridicule and show your disdain.
Only this ludicrous question:
Why did you leave out the balance of what Jesus said, being Matthew 22:39-40?
Teacher, which commandment in the law is the greatest?
He said to him, " 'You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind.' This is the greatest and first commandment.
And a second is like it:'You shall love your neighbor as yourself.' On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets."
Copy and paste job, no thinking required.

http://icgwp.tripod.com/ten.html

Since: Aug 09

Location hidden

#12638 Oct 30, 2012
MiddleWay wrote:
<quoted text>
Copy and paste job, no thinking required.
http://icgwp.tripod.com/ten.html
It sure would seem so. You can't very well open up the Book and read these things without taking in some of the surrounding context. That is, unless one intentionally leaves something important out.

The whole nature of this question, reflected in the Thread Topic, is about the Spirit of the Law versus the Letter of the Law. The Thread Topic is about these two ideas:

1. Cause for belief in Spirit.

2. The legitimacy of the Human Being as a Divine person.

One follows the other. Both are similar to the intent shown by Jesus in defining Two Commandments as the structure upon which hang all the Law and the Prophets.

Even modern Law is argued by employing both of these principles - the body of statutory Law, the "Letter," together with leniences found through case history, interpretation and Common Law, the "Spirit."

They both have value. But, ultimately, the judge is found in error if he or she relies entirely upon the strictness of the Letter.

Love exists, both as the pitch and the catch.

Rev. Ken

“Can't help being fabulous”

Since: Dec 10

Sparkle <3

#12640 Oct 30, 2012
Jose - in Miami wrote:
<quoted text>
Agree.
I would simply like to meet one who practiced what they preached.
Some areas in the south are full of them .
They are good for some laughs but after 10 minutes you wind up mentally exhausted.
Indeed, to be honest rather than taking these threads seriously I just enjoy watching the trolls squirm. Though I find I can skip about 20 pages and not miss much, they tend to repeat the same argument.

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#12645 Oct 30, 2012
unigenito wrote:
And of course no one can keep the Law (Commandments) so we are not under the Law of works but are under the Law of faith (Rom 3:27,28), saved if we believe in the name of the only-begotten Son of God, whose name is called 'The Word of God' in Rev 19:13.
You are calling Jesus a liar!

Jesus: "Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy but to fulfill. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments and shall teach men so, he shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven...." (Matt. 5:17-19) and "it is easier for heaven and earth to pass, than one tittle of the law to fall" (Luke 16:17) and "The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat: all therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do" (Matt. 23:2-3) and (John 7:19, Mark 1:44)
TheNukedFarma

Chicago, IL

#12646 Oct 30, 2012
Mr. Reverend Alan, dude if Jesus was a lair (which he was(I'm atheist )) than who the hell is god????????? I believe that persons whom are not straight should be who they feel is them.?????? Did I just write that:$???????

“The Kingdom of God Begins NOW!”

Since: May 07

The Mountain Empire

#12647 Oct 31, 2012
RevKen wrote:
<quoted text>
It sure would seem so. You can't very well open up the Book and read these things without taking in some of the surrounding context. That is, unless one intentionally leaves something important out.
The whole nature of this question, reflected in the Thread Topic, is about the Spirit of the Law versus the Letter of the Law. The Thread Topic is about these two ideas:
1. Cause for belief in Spirit.
2. The legitimacy of the Human Being as a Divine person.
One follows the other. Both are similar to the intent shown by Jesus in defining Two Commandments as the structure upon which hang all the Law and the Prophets.
Even modern Law is argued by employing both of these principles - the body of statutory Law, the "Letter," together with leniences found through case history, interpretation and Common Law, the "Spirit."
They both have value. But, ultimately, the judge is found in error if he or she relies entirely upon the strictness of the Letter.
Love exists, both as the pitch and the catch.
Rev. Ken
I don't pay any attention to No Surprise, he tried to give me info about Jews from Rev. Ted Pike, one of the biggest anti-Semites around.

It did give me a good laugh.

Keep on with the truth brother.......
Caleb

Pekin, IL

#12648 Oct 31, 2012
Kesla15 wrote:
<quoted text>
Indeed, to be honest rather than taking these threads seriously I just enjoy watching the trolls squirm. Though I find I can skip about 20 pages and not miss much, they tend to repeat the same argument.
The homofascist trolls can keep repeating and squirming all they want. Not one of them has been able to cite ANY Bible translation, ancient Bible text, or Judeo-Christian tradition that places in question the Bible's many commands against all homosexual behavior.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#12649 Oct 31, 2012
MiddleWay wrote:
<quoted text>

Keep on with the truth brother.......
Not for Middleway:

Middleway talks about RevKen; RevKen threats people (me, as far as I can see) like shit, and Middleway say that RevKen is a man of truth?

How can Middleway say that? What does Middleway think truth is? What are the fruits of the Spirit? Isn't it love, peace, joy, not asshole-behaviour?

Doesn't Yeshua tell us to love each other?

Is it love to insult other people? How can RevKen be full of Truth?

Maybe RevKen and Middleway are of the same Spirit?

Since: Aug 09

Location hidden

#12651 Oct 31, 2012
Manmanman wrote:
<quoted text>
Not for Middleway:
Middleway talks about RevKen; RevKen threats people (me, as far as I can see) like shit, and Middleway say that RevKen is a man of truth?
How can Middleway say that? What does Middleway think truth is? What are the fruits of the Spirit? Isn't it love, peace, joy, not asshole-behaviour?
Doesn't Yeshua tell us to love each other?
Is it love to insult other people? How can RevKen be full of Truth?
Maybe RevKen and Middleway are of the same Spirit?
LOL!!!....

AWWWWW, MMM!

Don't you think I love you, little buddy?

I sure do!

As a matter of fact, I think you are just as full of Baloney as I am. Maybe even MORE! If that is possible.

You could do something to help yourself along, though, at least as pertains to responding on these Topix Episcopal Church threads:

That would be to stop your incessant whining. Of course, far be it from ME to tell YOU what to do. And you could put your ideas forward as your own opinions and then take your lumps for having done so, rightly or wrongly, just like everybody else who posts here. Then you'd be just like the rest of us, instead of acting like a sanctimonious, dirty fly buzzing around the cowpie looking for a warm, wet place to alight and indiscriminately dine.

Of course, if you are still inclined to come in here and puke around and then lap it all up and buzz off again, like a big blue-bottle fly, why,...

That is certainly within your prerogative and no one would expect anything much better from you, seeins that is how you appear to behave in your preferred mode.

Hey! But, we are always ready for a surprise!
Hint: Thread Topic is Homosexuality and the Bible.

Rev. Ken

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#12652 Oct 31, 2012
Not for RevKen:

It's reported of course.
RevKen wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL!!!....
AWWWWW, MMM!
He makes fun of, breaks my boundaries, contacts me when I don't want to, uses MMM instead of Manmanman.

I guess he knows very well that he needs to repent, play after fair and respectful rules and so on. If he doesn't want to, I might just observe him because we are not in the same game?:)

.
RevKen wrote:
Don't you think I love you, little buddy?
I sure do!
Again he contacts me when I guess he knows that I don't want it. His fate might be very terrible, so terrible that it might be just terrible?

.
RevKen wrote:
As a matter of fact, I think you are just as full of Baloney as I am. Maybe even MORE! If that is possible.
You could do something to help yourself along, though, at least as pertains to responding on these Topix Episcopal Church threads:
That would be to stop your incessant whining. Of course, far be it from ME to tell YOU what to do. And you could put your ideas forward as your own opinions and then take your lumps for having done so, rightly or wrongly, just like everybody else who posts here. Then you'd be just like the rest of us, instead of acting like a sanctimonious, dirty fly buzzing around the cowpie looking for a warm, wet place to alight and indiscriminately dine.
Of course, if you are still inclined to come in here and puke around and then lap it all up and buzz off again, like a big blue-bottle fly, why,...
He seems to want to change me and he compares me with others (just like everybody else who posts here.) Wonder what good comes out of comparing people? Aren't we all originals?:)

It seems to be important for him to change me? If he manages that, will he be happy then?:)

.
RevKen wrote:
That is certainly within your prerogative and no one would expect anything much better from you, seeins that is how you appear to behave in your preferred mode.
Wonder how he can know what all people would expect from me? Can he read other peoples thoughts?:)

.
RevKen wrote:
Hey! But, we are always ready for a surprise!
Hint: Thread Topic is Homosexuality and the Bible.
Rev. Ken
"We"? Did he ask everybody if they are ready for a surprise? Wouldn't it be if RevKen talked for himself?

If I wonder what the other mean, I might ask them instead of RevKen telling me what everybody else mean? Isn't it better if each person talks for him/herself?

And in the end he seems to try to tell me what to do again with the hint ;)

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#12653 Oct 31, 2012
Correction:

My passage above:

I wrote:

"(just like everybody else who posts here.)"

What is inside the parenthesis is a quote from the writing of RevKen.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#12654 Oct 31, 2012
Not for RevKen:

Wonder if RevKen would be happy if he managed to change me?

What do people achive when they manage to change other people? Is it possible? Is it possible to succeed in that mission?

“Good day to you!”

Since: Oct 08

Earth

#12655 Oct 31, 2012
RevKen wrote:
<quoted text>
In your first post,#12623 above, you began your concordance-driven diatribe, listing Matthew 22:37. You then continued to quote scripture after scripture, passage after passage, through three more lengthy posts.
Then, proud of yourself, you thought it necessary to ridicule and show your disdain.
Only this ludicrous question:
Why did you leave out the balance of what Jesus said, being Matthew 22:39-40?
Teacher, which commandment in the law is the greatest?
He said to him, " 'You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind.' This is the greatest and first commandment.
And a second is like it:'You shall love your neighbor as yourself.' On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets."
You strain at gnats but won't address the beam in thy own eye? Why is that? I left nothing out with purpose. I thought the below was enough to stress Matt 22:39-40. Not surprised you didn't get it though :)
In the very first post these verses were listed...
"You shall love the LORD your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind. This is the first and the great commandment" (Mat 22:37). "And you shall love the LORD your God with all your heart, with all your soul, with all your mind, and with all your strength. This is the first commandment" (Mk 12:30).

“Good day to you!”

Since: Oct 08

Earth

#12656 Oct 31, 2012
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
That's a subjective rationalization. You don't actually know what he meant. Quite literally, Jesus is a separate entity to God the father right?(SMILE)
Of course it was a subjective rationalization! lol You asked me for my opinion to explain that verse, did you forget?:)
you did ask... "Then how do you explain the following passage?"
And yes, I do believe Jesus is a separate entity to God the Father. I do not nor have I ever entertained the concept, of the trinity theory that God's an entity that suffers from what we call a "multiple personality disorder." :)P

“Good day to you!”

Since: Oct 08

Earth

#12657 Oct 31, 2012
Kesla15 wrote:
It's surprising how the supposed "die-hard" christians who are meant to be expressing love and forgiveness and constantly preaching Hell and damnation, even though it's mentioned very little in the Bible.
In the year 2012, there's a good reason why you see less and less of hell and damnation being mentioned in the Bible. To find out why, you should visit this link :)

http://brandplucked.webs.com/helldamnation.ht...

“Good day to you!”

Since: Oct 08

Earth

#12658 Oct 31, 2012
MiddleWay wrote:
<quoted text>
Copy and paste job, no thinking required.
http://icgwp.tripod.com/ten.html
I try and make it as easy for the reverend as possible and you fault me? lol
See, though you wouldn't have noted it, or if you have you're being polite in not saying anything, the reverend often doesn't think out what he's saying. He just reads and reacts.
Need an example? How about his last opinion (that I addressed with paste and copy) that Jesus was all about the first and second commandments he taught, and said little to nothing about the rest of the commandments he also did teach that the reverend didn't think he said anything about?
Hmmm?

“Good day to you!”

Since: Oct 08

Earth

#12659 Oct 31, 2012
MiddleWay wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't pay any attention to No Surprise, he tried to give me info about Jews from Rev. Ted Pike, one of the biggest anti-Semites around.
It did give me a good laugh.
Keep on with the truth brother.......
If what you say is true of Ted Pikes, than you should welcome anything from Pike for information. It means you're both religious bigots that write with agendas based on extreme bias and you both think you're correct and all others incorrect, get the comparison value you just established? Nice job as usual dude :)

“Can't help being fabulous”

Since: Dec 10

Sparkle <3

#12662 Nov 1, 2012
Caleb wrote:
<quoted text>The homofascist trolls can keep repeating and squirming all they want. Not one of them has been able to cite ANY Bible translation, ancient Bible text, or Judeo-Christian tradition that places in question the Bible's many commands against all homosexual behavior.
What about the story of David and Jonathan? They were openly gay.

Also, the majority of the text which supposedly opposes homosexuality is extremely open to interpretation, and it is also mainly present in the Old Testament, which was refuted by Jesus in the New Testament.

Thirdly, the Lord declares quite clearly "judge not lest ye yourself be judged" - Surely you should leave your hateful views and ignorant fire and brimstone speeches to one side, and do as YOUR religion states and allow God to judge us.

Lastly, i'm only a homoromantic, none of your speeches of damnation apply to me.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#12664 Nov 1, 2012
fry321 wrote:
Hi
Hi, do you have any opinion?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News 'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15) 4 min Just Think 24,715
News Doritos makes rainbow chips in support of gay r... (Sep '15) 33 min Harvey 1,023
News Gay DNC chair candidate Ray Buckley drops out, ... 50 min Mikey 2
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 1 hr Respect71 44,897
News Washington court rules against florist in gay w... 1 hr Retribution 46
News Tupelo mother, son featured on LGBT video 1 hr Read nor right 18
Maybe god is gay! (Dec '09) 2 hr June VanDerMark 13,022
More from around the web