What a pile of ignorant crock.<quoted text>
If you had specifically said EVANGELICAL Christianity, I might almost have notionally conceded that to you, but with reservations.
However, many moderate Christians seem content to accept that there are inconsistencies, contradictions and factual errors in the "Bible". This is largely overcome by treating it in part as allegorical and metaphorical. Because of this, no religion can apply biblical doctrine absolutely without running into severe problems with modern expectations of secular morality. Does your church participate in stoning people for adultery, or killing children who are rebellious/abusive towards their parents, or killing others not of your faith, or killing people who work on Sunday, etc, etc, etc??? Therefore, because all religion accepts such compromises with biblical doctrine, no religion completely and absolutely adheres to doctrine - yours included. So, according to Stan's claim, neither of you are truly Christian.
Do you really think those stupid little facial gesture verbs you finish your posts with makes up for your being a complete arsehole?
Now off you go KiMare, as I fully expect you to feverishly work on some crass and flippant reply which totally ignores the points made in the argument, and doing so largely by insulting the arguer. That appears to be your only discussion technique.
If you had one iota of honesty and a Sunday School knowledge of what the Bible says, you would not use the examples you do.
Neither Jews nor Christians practice certain parts of the OT for Biblical reasons, not secular pressures. Nor is there a dispute between traditional, evangelical or fundamental Christians about those things.