So, What Is It That The Anti-Gay Grou...

So, What Is It That The Anti-Gay Groups Actually Fear?

There are 18009 comments on the lezgetreal.com story from Aug 17, 2012, titled So, What Is It That The Anti-Gay Groups Actually Fear?. In it, lezgetreal.com reports that:

What makes hate, well, hate? Given that today is something of a quiet news day, it may be nice to give ourselves a breather and think about some things.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at lezgetreal.com.

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#19420 Jan 28, 2013
Passing Through wrote:
<quoted text>You forgot Patricia's 106 posts as wrongrighter_wins. One should always endeavor for accuracy. ;-)

link: http://www.topix.com/member/profile/wrongrigh...
There must have been a few more in between.
Jane Dodo

West New York, NJ

#19422 Jan 29, 2013
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
the only thing acceptable to me is that you LEAVE PEOPLE ALONE.
live your life and let others live theres.
LEAVE PEOPLE ALONE.
Why don't you practice what you preach?
straight shooter

Barre, VT

#19423 Jan 29, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>
Why don't you practice what you preach?
prolly the same reason you are a compete fraud...
Jane Dodo

West New York, NJ

#19424 Jan 29, 2013
straight shooter wrote:
<quoted text>
prolly the same reason you are a compete fraud...
I'm sure that nonsequitur made sense to you, being a fake lawyer and all....
straight shooter

Barre, VT

#19425 Jan 29, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>I'm sure that nonsequitur made sense to you, being a fake lawyer and all....
lets have a full out reality aside convo..

are you a lawyer?
NO?

so are you trying to insult me or something by suggesting I merely have the same capabilities as you?

this is like you insulting people by calling them gay like you, right?
Jane Dodo

West New York, NJ

#19426 Jan 29, 2013
straight shooter wrote:
<quoted text>
lets have a full out reality aside convo..
are you a lawyer?
NO?
so are you trying to insult me or something by suggesting I merely have the same capabilities as you?
this is like you insulting people by calling them gay like you, right?
No. Calling someone a "closet queen" is NOT an insult. It's an observation based on their posts and the odds (you know.... 4 out of 5.... pretty good odds).

Where did I suggest that you have the same capabilities that I have? You fabricated that and then started an argument over it. You do that all the time. That's how I KNOW, beyond a reasonable doubt, that you do not have the skills to be a lawyer. And NOTHING you can say will ever change my mind. You don't even have the intellect to have cheated your way through Law School.
straight shooter

Barre, VT

#19427 Jan 29, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>No. Calling someone a "closet queen" is NOT an insult. It's an observation based on their posts and the odds (you know.... 4 out of 5.... pretty good odds).
Where did I suggest that you have the same capabilities that I have? You fabricated that and then started an argument over it. You do that all the time. That's how I KNOW, beyond a reasonable doubt, that you do not have the skills to be a lawyer. And NOTHING you can say will ever change my mind. You don't even have the intellect to have cheated your way through Law School.
But luckily for me, there is a reality and your beliefs don't bear on it at all...

my point which clearly went OVER YOUR HEAD is, if I am not a lawyer, then I am still just as capable as YOU who are also not a lawyer...

now, WHAT JOB DID YOU HAVE?
Not saying actually speaks volumes...

as does your playing with the icons you fraud...
how many names do you use to judge posts again?
I have sen you use Ida/Mona/Frankies/Jane....how many names do you use troll boy?
Jane Dodo

West New York, NJ

#19428 Jan 29, 2013
straight shooter wrote:
<quoted text>
But luckily for me, there is a reality and your beliefs don't bear on it at all...
my point which clearly went OVER YOUR HEAD is, if I am not a lawyer, then I am still just as capable as YOU who are also not a lawyer...
Where do you come up with this shit? If you were as capable as me, you wouldn't suggest it's ok to ignore a law because you don't like it. A real lawyer would NEVER suggest that... if he wanted to keep his license... but that's not a concern for you, I'm sure. They can't take away something you don't have.
Jane Dodo

West New York, NJ

#19429 Jan 29, 2013
straight shooter wrote:
<
as does your playing with the icons you fraud...
how many names do you use to judge posts again?
Where's your evidence, Mr. Fake Lawyer?
straight shooter

Barre, VT

#19430 Jan 29, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>Where do you come up with this shit? If you were as capable as me, you wouldn't suggest it's ok to ignore a law because you don't like it. A real lawyer would NEVER suggest that... if he wanted to keep his license... but that's not a concern for you, I'm sure. They can't take away something you don't have.
more reality aside dearie...
do you even know what planet you are on?

how many hours have you spent insisting in error what i do for a living...a PATHETIC number that's how many!

And all the while refusing to say what you do/did?

Why is that FRAUD BOY?

Keep plying with the icons dearie that's on your level...
straight shooter

Barre, VT

#19431 Jan 29, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text> Where's your evidence, Mr. Fake Lawyer?
where's the court dipshit?
oh right reality aside as usual dude...
Jane Dodo

West New York, NJ

#19432 Jan 29, 2013
straight shooter wrote:
<quoted text>
where's the court dipshit?
oh right reality aside as usual dude...
Well, in the real world, a prosecutor needs to have EVIDENCE. Why is it that you think you are exempt from proving anything?
straight shooter

Barre, VT

#19433 Jan 29, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, in the real world, a prosecutor needs to have EVIDENCE. Why is it that you think you are exempt from proving anything?
1. this is a message board not a court
2. Who is "prosecuting" who?
3. Are you a fruckin idiot?
Jane Dodo

West New York, NJ

#19434 Jan 29, 2013
straight shooter wrote:
<quoted text>
1. this is a message board not a court
2. Who is "prosecuting" who?
3. Are you a fruckin idiot?
Gee.... a "lawyer" that doesn't comprehend court metaphors.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#19435 Jan 29, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
It is my respect for children, families and marriage that confronts your selfish abuse and desecration of them.
Your personal attacks are not a defense of faulty and deceitful thinking.
Get really honey.
Smile.
Tony C wrote:
<quoted text>
No, you should respect all marriages.
Shortly, the law will require this. Best to start getting used to it now.
Grin.
I do respect all marriages. We are talking about imposter relationships.
The law has no power over reality. It is best people in denial get used to it.
Smile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#19436 Jan 29, 2013
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
I doubt anyone could read through that entire thing without banging their head against a wall, and I don't believe you can actually steal a wife, since they aren't really personal property in the first place.
But what is clear is that he is an unrepentant adulterer in the eyes of his own God. Which makes a lot of sense when it comes to his posts and thought process.
Swimming in guilt for his own sexual sins, he need to endlessly point out what he believes are the sexual sins of others.
It's classic. Ans very sad.
Funny, I never saw the word 'adultery' in the letter to the White House.

Did you?

Smirk.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#19437 Jan 29, 2013
Tony C wrote:
Ah, now we see with whom we are dealing. An unworthy adversary at best.
Innocent until proven guilty?

Perhaps instead we are seeing the moral caliber of your position?

Anything but logical reasoned answers.

Smile.

Since: Jul 12

Daytona Beach, FL

#19438 Jan 29, 2013
KiMare wrote:
Funny, I never saw the word 'adultery' in the letter to the White House.
Did you?
Smirk.
I think "wife-thief" implies adultery.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#19439 Jan 29, 2013
Peace-Love-Happiness wrote:
<quoted text>
I think "wife-thief" implies adultery.
Is that kind of like 'round' implies 'flat'?

Don't you think 'adultery' would be a little more definitive if that was the charge?

Wonder if the 'White House' sees it like a blonde would?

Snicker.

Since: Jul 12

Daytona Beach, FL

#19440 Jan 29, 2013
KiMare wrote:
Is that kind of like 'round' implies 'flat'?
Don't you think 'adultery' would be a little more definitive if that was the charge?
Wonder if the 'White House' sees it like a blonde would?
Snicker.
What word would *you* use to describe a wife-thief?

I think that telling the WH is being a bit melodramatic but, the truth remains, he was upset enough at you about stealing his wife, that he wrote such a letter. You seem unrepentant.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Obama: Notion that being armed would have saved... 4 min OK Barry 947
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 6 min Respect71 37,331
News 'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15) 7 min lides 13,062
News Sanders: Don't blame Islam for Orlando shooting 28 min Hell N Stone 721
News Frank Ocean on Orlando massacre: 'Many hate us' 1 hr TerriB1 11
News Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) 7 hr Barbi A 201,865
The gay cafe for GLBT, friends and family (Oct '09) 8 hr Frankie Rizzo 68,797
More from around the web