The prophecy in the OT predicted a 'virgin', hence Joseph did not procreate Jesus with Mary.<quoted text>
Not to mention, according to the bible story, wouldn't Mary and Joseph be the first known couple to have a third party involved in having Jesus?
It looks a pretty "god approved" practice.
Isaiah 7:14 (GW) So the Lord himself will give you this sign: A virgin will become pregnant and give birth to a son, and she will name him Immanuel [God Is With Us].
It was nothing new to claim sex between gods and humans. What makes this prophecy and the fulfillment totally unique and astounding, is the clear claim of virgin birth.
That was pondered and ignorantly mocked by people like you for thousands of years... Until the 1940's when the first invitro pregnancy occurred. A virgin, it was discovered, could bear a child.
Can you rationally explain how a mistranslated fiction book accurately predicted that thousands of years ago?
However, that brings us back to the word 'procreation'. Third parties procreating with one member of a couple has always been a fact. Usually it is not considered a 'good thing'.
I'd also point out that adding your stupidity to hers didn't help your cause.