So, What Is It That The Anti-Gay Grou...

So, What Is It That The Anti-Gay Groups Actually Fear?

There are 18008 comments on the lezgetreal.com story from Aug 17, 2012, titled So, What Is It That The Anti-Gay Groups Actually Fear?. In it, lezgetreal.com reports that:

What makes hate, well, hate? Given that today is something of a quiet news day, it may be nice to give ourselves a breather and think about some things.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at lezgetreal.com.

ROCCO

Twentynine Palms, CA

#19069 Jan 22, 2013
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
If i were god you wouldn't be here.
I think there's a law that prevents (INSERT WORD HERE THAT RHYMES WITH PUNTS) from becoming a god.

Unfortunately, there isn't one that prevents (insert word here that rhymes with punts) from becoming pricks.

Fortunately, pricks can only irritate, not erraticate(sic).

Since: Jul 12

Daytona Beach, FL

#19070 Jan 22, 2013
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
IN DEFENDING it, yes.
everytime your queerly beloved posts remarkes like
patricia is this, or patricia is that,
every time you reply to posts with a put down and slur, yes.
thats my right.
You make it impossible to be nice to you and you always have to be the center of attention. Then, you wonder why people can't stay on topic.
ROCCO

Twentynine Palms, CA

#19071 Jan 22, 2013
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
yeah well, thats your personal opinion.
you are not God.
so that is not your call to make
what i do know is, that
without the remission and removal of sin, you don't know the half of what it will mean to become on big bubbling boil in hell.
Patricia, your god is a weak, puny, pathetic psychosis in your brain.

But I'm glad that you've created a hell to which you believe you can banish those with whom you have unfavorable energy, knowing all the while that it is you who cannot live your life without the fear of it, rather than me and others who know it is nothing but an impediment in your life which concerns us not one whit.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#19073 Jan 22, 2013
macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>"Before you can equate gay unions to marriage, you have to prove they are the same type of relationship."
Why? And what type of relationship do you think marriage is?
You keep C&Ping that "cross-cultural constraint" line - I don't think you have a clue what it means. You just found it in a Chick tract, and thought it sounded impressive, didn't you?
"Get back to me when you can equate gay unions with the fundamental essence of marriage."
Define "the essence of marriage", please. Be specific.
Marriage is a cross cultural (common to every culture in history)
constraint (defines a unique relationship)
on evolutionary mating behavior (so powerful that it equates to the desire to air and food).

President Obama's description, "the love we commit to each other", is no more than a friendship. A description that fits numerous relationships that then must be defined as 'marriage'.

It is an attempt to dumb down marriage to a friendship so an imposter relationship can impose itself in a futile attempt to look normal. Ignorantly, it denies the reality that the closer a counterfeit gets to the real thing, the more it stands distinct.

Even more telling, it exposes the insecurity of a relationship that is unable to stand on it's own merits.

Even if a court tries to impose it's ruling on reality, even a child will always be able to tell the difference between marriage and gay couples. Especially if one couple is mom and dad.

Smile.

Since: Jul 12

Daytona Beach, FL

#19074 Jan 22, 2013
Lacez wrote:
She clearly meant that when you, Patty, leave, we can stop talking about you, Patty.
She knew what I meant, she just enjoys playing the martyr.
ROCCO

Twentynine Palms, CA

#19075 Jan 22, 2013
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
you are an idiot.
and a poor POOR interperter of the english language.
you can not be talking about OTHER people when you are talking about one specific individual.
when a gay attempted to insult me by calling pattycake gay, OF COURSE I LAUGHED.
and my reply was IF she was, she would of committed sucide because thats how much that lifestyle repulses her.........
the reply was about ONE person, not other people.
you can't make everything a fight here.
So you DO support suicide, especially for gays.

You're despicable as despicable can be, Patricia.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#19076 Jan 22, 2013
Peace-Love-Happiness wrote:
<quoted text>
Marriage is a union of two individuals who are romantically connected to form a family unit. Children are not required and do not have to be created by the two individuals if they are included.
If you can't understand why ss marriages ARE marriages, you don't have any place in defining them or denying their equality. It just means you are ignorant to their validity and, therefore, have no place determining their value and worth.
You might as well deny evolution, that's how intelligent you sound about this topic. <insert eye roll here>
First you talk about a romantic friendship forming a family unit, even though they are incapable of procreating, but immediately declare children are not necessary.

None of that mish-mash of nonsense equates gay couples to the cross cultural constraint of evolutionary mating behavior, marriage.

It is clear you don't know what you are talking about, but it is funny.

Smile.

Since: Jul 12

Daytona Beach, FL

#19077 Jan 22, 2013
Lacez wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, the constant posts from you DO show that you are not being stalked. For if one were to be stalked, they would not give out their information and hang around the stalkers for 4 years.
People who truly have stalkers and fear them, do not stay in a situation where they are exposed to them.
ROCCO

Twentynine Palms, CA

#19078 Jan 22, 2013
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
the posts show it, the actions of one irrational poster proved it and the PD know it.
I don't have to prove anything.
Yes you do have to prove something.

You have to prove that you can post without lying about anything, including who you are, and who you claim you are not.

The only thing you have proven thus far in over 4 years is that you cannot be relied upon to present yourself honestly, Patricia.

Until you prove you have stopped lying, no one is in a position to trust anything you say.

Pssssttttt:
Did you know that if you google your name in Russell Springs, quite a few things show up, including your gravestone with "Nov. 17, 1954", but no second date, since you're still alive and whining?
ROCCO

Twentynine Palms, CA

#19079 Jan 22, 2013
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
STOP TRASHING HER.
STOP YOUR STUPIDITY.
ROCCO

Twentynine Palms, CA

#19080 Jan 22, 2013
Peace-Love-Happiness wrote:
<quoted text>
YOU use "P's" name ALL THE TIME. What's the difference?
It's OK for Patricia to call "P" Patty, since she/they are.

She just really, really doesn't like to be called "Patricia". Not daddy's little girl, Pattiecake.

Since: Jul 12

Daytona Beach, FL

#19081 Jan 22, 2013
Happy Lesbo wrote:
<quoted text>
.. if Booots pursued it, Amy would be fired for releasing the information. Does Patricia care? Hell no. She'll ride that pony until it keels over. She's void of empathy or she would drop the matter before Booots does take action ..
.. Patricia is a sociopath ..
She's *pushing* him to take more action. She WANTS him to do more so she can feel more persecuted. She tells him things like "THEY LAUGHED AT YOU" and lies about what his reasons were for contacting them because she KNOWS he will feel compelled to defend himself. The more he contacts the authorities, the more drama she gets to feed on and the more justified she feels to invade *his* private life. She is ABSOLUTELY a sociopath.
ROCCO

Twentynine Palms, CA

#19082 Jan 22, 2013
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
IN DEFENDING it, yes.
everytime your queerly beloved posts remarkes like
patricia is this, or patricia is that,
every time you reply to posts with a put down and slur, yes.
thats my right.
So you think "Patricia" is a put down and a slur, Patricia?
ROCCO

Twentynine Palms, CA

#19083 Jan 22, 2013
MisterCharrington wrote:
<quoted text>
Hi I`m Julian, please pin down my IP address, I`m just dying to see how it`s done.
or were you just typing more crap from your own tiny little reality?
Hi, I'm Rocco's parrot Malaika. I can say 150 different words, and put them in proper grammatical context. I don't like crackers, but I think Pattiecake has gone crackers. I know that's true, because my daddy Rocco has told me about EVERY TOPIX POST he has ever shared with Pattiecake/aka Patricia, Yellodog, United in faith, et al.

Please pin down MY IP address. I'm just dying to see if you can track down a sassy, literate parrot who thinks Pattiecake58 is mental.

Squuuuuuaaaaaaawwwwwwwwwkkkkkk kkkkk!!!
ROCCO

Twentynine Palms, CA

#19084 Jan 22, 2013
Religionthebiglie wrote:
<quoted text>
Another one of her greatest hits.
Bounced a few times too many on her pappy's knee, she was!

Since: Jul 12

Daytona Beach, FL

#19085 Jan 22, 2013
Peace-Love-Happiness wrote:
Marriage is a union of two individuals who are romantically connected to form a family unit. Children are not required and do not have to be created by the two individuals if they are included.
If you can't understand why ss marriages ARE marriages, you don't have any place in defining them or denying their equality. It just means you are ignorant to their validity and, therefore, have no place determining their value and worth.
You might as well deny evolution, that's how intelligent you sound about this topic. <insert eye roll here>
KiMare wrote:
First you talk about a romantic friendship forming a family unit, even though they are incapable of procreating, but immediately declare children are not necessary.
None of that mish-mash of nonsense equates gay couples to the cross cultural constraint of evolutionary mating behavior, marriage.
It is clear you don't know what you are talking about, but it is funny.
Smile.
How does a romantic relationship equate to a "friendship"?? You keep inserting that word in there, attempting to devalue the relationship, but it's not an accurate description. Ideally, the romantic couple *are* friends, but each couple defines the characteristics of their marriage in their own way. That means that you are not "entitled" to define someone else's relationship.

There are many different types of family units: married without children, nuclear, blended, extended, etc. A married couple without children is *still* a family. You act like I discourage procreation, when what I actually said was that couples are not REQUIRED to procreate. There is no box on the marriage application that asks about intentions to procreate.

I do not accept your "cross cultural constraint" nonsense to be an accurate definition of all marriages, so my responses do not need to satisfy you. I don't "strive" to conform to your reality because it is an alternate one.
ROCCO

Twentynine Palms, CA

#19086 Jan 22, 2013
MisterCharrington wrote:
<quoted text>
"went on a expidition[sic]"
...hooked on phonics.
...erraticate. lol

I'm surprised she doesn't spell stupid as stewpid. But just maybe she's been in contact with that word more than the average person...
ROCCO

Twentynine Palms, CA

#19087 Jan 22, 2013
Lacez wrote:
<quoted text>
Because it's been disproven time and time again. If someone says an orange is an apple, then you prove it isn't, if they continue to say that, then their opinions are uneducated.
Patty, you're in the same boat, but your reactions are priceless, that's why I continue to reply to you.
Her stupidity is sometimes the funniest moment in my day.

I sometimes feel ashamed for taking advantage of her, but the payoff is just SO FREAKING HILARIOUS! The devil's boss (god, with or without a big "G") makes me do it. I can't help myself!

I've fractured 4 of my ribs because of her!
ROCCO

Twentynine Palms, CA

#19088 Jan 22, 2013
Religionthebiglie wrote:
<quoted text>
If you're going to lie, make it big and make it detailed. Go big or go home, right?
hehehehehehehe! lol!
ROCCO

Twentynine Palms, CA

#19089 Jan 22, 2013
Religionthebiglie wrote:
<quoted text>
Not according to jesus.
My gardener has nothing to do with this, so kindly leave him out, OK?

(He pronounces his name Hey Zeus. He has a couple of helpers, both named JOSE. I call them Hose A and Hose B in order to avoid confusion.)

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 3 min Doctor Who 42,976
News Thousands of people march during rally at Bosto... 7 min Doctor Who 2,239
News 'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15) 21 min who cares 22,538
Maybe god is gay! (Dec '09) 23 min June VanDerMark 12,299
News Is Same-Sex Attraction a Sin? 36 min No Teq Cok 8
News Trump's staff picks disappoint, alarm minority ... 40 min WasteWater 270
News Woman Hangs Rainbow Christmas Lights to Protest... 1 hr I Hate Queers 4
More from around the web