So, What Is It That The Anti-Gay Grou...

So, What Is It That The Anti-Gay Groups Actually Fear?

There are 18008 comments on the lezgetreal.com story from Aug 17, 2012, titled So, What Is It That The Anti-Gay Groups Actually Fear?. In it, lezgetreal.com reports that:

What makes hate, well, hate? Given that today is something of a quiet news day, it may be nice to give ourselves a breather and think about some things.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at lezgetreal.com.

“O'si yo!”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#19008 Jan 22, 2013
Lacez wrote:
<quoted text>
Trying to hide what you said again? It's not going to work, just like it hasn't worked all those other times.
You said that Patty (you) would have killed herself (yourself) if she (you) had been gay. Then you laughed.
And so you laughed about gay people committing suicide.
you are an idiot.
and a poor POOR interperter of the english language.

you can not be talking about OTHER people when you are talking about one specific individual.

when a gay attempted to insult me by calling pattycake gay, OF COURSE I LAUGHED.
and my reply was IF she was, she would of committed sucide because thats how much that lifestyle repulses her.........
the reply was about ONE person, not other people.

you can't make everything a fight here.

“O'si yo!”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#19009 Jan 22, 2013
Lacez wrote:
<quoted text>
Oooooh, so Patty, have you ever heard of hockey? That question now means I'm a player in the NHL, right?
As Charrington mentioned, you need the permission of the Internet service provider. Even then, none of us have done anything wrong, none of us are evil like you and so disgusting, and so none of us have to care if we give out only our first name.
Giving out your last name is incredibly stupid, and you've done it.
we are not talking about hockey.
we were discussing tracking folks........you don't know MY last name
and the fact you PERFECTS dug around and obtained pattycakes last name was YOU not her.
you all invaded her privacy, not the other way around.
she NEVER EVER gave that information out
just like you retards continuing to use her name on here PROVES the extent in which you will go to harm others.

you are not going to convience ANYONE that you are blameless on here.

“O'si yo!”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#19010 Jan 22, 2013
Lacez wrote:
<quoted text>
So now you're claiming the FBI is after everyone over here?
You're more of a nutter than I originally thought.
OH STOP IT.......... my gwad you are dangerous, no matter what i say you twist it and make a argument out of it.

if you can't read or understand what i say, then you certainly do not need to be on here at all.

i will not reply to any more of your lunitic posts where you twist what i say.

grow up already.

“O'si yo!”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#19011 Jan 22, 2013
Lacez wrote:
<quoted text>
You're the one trying to convince people you're being stalked. You're the one who's doing a horrible job of it.
the posts show it, the actions of one irrational poster proved it and the PD know it.

I don't have to prove anything.

“O'si yo!”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#19012 Jan 22, 2013
Lacez wrote:
Kmart is on the same level as CHL now, I just scroll past without reading his posts. He never actually listens to everyone else, he just continues to spew the same disproven, uneducated opinions.
why do you call ANYONE who has different opinions from yours as uneducated? kind of phobic and bigoted of you isn't it?

“O'si yo!”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#19013 Jan 22, 2013
Peace-Love-Happiness wrote:
<quoted text>
I do, when I know she has not done any hacking and you are accusing her of it.
plh i never once said she HAD hacked.
i said her reply was to a post about 'finding out my Id' and her reply was said in the light of 'ever heard of computer hacking'?
there was no accusing of her doing it, just her posting the remark in such a way as to SUGGEST it.

please don't twist what i say.

Since: May 11

Witham, UK

#19014 Jan 22, 2013
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
the point was that the viruses still exist.
matters not that you are vaccinated against the illness, that is what keeps you from getting it........ the viruses themselves are still existant in the world.
whether in the wild or in a lab.
they still are existant. and small pox is only one of FEW that have been contained or erraticated from the wild.
there are MANY MANY incurable diseases out there.
here is a good example ... many get flu shots every year.
and the Dr will tell you, this is not a solid 100% guarantee that you won't still get the flu.
anotherwords, it is not a cure just a prevention of lower your chances of getting it.
There have been two diseases in the history of man which have been eradicated to the point of being called CURED by the World Health Organisation, rinderpest and SMALLPOX.

A flu virus adapts, a cold virus adapts which is why there are so many strains.

If I get an anthrax shot(which I have had) I am fairly confident that I won`t get pulmonary anthrax. If I get a yellow fever shot(which I have had) I am fairly sure that little yellow certificate from the WHO means that I am immune to yellow fever. People STILL get those diseases who have NOT been vaccinated.

HERE`S THE EASY BIT!

NO PERSON IS ROUTINELY VACCINATED AGAINST SMALLPOX BECAUSE IT HAS NOT BEEN FOUND IN THE WILD SINCE 1977. IT HAS BEEN CURED!

PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT VACCINATED DO NOT GET IT!

“O'si yo!”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#19015 Jan 22, 2013
Happy Lesbo wrote:
<quoted text>
DO NOT POST TO ME
STOP TRASHING HER.

Since: Jul 12

Daytona Beach, FL

#19016 Jan 22, 2013
United in faith wrote:
every time you call me a name i am not, every time you continue to use private names on here...
YOU use "P's" name ALL THE TIME. What's the difference?

“O'si yo!”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#19017 Jan 22, 2013
boooots wrote:
The RS Police web site and also the RC Sheriff web site both state that Tips can be anonymous or a person can leave their name, as it is not who contacts them that is important but rather they want the info.
By law the police are not permitted to divulge to someone outside their office the source of their info, except if that was ordered by a court. They would not have that permission based on an unexpected phone call from an involved party, nor could they release it on the phone because they could not legally prove who they were speaking with.
We all know that police, like everyone else, don't always play it by the book, and they will often do things, such as asking for personal information from someone who they are questioning, which the party does not legally have to give them unless they have a warrant, and/or he has asked to speak to a lawyer first, but they will attempt to get the info, because most people do not know they have a right not to respond.
The simple fact is an office worker in a police office should never divulge information from their files to anyone, especially if she does not have the permission from her employer to do so, which then would be the responsibility of the police department itself, for having divulged private info.
I know having talked with several agencies now in Kentucky that they are quite free with information that they need not provide, and probably shouldn't. So far I have not been given any info by them that would be considered illegal, but I was told some information about an office which would not have been known to me, and was not really professional to divulge.
When you file a false report all bets are off.

Since: May 11

Witham, UK

#19018 Jan 22, 2013
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
you must think the FBI are stupid people.
LOL
anyone could be found if they were being looked for.
The FBI?

You said and I quote

"the point is personal info DOES NOT belong on the internet. for many reasons. an IP is not that hard to pin down. so you are stupid if you give even just your first name".

So what you meant to say was, if you can demonstrate probable cause to a police officer who with then determine if it is within his jurisdiction and if not will hand it off to a federal agency who will then decide if it is worth the time or the effort, assuming it is he will then ask a judge to issue a subpoena for the server records of Topix, then once the IP address has been resolved he will then petition a judge to issue a subpoena for the ISP records of the IP address in question to determine if it is an individual or a corporation, if it is a corporation he will then contact the network administrator to check if it is possible to pin down who was on a particular workstation or if it`s a public hotspot to see if there is any way to identify a particular wireless client who has connected with specific websites at the time of the alleged offences.....and this is just if everything is happening in the US.

So an IP address is "not that hard to pin down"...and only if you`re a federal agent...I`m SO sure they`re literally lining up to do this right now because some batty old tart from west bumblefuck Kentucky feels aggrieved that someone called her out on her complete ignorance of EVERYTHING.

So tell me again...why I should worry about giving my first name on Topix?

“O'si yo!”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#19019 Jan 22, 2013
Happy Lesbo wrote:
<quoted text>
.. Patricia wants everyone to defend, she counts on that. Corner someone with lies and innuendos, make them squeal like a pig. She's a bully ..
.. when we stop defending, her game is up, the drama gone ..
Hows that? the drama will be gone? and here you are STILL talking about her every day in every post.

when you stop dragging her name thru the mud THEN the drama will be gone.

You are the one stirring in it.

Since: Jul 12

Daytona Beach, FL

#19020 Jan 22, 2013
United in faith wrote:
and there it is! there you have it.......... THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU for proving my point.
you won't stop trashing pattycake until I leave.
there it is..........
YOUR AGENDA.
if you can't make some agree with you
they must go.
if you can't make someone keep their opinions to themself they must go.
the lie you think you are concealing is shining through like a beacon in the dark.........the agenda you share with your god haters and gays on here, "SILENCE ANY AND ALL OPPOSING VOICES"
RUN EM OFF.
what ever it takes.
you just said it.
and the lie is even if i wasn't here you would STILL talk about and trash 'P' because you did it before i was here.
and becauase you all call other posters patty.
so you lie plh.
you want me gone because i am a reminder of what you did
a thorn in your muddy paw.
TUFF.
i will go when i choose to go.
not because you and others are limited in your ability to handle and deal with opposing views.
but thanks for admitting your agenda openly.
How, exactly, does "when 'P' leaves, we can stop talking about her," equate to us trying to "silence" you for your opinions?? You are truly mentally challenged.

I never *suggested* that you leave. You SAID that if we stopped talking about "P," you would leave. I was responding to your claim, not requesting that you leave.

There's no point in asking you to leave because I know it will never happen.

Since: May 11

Witham, UK

#19021 Jan 22, 2013
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
STOP TRASHING HER.
"ANOTHERWORDS"...sto p telling the truth about you because you just cant handle it.

go and take your medication.

Since: Jul 12

Daytona Beach, FL

#19022 Jan 22, 2013
United in faith wrote:
please don't twist what i say.
Ditto.

“O'si yo!”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#19023 Jan 22, 2013
boooots wrote:
I wish someone else here, who isn't mentally ill as I allegedly am, according to Patty (blame me for being open about my past history for that), would explain to Patty that all of her posts since the discussion regarding her talk with the RS police office will prove she is not only seriously mentally ill, but is also a proved liar. I think she needs to know and understand that to protect herself, as everything she has said on here in the past several weeks would go against her if anyone ever decided to check out her online behavior.
Again, Patty, it has nothing to do with your beliefs, other than you do bring them into conversations about something not related to your beliefs at all. What it says in the Bible, for example, would have nothing to do with what you are saying about who you are not in real life (whether Patty or not - and we all know you are Patty).
I actually mean that as advice, not from malice, because I am leaving for 9 1/2 weeks of sun and beach in less than a week, and Patty's personal issues are not going to be my concern when I am away.
online behavior?
you are the one STALKING a poster who isn't even on here.
you are the one who BEGGED me to call the pd
you wanted me to tell her to call them, and what did you expect would happen?
online behavior?
why do you think they sided with her over you?
OMG, you live in frickin canada, you are a total stranger.
you don't know patty.
never met her.
you have no facts or evidence to support the false report you made
and they DID tell her that you were talking about her opposition of homosexuality on topix.
then you told them about your mental problems.
OMG boots what did you expect them to think?
online behavior? trying to tell posters that they have no right to come here and openly share their opinions. Everyone on topix knows you and she argued and that you got pissed off many times with her opinions.
online behavior? when EVERY poster told you NOT to do what you did
and you still did......is that a rational mind?
online behavior? your still bothering people.
Everyone on here knows you are 'not right' and this behavior you have exhibited sealed that fact.
how many times have 'I' ask you to leave it alone.....
and here you are STILL messing in it.

the only online behavior in question here is yours.

LEAVE PEOPLE ALONE.
you can't make people agree with you.
and filing false reports on people out of revenge will ONLY hurt you in the end.
you would think by now you would begin to get that.

do you want to wind back up in the hospital boots?
is that why you are doing this?

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#19024 Jan 22, 2013
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
online behavior?
you are the one STALKING a poster who isn't even on here.
you are the one who BEGGED me to call the pd
you wanted me to tell her to call them, and what did you expect would happen?
online behavior?
why do you think they sided with her over you?
OMG, you live in frickin canada, you are a total stranger.
you don't know patty.
never met her.
you have no facts or evidence to support the false report you made
and they DID tell her that you were talking about her opposition of homosexuality on topix.
then you told them about your mental problems.
OMG boots what did you expect them to think?
online behavior? trying to tell posters that they have no right to come here and openly share their opinions. Everyone on topix knows you and she argued and that you got pissed off many times with her opinions.
online behavior? when EVERY poster told you NOT to do what you did
and you still did......is that a rational mind?
online behavior? your still bothering people.
Everyone on here knows you are 'not right' and this behavior you have exhibited sealed that fact.
how many times have 'I' ask you to leave it alone.....
and here you are STILL messing in it.
the only online behavior in question here is yours.
LEAVE PEOPLE ALONE.
you can't make people agree with you.
and filing false reports on people out of revenge will ONLY hurt you in the end.
you would think by now you would begin to get that.
do you want to wind back up in the hospital boots?
is that why you are doing this?
Okay, you are really going overboard lying now. I told them about the homosexuality, or my opposition to your opinion?????? I sent you the reports which were all made by email to them. I never mentioned to them about the topics of discussion on Topix, but I think after you had spoken to them, when I later talked by telephone to Chief Irvin, he said something about he was not interested in online discussion sites. I don't think even then he mentioned homosexuality, but if he did, I didn't. The only people that might know what this site is about would be the Kentucky Social Services, as I did give them a couple links where they could find your post way back last spring.

Oh, I just remembered, I did send Amy a copy and paste of your post when you gave out my full name on one of the threads, so if they followed a link to that, which I gave to them, so they could see that you actually posted my name, rather than my just claiming you did, they might have seen that the topic of homosexuality was being discussed. It would have been them who had brought up the topic though, because I certainly didn't.

I was never making reports about your opinions on Topix, but rather I was reporting because I and others had identified some serious mental issues, which then were confirmed by others who claimed to know you in person. If these other people were lying about you, I can't be responsible for that, which is why the police were involved because they do have the resources and expertise to sort out the truth and lies.

Patty, if you are going to talk about the situation with you having given out private information about me on a website, which information you should not have have anyway, at least don't make up stories about that.

“O'si yo!”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#19025 Jan 22, 2013
Peace-Love-Happiness wrote:
<quoted text>
How, exactly, does "when 'P' leaves, we can stop talking about her," equate to us trying to "silence" you for your opinions?? You are truly mentally challenged.
I never *suggested* that you leave. You SAID that if we stopped talking about "P," you would leave. I was responding to your claim, not requesting that you leave.
There's no point in asking you to leave because I know it will never happen.
well see now you are opening the flood gates of stupidity.
how exactly does when 'p' leaves you can stop talking about her have to do with me you say?

you think about that.
you are insistant i am 'p'. and therefore since i am here
and you are STILL trashing 'p' you are saying when 'I' leave you will stop dragging her name thru the mud here.

who do you think you are fooling here?

why are you wanting anyone to leave? why can't you just discuss issues without making it personal all the time?

“O'si yo!”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#19026 Jan 22, 2013
MisterCharrington wrote:
<quoted text>
The FBI?
You said and I quote
"the point is personal info DOES NOT belong on the internet. for many reasons. an IP is not that hard to pin down. so you are stupid if you give even just your first name".
So what you meant to say was, if you can demonstrate probable cause to a police officer who with then determine if it is within his jurisdiction and if not will hand it off to a federal agency who will then decide if it is worth the time or the effort, assuming it is he will then ask a judge to issue a subpoena for the server records of Topix, then once the IP address has been resolved he will then petition a judge to issue a subpoena for the ISP records of the IP address in question to determine if it is an individual or a corporation, if it is a corporation he will then contact the network administrator to check if it is possible to pin down who was on a particular workstation or if it`s a public hotspot to see if there is any way to identify a particular wireless client who has connected with specific websites at the time of the alleged offences.....and this is just if everything is happening in the US.
So an IP address is "not that hard to pin down"...and only if you`re a federal agent...I`m SO sure they`re literally lining up to do this right now because some batty old tart from west bumblefuck Kentucky feels aggrieved that someone called her out on her complete ignorance of EVERYTHING.
So tell me again...why I should worry about giving my first name on Topix?
well leave it up to you to make a federal case out of a topix statement given to you by an individual.

point is, giving out ANY personal info on a computer is not wise.
you wish to argue that point? go ahead.

Since: May 11

Witham, UK

#19027 Jan 22, 2013
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
online behavior?
you are the one STALKING a poster who isn't even on here.
you are the one who BEGGED me to call the pd
you wanted me to tell her to call them, and what did you expect would happen?
online behavior?
why do you think they sided with her over you?
OMG, you live in frickin canada, you are a total stranger.
you don't know patty.
never met her.
you have no facts or evidence to support the false report you made
and they DID tell her that you were talking about her opposition of homosexuality on topix.
then you told them about your mental problems.
OMG boots what did you expect them to think?
online behavior? trying to tell posters that they have no right to come here and openly share their opinions. Everyone on topix knows you and she argued and that you got pissed off many times with her opinions.
online behavior? when EVERY poster told you NOT to do what you did
and you still did......is that a rational mind?
online behavior? your still bothering people.
Everyone on here knows you are 'not right' and this behavior you have exhibited sealed that fact.
how many times have 'I' ask you to leave it alone.....
and here you are STILL messing in it.
the only online behavior in question here is yours.
LEAVE PEOPLE ALONE.
you can't make people agree with you.
and filing false reports on people out of revenge will ONLY hurt you in the end.
you would think by now you would begin to get that.
do you want to wind back up in the hospital boots?
is that why you are doing this?
you`re quite mental Patricia.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News What would Jesus say about same-sex marriage? (Jul '15) 53 min Chalupa Batgirl 12,907
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 1 hr NoahLovesU 57,493
News British neo-Nazi comes out as gay and Jewish, b... 4 hr EdmondWA 6
News Trump pledges fealty to religious values, a oeM... 5 hr Red Crosse 145
NE Jedediah 5 hr Frankie Rizzo 1
News Gay bar opens near Macon Road, drawing visitors... 5 hr Vic H 663
News Lesbian couple sues airline, claiming discrimin... 6 hr Pope Closet Emeritus 4
News Is Hollywood's Rape Culture Like a Gay Bar? 7 hr Pope Closet Emeritus 29
VP Mike Pence says gays should be hung 19 hr Wondering 4
More from around the web