So, What Is It That The Anti-Gay Grou...

So, What Is It That The Anti-Gay Groups Actually Fear?

There are 18008 comments on the lezgetreal.com story from Aug 17, 2012, titled So, What Is It That The Anti-Gay Groups Actually Fear?. In it, lezgetreal.com reports that:

What makes hate, well, hate? Given that today is something of a quiet news day, it may be nice to give ourselves a breather and think about some things.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at lezgetreal.com.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#18230 Jan 12, 2013
Lacez wrote:
<quoted text>
Show me your sources that claim it's unnatural...oh wait, they don't exist, because natural is defined by what occurs in nature. It is in nature and is therefore natural.
Oops, you lost again, that pesky denial of yours continues to get in the way of facts and reality.
I don't need to prove anything.

You need to go back to school.

Smile.

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#18231 Jan 12, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Physically and mentally to start with.
Men lead with logic, women follow their emotions. Our dialogue is a classic example.
Evolutionary wise, men are designed to protect and provide for their mate and offspring. Women are designed to bear and care for the offspring.
Even the Bible recognizes this.
Smile.
Ah, the sexist and misogynistic Kmart continues to show how uneducated and pointlessly demeaning his posts are.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#18232 Jan 12, 2013
Lacez wrote:
<quoted text>
You said marriage is only about rearing a child, you contradicted yourself by showing us your vows, which have nothing to do with children.
Whoops, you lose again, keep on twirling.
You lie.

I have never said marriage is only about children.

I said the government interest is only about children.

Those weren't my vows silly girl.

Snicker.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#18233 Jan 12, 2013
Lacez wrote:
<quoted text>
There's already a benefit program set up for people with kids, without marriage. So marriage obviously is not about raising children, for people would need to get married to get those benefits if that were the case.
Also, you have us your vows, which had nothing to do with children or reproduction. That indicates that your opinion that gay people shouldn't marry is not justified, because the only reason you gave was reproduction.
IF marriage has anything to do with reproduction, it most definitely does NOT SOLELY have to do with reproduction, as your vows proved.
You have not given ANY argument supporting the idea that gay people should be banned from marriage regarding that OTHER part of marriage. If you come up with something, I doubt it would stand as a valid point anyways.
You know this, so you refuse to give another reason besides your opinion regarding reproduction.
You already answered my question. The only reason government has to be involved in marriage is because of the children and the weaker partner (mother).
If you remove the issue of children, you again raise the question; What prevailing reason does government have in supporting and regulating selective friendships?
Smile.

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

#18234 Jan 12, 2013
Worm wrote:
Morengo Jon,Just Think,Religionthebigli e, Anderson Pooper are all the same person! Scammer!
<quoted text>
Well, golly, what do you know! I posted my little bit about Cool Hand Luke/ Samatha/ Lone Gunman/ Brenda Lee Johnson/ Horatio/ Blair and Mr. Worm (who I guess we can add to the list) posted the exact same response on both threads. I wonder why?

So predictable, so lame.

As for me, I'm a registered user who has only ever posted under this one screen name.

What's the matter Cool Hand Luke/ Samatha/ Lone Gunman/ Brenda Lee Johnson/ Horatio/ Blair/ Worm - afraid you'll be banned for spamming if you register?

Poor little troll....

Since: Jul 12

Daytona Beach, FL

#18235 Jan 12, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
1. We were talking about strength, not coordination. But since you shifted the subject, women aren't in the same league, just look at any sport. And speaking of shifting the subject, men are better cooks.
2. Really. And well known too. Who is she? All the genius' I know are male.
3. No question, the way to subvert the superior intellect is a low blow.
4. Are you a mama grizzly bear too?
5. Amazon women? Queen bee society? We are headed there. Women can do everything a man can do... and are doing it. That is why men are playing video games and watching porn. How are you girls doing?
6. Biblical misunderstanding? Try me.
:-)
1. So, your barrel-chested self could over-power a dancer. Congrats. Did your testicles grow larger with that admission? Men and women have various strengths and weaknesses, but each individual - regardless of sex - is different and unique and strong in their own way.

Better cooks? Sheesh, you like to put every gender into neat, little boxes and claim that all males are better at "X" and all females are good for is birthing babies and cooking and cleaning. Is that all you really gave your wife a chance at doing? You limit her with your limited views.

2. The genius I was referring to was Marilyn Vos Savant, but I now see she has been unseated as the smartest person in the world. She held the titles for years.

3. You call it a "low blow", I call it wit. I'm sorry if you have weaknesses for me to point out. You do the same with other users and I all the time.

4. I am a protective mother, but there's nothing grizzly about me.

5. Men playing video games and watching pr0n? Not my man, not my fault.

6. Not going to "try" you because I've read some of your work. You went to theology school and were so good at it, you chose a career as a truck driver. A low blow, yes, but truth sometimes hurts.

“It's a bathroom”

Since: Jul 07

Get over it, already

#18236 Jan 12, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Because the government has no business regulating or supporting friendships.
Marriages are not friendships. This is merely your newest efforst to create a distinction. SSM's ARE marriages.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
They do supporting the fundamental birthplace of society.
QUOTE]

Chimera spin; this means absolutely nothing.

[QUOTE who="KiMare"]<quo ted text>

This is why you gay twirl tap dance around the issue.
You call it gay twirl tap dance, we call it reality.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>

Smile.
Troll on Mangina Man

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#18237 Jan 12, 2013
Lacez wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah, the sexist and misogynistic Kmart continues to show how uneducated and pointlessly demeaning his posts are.
Yup.

That's his only trick.

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#18238 Jan 12, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You already answered my question. The only reason government has to be involved in marriage is because of the children and the weaker partner (mother).
If you remove the issue of children, you again raise the question; What prevailing reason does government have in supporting and regulating selective friendships?
Smile.
To answer the question: none whatsoever.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#18239 Jan 13, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
1. We were talking about strength, not coordination. But since you shifted the subject, women aren't in the same league, just look at any sport. And speaking of shifting the subject, men are better cooks.
2. Really. And well known too. Who is she? All the genius' I know are male.
3. No question, the way to subvert the superior intellect is a low blow.
4. Are you a mama grizzly bear too?
5. Amazon women? Queen bee society? We are headed there. Women can do everything a man can do... and are doing it. That is why men are playing video games and watching porn. How are you girls doing?
6. Biblical misunderstanding? Try me.
:-)
Peace-Love-Happiness wrote:
<quoted text>
1. So, your barrel-chested self could over-power a dancer. Congrats. Did your testicles grow larger with that admission? Men and women have various strengths and weaknesses, but each individual - regardless of sex - is different and unique and strong in their own way.
Better cooks? Sheesh, you like to put every gender into neat, little boxes and claim that all males are better at "X" and all females are good for is birthing babies and cooking and cleaning. Is that all you really gave your wife a chance at doing? You limit her with your limited views.
2. The genius I was referring to was Marilyn Vos Savant, but I now see she has been unseated as the smartest person in the world. She held the titles for years.
3. You call it a "low blow", I call it wit. I'm sorry if you have weaknesses for me to point out. You do the same with other users and I all the time.
4. I am a protective mother, but there's nothing grizzly about me.
5. Men playing video games and watching pr0n? Not my man, not my fault.
6. Not going to "try" you because I've read some of your work. You went to theology school and were so good at it, you chose a career as a truck driver. A low blow, yes, but truth sometimes hurts.
Your question was, how are men and women different.

I answered the question and now you agree with me.

My wife and I were married twelve years before we had our sons. She like most women found her greatest fulfillment in a career as a mother among the several she succeeded in, including owning several businesses.

I responded with a matching pun to your wit.

I would disagree about the grizzly, not just because of your body hair, but also because evolution has dictated and demanded a mother will protect her child like no other person on the planet. Except maybe the father.

As to your man, maybe. Maybe he and I are of the older generation, the last of the gentleman chauvinists. I was referring to your PC social engineering and the ancient cultural experiment with a extreme maternal society.

What I ponder with wonder about the Bible, is that 40 authors writing 60 books over thousands of years and compiled long ago is so consistent on so many subjects. Gender roles is just one. You made the claim my understanding was mistaken, I simply asked you to expose that. The withdrawal of that silly challenge is the wisest thing I've experienced you doing.

As to truck driving, you may have the skeleton of my life, if that. Construct what you will, but this is certain; it looks nothing like the real me.

:-)

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#18240 Jan 13, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You already answered my question. The only reason government has to be involved in marriage is because of the children and the weaker partner (mother).
If you remove the issue of children, you again raise the question; What prevailing reason does government have in supporting and regulating selective friendships?
Smile.
macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>To answer the question: none whatsoever.
Hence the government has no authority to regulate or support your definition of marriage.

Snicker.

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#18242 Jan 13, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't need to prove anything.
You need to go back to school.
Smile.
That's because you're making things up.
That's because you CAN'T provide a source.
It doesn't exist.

Logic defeats you and so you continue to deny reality. When are you going to accept the facts?

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#18243 Jan 13, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You lie.
I have never said marriage is only about children.
I said the government interest is only about children.
Those weren't my vows silly girl.
Snicker.
Calling a man a girl, after being repeatedly corrected, simply enforces the idea of you being mentally deranged. You thoughts are all messed up, a confused bundle of thoughts that get in the way of reality.

You did claim that marriage was about reproduction. The government already has a plan in place for parents and their children (not marriage) and so marriage is not about the government's support of children.
If that were true, as many have stated, yet you continue to ignore for you know you are wrong:
-infertile people would not be able to marry
-elderly people would not be able to marry
-divorce would be outlawed

You are wrong.
Purely and simply wrong.
Otherwise, you would have an answer to my above paragraph instead of "gay twirl," which only yells that you have no answer.

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#18244 Jan 13, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You already answered my question. The only reason government has to be involved in marriage is because of the children and the weaker partner (mother).
If you remove the issue of children, you again raise the question; What prevailing reason does government have in supporting and regulating selective friendships?
Smile.
Ah, turning into a Cool Hand Luke, I see.
You haven't answered my questions.
You continue to deny reality by refusing to submit a valid reason for banning gay people from marriage.
You know that there is no valid reason to do so.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#18245 Jan 13, 2013
Lacez wrote:
<quoted text>
That's because you're making things up.
That's because you CAN'T provide a source.
It doesn't exist.
Logic defeats you and so you continue to deny reality. When are you going to accept the facts?
You made stupid unvalidated claims, I didn't.

Prove that there are not defective mutations.

Snicker.

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#18246 Jan 13, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You made stupid unvalidated claims, I didn't.
Prove that there are not defective mutations.
Snicker.
Prove that anal sex is unnatural, when it certainly occurs in nature (the very definition of natural).
You made an "unvalidated" (not even a word) claim yourself by stating that anal sex was unnatural.
Then you refused to back up your INvalid claim.
Quit trying to change the subject, that has nothing to do with my reply nor the comment I replied to.

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#18247 Jan 13, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You already answered my question. The only reason government has to be involved in marriage is because of the children and the weaker partner (mother).
If you remove the issue of children, you again raise the question; What prevailing reason does government have in supporting and regulating selective friendships?
Smile.
<quoted text>
Hence the government has no authority to regulate or support your definition of marriage.
Snicker.
No, he answered your question, which has nothing to do with marriage.
Is your wife happy that you only consider her as a friend?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#18248 Jan 13, 2013
Lacez wrote:
<quoted text>
Calling a man a girl, after being repeatedly corrected, simply enforces the idea of you being mentally deranged. You thoughts are all messed up, a confused bundle of thoughts that get in the way of reality.
You did claim that marriage was about reproduction. The government already has a plan in place for parents and their children (not marriage) and so marriage is not about the government's support of children.
If that were true, as many have stated, yet you continue to ignore for you know you are wrong:
-infertile people would not be able to marry
-elderly people would not be able to marry
-divorce would be outlawed
You are wrong.
Purely and simply wrong.
Otherwise, you would have an answer to my above paragraph instead of "gay twirl," which only yells that you have no answer.
1. You have a girl's name. I should know.

2. The government's plan for children is marriage. I have already posted SCOTUS judgments expressing that. You have no counter.

3. As stated many times before, the situations you note are so rare, the government didn't address them. Equating a group who is 100% barren and defective is a whole different issue.

Two men don't need the support and protection women and children do. If you are a man, man up!

Snicker.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#18250 Jan 13, 2013
Lacez wrote:
<quoted text>
No, he answered your question, which has nothing to do with marriage.
Is your wife happy that you only consider her as a friend?
Exactly what I said.

Marriage is much more than your dumbed down definition which makes it only friendship.

She's my wife because we are married, and the mother of our children. We were friends before that. The only identity you have with marriage is what existed before marriage; friendship.

Snicker smile.

Snicker.

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#18251 Jan 13, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
1. You have a girl's name. I should know.
2. The government's plan for children is marriage. I have already posted SCOTUS judgments expressing that. You have no counter.
3. As stated many times before, the situations you note are so rare, the government didn't address them. Equating a group who is 100% barren and defective is a whole different issue.
Two men don't need the support and protection women and children do. If you are a man, man up!
Snicker.
1. So now shoe laces have a gender, and it's female?
2. No, the government gives benefits to those who have children, outside of marriage. Marriage would not exist ANYWHERE for same sex couples if what you say is true. Yet look at where we are and look at where we'll be. No matter what you say, the fact of the matter is still that reproduction isn't a part of marriage and same sex couples will have the right to marry.
3. "Equating a group who is 100% barren and defective is a whole different issue." Gay people have children and raise children, therefore your logic is severely flawed. You think people that have no chance of taking part in reproduction don't matter but those who can do matter? And your argument is reproduction?
You really should get your opinions sorted out, for that doesn't make sense.

Besides, reproduction isn't important anymore, it's actually a problem.

Keep on denying reality, you only show people how deluded you are with every boring and repetitive post.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Is Fa-Foxy a Catholic? (Mar '16) 1 min PedoQueer 502
News Alabama chief justice waits for judgment day on... 7 min barefoot2626 30
News 10 Reasons Why You Should Help Fight Biphobia i... 11 min WeTheSheeple 87
News Eastern Kentucky holds first Pride Festival 38 min antipolicticalcor... 123
News 'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15) 45 min antipolicticalcor... 18,588
News Alabama chief justice removed from bench for de... 51 min EdmondWA 14
News Anti-gay slur sparks protest on BC campus 1 hr david traversa 8
The gay cafe for GLBT, friends and family (Oct '09) 1 hr Pauli 68,998
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 6 hr TomInElPaso 40,519
More from around the web