So, What Is It That The Anti-Gay Grou...

So, What Is It That The Anti-Gay Groups Actually Fear?

There are 18008 comments on the lezgetreal.com story from Aug 17, 2012, titled So, What Is It That The Anti-Gay Groups Actually Fear?. In it, lezgetreal.com reports that:

What makes hate, well, hate? Given that today is something of a quiet news day, it may be nice to give ourselves a breather and think about some things.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at lezgetreal.com.

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#17196 Jan 3, 2013
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
you beg people to call you an idiot.
i didn't go to the ER.
and her condition was far more than eye pain you moeron.
i wonder how you would feel if you lost a portion of your vision.
you should know that often people who mock others, always end up receiving a taste of the same thing as a reminder that they could suffer just as easily as the next person does.
you really should stop and consider that what goes around always comes around.
mocking someones problems in life always comes back to bite you in the butt.
I know you're very much into biting, kissing, and barking at butts, but please leave your fetishes out of this forum.
You contradict yourself by saying you were never there, but then saying that Patty was there, for you are the same person.

And again, I assume you're complimenting me again, for you have no understanding of the English language and definitions. Otherwise you'd be saying you're always WRONG and not right.

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#17197 Jan 3, 2013
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
i know how it is spelled mary........
i spell it MOEron
deal with it.
No, you don't SPELL it "moeron," you MISspell it "moeron."

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#17198 Jan 3, 2013
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
you don't make any sense, but then so far no one on here from canada has made any sense.
I'm sorry, if I wanted my come back I would have wiped it off your dad's face.

That was a bit brutal, but I think you get the point; repeating the same thing over proves how stupid you are and how you don't make any sense.

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#17199 Jan 3, 2013
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
are you familar with the penalty of cyber stalking?
Let me guess, being sent to Uganda?
You don't even know the meaning of stalking, let alone the penalty for it.

Since: Jul 12

Daytona Beach, FL

#17200 Jan 3, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Never said they can't procreate, they just can't do it within their orientation, hence, a defect.
You neglect one critical item.
Three children are left separated from their mother and father. Immediately their social welfare outcome is dealt a severe blow. Hardly an act to celebrate.
Tell that to the MILLIONS of heterosexual couples who are divorced with children.

Is that a defect? If so, how can you discriminate against *just* the homosexuals?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#17201 Jan 3, 2013
Peace-Love-Happiness wrote:
<quoted text>
Tell that to the MILLIONS of heterosexual couples who are divorced with children.
Is that a defect? If so, how can you discriminate against *just* the homosexuals?
Where did I limit it to 'just' lying gays?

Why are you still ignoring the kids?

What kind of woman are you?

:-)

Since: Jul 12

Daytona Beach, FL

#17202 Jan 3, 2013
Lacez wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sorry, if I wanted my come back I would have wiped it off your dad's face.
That was a bit brutal, but I think you get the point; repeating the same thing over proves how stupid you are and how you don't make any sense.
Gross. Too far.

Since: Jul 12

Daytona Beach, FL

#17203 Jan 3, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Where did I limit it to 'just' lying gays?
Why are you still ignoring the kids?
What kind of woman are you?
:-)
Why do you automatically acuse all gays of being liars?

Those 3 kids have 3 dads and a mom. Just like kids of divorced heterosexuals, they have more than 2 parents and have the opportunity to split their time between 2 happy households versus 1 unhappy one. What's *your* opinion on divorced heterosexual families versus divorced non-heterosexual families?

A good one.

:-)

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#17204 Jan 3, 2013
Peace-Love-Happiness wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you automatically acuse all gays of being liars?
Those 3 kids have 3 dads and a mom. Just like kids of divorced heterosexuals, they have more than 2 parents and have the opportunity to split their time between 2 happy households versus 1 unhappy one. What's *your* opinion on divorced heterosexual families versus divorced non-heterosexual families?
A good one.
:-)
It's clear your opinion is ignorant and against nature.

Mine is based on the conclusion of every single legitimate study of children in broken homes.

What kind of person are you?

:-)

Since: Jul 12

Daytona Beach, FL

#17205 Jan 3, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
It's clear your opinion is ignorant and against nature.
Mine is based on the conclusion of every single legitimate study of children in broken homes.
What kind of person are you?
:-)
Funny...a hermaphrodite saying *I'm* against nature. Are hermaphrodites both the pot AND the kettle??

If you're against children in broken homes, offer a reasonable solution. While you're at it, please provide some of your "advanced perspective" on what gay people are supposed to do with their lives if they're not allowed the same rights as everyone else. They're still going to have relationships and will still have children. Denying them marriage will not change that. Nothing will change by allowing them marriage, except that they'll receive equal treatment under the law and their tax money will go to *their* benefits, not yours.

A good one.

:-)

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#17206 Jan 3, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
It's clear your opinion is ignorant and against nature.
Mine is based on the conclusion of every single legitimate study of children in broken homes.
What kind of person are you?
:-)
Watch out!
It's dodging questions again!

Since: Jul 12

Daytona Beach, FL

#17207 Jan 3, 2013
Lacez wrote:
<quoted text>
Watch out!
It's dodging questions again!
I noticed.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#17208 Jan 4, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
It's clear your opinion is ignorant and against nature.
Mine is based on the conclusion of every single legitimate study of children in broken homes.
What kind of person are you?
:-)
Peace-Love-Happiness wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny...a hermaphrodite saying *I'm* against nature. Are hermaphrodites both the pot AND the kettle??
If you're against children in broken homes, offer a reasonable solution. While you're at it, please provide some of your "advanced perspective" on what gay people are supposed to do with their lives if they're not allowed the same rights as everyone else. They're still going to have relationships and will still have children. Denying them marriage will not change that. Nothing will change by allowing them marriage, except that they'll receive equal treatment under the law and their tax money will go to *their* benefits, not yours.
A good one.
:-)
So you admit it is sick to brag about putting children in the worst possible setting according to the latest, largest and most scientific study to date of all family types including gays.

My wife and I worked to restore our ten foster kids back to their family, and we succeeded in every case. In other words, work for the child's best interests, something you as a human AND a female STILL don't get. The only right place for a child is with their mother and father. Any other place is a sad default.

Stop the victim gay twirl. Gays have every right others have. If you want special rights, quite trying to impose an imposter relationship on marriage and family, and get your own rights. Many states already have those in place.

:-)

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#17209 Jan 4, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
It's clear your opinion is ignorant and against nature.
Mine is based on the conclusion of every single legitimate study of children in broken homes.
What kind of person are you?
:-)
Lacez wrote:
<quoted text>
Watch out!
It's dodging questions again!
Honey, shut up and go clean or cook something, you are not qualified to understand, let alone engage this discussion.

Smirk.

Since: Jul 12

Daytona Beach, FL

#17210 Jan 4, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
It's clear your opinion is ignorant and against nature.
Mine is based on the conclusion of every single legitimate study of children in broken homes.
What kind of person are you?
:-)
<quoted text>
So you admit it is sick to brag about putting children in the worst possible setting according to the latest, largest and most scientific study to date of all family types including gays.
My wife and I worked to restore our ten foster kids back to their family, and we succeeded in every case. In other words, work for the child's best interests, something you as a human AND a female STILL don't get. The only right place for a child is with their mother and father. Any other place is a sad default.
Stop the victim gay twirl. Gays have every right others have. If you want special rights, quite trying to impose an imposter relationship on marriage and family, and get your own rights. Many states already have those in place.
:-)
My degree is in psychology and my husband works in stats, so I'm fully aware of how the results of studies can be "interpreted" to mean whatever the writer wants to convey. You seem to be either unaware of that fact or intentionally blind to it. Here's a thought...why don't you focus on fact that you can't control other people's relationship status, just like you can't control the kids who get multiple sets of parents, as a result.

Also, I've heard of PLENTY of situations that would be considered the "worst possible setting" for children and they were in heterosexual, married homes. It's not the structure of the family unit that makes the biggest difference, it's the strength of it.

Did all your foster children go back to their mother AND their father? If not, then according to your definition, you failed.

I'm not gay, Kmart. I've been married for 10 years and have a son.

Families should be able to make their own decisions, not be denied equality based on "doctored" statistics" and the ignorance of people like you.

Since: Jul 12

Daytona Beach, FL

#17211 Jan 4, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
It's clear your opinion is ignorant and against nature.
Mine is based on the conclusion of every single legitimate study of children in broken homes.
What kind of person are you?
:-)
<quoted text>
Honey, shut up and go clean or cook something, you are not qualified to understand, let alone engage this discussion.
Smirk.
Do you tell the lesbian inside you to do the same? Why don't you try to not be a pig, just for today?

“It's a bathroom”

Since: Jul 07

Get over it, already

#17212 Jan 4, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:

So you admit it is sick to brag about putting children in the worst possible setting according to the latest, largest and most scientific study to date of all family types including gays.
My wife and I once had sex.
If you want special rights, quite<SIC> trying to impose an imposter relationship on marriage and family, and get your own rights. Many states already have those in place.
:-)
WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN?
WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDRREN???

Your verbal ejaculations are merely the opinions of a man with a mangina, a third nipple, and a psychotic alter ego.

“It's a bathroom”

Since: Jul 07

Get over it, already

#17213 Jan 4, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>

What kind of person are you?
:-)
A person with one set of genitalia, two nipples and one personality.
Blair

Santa Clara, CA

#17214 Jan 4, 2013
What about the children?

**

Sex abuse lawsuit brought against Moose CEO

Updated: December 14, 2012 2:39AM

A South Carolina-based doctor announced Thursday allegations of childhood sexual abuse and a lawsuit against the head of Moose International.

In a civil suit filed Thursday, Jason Peck, now a 44-year-old physician in Fort Hill, S.C., alleges that William B. Airey sexually abused him as a child.

Airey is director general and CEO of the Loyal Order of the Moose and Moose International, which is headquartered on the Mooseheart campus on Route 31 north of North Aurora. The lawsuit does not make any allegations related to Mooseheart.

According to the suit, in 1980, when Peck was 12-years-old, Airey began “grooming” Peck and sexually abused him on two occasions when Peck was a minor living in Ohio. The suit alleges that on both occasions, the abuse happened when Airey took Peck to Moose-related functions.

“When he (Peck) was a child William Airey was his neighbor and befriended him in the Columbus (Ohio) suburbs,” said Konrad Kircher, attorney for Peck.“He would give him gifts, take him to the Moose Lodge in Whitehall (Ohio), and buy him alcoholic drinks, then sexually abuse him in the Columbus area.”

At the time of the alleged abuse, Airey was a Moose member and volunteer. He was hired by Moose International in 1983, and has served at the organization’s CEO since 2006, according to the suit.

Peck was never a student at Mooseheart, nor otherwise associated with the Moose organization.

On Thursday, members of Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, or SNAP, delivered a letter to Moose International headquarters, urging that Airey be suspended, and requesting a criminal investigation.

The suit and a press release from SNAP allege that Moose International has investigated Airey twice before, in 1996 and again in 2007, for child sexual abuse, but took no action.

“Our main concern is that the Moose suspend Mr. Airey while the investigation continues,” said SNAP member Kate Bochte, in a press conference held in the parking lot of the Aurora Moose Lodge Thursday afternoon.“Organizations should not be covering up for their leaders and should not do their own internal investigations. This is a criminal matter.”

Airey could not be reached for comment Thursday, but Moose International released a statement saying,“The Moose fraternity is shocked by this allegation.”

“This is not the Bill Airey we know,” the Moose International statement says.“Although the Moose organization is not a party to this lawsuit, consistent with Board policy Mr. Airey will not be in contact with residential students at Mooseheart until further notice.

“At this time Mr. Airey is out of the office, celebrating his 50th wedding anniversary with his wife. Upon his return, the Board will ascertain all facts relating to this situation, and determine what actions, if any, are necessary.”
Marengo Jon wrote:
<quoted text>
WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN?
WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDRREN???
Your verbal ejaculations are merely the opinions of a man with a mangina, a third nipple, and a psychotic alter ego.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#17217 Jan 4, 2013
Blair wrote:
What about the children?
Damn right, little boys should be protected from heterosexual men like this. Too bad freaks like you don't want to do a damn thing about them.

By the by, your article, one child, now 44 years old, alleging two incidents happening more than 20 years ago. Filing a lawsuit is not proof of guilt and there has been no one else to raise their hand to say he did this to me too, so it is nothing more than a yet unproven accusation. You may have heard of the concept of innocent until proved guilty and your standard of proof seems downright shaky here.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Microphone cut after Mormon girl reveals shea s... 3 min democrat destroyer 4
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 7 min Terra Firma 51,288
News A Monument to Gay and Transgender People Is Com... 9 min bja62 1
News What would Jesus say about same-sex marriage? (Jul '15) 18 min Frindly 6,854
Can a Man be Gay But Only Like Oral Sex? (Aug '13) 48 min Dynomite 18
News Gay bar opens near Macon Road, drawing visitors... 1 hr Dynomite 94
News In Turkey, no teaching of evolution, but bannin... 1 hr Rossum 2
The gay cafe for GLBT, friends and family (Oct '09) 2 hr Frankie Rizzo 69,545
News California AG bans state travel to Texas, 3 oth... 2 hr Frogface Kate 69
News 'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15) 6 hr Pres Donald J Tru... 26,388
More from around the web