So, What Is It That The Anti-Gay Grou...

So, What Is It That The Anti-Gay Groups Actually Fear?

There are 18008 comments on the lezgetreal.com story from Aug 17, 2012, titled So, What Is It That The Anti-Gay Groups Actually Fear?. In it, lezgetreal.com reports that:

What makes hate, well, hate? Given that today is something of a quiet news day, it may be nice to give ourselves a breather and think about some things.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at lezgetreal.com.

“It's a bathroom”

Since: Jul 07

Get over it, already

#14877 Dec 10, 2012
can't*

Kimare's third nipple, completely non-functional vagina and inner lesbian have no bearing on MY life, just like SSM has no bearing on zher's.

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#14878 Dec 10, 2012
Marengo Jon wrote:
can't*
Kimare's third nipple, completely non-functional vagina and inner lesbian have no bearing on MY life, just like SSM has no bearing on zher's.
But this is the average bigot's problem.
They DON'T care, they just want to feel superior to a minority.
It used to be black people, then women, and now homosexuals.
Mona Lott

West New York, NJ

#14879 Dec 10, 2012
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I have stated many times that I don't debate faith with faithless people. That applies even more so to disciples of Satan.
I simply and accurately stated what the Bible says. I did not attempt to prove any of it happened.
The absence of proof in archeology does not prove it did not happen. You still have been unable to explain how Exodus records a number of things, right?
Go back in your hole weeman.
Smirk.
<quoted text>
You are an idiot, and your post is historical evidence.
1. There is numerous historical evidences for things the Bible states. In fact, over time new finds have only validated the Bible. Here is an excellent site, read it and learn something;
http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/
2. You still have been unable to explain how a accurate description of radiation got into a 'fiction' book written thousands of years ago and misinterpreted over and over.
3. Here is one example of history the Bible notes, that you should be worried about;
Leviticus 18 lists three abominations; abortion, homosexuality and bestiality.
It then concludes with these words;
Leviticus 18:27-30 (NJB)
27 For all these hateful things were done by the people who lived in the country before you, and the country became unclean.
28 If you make it unclean, will it not vomit you out as it vomited out the nations there before you?
29 Yes, anyone who does any of these hateful things, whatever it may be, any person doing so, will be outlawed from his people;
30 so keep my rules and do not observe any of the hateful laws which were in force before you came; then you will not be made unclean by them. I am Yahweh your God.”
Note the words; "do not observe any of the hateful laws which were in force before you came"
In other words, when a culture LEGALLY excuses these behaviors, it signals the end of said culture. Greece would be a more recent example, and even the Roman empire.
ps; You care because you responded.
Bazinga!
1. There are numerous historical evidences for things stated in GONE WITH THE WIND. That does not mean Scarlett O'Hara was a real person.

Do YOU follow all the commands in Leviticus? No, of course you don't. So why don't you save god the time and kill yourself for working on the sabbath?
ronone

Masontown, PA

#14880 Dec 10, 2012
youtube.com/watch... … I doubt that they fear nothing? I feel they call same sex wrong..
I find fearing and feeling wrong are to different emotions.
Myself Same Sex Marriage should be legalized and
its been slowly legalizing antway nothing to stop it.
The Lone Gunmen

United States

#14881 Dec 10, 2012
Obama's next Goal

Gay Activists Demand Canada Lower Age of Consent for Anal Sex



TORONTO,Homosexual activists have long sought to distance themselves from pedophiles, however Canada’s most prominent homosexual activist group has now demanded the lowering the age of consent for anal sex to 14 from 16.

Reacting to the Conservative Government’s plan to raise the age of consent for Anal sex from 16 to 18, EGALE (Equality for Gays and Lesbians Everywhere) has commenced a campaign to have the age of consent for anal sex lowered to 14 from 16. Laurie Arron, the director of advocacy for EGALE remarked to the Ottawa Citizen,“There’s no reason to treat anal sex differently than other sexual acts except to stigmatize gay and bisexual men.”

However, that statement is categorically false, speaking strictly from a medical standpoint. Even those who support homosexual sex acts warn nonetheless that anal sex is a dangerous activity, regardless of genders involved. The sex info site of the University of California at Santa Barbara, which can in no way be described as opposed to homosexual activity, nonetheless points out that anal sex is a dangerous practice.

Experts on sexual behavior, or “sexperts” at the site refers to them, warn that anal sex is the most dangerous behavior for transmission of HIV/AIDS and all other STDs since the anus is not designed for sexual activity as is the vagina. Moreover, the ‘sexperts’ warn that the practice also leads to fecal incontinence - loss of normal control of the sphincter muscles which leads to stool leaking from the rectum at unexpected times.

As the website puts it:“Even when people use lots of lubrication during anal sex, there can be tearing of the tissue inside the anus ... For this reason, anal sex is the riskiest form of sexual activity when it comes to the transmission of HIV/AIDS.

“Tiny tears in the anal tissue are like giant superhighways for the HIV viruses, allowing them to get inside the body and enter the blood system. Anal tears provide an opening for all the other STDs as well.

“It may be possible for repetitive anal sex to lead to weakening of the anal sphincter, which is the muscle that tightens after we defecate. Once weakened, feces can escape the anus against our will.

In response to the editorial, Jessica White West Vancouver, B.C. wrote a letter to the editor of the National Post. The published letter stated,“If both vaginal and anal intercourse were in accordance with natural law and did not discriminate in terms of consequences, this would be true. However, this is not the case with homosexual sex, as two people of the same sex do not have the required body parts to interact sexually and their intercourse can never be fruitful.”

White continued,“Furthermore, their sexual practices result in both physical and emotional damage, as is evidenced in numerous studies. More than 80% of AIDS cases in Canada are among homosexual or bisexual males; other diseases suffered either exclusively, or in larger percentages by the homosexual population, include: anal cancer, chlamydia trachomatis, cryptosporidium, giardia lamblia, herpes simplex virus, HPV, gonorrhea, viral hepatitis B and C, and syphilis.”
The Lone Gunmen

United States

#14882 Dec 10, 2012
Bigot? Cool Hand Luke Wrote:

``

Isn't the definition of "Homophobia" An irrational fear of homosexuals?

Lets see as of August 2012 homosexuals are responsible for 63% of all the Aids cases in the U.S.
.

For more information visit the CDC website here.
http://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/HIVIncide...

2.During the same period syphilis in homosexuals is up 134%

“Citizens need to be given the information as to options about sexuality,” Goldberg continued.“Equal access to ‘ex-gay’ information is essential.”
http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats10/trends.htm

.

3. Increased incidence of infectious diseases
- gonorrhea- chlamydia - pubic lice- hepatitis A - hepatitis B
- hepatitis C - anal papilloma
Gays are still Banned From Donating Blood
http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Blo...

4. The highest rate of anal cancer and shigellosis from eating feces.
http://publichealth.lacounty.gov/acd/docs/Shi...

5.The Epidemic of Parasites in Gay Men

The incidence of gastrointestinal parasites rose exponentially in gay men during the two decades The transmission of parasites was associated with sexual activity that exposed partners to feces, particularly oral-anal sex or "rimming." By 2010, the prevalence of parasites was 60% or greater for homosexual men attending STD clinics or private practice.

.

6.Homosexuals make up less than 4% of the population .

"The rate of homosexual versus heterosexual child sexual abuse is staggering,"Homosexuals make up less than 2% of the population .

"Abel’s data of 150.2 boys abused per male homosexual offender finds no equal (yet) in heterosexual violations of 19.8 girls."
Authorities say evidence examined disproves the assertion that child molestation is more prevalent among heterosexuals.
http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/crimestats
Lacez wrote:
<quoted text>
But this is the average bigot's problem.
They DON'T care, they just want to feel superior to a minority.
It used to be black people, then women, and now homosexuals.

“It's a bathroom”

Since: Jul 07

Get over it, already

#14884 Dec 10, 2012
Oh look, the Loner Gunman appears after Kimare takes a whooping. How entirely predictable.

“O'si yo!”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#14885 Dec 10, 2012
Peace-Love-Happiness wrote:
<quoted text>
Reproduction is not a requirement of marriage. Marriage is a union of a couple, it does not even require sex at all.
Your description of gay sex is strictly your opinion. It's a good thing our government doesn't make laws based on opinions about sex. I have a strong suspicion that many people would have opinions on your unusual sexual situation.
you did it again. you told someone who gave you a biblical truth that it was THEIR opinion.
Marriage is a union yes, but people get married to establish a FAMILY. and the furthering of mankind DEPENDS upon that family unit to procreate.

thats why God created them MALE and FEMALE in the begining.

because a minority of couples can't have children for one reason or another is not a pattern of the norm that the majority go by.

same sex is abnormal on every level.
nothing about it is right.
and loving someone has nothing to do with engaging in same sex activity.
friends love one another but that doesn't mean they have sex with them.

“O'si yo!”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#14886 Dec 10, 2012
Samatha wrote:
Gays are the primary reason Muslims hate America and Israel.
and why God is turning His back on America to.

the hedge of His protection is being removed.
911 was the first red flag of warning.
if we continue to grow more and more immoral, He won't protect and bless us as He once did.

“O'si yo!”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#14887 Dec 10, 2012
Peace-Love-Happiness wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't know anything about the situation you're referring to but I do know that the government does not allow grandparents to take custody of their grandchildren unless the parents are truly unfit. How would that make a grandmother a bad person?
how you ask? because a grandmother doesn't write off her own flesh and blood and disown them after taking away her children, and let that daughter live in squaller, KNOWING she has to beg people for food and barely gets by.
while the grandmother blows money left and right and the daughter lives in poverity.
and FYI, the daughter that was disowned has a good heart, she is a bit slow, but that is only because she didn't get the kind of help she needed as a child.
the government is like anything else..........money talks.

“O'si yo!”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#14888 Dec 10, 2012
Mona Lott wrote:
<quoted text>
Pervert it? I can read Hebrew, can you? Isn't a translation "perverting" the original scroll? Besides, it says what it says.
I don't have to be fluent in Hebrew.
thats what SCRIBES are for.

tell me what does it say?

i know there are gays that delight in trying to 'gay-up' the book of ruth.
when in reality it is a story of friendship between an OLD woman Naomi who had 2 sons. one was married to Ruth.
and Naomi introduced Ruth to a wealthy man name Boaz who married ruth.

it was a friendship between the mother -in- law and daughter -in -law.

and if you think you can gay that up, your sick.

“O'si yo!”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#14889 Dec 10, 2012
Peace-Love-Happiness wrote:
<quoted text>
No, MOERON, the SPANISH Inquisition. You know...where they traveled across many lands and killed anyone who did not submit to their version of Christianity?
AH 'SPANISH'.

i thought maybe you were gonna go off on the witch inquisitions in Salem. you know IN AMERICA.

“O'si yo!”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#14890 Dec 10, 2012
Peace-Love-Happiness wrote:
<quoted text>
Not really, but it's an interesting side effect.
yeah, and drugs have a side effect to.

“O'si yo!”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#14892 Dec 10, 2012
Peace-Love-Happiness wrote:
<quoted text>
No, MOERON, the SPANISH Inquisition. You know...where they traveled across many lands and killed anyone who did not submit to their version of Christianity?
i bet Muslims scare the beegeebies out of you to.
cause Islam teaches in its quran to convert infidels or kill them.
no excepts.

“O'si yo!”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#14893 Dec 10, 2012
Peace-Love-Happiness wrote:
<quoted text>
How can I know who you are if you don't present any ID? I never asked for you to offer any written proof of who you are because I know what Patty looks like. All you have to do is show up and not be her and I can confirm that fact. Then, you'll be proven right about you not being her. Vindication, right?? I'm the only person on this forum who can put the whole Pattiecake-UIF confusion to rest. Here's your chance to say, "Help me, PLH, you're my only hope!"
Think about it...if *I* met with you, would you be able to identify me or anything personal about me simply by meeting in a public place and *looking* at me? No. You'd see that I'm a caucasian female in my 30's, with brown hair. That's all. I wouldn't be able to obtain any other information about you other than the fact that you're not Patty (if that's the case).
If you *still* think you have something to worry about by meeting me in a public place, I'd say that you'd be worried about revealing that you ARE Patty.
you could EASILY take a pic of me on your phone.
you could EASILY copy my car tags
you could EASILY ask someone near by, hey who is she?

sorry but like i told you before i will NOT risk my ID on topix.
no way, no how, no time.

does pattiecake know you?
i could bring her along for insurance to ID you.
and if you tried to publisize my id, she could publisize yours.

thats the only way i would even consider it.

“O'si yo!”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#14894 Dec 10, 2012
Peace-Love-Happiness wrote:
<quoted text>
I have more to be worried about by meeting her than she does. She's already threatened to sue me if she finds out who I am.
The only thing keeping her from meeting me is the fact that she's actually Patty.
thats not true.

first of all, no one else on here needs to meet in person to clarify who they are.
or prove anything.

and you will excuse me if i have ZERO trust in you.
after all that i have witnessed on here.

did it ever occur to you that i do not want anyone to know who i am on a public website...and if you had any sense NOR WOULD YOU.
i don't think you are wanting to prove i and pattiecake are the same or not the same person, no, i think you just want to know who i am so you can 'use it' to your advantage with your sources you get on here and brag about.

if you knew me, then you could easily have someone near by watching and they could tell you how i am related to her.
and blow my cover sky high.

so, no........ i am not interested in being a pawn in your scam.

and if i were you, i don't think you should place yourself in such a vunerable position either.

“O'si yo!”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#14895 Dec 10, 2012
boooots wrote:
<quoted text>
OK, UIF, how long are you going to drag this out before someone takes some really serious action to get you canned from this site, charged with persecution of a group protected under your law, and maybe even jailed?
SHUT UP.

i am not pattiecake, and i am not going to put up with your threats.

you can't threaten me and run me off because you don't like what i say.

you have 3 choices
1. respond in a mature NON threatening manner
2. Ignor my post
3. get the heck off topix all together.

thats your ONLY choices.
pick one.

“O'si yo!”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#14897 Dec 10, 2012
boooots wrote:
<quoted text>
Since it would be in hers and Patty's best interest to clear up this misunderstanding, it pretty well proves the theory that she is Patty. Why else would UIF not want to help Patty prove that she and Patty are not the same person?
I would accept UIF's refusal to meet you as a confession that she is Patty, and that is how I will think of it from this point. However, I will hold to my contract with her about how I post to her (maybe I should re-read that first) before I again actually call her Patty to her face (or her screen, in this case).
I don't have to prove a dippidy thing to you.
nor does pattiecake or any other poster on here.

it would be in YOUR best interest to stop sticking your nose in peoples personal matters.

NO ONE owes you anything boots.
you don't own, oversee, or pay for topix
you pay no ones bills or taxes but your own.
so no one OWES you anything on here.

do you undestand that?

Religionthebigli e

“saved From jesus”

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#14898 Dec 10, 2012
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
i bet Muslims scare the beegeebies out of you to.
cause Islam teaches in its quran to convert infidels or kill them.
no excepts.
The christian religion has a long history of doing the same thing.

Who do you think spread the filth in Uganda that calls for death and imprisonment? How about in parts of Africa where they are killing kids in the name of superstition? Any place your cult takes a foothold, death and destruction follow.

You follow the same deity.

“O'si yo!”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#14899 Dec 10, 2012
boooots wrote:
<quoted text>
I guess one other thing you might be concerned about, since you said that your husband has family in the area, is that Patty might become a thorn in their side unnecessarily too, if she identified you. I know nothing about the family situation so that may or may not be a concern. It doesn't seem Patty or UIF have many allies in RS anyway, if she is anything like she presents herself here.
thats the first sensible post you have posted boots.

after all that was said about pattiecake on here by PLH.
it would not be in her best interest to scratch that itch any further. I don't blame pattiecake either, someone trash me like that i wouldn't take to kindly to it either.
and yes i have many 'allies' in RC.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News LGBT kids should be very nervous about Betsy De... 14 min Core Feminist No ... 1
News Doritos makes rainbow chips in support of gay r... (Sep '15) 46 min guest 496
News 'Gay cake' appeal decided 2 hr Bubba Cooder 26
Gay oovoo (Dec '12) 2 hr Ryan Blue eyed boy 25
The gay cafe for GLBT, friends and family (Oct '09) 3 hr Frankie Rizzo 69,504
News Thousands of people march during rally at Bosto... 3 hr TRUMP WINNERS 1,857
News Walmart agrees to $7.5 million settlement in di... 5 hr Rainbow Kid 1
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 7 hr Respect71 42,770
News 'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15) 8 hr lides 22,323
More from around the web