So, What Is It That The Anti-Gay Grou...

So, What Is It That The Anti-Gay Groups Actually Fear?

There are 18009 comments on the lezgetreal.com story from Aug 17, 2012, titled So, What Is It That The Anti-Gay Groups Actually Fear?. In it, lezgetreal.com reports that:

What makes hate, well, hate? Given that today is something of a quiet news day, it may be nice to give ourselves a breather and think about some things.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at lezgetreal.com.

Dan C

Sacramento, CA

#14330 Dec 4, 2012
ROCCO wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you make loans perchance?
Anything $2.00 an under.

And you better hurry on that offer given I'm getting hungry and a Taco Bell burrito sounds good right now.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#14331 Dec 4, 2012
KiMare wrote:
Which is exactly my point.
Anyone who contributes such a small part of marriage has no authority to define marriage. That has already been accomplished in numerous ways.
This is why marriage has always been diverse couples in every single culture across history. Government has not even been a part in many of those places, and still is not in some.
Like I said, if you want the legal aspects, get a gay union and rights that are specific to a duplicate couple.
:-)
Peace-Love-Happiness wrote:
<quoted text>
And you have the authority to define marriage? Are you that narcissistic? Wait...I just remembered who I'm talking to. Of course, you are.
A civil union does not provide all the rights and benefits that a legal marriage does. If you insist on refusing marriage to gays, work toward equating the rights and benefits of civil unions to those of marriage. But then, they'd both be marriage, just with different names. Then, we're back, full-circle, to fighting for marriage again.
1. I didn't define marriage. I simply gave the historical essence of it. You have no counter to address it.

2. You also had no answer for government's historically limited role or even absence regarding marriage.

3. To have equal rights you have to have equal identity. Gay unions don't, therefore their rights will never be the same as marriage.

:-)

“It's a bathroom”

Since: Jul 07

Get over it, already

#14332 Dec 4, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You prove my points.
Kimare's standard answer when zhe doesn't really have an answer, or a comeback.

“It's a bathroom”

Since: Jul 07

Get over it, already

#14333 Dec 4, 2012
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:

3. To have equal rights you have to have equal identity. Gay unions don't, therefore their rights will never be the same as marriage.
:-)
And yet, we're about to have marriage equality. You know why? Our equal identity is the same as yours; two consenting adults.

It really is that simple; don't over-think it.

Muntzinga, Mangina Man

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#14334 Dec 4, 2012
KiMare wrote:
3. To have equal rights you have to have equal identity. Gay unions don't, therefore their rights will never be the same as marriage.
Your constitution says otherwise.
It's nice that you're a decrepit old man who believes you're better than everyone else, but don't expect others to believe your own denial.

Since: Jul 12

Daytona Beach, FL

#14335 Dec 4, 2012
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
Which is exactly my point.
Anyone who contributes such a small part of marriage has no authority to define marriage. That has already been accomplished in numerous ways.
This is why marriage has always been diverse couples in every single culture across history. Government has not even been a part in many of those places, and still is not in some.
Like I said, if you want the legal aspects, get a gay union and rights that are specific to a duplicate couple.
:-)
<quoted text>
1. I didn't define marriage. I simply gave the historical essence of it. You have no counter to address it.
2. You also had no answer for government's historically limited role or even absence regarding marriage.
3. To have equal rights you have to have equal identity. Gay unions don't, therefore their rights will never be the same as marriage.
:-)
1. Life is like a story. History is just the first part of the story. Not every chapter is the same.

2. What was your point about government's historically limited role? That is irrelevant because the government CURRENTLY controls who gets that little piece of paper and, ultimately, who gets the rights and benefits that go with it.

3. Equal identity? Are you talking about clones? We're all human....how's that for equal?

“It's a bathroom”

Since: Jul 07

Get over it, already

#14336 Dec 4, 2012
3-1, slam dunk, Kimare loses.

Game over.

Since: Jul 12

Daytona Beach, FL

#14337 Dec 4, 2012
Marengo Jon wrote:
3-1, slam dunk, Kimare loses.
Game over.
I'm not sure if he really believes that his drivel contains actual, valid points or if he's a true troll and does this all purely for shock value.
Dan C

Sacramento, CA

#14338 Dec 4, 2012
Marengo Jon wrote:
3-1, slam dunk, Kimare loses.
Game over.
That "KiMare" hag lost a long taime ago but keeps showing up on the playing field like an unwanted streaker barging into a game whose only joy in life comes from disruption.

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#14339 Dec 4, 2012
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
you have fallen prey to the lies of the agenda if you believe that.
the entire homosexual senerio, effects EVERY facet of society.
from schools/children/churches/laws that restrict believers in God and bible from openly expressing opposition without penalty.
if you think legalizing marriage of the same sex won't effect all people in one way or the other YOU ARE NAIVE.
certainly, equal contractual rights, and equality before the state and culture, are the hallmarks of a moral society, and that would indeed be a big change for the christian culture.

equality is the minimum position for a democratic society.

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#14340 Dec 4, 2012
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
you are backward in your thinking.
nations that 'go gay' as they say, never last.
Rome fell due to ungodly practices.
look at Europe today, talk about making the news all the time in their slow demise of finances and muslim take over....slow but sure.
America has always been great and prosperous because of our faith in God.
God protects the nation that does not turn its back on Him.
if we do, then you will see America (like other nations) go down that slippery slide to demise.
thats a fact proven time and time again through out history.
christianity, a failed moral system

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#14341 Dec 4, 2012
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
I disagree.
gays try to insert they are born that way.
BUT
science says, no gene to define it.
PLUS up until the 70s it was diagnosed by physicritrists as a mental illness.
some Dr's still adhere to that diagnoses.
and the fact many have left that lifestyle and made changes in the other direction is proof enough that it is not 'fixed in stone' as they say.
the fact people can, have and do change their sexual activities is proof enough that it is not how one is born.
all mammals display homosexuality, it is completely natural.

what is not natural is religiosity, that failure is entirely human.

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#14342 Dec 4, 2012
Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
Really.
Do you 'know God'?
You believe you know of Him and His presence but you don't speak for Him you blasphemous asshat.
patty is courtesan to jesus

every night

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#14343 Dec 5, 2012
Lacez wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank you for that bit of insight.
I do agree with you on transgendered people.
I have trouble understanding what it's like to be them and I have trouble understanding how one would be like that.
Though I don't understand, I recognize that these people exist and as people, they should be treated just like everyone else. They should receive the same respect everyone else does.
My philosophy:
If it isn't harming anyone and those involved are at the age of consent, then we should let them be.
You are still so confused...

Transgendered are the simplest to understand. No rocket science needed.

One gender in their brain, another in their body. The gender/body wire got switched.

Even they acknowledge that. A genetic defect that they often try to fix.

Which brings us to GLB's. Why do you refuse to accept lessor mess-ups occurred?

In the spectrum of masculinity to femininity, GLBT's fall smack dab in the middle cross-over point, representing about 4%.

Which brings us to your last point, "if it isn't harming anyone."

Anal sex is inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning. I have posted medical proof of this over and over. You have posted proof of nothing.

Moreover, for someone to deliberately harm someone is criminal. For someone to allow themselves to be harmed is sick.

It is mind-boggling you would attempt to defend such idiocy.

:-)

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#14344 Dec 5, 2012
KiMare wrote:
Which is exactly my point.
Anyone who contributes such a small part of marriage has no authority to define marriage. That has already been accomplished in numerous ways.
This is why marriage has always been diverse couples in every single culture across history. Government has not even been a part in many of those places, and still is not in some.
Like I said, if you want the legal aspects, get a gay union and rights that are specific to a duplicate couple.
:-)


1. I didn't define marriage. I simply gave the historical essence of it. You have no counter to address it.

2. You also had no answer for government's historically limited role or even absence regarding marriage.

3. To have equal rights you have to have equal identity. Gay unions don't, therefore their rights will never be the same as marriage.
Marengo Jon wrote:
<quoted text>
Kimare's standard answer when zhe doesn't really have an answer, or a comeback.
Seems like your cut and paste gay twirl left out what you claim.

Makes you a liar. Pure and simple. Are you proud of that?

Why does a legitimate cause need to make ad homoan attacks? None of you girls ever answer that.

Hmmmm.

Smirk.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#14345 Dec 5, 2012
KiMare wrote:

3. To have equal rights you have to have equal identity. Gay unions don't, therefore their rights will never be the same as marriage.
:-)
Marengo Jon wrote:
<quoted text>
And yet, we're about to have marriage equality. You know why? Our equal identity is the same as yours; two consenting adults.
It really is that simple; don't over-think it.
Muntzinga, Mangina Man
More selective cut and paste.

Why are you always so afraid to respond to the whole statement? Devious? Not smart enough? Chicken sh/t?

"consenting adults"? Really.

You mean like two soldiers? Co-workers? All kinds of examples of 'consenting adults' who have no desire to be married.

Marriage is not 'just that simple'. Your inability to think does not require me not to think. It just identifies you as a idiot.

Smirk.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#14346 Dec 5, 2012
KiMare wrote:
3. To have equal rights you have to have equal identity. Gay unions don't, therefore their rights will never be the same as marriage.
Lacez wrote:
<quoted text>
Your constitution says otherwise.
It's nice that you're a decrepit old man who believes you're better than everyone else, but don't expect others to believe your own denial.
Hardly.

I've posted numerous SCOTUS rulings that distinguish marriage and children as 'the foundation of society'.

Moreover, you fail to even comprehend the point. You have to dumb down marriage to a 'contract between two people'. That makes every adult in existence in numerous polygamous relationships!

I am an old man, but I never claimed to be smarter than anyone else, that is your experience of me.

The fact is, I'm marginally educated, but with a firm grip on common sense and reality. It is scary how easy that makes your issue look utterly idiotic.

:-)

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#14347 Dec 5, 2012
KiMare wrote:
Transgendered are the simplest to understand. No rocket science needed.
One gender in their brain, another in their body. The gender/body wire got switched.
As oppose to KiMare, No gender, no brain; the gender body wire got flushed.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#14348 Dec 5, 2012
KiMare wrote:
Which is exactly my point.
Anyone who contributes such a small part of marriage has no authority to define marriage. That has already been accomplished in numerous ways.
This is why marriage has always been diverse couples in every single culture across history. Government has not even been a part in many of those places, and still is not in some.
Like I said, if you want the legal aspects, get a gay union and rights that are specific to a duplicate couple.
:-)
<quoted text>
1. I didn't define marriage. I simply gave the historical essence of it. You have no counter to address it.
2. You also had no answer for government's historically limited role or even absence regarding marriage.
3. To have equal rights you have to have equal identity. Gay unions don't, therefore their rights will never be the same as marriage.
:-)
Peace-Love-Happiness wrote:
<quoted text>
1. Life is like a story. History is just the first part of the story. Not every chapter is the same.
2. What was your point about government's historically limited role? That is irrelevant because the government CURRENTLY controls who gets that little piece of paper and, ultimately, who gets the rights and benefits that go with it.
3. Equal identity? Are you talking about clones? We're all human....how's that for equal?
1. Blonde. The facts that history records do not change.
2. More blonde. The government has many times claimed a reach it does not have nor should have. This is one.
3. Incredibly blonde. So any human, of any age should be able to marry?

You are so blonde it hurts my eyes!

Smile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#14349 Dec 5, 2012
Marengo Jon wrote:
3-1, slam dunk, Kimare loses.
Game over.
Judging from a proven idiot liar?

Really.

Bazinga!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Feds' transgender guidance provokes fierce back... 1 min Quirky 921
News Maroon 5 scrap North Carolina shows 2 min NE Jade 20
News Anti-Gay Jehovah's Witness Cartoon Tells Kids T... 6 min little lamb 2,026
News UN committee denies credentials to press freedo... 13 min Belles Echoes 1
Maybe god is gay! (Dec '09) 36 min June VanDerMark 10,304
News Gates leaves Boy Scouts presidency, defends gay... 37 min Rainbow Angels 2
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 1 hr Respect71 36,196
News 'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15) 1 hr Big C 11,810
More from around the web