So, What Is It That The Anti-Gay Grou...

So, What Is It That The Anti-Gay Groups Actually Fear?

There are 18008 comments on the lezgetreal.com story from Aug 17, 2012, titled So, What Is It That The Anti-Gay Groups Actually Fear?. In it, lezgetreal.com reports that:

What makes hate, well, hate? Given that today is something of a quiet news day, it may be nice to give ourselves a breather and think about some things.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at lezgetreal.com.

“What came 1st? Stupid or bigot”

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#11935 Nov 19, 2012
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
your posts begin with a fakey pretence of playing doctor,
then it trails off into a sleezy pornagraphic smutfest.
the fact you are still hammering away at a poster who IS gone, shows your inability to OVERCOME anything.
And your inability to stop defending Patty, answering posts directed to Patty, addressed to Patty, and your inability to let PATTY'S issues rest... Proves that you are...
in fact..

PATTY!

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#11936 Nov 19, 2012
RatherBeInMissouri wrote:
Just Think wrote:
<quoted text>
I can't wait to hear how one has sex back to back...oh, Pattie, you've been doing it wrong all these years...
and you call yourself a good atheist.
go watch ANY animal mate.
they are not face to face.
<quoted text>
So that's how you get your jollies now?
I assure you, they don't do it back to back either..
And I'm pretty sure that would impossible for humans.
LMAO
There is one way.

“What came 1st? Stupid or bigot”

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#11937 Nov 19, 2012
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
apparently you are not all that familar with it.
you are a deceptive and deceitful person
where is the public records of her ex's name
her past places she lived
who she ever dated
her pastors name
her tombstone, etc etc etc....... all those things were not given BY HER on here, and they came thru GOSSIPS who obtained such information without her giving it......
how STUPID can you be? i mean honestly how retarded are you?
to think you have a right to violate anyones life and post such things JUST BECAUSE YOU CAN.....your sick, your stupid, your dangerous, your vindictive, your a CYBERSTALKER.
if someone placed a gernade in your hand would you pull the pin and blow something up, JUST BECAUSE YOU COULD?
yes i am certain you would.
you will never understand it, no matter how many times it is explained to you.....why? becaues you don't know the difference between right and wrong, nor do you care.
you think you have a right to do anything you want to do and to heck with the consequences or who it might hurt along the way.
you are a very BAD person.
and until you grow some brain cells and use them to figure out that posting private info about ANYone on the internet is wrong, you will continue to be a bad person.
In case you forgot Patty,*I* have no posted or searched for ANY of your personal info.
As I understand it, it was you that posted it all to begin with. And I listed in my previous post, all the ways you can find out those things about anyone in country. It's PUBLIC RECORD. Look it up yourself.

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#11938 Nov 19, 2012
Peace-Love-Happiness wrote:
<quoted text>
A fundie is someone who respects their Bible more than anyone else's Constitutional rights.
A normal Christian can respect both at the same time.
:)
That's a short summary, but essentially, yeah.
Complete disregard for anyone else's freedom.

“What came 1st? Stupid or bigot”

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#11939 Nov 19, 2012
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
its not a sin to be a duck ..... but it is a sin to be a homosexual.
Just because you made that up and continue to beleive it, doesn't make it true. ;)

Where does it say, It is a SIN TO BE A HOMO??

Those words are never used.
The Bible doesn't say ANYTHING about homosexuality.
It never uses the word sin in context with anything that might even be misunderstood to be about homosexuality.

And even the verses you will INEVITABLY post only ELUDE to a single act between 2 men, not the STATE or being homosexual or sexual orientation AT ALL.

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#11940 Nov 19, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
That's funny. You have no problem with abusing each other willingly. You aren't disgusted that someone (you) mistake a sewer system for a playground.
But you do have a problem when someone says the sex drive is far more powerful than any motive but food. And that's a close call!
The denial it takes for you to try to legitimize a genetic defect is astounding.
I take it as a compliment that my simple common sense and reality disgusts you.
Smirk.
Please, I shall ask this for the millionth time.
Give us a source, credible and professional, in which someone claims that being gay is a genetic defect.
If you can't provide that source, your claims will continue to simply be your uneducated belief.

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#11941 Nov 19, 2012
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
"Rape is a type of sexual assault usually involving sexual intercourse..."
Smirking look of pity.
<quoted text>
Not my world, honey, the real world. That was a quote from a dictionary.
Don't you think you've slept with enough people?
Smirk.
Define assault.
I want to see you copy/paste a direct contradiction to what you are saying assault is.

“What came 1st? Stupid or bigot”

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#11942 Nov 19, 2012
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
NO you do NOT have God's approval.
You are certainly not qualified to put those words in His mouth. I told you time and time again, God and I are GOOD. I have HIS approval. It doesn't matter if you beleive it, beleive me, or belive HIM, or whether or not you EVER chose to see orientation for what it is. YOUR OPINION means NOTHING.
United in faith wrote:
<YOU SHOW ME in HIS word where He blesses a SS union.
It's not necessary, Patty. Exclusion of something in a book does not invalidate its existance.
United in faith wrote:
<in the meantime i will show you where He calls it vile, shameful, error, unnatural and an abomination.
Not yourself out, Patty. I know what you will "show" me and it's the same vague crap about sexual immorality that never addresses homosexuality that you ALWAYS use.
United in faith wrote:
<The scriptures are crystal clear on what God says about it.
yes you have a right to be gay and do anything you want to do.
thats your free will choice.
but with every choice comes consequences.
and i PROMISE YOU......GARENTEE YOU......ASSURE YOU.....God is not blessing what it clearly condemns as wrong.
It's not a choice, Patty.
If it was, you would be able to tell me when and how you chose your orientation, along with what was so tempting about homosexuality and how you overcame it.

“What came 1st? Stupid or bigot”

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#11943 Nov 19, 2012
RatherBeInMissouri wrote:
<quoted text>
BTW, Patty, master of avoidance and denial, answer this:
So just what is so tempting about homosexuality?? I'd really like to know. And if it's SOOOO tempting, how on Earth do so many people CHOOSE heterosexual exclusivity over the "wonderful world of GAY?" LMAO
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
why do so many people overeat?
why is alcohal and drugs SOOOOOOOOOO tempting to some
why is smoking so tempting to some?
why is permiscuious sexual behavior so attempting to some?
addictions are birthed from temptations.
and they come in all forms, and packages.
it boils down to CHOOSING right over wrong.
Unless you're saying that lesbians taste good, make you feel high, and make your body feel good.... and it's wrong to like anything that makes you feel good or tastes good....

Then you didn't answer the question. Care to try again?

So just what is so tempting about homosexuality?? I'd really like to know. And if it's SOOOO tempting, how on Earth do so many people CHOOSE heterosexual exclusivity over the "wonderful world of GAY?" LMAO

“What came 1st? Stupid or bigot”

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#11944 Nov 19, 2012
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
I know the difference between right and wrong.
which you apparently never have.
Sadly, i could probably teach you a few things about right and wrong. I shouldn't have to do that for a "Christian" woman... which you're not, BTW.
Passing Through

Chicago, IL

#11945 Nov 19, 2012
Peace-Love-Happiness wrote:
<quoted text>
You must have missed where she claimed that there's such a thing as "internet etiquette" where, if you put information online, no one else will do anything with that info.
I must have lost my "internet manual" back in the 90's because I always assumed, like in real life, it's my responsibility to keep my private information, private. lol
I did miss that post of hers. How like her to demand that everyone else needs to protect her from herself.
Passing Through

Chicago, IL

#11946 Nov 19, 2012
Religionthebiglie wrote:
<quoted text>
I've Googled myself, and others who share my name. Does that make me a stalker?
By Patricia's definition, yes.

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#11947 Nov 19, 2012
RatherBeInMissouri wrote:
RatherBeInMissouri wrote:
<quoted text>
BTW, Patty, master of avoidance and denial, answer this:
So just what is so tempting about homosexuality?? I'd really like to know. And if it's SOOOO tempting, how on Earth do so many people CHOOSE heterosexual exclusivity over the "wonderful world of GAY?" LMAO
<quoted text>
Unless you're saying that lesbians taste good, make you feel high, and make your body feel good.... and it's wrong to like anything that makes you feel good or tastes good....
Then you didn't answer the question. Care to try again?
So just what is so tempting about homosexuality?? I'd really like to know. And if it's SOOOO tempting, how on Earth do so many people CHOOSE heterosexual exclusivity over the "wonderful world of GAY?" LMAO
You know what's PROVEN to be a choice?

Religion.

“What came 1st? Stupid or bigot”

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#11948 Nov 19, 2012
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
you are making a jack--- of yourself.
the word pedophile didn't exist either but God would condemn anyone who had sex with a child.
But you just used scripture with the word homosexual to PROVE to me that it's in there... And I proved you a liar reading a very biased EDITED VERSION of the original book.
Let's not forget that women used to be married off at an age we would now consider to be a child... so your definition of child is in question when speaking of biblical times.
United in faith wrote:
<the word donut, walmart or chevy didn't exist either.
so stop making stupid excuses.
But you're not claiming to see those words where they are not, like you're doing with homosexuality. Irrelevant.
United in faith wrote:
<God didn't have to use the word homosexual you imp
HE got His point across when He detailed it for you in Lev
you shall not lie with a male as you would like with a woman, it IS an abomination.
1. Have no fear, I will NEVER attempt to lie with a man as i lie with a woman.
2. It is impossible for anyone to have sex (assuming that's actually what the word "lay" means in this case) with a man as they would a woman. They have completely different sex organs, used in completely different way.
3. It makes much more sense to see this verse for what it really means:
You are not to have sex with ANYONE you are not married to. knowing this, the word "woman" means wife. Do not have sex with a man as you would with your wife. DUH!? Don't have sex with ANYONE but your wife! And that includes male prostitutes incapable of conceiving unwanted children.
DUH!
United in faith wrote:
<Lev 18:22 God made His point.
that was clear.
Romans 1 was even clearer.
and Genesis 19 God really drove that point home when He distroyed entire cities because they were doing that.
and the 2 MEN angels blinded all the sodomite MEN for demanding Lot send them out so they could know them CARNALLY.
men with men.
the angels called it wicked and blinded them all.
so do NOT make excuses for your need to sin.
There was a hell of a lot more going on there than a little man on man lovin'. Besides which, it never even mentions sexual acts between men, between women or sexual orientation or the state of being a homo AT ALL.

Since: Jul 12

Daytona Beach, FL

#11949 Nov 19, 2012
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
I think you have purposely twisted and perverted the story to reflect a negitive spin to push your own anti-God agenda.
you might want to actually read the story as it is written.
the two daughters got their father drunk and violated him.
that was a story given to you so you would KNOW HOW WRONG that is.
it was not something God endorsed as right.
Either way, there was some father-daughters schtooping going on.

Since: Jul 12

Daytona Beach, FL

#11950 Nov 19, 2012
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
No, you absolutely do not know any such thing.
you might wish it was and hope it was, but that doesn't make it so.
so how about you cease with the pretending it is.
I don't think we're in the mood to step on your crazy train any time soon.

Since: Jul 12

Daytona Beach, FL

#11951 Nov 19, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Here is the fallacy.
You are asserting that the primary goal is control, not sex.
You know, can't get enough of that control climax!
Silly stupid.
Smirk.
The purpose of consensual sex is to get your rocks off. The purpose of rape is to control and demean.

Since: Jul 12

Daytona Beach, FL

#11952 Nov 19, 2012
RatherBeInMissouri wrote:
<quoted text>
And your inability to stop defending Patty, answering posts directed to Patty, addressed to Patty, and your inability to let PATTY'S issues rest... Proves that you are...
in fact..
PATTY!
It's just her way to escape her humiliation and maintain her addiction to us heathens.

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#11953 Nov 19, 2012
RatherBeInMissouri wrote:
<quoted text>
And your inability to stop defending Patty, answering posts directed to Patty, addressed to Patty, and your inability to let PATTY'S issues rest... Proves that you are...
in fact..
PATTY!
I have to admit that I am at a loss to explain what has been happening here. I did kind of understand it when she was posing as two different people as Yellodog and Pattiecake58, and when called on it, by me and others, due to the exact same misuse of the English language, she flatly denied it, but eventually tried to wiggle her way out by stating that she had lied because she didn't want the Pattiecake58 character to be tied to the YD character because of alleged contacts at her workplace by someone.

It was not a rational excuse but based on her history here, I could see that it might make some sort of perverted sense to her. But now, with this new ID, she was caught in the very first post, or at least in the first day of posting, and she has flatly denied, when she has no personal issues to hide because they are all already on the table.

What I am thinking is that my diagnosis of her mental illnesses was just touching on the surface of her real problems. I would hate to give her the benefit of the doubt and state that she is a true split personality case, and one personality isn't aware of the other, because someone with that condition as I understand it would not be here defending her other personality; she wouldn't even know the other personality.

Except in movies I have never seen someone with separate personalities, so I am not at all familiar with them.

I tend to think though that her condition is such that she convinces herself that the things she does that she would call sins in anyone else are somehow okay if she does them. That could be because she actually DOES think she is God, or she really believes that once you are born again, you can do whatever you damned well please, because God will tke you home anyway.

I am kind of glad that this God doesn't exist, because I think Patty would be in for some pretty unpleasant surprises later on, which I wouldn't wish on anyone.

OR, perhaps there is really a God, and Patty IS God.:) Maybe she is testing us.:)

Please don't anyone take me seriously on that last bit, or may have to have you committed too.

Since I was able to talk, I have always been asking what and how about things. I used to drive my father crazy when I was a toddler because I would go to the barn with him, and pelt him with questions while he was milking the cows until he could take it no longer and he would send me to the house to be with my mother, assuming that she wasn't also at the barn milking cows, which she often did.

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#11954 Nov 19, 2012
Peace-Love-Happiness wrote:
<quoted text>
The purpose of consensual sex is to get your rocks off. The purpose of rape is to control and demean.
You have such a sensuous way of stating that.:)

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News What would Jesus say about same-sex marriage? (Jul '15) 5 min SaviorSelf 5,579
News Gay pastor fights censure by United Methodist C... 7 min SaviorSelf 152
News 'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15) 1 hr Lou 26,112
Turkey season in Meadow Grove 2 hr Frankie Rizzo 1
News Are You Gay? Take This CIA-Inspired Test to Fin... 2 hr Frankie Rizzo 3
News Barry Manilow says he kept his sexuality secret... 11 hr Gary 77
News Tim Farron - pretty offensive' for failing to s... 12 hr Trump s Birtherex... 8
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 14 hr Terra Firma 47,986
More from around the web