So, What Is It That The Anti-Gay Grou...

So, What Is It That The Anti-Gay Groups Actually Fear?

There are 18009 comments on the lezgetreal.com story from Aug 17, 2012, titled So, What Is It That The Anti-Gay Groups Actually Fear?. In it, lezgetreal.com reports that:

What makes hate, well, hate? Given that today is something of a quiet news day, it may be nice to give ourselves a breather and think about some things.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at lezgetreal.com.

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#11871 Nov 19, 2012
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
your posts begin with a fakey pretence of playing doctor,
then it trails off into a sleezy pornagraphic smutfest.
the fact you are still hammering away at a poster who IS gone, shows your inability to OVERCOME anything.
The fact that you think you can fool anyone into believing you aren't Patricia Hadley shows your inability to tell the truth. Everyone already knows it's you, saying it isn't is not going to convince anyone.

I remember a clip from Grandma's Boy...you fit the part of JP perfectly, I bet everyone would agree with me:
http://youtu.be/p-ho9L4Jazw
Mona Lott

Hoboken, NJ

#11872 Nov 19, 2012
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
your posts begin with a fakey pretence of playing doctor,
then it trails off into a sleezy pornagraphic smutfest.
the fact you are still hammering away at a poster who IS gone, shows your inability to OVERCOME anything.
Funny that you misspell the same words in the same way as YellowDogDirt, ain't it?

It's even funnier that you think you're fooling anyone.

“O'si yo!”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#11873 Nov 19, 2012
RatherBeInMissouri wrote:
<quoted text>
It's called a suburb, Patty. Most Americans are quite familiar with the concept.
<quoted text>
Ever hear of google Earth, patty? Really cool, you should check it out... you can see ANYTHING... even under the surface of the ocean and the surface of the moon.
<quoted text>
Marriage, divorce, birth and death records, police book-ins, county jail rosters most certainly ARE, literally, PUBLIC RECORD. Most cities have a whole section of the newspaper dedicated to publishing this information. It is available for internet search on newspaper and government websites. Looking it up is not a crime.
And if you provide the information yourself, SOMEONE WILL remember it.
apparently you are not all that familar with it.

you are a deceptive and deceitful person

where is the public records of her ex's name
her past places she lived
who she ever dated
her pastors name
her tombstone, etc etc etc....... all those things were not given BY HER on here, and they came thru GOSSIPS who obtained such information without her giving it......

how STUPID can you be? i mean honestly how retarded are you?
to think you have a right to violate anyones life and post such things JUST BECAUSE YOU CAN.....your sick, your stupid, your dangerous, your vindictive, your a CYBERSTALKER.

if someone placed a gernade in your hand would you pull the pin and blow something up, JUST BECAUSE YOU COULD?
yes i am certain you would.

you will never understand it, no matter how many times it is explained to you.....why? becaues you don't know the difference between right and wrong, nor do you care.
you think you have a right to do anything you want to do and to heck with the consequences or who it might hurt along the way.
you are a very BAD person.
and until you grow some brain cells and use them to figure out that posting private info about ANYone on the internet is wrong, you will continue to be a bad person.

“O'si yo!”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#11874 Nov 19, 2012
RatherBeInMissouri wrote:
<quoted text>
If it walks looks like a duck, walks like a duck and squaks like a duck........
its not a sin to be a duck ..... but it is a sin to be a homosexual.

“MEET KIKI -She Seeks Home”

Since: Oct 10

With Established Harem

#11875 Nov 19, 2012
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
ex husbands names, pastors names, tombstones, her parents names, none of that is information that was given by her.
.. you're fibbing. Again. Patricia confirmed her parents' names in this post:

http://www.topix.com/forum/city/russell-sprin...

.. nobody ever revealed your x-husband's or pastor's name ..
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
issues of her past was not public record but GOSSIP gathered by immoral queers and God haters.
.. anyone who disagrees with you is an immoral God-hater, even fellow Christians ..
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
U.S citizens are not required to go around insulting, bashing, and blaspheming the faith either like you do continually on here.
.. several posters in this forum are Christians. They insult you but not their faith. There's a difference ..

.. conversely, you insult their faith by calling them immoral God-haters ..
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
pattiecake is GONE....... from all appearances
she isn't spending her time on here anymore.
.. yes, Pattiecake is gone. United In Faith is the reincarnation of Patricia ..

P.S. Again, happy belated birthday.

“MEET KIKI -She Seeks Home”

Since: Oct 10

With Established Harem

#11876 Nov 19, 2012
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
your posts begin with a fakey pretence of playing doctor,
then it trails off into a sleezy pornagraphic smutfest.
the fact you are still hammering away at a poster who IS gone, shows your inability to OVERCOME anything.
.. regardless, you still want to have sex with me ..

“O'si yo!”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#11877 Nov 19, 2012
RatherBeInMissouri wrote:
<quoted text>
You miss the point EVERY time.
1. My having a relationship with a woman that I love is NOT wrong doing, I don't care what you or anyone else say. I don't need your approval, I have GOD's.
2. And identity is NOT a behavior. A behavior expresses an identity or emotion.
3. Self control is always possible. But it's not necessary for something that ISN'T wrong.
4. If someone wants to change, they're welcome to, but it's not always possible. I'm sure you don't like being a total rotten bitch, but you just can't seem to change.
We are who we are. I'm gay even if I never act on it with a particular behavior.
You're a bigoted irrational bitch... even if you never say another word.
NO you do NOT have God's approval. YOU SHOW ME in HIS word where He blesses a SS union.

in the meantime i will show you where He calls it vile, shameful, error, unnatural and an abomination.
The scriptures are crystal clear on what God says about it.

yes you have a right to be gay and do anything you want to do.
thats your free will choice.
but with every choice comes consequences.
and i PROMISE YOU......GARENTEE YOU......ASSURE YOU.....God is not blessing what it clearly condemns as wrong.

“O'si yo!”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#11878 Nov 19, 2012
RatherBeInMissouri wrote:
<quoted text>
BTW, Patty, master of avoidance and denial, answer this:
So just what is so tempting about homosexuality?? I'd really like to know. And if it's SOOOO tempting, how on Earth do so many people CHOOSE heterosexual exclusivity over the "wonderful world of GAY?" LMAO
why do so many people overeat?
why is alcohal and drugs SOOOOOOOOOO tempting to some
why is smoking so tempting to some?
why is permiscuious sexual behavior so attempting to some?

addictions are birthed from temptations.

and they come in all forms, and packages.
it boils down to CHOOSING right over wrong.

“O'si yo!”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#11879 Nov 19, 2012
EdmondWA wrote:
<quoted text>
But is that significant? There have been MANY kingdoms and lands that used to exist throughout history, not just in the Middle East but all over the entire WORLD, that do not continue to exist today. Were they ALL prophesized to be destroyed? The geo-political landscape is always changing.
But, the geographical landscape changes much slower. The region of Edom is a desert. It always has been. It wasn't once a tropical paradise, and then transformed into a desert. It's always been a desert. Proclaiming that a desert shall be a wasteland is hardly a great leap to make. Is this something we can assume about ALL deserts? Has God cursed the Sahara, Gobi and Mojave regions as well?
This seems as interesting as if I were to step outside, point to Mount Rainier, and say "God curses you to be tall and snowy!". It was ALREADY tall and snowy, it's going to be tall and snowy for decades, if not centuries (barring eruption). Cursing a desert region to be a barren wasteland is a bit obvious. It would have made much more impact for Edom to have been cursed with perpetual ice and snow. Such an anomaly in such a hot, arid part of the world would have been MUCH stronger evidence for the veracity of the Bible.
One also wonders why God would proclaim this curse against the land "forever". Does this mean that the present residents (again, not uninhabited) are doomed to lives of misery and failure? If so, why? Why should descendents be saddled with the punishments of their forebears' crimes? This seems drastically unjust to me. A child is not responsible for their parents' crimes. This reminds me of Pat Robertson claiming that the Haiti earthquake was due to a pact with the devil that the people of Haiti once entered into, to free themselves from slavery under the French. But that supposed event was hundreds of years ago. The people living there today had nothing to do with it. How is this a fair way to mete out justice? It seems atrocious to me!
READ THE BIBLE.
it is all there.
prophecy, detailed, and up to date, fulfilled.

thats all i can tell you, READ IT for yourself.
take no ones word for it.

“O'si yo!”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#11880 Nov 19, 2012
Passing Through wrote:
<quoted text>
No, you lying sl*t, Cincinnati is wholly contained within Hamilton county. Further, Norwood is an independent city within Hamilton county too; it is NOT part of Cincinnati or a "subcity" of Cincinnati. Norwood has it's own mayor and city council and provides various governmental services to its residents. Norwood even has its own school district.
<quoted text>
Then you should start a personal campaign to tell churches to remove their web sites from the internet because the churches themselves are listing who their pastors are.
<quoted text>
So the members of your church are all cyber stalkers since they posted the name of your pastor on the internet?
<quoted text>
There most certainly is a picture of your gravestone on the internet, Patricia. I doubt whether the person who posted it was a cyber stalker; more likely someone with an interest in genealogy trying to make it easier for others to research online without having to travel hundreds or thousands of miles personally to see it. Have you ever contacted your cemetery to complain about it? Or are you still just whining to me?
<quoted text>
Then why is it all available on the internet where it's posted so people can search for it? The marriage records in Hamilton County were PURPOSELY made available online to enable people to search the records. You're more than stupid if you think thing like your marriage application/license aren't public record.
<quoted text>
No, the more you whine about it just demonstrates what a stupid, clueless *sswipe you are about how things work in the real world.
<quoted text>
Accessing PUBLIC information isn't an invasion of privacy, Patricia. And who was it again that posted their name, the names of her parents, the city in which she was born/married, a complete physical description, where she currently lives and the name of the church she attends, among other things in a PUBLIC forum? Oh that's right; YOU.
<quoted text>
Blah, blah, blah. Grow up, you silly child. And learn something about the real world rather than spouting your lies and uninformed drivel.
NO KIDDING! don't you think someone who grew up there all their life knows a lot more about it than YOU do?

is there no end to your blowhard dialogue?

HORSEFEATHERS! you should not be concerned with who goes to what church you stalker.
you SHOULD not care what church someone attends enough to post information about it on TOPIX for pete sakes.
the more you post the more i KNOW you are mentally unbalanced.
rational people don't care enough about strangers on a website to hunt up their church or anything else to post it, UNLESS they are intentionally wanting to expose a persons ID and place them in harms way.
that takes the mind of a cyberstalker.
you would THINK you could put two and two together and know that much.

apparently not.

you are like any other criminal out there, you are NEVER in the wrong, you are never responsible for what you do.

You are a BAD person.

“O'si yo!”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#11881 Nov 19, 2012
RatherBeInMissouri wrote:
<quoted text>
LMAO!!!!
So this is your philosophy on debate?
Learn about things you like that aren't true.. because learning is always better than being right? LOL
I see it now!
BTW, take your own advice.
You talk about stuff you know NOTHING about all the time! Like psychology, politics, human sexuality..........
......
..........
I know the difference between right and wrong.
which you apparently never have.
Passing Through

Chicago, IL

#11882 Nov 19, 2012
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
you really are stubborn and stupid aren't you? how many times have i told you this and you absolutely refuse to acknowledge it?
ex husbands names, pastors names, tombstones, her parents names, none of that is information that was given by her.
It's all easily found on the internet using the information you did provide, Patricia. Posting your real name in a public forum makes a great deal of information about you available for free via the internet.
United in faith wrote:
issues of her past was not public record but GOSSIP gathered by immoral queers and God haters.
you can't pass it off as obtainable public record.
And yet by raising such a stink over it to the point of creating a new Topix ID and abandoning your old ones, you essentially confirmed what you deem "gossip" as true. After all, you lie about me all the time but I just note them as lies and move on.
United in faith wrote:
U.S citizens are not required to go around insulting, bashing, and blaspheming the faith either like you do continually on here.
You don't seem to have a problem with bashing, insulting and/or blaspheming entire religions classes of people or their faiths when you're the one doing it, Patricia. Yet you whine when on the receiving end. Why do you hate others for exercising the same constitutional rights of free speech and religion that you claim for yourself?
United in faith wrote:
who do you think you are to slander the faith of billions of Christians just because you have a personal problem with God?
Who so you think you are to slander the faith of billions of Muslims and Jews because of your religious beliefs?
United in faith wrote:
your a vindictive, hateful, miserable soul
You're a lying, hypocritical, uneducated, bigoted, fornicating sl*t.
United in faith wrote:
who has little to do but spend his every waking hour on topix
I don't spend every waking hour on Topix; why do you post the most blatant and ridiculous lies, Patricia?
United in faith wrote:
being verbally abusive to anyone who won't agree with his love of immoral things.
What immoral things do I "love", Patricia? Still fantasizing about my sex life, you pathetic PERVERT?
United in faith wrote:
get over it passing through.
pattiecake is GONE....... from all appearances
she isn't spending her time on here anymore.
There's nothing to get over because I haven't been posting to "Pattiecake"; I'm posting to YOU, Patricia.
United in faith wrote:
and if it wasn't me, you would be trashing the next person who stepped up to the plate to tell you how wrong you are to endorse such things.
Claiming God's power of omniscience for yourself again, blasphemer?
United in faith wrote:
you might as well get over it, cause you will never have the entire world on your side..........
Why would I care if the entire world was "on my side"? You're the one who mistakenly thinks "might (or a majority) makes right". I know better.
United in faith wrote:
and whats worse you don't have God on your side either.
And you think God is on the side of a lying, hypocritical, false-messiah worshiping apostate like you? Please.

“O'si yo!”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#11883 Nov 19, 2012
RatherBeInMissouri wrote:
<quoted text>
That's YOUR version, Patty. The word homosexual didn't even exist when the Bible was written... or when it was first translated to English.
None of those verses address the state of being homosexual AT ALL.
BTW, your "Cor 6:9 SPECIFICALLY says homosexuals will NOT inherit the kingdom of God."
Look what mine says:
Know yee not that the vnrighteous shall not inherite the kingdome of God? Be not deceiued: neither fornicatours, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselues with mankinde, Nor theeues, nor couetous, nor drunkards, nor reuilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.
Homosexual????? Nowhere to be found.
you are making a jack--- of yourself.
the word pedophile didn't exist either but God would condemn anyone who had sex with a child.
the word donut, walmart or chevy didn't exist either.

so stop making stupid excuses.

God didn't have to use the word homosexual you imp

HE got His point across when He detailed it for you in Lev
you shall not lie with a male as you would like with a woman, it IS an abomination.
Lev 18:22 God made His point.
that was clear.

Romans 1 was even clearer.
and Genesis 19 God really drove that point home when He distroyed entire cities because they were doing that.
and the 2 MEN angels blinded all the sodomite MEN for demanding Lot send them out so they could know them CARNALLY.
men with men.
the angels called it wicked and blinded them all.

so do NOT make excuses for your need to sin.

Lililth_Satans_B ore

Since: May 12

Bellevue, WA

#11884 Nov 19, 2012
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
apparently you are not all that familar with it.
you are a deceptive and deceitful person
where is the public records of her ex's name
her past places she lived
who she ever dated
her pastors name
her tombstone, etc etc etc....... all those things were not given BY HER on here, and they came thru GOSSIPS who obtained such information without her giving it......
how STUPID can you be? i mean honestly how retarded are you?
to think you have a right to violate anyones life and post such things JUST BECAUSE YOU CAN.....your sick, your stupid, your dangerous, your vindictive, your a CYBERSTALKER.
if someone placed a gernade in your hand would you pull the pin and blow something up, JUST BECAUSE YOU COULD?
yes i am certain you would.
you will never understand it, no matter how many times it is explained to you.....why? becaues you don't know the difference between right and wrong, nor do you care.
you think you have a right to do anything you want to do and to heck with the consequences or who it might hurt along the way.
you are a very BAD person.
and until you grow some brain cells and use them to figure out that posting private info about ANYone on the internet is wrong, you will continue to be a bad person.
oh stfu drama queen

Lililth_Satans_B ore

Since: May 12

Bellevue, WA

#11885 Nov 19, 2012
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
NO KIDDING! don't you think someone who grew up there all their life knows a lot more about it than YOU do?
is there no end to your blowhard dialogue?
HORSEFEATHERS! you should not be concerned with who goes to what church you stalker.
you SHOULD not care what church someone attends enough to post information about it on TOPIX for pete sakes.
the more you post the more i KNOW you are mentally unbalanced.
rational people don't care enough about strangers on a website to hunt up their church or anything else to post it, UNLESS they are intentionally wanting to expose a persons ID and place them in harms way.
that takes the mind of a cyberstalker.
you would THINK you could put two and two together and know that much.
apparently not.
you are like any other criminal out there, you are NEVER in the wrong, you are never responsible for what you do.
You are a BAD person.
churches are terrorist organizations

“O'si yo!”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#11886 Nov 19, 2012
DNF wrote:
<quoted text>You think that a story that ends with a father getting drunk in a cave and raping his two teen daughters is a good Biblical prophesy?
I think you have purposely twisted and perverted the story to reflect a negitive spin to push your own anti-God agenda.

you might want to actually read the story as it is written.

the two daughters got their father drunk and violated him.
that was a story given to you so you would KNOW HOW WRONG that is.
it was not something God endorsed as right.

“O'si yo!”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#11887 Nov 19, 2012
DNF wrote:
<quoted text>we know it's you Pattie. Stop trying to pretend you're not Pattie.
No, you absolutely do not know any such thing.
you might wish it was and hope it was, but that doesn't make it so.

so how about you cease with the pretending it is.

“What came 1st? Stupid or bigot”

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#11888 Nov 19, 2012
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
Rape is the act of someone so horny, they force an unwilling partner to participate.
<quoted text>
I am a professional. Others and I disagree with other professionals for the reason I stated above.
You have no reasoning against mine except to quote professionals who have lied and been wrong before.
Bazinga.
Good thing we're not quoting your "professional" opinions, or we'd be wrong ALL the time.
Passing Through

Chicago, IL

#11889 Nov 19, 2012
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
its not a sin to be a duck ..... but it is a sin to be a homosexual.
On the contrary, Patricia, existing is not a sin.

“What came 1st? Stupid or bigot”

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#11890 Nov 19, 2012
KiMare wrote:
XY wrote;
You really are dumb, not even close to intellect and dumber than a 6 year old.
Rape is an act of obtaining sex without consent. To say otherwise excludes over 70% of all rapes. Anger, violence, power, control, and assault may be added elements, but they do not define rape.
It describes it as much as the word sexual. Sexual is the adjective here, assault is the subject. Without assualt, it's just sexual. Which isn't anything but at adjective.
Assault is still assault, no matter the nature or degree.
KiMare wrote:
If you give a person a date rape drug and you are as gentle and loving as can be, it is still rape.
Control. Why would you give someone a date rape drug and be loving and gentle with an unconscious person unless you were afraid of rejection? Date rape drug is an attempt at complete control and deception.
KiMare wrote:
If you are 21 and the person is 14, it is still rape, even if he/she agrees.
Statutory rape. A TYPE of rape, still sexual contact without consent. A minor cannot consent for themself.
KiMare wrote:
If a person says no, no, no and you continue with roses and flowers it is still rape. If the person is passed out and you got him/her drunk it is rape. If you are having great consensual sex and you are right in the middle and the person changes her/his mind and says no, it is rape from that point on.
In all of these cases, there is no anger, assault, violence, control or power, it is simply non consensual
In all of these cases, it is an act of control. To force someone, no matter your method, to do something they are not consenting to. When a person says no, yes, that's it. STOP or it's rape! After that point, any continuance of sexual contact is a physical attack, with the attacker disregarding the wishes of the person he is with and exerting CONTROL. And once someone FORCES you to use your body in a way you have said NO to, it becomes an assault. A violation and disrespect of someone else's PRIVATE body parts, and complete disregard for the well being of the other person's well being or after effects.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News North Carolina's rush to bigotry 2 min Time again 1,930
Maybe god is gay! (Dec '09) 5 min Frankie Rizzo 9,788
News 'Atheists, homosexuals and transgender individu... 6 min Robin Hood 4
News The Latest: Kasich calls for balance on gay rig... 19 min Denny CranesPlace 16
News 'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15) 1 hr Harvey 10,682
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 2 hr Respect71 34,242
News Mississippi Governor Signs Law Allowing Busines... 2 hr Missy Heroin 370
More from around the web