So, What Is It That The Anti-Gay Grou...

So, What Is It That The Anti-Gay Groups Actually Fear?

There are 18009 comments on the lezgetreal.com story from Aug 17, 2012, titled So, What Is It That The Anti-Gay Groups Actually Fear?. In it, lezgetreal.com reports that:

What makes hate, well, hate? Given that today is something of a quiet news day, it may be nice to give ourselves a breather and think about some things.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at lezgetreal.com.

Passing Through

Chicago, IL

#11385 Nov 15, 2012
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
first of all, hamilton county is not all of cincinnati.
Norwood is a city within cincinnati.
a subcity within a city.
No, you lying sl*t, Cincinnati is wholly contained within Hamilton county. Further, Norwood is an independent city within Hamilton county too; it is NOT part of Cincinnati or a "subcity" of Cincinnati. Norwood has it's own mayor and city council and provides various governmental services to its residents. Norwood even has its own school district.
United in faith wrote:
second of all, you shouldn't have access to someones pastor on here.
you shouldn't KNOW who anyones pastor is on here.
Then you should start a personal campaign to tell churches to remove their web sites from the internet because the churches themselves are listing who their pastors are.
United in faith wrote:
and even if you do, you shouldn't post it.
cyberstalkers do that.
So the members of your church are all cyber stalkers since they posted the name of your pastor on the internet?
United in faith wrote:
and no there is no picture of pattiecakes grave stone on line.
unless someone went there and uploaded it for the purpose of posting it, again cyberstalkers do that.
There most certainly is a picture of your gravestone on the internet, Patricia. I doubt whether the person who posted it was a cyber stalker; more likely someone with an interest in genealogy trying to make it easier for others to research online without having to travel hundreds or thousands of miles personally to see it. Have you ever contacted your cemetery to complain about it? Or are you still just whining to me?
United in faith wrote:
someones Ex's name or pastors name or tombstone or parents name or anything else, such as places they lived or past relationships is most certainly not PUBLIC information you sicko.
Then why is it all available on the internet where it's posted so people can search for it? The marriage records in Hamilton County were PURPOSELY made available online to enable people to search the records. You're more than stupid if you think thing like your marriage application/license aren't public record.
United in faith wrote:
the more you defend this behavior the more you PROVE how immoral and perverted you are.
No, the more you whine about it just demonstrates what a stupid, clueless *sswipe you are about how things work in the real world.
United in faith wrote:
you don't have a right to invade ANYones privacy.
who ever told you that you did, was munching on demonseeds.
Accessing PUBLIC information isn't an invasion of privacy, Patricia. And who was it again that posted their name, the names of her parents, the city in which she was born/married, a complete physical description, where she currently lives and the name of the church she attends, among other things in a PUBLIC forum? Oh that's right; YOU.
United in faith wrote:
honestly, what makes you think you have the right to post ANY information on a public website for the intent of trashing a person?
were you raised in such a way?
did your parents never sit you down and explain the golden rule?
did your parents teach you that anyone who opposes you, is fair game to be abused on any level?
is that who you want the world to see you as?
how can i make it any clearer.........what you did and what you condone is called cyberstalking. and it is illegal and it is wrong.
you are the kind of person, who would hack into someones banking records and post it on a website to be vindictive.
just because you could.
thats the difference between good people and bad people.
your not a good person.
cause good people always own up to their mistakes.
bad people don't.
Blah, blah, blah. Grow up, you silly child. And learn something about the real world rather than spouting your lies and uninformed drivel.

“MEET KIKI -She Seeks Home”

Since: Oct 10

With Established Harem

#11386 Nov 15, 2012
RatherBeInMissouri wrote:
<quoted text>
If it walks looks like a duck, walks like a duck and squaks like a duck........
.. it's Santa Claus? The Easter Bunny ??..

“What came 1st? Stupid or bigot”

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#11387 Nov 15, 2012
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
why don't you try to LEARN instead of being right
cause when you don't learn you are NEVER right.
LMAO!!!!

So this is your philosophy on debate?

Learn about things you like that aren't true.. because learning is always better than being right? LOL
I see it now!

BTW, take your own advice.
You talk about stuff you know NOTHING about all the time! Like psychology, politics, human sexuality..........

......
..........
Passing Through

Chicago, IL

#11388 Nov 15, 2012
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
exactly, you are always trying to prove me wrong.
what does that tell you?
That you're stupid and lie a lot.
United in faith wrote:
that being right is more important to you than an exchange of ideas on here are.
you misuse topix like you do everything else.
Really? Well I don't consider you posting lies and factually incorrectly information to be a proper use of Topix, Patricia. You have no interest in "discussing" topics or even learnig from your mistakes. All you want is a platform to be an attention wh*re.
United in faith wrote:
i know folks who have had multiple blood transfusions, my aunt for one, and they are very much screened.
I didn't say blood wasn't screened, you illiterate c*nt. I said screening isn't PERFECT. Otherwise, there would NOT be documented cases of HIV transmission via blood transfusions as recently as 2008
United in faith wrote:
you can't give blood if you have any kind of diseases that are transferable.
Well, if people can still contract HIV via a blood transfusion, however infrequently it happens, obviously people with communicable diseases CAN give blood. The system for screening is very good, Patricia; it's not, however, perfect.
United in faith wrote:
HIV is transmitted through sexual encounters
or drug use.
no longer in transfusions.
And yet my link to the US government's Centers for Disease Control proves you wrong, Patricia. Did you even bother to open the link and read the material? Of course not; you have no interest in being educated, only in arguing from your position of stupidity.
United in faith wrote:
ask any hosp or medical person how safe they are today.
why don't you try to LEARN instead of being right
That's priceless, Patricia, since I'm CONSISTENTLY right and you're consistently WRONG. Take your own advice and LEARN for a change rather than clinging to your ignorance like a baby sucking on a pacifier.
United in faith wrote:
cause when you don't learn you are NEVER right.
There we have it, folks; Patricia finally admits why she's NEVER right.

“What came 1st? Stupid or bigot”

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#11389 Nov 15, 2012
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
YOU are the one who said you had 'pastey' white skin.
so why are you getting all defensive about it?
i didn't say anything other than get some sun.
sun is healthy in moderation.
I said pasty because I was being honest.
Something you know nothing about.
You know when you go outside in the winter and the sun refelects off the snow and burns your eyes?

That's my skin.
Just being honest..

UV rays without a barrier or sunscreen causes cancer. The more sunburns you have in your life, the higher the risk. I'm not concerned with "getting some sun" for tanning purposes. Why? Without a high SPF, which virtually prevents tanning, I BURN, that's the way pasty white skin works. There is no in between. Pasty or burned like a lobster... which means cancer.
I choose pasty.

Now you know.
Passing Through

Chicago, IL

#11390 Nov 15, 2012
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
you don't listen to others. I can only imagin the nightmare it must of been for your parents raising you.
Yeah, it was a real nightmare for my parents raising a child who excelled in school, never got into trouble with the law and got a high paying job with one of the largest companies in the world. And unlike YOU, I don't live with my parents and haven't since I graduated from college.
United in faith wrote:
you never listen.
You never say anything worth listening to.
United in faith wrote:
i am not going to argue with you over God's SETTLED word
your a fool to do so.
Guess you were not only a fool but made to look like a fool in our previous discussions on the subject matter. At least you finally learned your lesson to keep your mouth shut on that topic.

“What came 1st? Stupid or bigot”

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#11391 Nov 15, 2012
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
oh but it is.
Lev 18:22
Lev 20:13
Romans 125-28
Genesis 19
why even 1 Cor 6:9 SPECIFICALLY says homosexuals will NOT inherit the kingdom of God.
those are just a few
Jude 1:7
it is condemned many times over in God's word.
That's YOUR version, Patty. The word homosexual didn't even exist when the Bible was written... or when it was first translated to English.
None of those verses address the state of being homosexual AT ALL.

BTW, your "Cor 6:9 SPECIFICALLY says homosexuals will NOT inherit the kingdom of God."

Look what mine says:
Know yee not that the vnrighteous shall not inherite the kingdome of God? Be not deceiued: neither fornicatours, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselues with mankinde, Nor theeues, nor couetous, nor drunkards, nor reuilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.

Homosexual????? Nowhere to be found.

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#11392 Nov 15, 2012
Cool Hand Luke wrote:
Absolutely true
<quoted text>
Agreeing with yourself?

That's just sad.

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#11393 Nov 15, 2012
Religionthebiglie wrote:
<quoted text>
...or she could just invent another character and avoid using words that she can't spell, like "distroy" and "anotherwords".
"Obscess"...

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#11394 Nov 15, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You give your friends bj's? What kind of friends do you... never mind.
Sodomy is rooted in the attempted rape of Angels by the men of Sodom, a homosexual act. It has been broadened since then to mean any form of unnatural sex.
Go back in your hole wee man.
MisterCharrington wrote:
<quoted text>
'Angels' are alleged to have no physical body so they are purely 'spirit beings' according to the gospel of Matthew (22:30) and Pauls 1st Epistle to the Corinthians.
When they 'appear' in the bible they almost always appear as males and are always referred to with a masculine pronoun except possibly in Zechariah(5:9). However; not needing to engage in the activities of eating or procreation I'm wondering how they'd have the equipment to fill the role of a male on male rape victim. Did god imbue them with redundant recta or purely decorative penes?
How one would violate the orifices of a 'spirit being'?
Why would you respond with deliberate deception?

Matt. does not say Angels have no body, it says they don't marry (just like gay couples).

Moreover, you are confusing (?) the capabilities of Angels with the desire of deviants. We can only assume that the idiocy that led Sodomites to confuse a sewer system with a playground also caused them to confuse a Angel with a mere man. Much to their harm, right?

Smirk.

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#11395 Nov 15, 2012
RatherBeInMissouri wrote:
<quoted text>
I said pasty because I was being honest.
Something you know nothing about.
You know when you go outside in the winter and the sun refelects off the snow and burns your eyes?
That's my skin.
Just being honest..
UV rays without a barrier or sunscreen causes cancer. The more sunburns you have in your life, the higher the risk. I'm not concerned with "getting some sun" for tanning purposes. Why? Without a high SPF, which virtually prevents tanning, I BURN, that's the way pasty white skin works. There is no in between. Pasty or burned like a lobster... which means cancer.
I choose pasty.
Now you know.
ZZ Top thinks these might help:

“What came 1st? Stupid or bigot”

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#11396 Nov 15, 2012
Happy Lesbo wrote:
<quoted text>
.. it's Santa Claus? The Easter Bunny ??..
No.. It's a motherf*kin DUCK, yo! LOL

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#11397 Nov 15, 2012
RatherBeInMissouri wrote:
<quoted text>
BTW, Patty, master of avoidance and denial, answer this:
So just what is so tempting about homosexuality?? I'd really like to know. And if it's SOOOO tempting, how on Earth do so many people CHOOSE heterosexual exclusivity over the "wonderful world of GAY?" LMAO
The matter of choice isn't a valid argument anyways.
Even if, on the off chance, being gay was a choice, you know what is PROVEN to be a choice and not a born-with trait?

Religion.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#11398 Nov 15, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You give your friends bj's? What kind of friends do you... never mind.
Sodomy is rooted in the attempted rape of Angels by the men of Sodom, a homosexual act. It has been broadened since then to mean any form of unnatural sex.
Go back in your hole wee man.
RatherBeInMissouri wrote:
<quoted text>
Rape is not a homosexual act. Rape is an act of aggression, hatred and power, no matter who the victim is.
Rape has a victim.
Homosexuality has a partner.
Learn the difference mangina man.
Rape is a sexual act against the will of the other person.

The very context of rape is sexual first and foremost. Anything else is secondary. I know that is not politically correct, but it is simple reality.

Homosexual sex has a victim because anal sex is inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning.

Smile.

“What came 1st? Stupid or bigot”

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#11399 Nov 15, 2012
Religionthebiglie wrote:
<quoted text>
...or she could just invent another character and avoid using words that she can't spell, like "distroy" and "anotherwords".
macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>"Obscess"...
Let's not forget her lack of grammar comprehension:
"must of been" and "should of been."

“What came 1st? Stupid or bigot”

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#11400 Nov 15, 2012
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
Why would you respond with deliberate deception?
Matt. does not say Angels have no body, it says they don't marry (just like gay couples).
Smirk.
So... you're saying we are God's messengers?
I always thought so too...
Living as God made us... withstanding discrimination, hatred and persecution of the fundamental Christian masses.... Testing them all...
Homosexuals: God's test for REAL Christians.

Smirk.

“What came 1st? Stupid or bigot”

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#11401 Nov 15, 2012
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You give your friends bj's? What kind of friends do you... never mind.
Sodomy is rooted in the attempted rape of Angels by the men of Sodom, a homosexual act. It has been broadened since then to mean any form of unnatural sex.
Go back in your hole wee man.
<quoted text>
Rape is a sexual act against the will of the other person.
The very context of rape is sexual first and foremost. Anything else is secondary. I know that is not politically correct, but it is simple reality.
Homosexual sex has a victim because anal sex is inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning.
Smile.
And you're wrong again, Mangina.
Even by your thinking, homosexual sex does not always have a "victim." A lot of homosexuals don't even engage in anal intercousrse, particularily lesbians.

A consenting partner is not the same as a victim.
Being whipped, beaten, burned and tortured is also inherantly unhealthy and demeaning.
But there are lots of people that enjoy it consentually.
They call it S&M.

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#11402 Nov 15, 2012
United in faith wrote:
<quoted text>
AH, yes 'playing house'.
I grant you calif calls you 'married' and i know you call yourself 'married' but i can PROMISE you God doesn't recognize you as 'married'.
thats not my opinion either.
its biblical FACT
as for obama being re-elected.
thats not your free ticket to gayism in all 50 states
but you will discover that in due time.
the upside is that i am THRILLED when biblical prophecy comes to pass.
as in the days of sodom and gomorrah so shall it be.......
you enjoy your 'season' of folly.
cause i stand on the promises of the Creator God who WILL have the last word. This is why in the midst of wickedness i can SMILE and feel confident.
You think that a story that ends with a father getting drunk in a cave and raping his two teen daughters is a good Biblical prophesy?

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#11403 Nov 15, 2012
Passing Through wrote:
<quoted text>
"Mosanic" law? ROFLOL. Way to pervert Hebrew scripture. Again.
and Battiecakes points fingers at people who make a mistake on a date in the calendar.

Geez like no one has never written the wrong date on a check at least once in their life.

PattiePerfect often accuses people of the same things she's guilty of.

But when your entire religious faith is based on being God's list taker for the sins of mankind it's hard to be taken very seriously.

And a pretty bad religion to follow as well.

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#11404 Nov 15, 2012
Passing Through wrote:
<quoted text>
Sexual activity is only one of several transmission vectors for HIV, Patricia. Sharing needles for drug usage with an infected person is another way. Receiving transfusions of or drugs made from tainted blood is another. In utero transmission is yet another. Accidental exposure to tainted bodily fluids from an infected person is yet another.
<quoted text>
Monogamous couples can still contract HIV, Patricia, through other risky behaviors or in some cases, through no fault of their own. You religious belief about "God's perfect plan" doesn't stopp all transmission vectors for HIV.
<quoted text>
IPerhaps we should think of you as a disease, then, huh Patricia? Because YOU surely aren't "right" and your very existence produces a negative effect on the world around you.
Here's where it gets interesting and funny. BattieCakes insists God has a perfect plan. But then insists God's perfect plan isn't possible because of free will.

Sort of screws the whole perfect plan idea if you ask me.

It's funny watching these christians who insist God has a plan turn around and admit God isn't as powerful as they claim.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Study: Children Of Same-Sex Parents More Likely... 6 min OccupyThis 17
News Lesbian pastor, United Methodist Church agree t... 1 hr Phyllis Schlafly ... 12
News How Donald Trump is slowly teaching Republicans... 1 hr Solid Blue November 40
News Pastors Rarely Asked to Wed Same-Sex Couples 2 hr Fa-Foxy 71
Maybe god is gay! (Dec '09) 2 hr June VanDerMark 11,297
News 'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15) 2 hr who cares 15,833
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 2 hr Frankie Rizzo 38,753
The gay cafe for GLBT, friends and family (Oct '09) 13 hr Frankie Rizzo 68,957
More from around the web