So, What Is It That The Anti-Gay Groups Actually Fear?

Aug 17, 2012 | Posted by: Sei | Full story: lezgetreal.com

What makes hate, well, hate? Given that today is something of a quiet news day, it may be nice to give ourselves a breather and think about some things.

Comments
5,621 - 5,640 of 18,016 Comments Last updated Feb 24, 2013

“MEET ROSEMARY-She Seeks Home”

Since: Oct 10

With Established Harem

#6016 Oct 6, 2012
Religionthebiglie wrote:
<quoted text>
I must not have been reading posts that week.
EVERYONE, PLEASE READ

.. our YD/Pattiecake's 'timeout' was on the PTAG thread about a year ago ..

.. OH !!! how she cried. Like a 2-year-old, played martyr all week, pouted, whined, threw hissy fits ..

.. if everyone here would agree to ignore Ms. Hadley for 5-days, the same thing will happen. Who's with me? It's really quite amusing ..
speed

United States

#6017 Oct 6, 2012
Passing Through

Chicago, IL

#6018 Oct 6, 2012
Pattiecake58 wrote:
<quoted text>
HAHAHAHA are you taking up where booots left off, playing physciatrist?
your wasting precious time with every childish insult.
Sorry you consider a detailed listing of symptoms of mental illness insults. That you do probably explains why you never get the medical care you so obviously need. Well, obvious to everyone but you, that is.
Pattiecake58 wrote:
what does equal PROTECTION under the law for all citizens mean?
PROTECTION means just that, protection.
not the endorsing of, or making of, laws that are considered unpopular by the majority.
As usual, you demonstrate your utter stupidity on the topic of constitutional law. Equal protection actually means that all citizens, even unpopular minorities, are guaranteed the same protection of laws enjoyed by the majority. It's meant to ensure minorities are not abused nor have their rights infringed by the majority, not the other way around as you stupidly assert.
Pattiecake58 wrote:
and if what you meant to say was YOU THINK the constitution ensures equal RIGHTS of all citizens to do whatever they so choose to do...thats just not in the constitution.
No, unlike you, I articulated what I meant to say. You're again just too brain dead to comprehend written English.
Pattiecake58 wrote:
that is the reason marriage is not in the FEDERAL constitution.
Marriage has been ruled a fundamental right of all citizens based on US Supreme Court interpretations of the constitution. So while the word marriage is not explicitly written in the constitution, marriage is deemed an unenumerated right as discussed in the ninth Amendment.
Pattiecake58 wrote:
if it was then you would be right, ALL citizens would have the same right to marry.
All citizens do have the right to marry. Like all rights (including freedom of religion), it's not absolute and is subject to restrictions and/or regulation. However, such restrictions and regulations must serve a compelling government interest in order to justify unequal treatment of different classes of citizens. Historical discrimination and animus towards gays is not a compelling government interest
Pattiecake58 wrote:
meaning polygamists, beastiality, incest, pedophilia, why you could even marry your car if you wanted to.
So uneducated morons like you claim but reality proves otherwise. Polygamy is currently illegal; homosexuality is not. Pedophiles who engage in sexual activities with underage children also commit criminal acts. Further, children can't give legal consent to marry or sign contracts so can't legally marry.Likewise, animals aren't citizens and therefore have no recognized civil rights under our legal system. NOr can animals or inanimate objects like cars given legal consent. Finally, one of the outcomes of marriage is to establish kinship between two previously unrelated parties. Participants in incestuous relations are already related by blood and therefore precluded from marriage.

These are basic legal concepts that educated adults should know and understand about our legal system. That you don't again proves just how pathetic your public education really was (or what a lousy student you were).
Pattiecake58 wrote:
thats why the federal constitution does not specify a right to marry.
On the contrary, the US constitution has been interpreted by the US Supreme Court as providing a fundamental civil right of marriage to all citizens.
Pattiecake58 wrote:
your individual state constitutions AMEND their state constitution to fit the needs and desires of the citizens of that state.
They may not legally do so in a way that violates the federal constitution.
Pattiecake58 wrote:
thats how it has ALWAYS been.
And more than one state constitutional amendment has been declared a violation of the federal constitution and deemed unenforceable.
Passing Through

Chicago, IL

#6019 Oct 6, 2012
Pattiecake58 wrote:
<quoted text>
you really are in the dark aren't you?
there is ONLY ONE GOD.
and ONE WORD.
the catholics have added their own bits and pieces to the bible.
now lets see what GOD says about that.
"I warn EVERYONE who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if ANYONE adds to them, GOD willa dd to him the plagues described in this book." Revelation 22:18
As usual, you lie about Catholics and you have no knowledge of the history of how the Christian texts became canonical.

Besides, the entire Christian new testament is an addition to Hebrew scriptures and therefore a violation of God's command not to change or add to His word. So it's a moot and irrelevant issue anyway.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#6020 Oct 6, 2012
Don't post personal contact data on these threads.
Passing Through

Chicago, IL

#6021 Oct 6, 2012
Pattiecake58 wrote:
<quoted text>
I wonder if you are even aware that what you just posted is not only without a point, but irrelvant as well.
Since Mr Charrington's post was in direct response to your request for proof of something you denied saying, thanks for admitting your posts are pointless and irrelevant.
Bob

Tenino, WA

#6023 Oct 6, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Working on Saturday is condemned in the Buy-bull. Below is a Buy-bull verses that condemns working on Saturday:
"For six days work may be done, but on the seventh day you shall have a holy day, a sabbath of complete rest to the LORD; whoever does any work on it shall be put to death." Exodus 35:2
Total GAY SHAME !
Bob

Tenino, WA

#6024 Oct 6, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
You spend a lot of time typing "child pornography" into search engines, huh?
Gay men are famous for raping and killing young boys. Its a known fact.

If someone harms a child like this then it would be better for them to have a millstone tied around thier neck and and be tossed into the deepest part of the sea.

Stop supporting NAMBLA. Its an evil abomination.

They will burn in hell for their evil crimes.
Passing Through

Chicago, IL

#6025 Oct 6, 2012
Pattiecake58 wrote:
<quoted text>
you should choke on your lies.
I didn't lie so that's why I'm not choking. You, on the other hand, don't choke on your lies because you have satan impaled up your rear end protecting you.
Pattiecake58 wrote:
show me where i EVER said 'all' jews are going to hell?
thats not true.
shame on you.
You've previously asserted anyone who doesn't accept Jesus as their personal savior is condemned to hell. Those of Jewish faith don't recognize Jesus as messiah and in fact consider him to be a false messiah. So by your assertion, all Jews of faith are condemned to hell.
Pattiecake58 wrote:
and if Golem didn't repent and get himself right with GOD by exiting an immoral life style before he died, then yes according to the bible ... hell is his destination.
According to your previous posts, Jews are unable to repent their sins and receive God's forgiveness because they no longer offer sacrifices. So either that was a lie (which it is, by the way, and is just another demonstration of your total ignorance of the Jewish faith) or your assertion above about Golem needing only to repent to avoid hell is a lie. And both assertions are irrelevant if your other assertion about needing to accept Jesus as savior were true. So all you offer are the befuddled, and inconsistent babbling of a memory impaired hag.
Pattiecake58 wrote:
and you misguided person, the president of Israel does not befriend Christians to be politically correct.
thats ridiculous.
Well, he certainly doesn't do so out of appreciation for the hundreds of years of persecution Jews suffered at the hands of Christians.
Pattiecake58 wrote:
again you are here to promote sexual immorality as right.
No, I'm not you lying c*nt. Whenever you bring up your bigotry and desire to discriminate against gays, I counter with they are guaranteed equal protection under the law by the US constitution.
Pattiecake58 wrote:
and i am here to tell you the bible BOTH OT and NT forbid it.
and you are ticked off at me for telling you what the bible says about it, clearly.
On the contrary, it's you who's ticked off that your religious beliefs are IRRELEVANT to secular civil law in the US. Your religious beliefs apply to YOU and ONLY you.
Pattiecake58 wrote:
you have not once acknowledged the scriptures on it.
you ignor, avoid and openly reject the word of GOD on it.
On the contrary, I've pointed out multiple times that neither Christians nor Jews universally agree with your biblical interpretations about homosexuality.
Pattiecake58 wrote:
you are more interested in promoting sin than you are acknowledging GOD'S truth.
And you're mosre interesting in committing sin in the name of God.
Pattiecake58 wrote:
you are more interested in playing your juvenile games of christian bashing than you are discussing issues in a civil tone.
You're mosre interested in infringing the civil rights of your fellow citizens and advocating sedition by asserting your religious beliefs supersede the US constitution.
Pattiecake58 wrote:
and you know what?
i REFUSE to have a battle of wits with an UNarmed person.
So that's your excuse for never being able to rebut any of my posts? Tell you what, Piggiecake; pretend I'm armed and bring your "A" game and we'll see if you can actually muster up a coherent rebuttal instead offering only your petulant, incessant whining about everything.

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

#6026 Oct 6, 2012
How I See It wrote:
<quoted text>
If they aren't heterosexual, they should remain celibate. The bible condemns those who "practice sin". They may very well be born homosexual although I'm of the mind it is a learned behavior but what I believe doesn't matter. What's important is what God says and if they feel they are homosexual it is incumbent on their part to remain celibate so as not to displease God and practice something he considers debased and which actions he condemns.
Why on earth would you want millions upon millions of people to live sad and lonely lives?
Bob

Seattle, WA

#6027 Oct 6, 2012
S.F. Gay Rights Leader Arrested Over Child Porn:

S.F. CRIME:

Published 09:21 p.m., Monday, June 25, 2012:

San Francisco police have arrested veteran gay rights advocate Larry Brinkin in connection with felony possession of child pornography.

Brinkin, 66, who worked for the San Francisco Human Rights Commission before his retirement in 2010, was taken into custody Friday night. He spent the night in jail before he was released on bail, according to a spokeswoman for the sheriff's department.
The district attorney's office will decide Tuesday whether to file charges. "We're still reviewing the case," district attorney's spokeswoman Stephanie Ong Stillman said Monday.

Police say that Brinkin had pornographic images, some that appear to show children as young as 1 and 2 or 3 years old being sodomized and performing oral sex on adult men, in e-mail attachments linked to his account, according to a search warrant served by San Francisco police.

Sick gays.
Bob

Seattle, WA

#6030 Oct 6, 2012
Happy Lesbo wrote:
<quoted text>
.. as long as people respond to her posts, Patricia will not leave. Instead, she will insist everyone is wrong and we're all demonic morons ..
.. she is unable to recognize her Narcissistic Personality Disorder although it's been pointed out to her on numerous occasions ..
.. everyone has been here long enough to recognize her behavior pattern. Compare your experience of her with:
http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/narcissistic...
Narcissistic personality disorder symptoms (Mayo Clinic)
----------
Romans 6:23 - "For the wages of sin is death... "
Appearing tough-minded or unemotional
Believing that you're special and acting accordingly
Failing to recognize other people's emotions and feelings
Expecting others to go along with your ideas and plans
Expressing disdain for those you feel are inferior or don't agree with you.
Believing others are jealous of you
Trouble keeping healthy relationships
Feels easily hurt and rejected (Martyr)
Having a fragile self-esteem
Believing that you're better than others
Exaggerating your achievements or talents
Expecting constant praise and admiration
.. Patricia, again, seek help ..
Romans 6:23 - "For the wages of sin is death... "
hey Bob

AOL

#6031 Oct 6, 2012
Have you ever given any thought to this scenario: There are songs, stories, and books about "What if Jesus came back...as a junkie, a homeless person, an unwed mother" etc. What if Jesus came back as a gay man? Would you treat him with the kindness and respect he deserves, or accuse him of being a child rapist and all the other lies you tell here?

You see Bob, it could happen - God does have a sense of humor...and what will He think of you for treating a person in this way? You just never know do you???

Treat all people with dignity, respect and kindness you could be talking to Jesus, please keep that in mind!

“saved From jesus”

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#6032 Oct 6, 2012
Happy Lesbo wrote:
<quoted text>
EVERYONE, PLEASE READ
.. our YD/Pattiecake's 'timeout' was on the PTAG thread about a year ago ..
.. OH !!! how she cried. Like a 2-year-old, played martyr all week, pouted, whined, threw hissy fits ..
.. if everyone here would agree to ignore Ms. Hadley for 5-days, the same thing will happen. Who's with me? It's really quite amusing ..
I'm game. Starting when? Sunday is a good day for it, after church when she's buzzed from her box of "whine."
Passing Through

Chicago, IL

#6033 Oct 6, 2012
Pattiecake58 wrote:
<quoted text>
you really don't have to continue trying to convience me you WANT to be vulgar.... i already know you DELIGHT in it.
Apparently you delight in vulgarity too since you use it when it suits your needs and you keep responding to my posts despite your protestations of offense and multiple public announcements that you no longer would.
Pattiecake58 wrote:
you wanna play that game? using the KKK to compare bigotry to?
So you don't think KKK members are bigots? Really?
Pattiecake58 wrote:
so you can bash me and christianity?
You bash Islam and Judaism, among other faiths. What's the matter? You can dish it out but can't take it?
Pattiecake58 wrote:
you are to BLIND to know this but YOU ARE A BIGOT.
you are so busy calling me and others who oppose sexual immorality as wrong, because it is wrong as bigots that you don't even see the bigotry splashed all over your face.
you are a bigot of GOD
If disagreeing with your interpretation of the bible makes one a bigot, then millions of Christians and Jews are also bigots since they don't share your views.
Pattiecake58 wrote:
because you reject and refuse His complete word and instructions and His gift of salvation.
I don't reject God; I reject your religious beliefs. Your freedom of religion in no way requires me or anyone else to share, much live by, your religious beliefs.
Pattiecake58 wrote:
you are a bigot of TRUTH and morality because you ignor truth and cling to the lie and SUPPORT WHAT GOD FORBIDS.
God forbids lying but you're a profligate liar. Thanks for admitting you're a bigot of truth and morality, sinner.
Pattiecake58 wrote:
you call good evil and evil good.
So do you since you consider yourself good and me evil.
Pattiecake58 wrote:
you are a bible bigot
a Christian bigot
a morality bigot[/QUOTE
You're obviously making up your own definitions of words again. The reason why you're a bigot and I'm not is that while I disagree with many if not most of your religious beliefs, I don't deny or infringe your right to profess the faith of your choice or exercise your freedom of speech to publicly discuss your faith (pointing out you're off topic in a Topix thread is not denying your freedom of speech either). You, on the other hand, publicly advocate discrimination against a minority class of your fellow citizens simply because you dislike them. You advocate infringing their civil rights and subjecting their civil rights to public vote in violation of the US constitution's guarantee of equal protection under the law for all, not merely the majority.

[QUOTE who="Pattiecake58"]s o every time you call me a bigot for obeying GOD, you are showing your demonic nature to the world as a bigot of that which is holy and good.[QUOTE]
If you think obeying God makes you above the law, then not only are you a bigot, you're a seditionist and should be treated accordingly as one who not only denies the authority of the constitution and our elected government but also incites others to disobedience against them.

[QUOTE who="Pattiecake58"]i see thru you like glass.
Actually, you're blind, deaf and dumb to reality; the Christian theocracy you think you live in is merely a a fantasy world created by your your delusional mind.

“saved From jesus”

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#6034 Oct 6, 2012
hey Bob wrote:
Have you ever given any thought to this scenario: There are songs, stories, and books about "What if Jesus came back...as a junkie, a homeless person, an unwed mother" etc. What if Jesus came back as a gay man? Would you treat him with the kindness and respect he deserves, or accuse him of being a child rapist and all the other lies you tell here?
You see Bob, it could happen - God does have a sense of humor...and what will He think of you for treating a person in this way? You just never know do you???
Treat all people with dignity, respect and kindness you could be talking to Jesus, please keep that in mind!
What if he comes back and tells everyone what a big jerk off his father really is?
guest

Farmington, MO

#6035 Oct 6, 2012
Bob wrote:
S.F. Gay Rights Leader Arrested Over Child Porn:

S.F. CRIME:

Published 09:21 p.m., Monday, June 25, 2012:

San Francisco police have arrested veteran gay rights advocate Larry Brinkin in connection with felony possession of child pornography.

Brinkin, 66, who worked for the San Francisco Human Rights Commission before his retirement in 2010, was taken into custody Friday night. He spent the night in jail before he was released on bail, according to a spokeswoman for the sheriff's department.
The district attorney's office will decide Tuesday whether to file charges. "We're still reviewing the case," district attorney's spokeswoman Stephanie Ong Stillman said Monday.

Police say that Brinkin had pornographic images, some that appear to show children as young as 1 and 2 or 3 years old being sodomized and performing oral sex on adult men, in e-mail attachments linked to his account, according to a search warrant served by San Francisco police.

Sick gays.
Just one man trying to keep up with the Catholics! Unfortunately the LGBT movement is not tolerant of this behavior, and will not protect their members at the cost of children.

Would you like me to post the articles that come up on line, when I google pedophiles and religion?

The devil is in the details! And in the church! And in you BOB!

I will pray for you, that your mind will be able to wander away from gay sex and molesting children. The lord will protect you from these desires! All you need to do is ask humbly.

Passing Through

Chicago, IL

#6036 Oct 6, 2012
Pattiecake58 wrote:
<quoted text>
MY GOODNESS! not only is your tongue diseased with filth but your mind is rotted out as well.
that post number does NOT show me saying that 'BRITIAN' discovered America, you filthy liar.
Your words clearly assert people that fled Britain discovered America:

"i said the ones that discovered America fled another country (Brit)"

And that's simply not true.
Pattiecake58 wrote:
i sent you 3 different history links
None of which supported your assertion that people fleeing Britain discovered America. Or even your original assertion that started your latest rampage of lies that the Founding Fathers fled Britain to establish a free nation.
Pattiecake58 wrote:
and if you are to bullheaded and wicked minded to acknowlege those links
I did acknowledge your links as irrelevant to the issue at hand: namely your lie that people fleeing Britain discovered America.
Pattiecake58 wrote:
then you can take yourself a long walk off a short pier.
And you can go f*ck yourself. If you can pry satan out of your ass, that is.
Pattiecake58 wrote:
you don't want to discuss the issue at hand.......
you are doing your best to skirt the issue of why homoseuxality is wrong, so you are avoiding it at all costs by nitpicking trivial things NON related Trival things so you won't have to face the truth of GODS WORD on it.[/QUOTE
The topic of the thread is NOT homosexuality or your religious beliefs. So I'm not skirting anything; you're simply trying to hijack the thread off topic. So I simply remind you of your lies and hypocrisy and apostasy.

[QUOTE who="Pattiecake58"]y ou are so transparent.
HOMOSEXUALITY IS FORBIDDEN BY GOD>
So you believe. But not all Christians or Jews share your belief. Deal with it.
Pattiecake58 wrote:
now you either acknowledge it
or admit you don't care what GOD says about it
I simply don't care what YOU say about it. YOU aren't God and you've yet to provide evidence God appointed you His spokesperson on earth. Until you can, your words and beliefs have no authority over anyone but yourself.
Pattiecake58 wrote:
and atleast be honest about your wicked agenda here.
I have no wicked agenda; I'm simply rebuking YOUR wickedness.
Pattiecake58 wrote:
you don't have the ----- to be honest.
Says the lying, hypocritical, bigoted apostate. Now what were you laughable pontificating about "honesty"?

And by the way, since I never fully spell out the word "c*nt", it doesn't really qualify as foul language. You've repeatedly asserted that intentionally misspelled words can't be vulgar or insulting which you demonstrate once more by substituting dashes for a word you obviously deem vulgar enough that you won't use the actual spelling for it.
Passing Through

Chicago, IL

#6038 Oct 6, 2012
Pattiecake58 wrote:
<quoted text>
HAHAHHAAHA so NOWW wwwwwwww you are an autority on catholic as well as Judiasm? LOL
you are amusing if nothing else.
I have alot of friends who are catholic, so don't try to peddle your vast knowledge of the ADDED books catholics have......in addition to the bible.
i know better.
If you knew "better", you'd know Protestants removed the canonical status of the Apocrypha after the Reformation. So in fact, it was Protestants that changed the Christian bible, not Catholics.

So as usual, you know nothing about the history of your own faith.
Passing Through

Chicago, IL

#6039 Oct 6, 2012
How I See It wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually the bible doesn't teach that the wicked go to hell. The scriptures say that the wages sin pays is death. It doesn't doesn't say death and an eternity of torment. God told Adam and Eve they would die if they disobeyed, not that they would suffer for all eternity. By the way, I see you mentioned that Golem person. Did he die? If so, was it from HIV?
Golem died from a heart attack.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Gay marriage (Mar '13) 8 min Reverend Alan 54,839
Gay Marriage Vs. the First Amendment 13 min Reverend Alan 381
Once more on fascism knocking on the Balkan doo... (Aug '09) 16 min UtterNutter 1,026
Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 17 min lides 2,969
Arkansas Police Chief Resigns After Calling Rep... 28 min MustBAMistake 2
Residents see Europe best for gays and lesbians... 32 min RalphB 26
Is Vladimir Putin Another Adolf Hitler? 34 min Tuco Blondie 882
Legislature Says No to "Gay Panic" Defense 1 hr RalphB 48
Judge critical of states defending gay marriage... 1 hr RalphB 58
Supreme Court: Was gay marriage settled in 1972... 9 hr Frankie Rizzo 493
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

Gay/Lesbian People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••