So, What Is It That The Anti-Gay Grou...

So, What Is It That The Anti-Gay Groups Actually Fear?

There are 18008 comments on the lezgetreal.com story from Aug 17, 2012, titled So, What Is It That The Anti-Gay Groups Actually Fear?. In it, lezgetreal.com reports that:

What makes hate, well, hate? Given that today is something of a quiet news day, it may be nice to give ourselves a breather and think about some things.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at lezgetreal.com.

Since: Jun 09

Location hidden

#5870 Oct 5, 2012
shaking head wrote:
<quoted text>
Jesus was a Rabbi (teacher) and a very radical one at that, in those times. His followers were fellow Jews...not Christians. What book are you reading, it certainly isn't the Bible?
Rabbi means "teacher". He wasn't radical at all. He simply taught the scriptures and stated his fathers purpose and how people should conduct themselves. He was not a Jewish religious leader and in fact had contempt for them, referring to them as "sons of their father the devil". He opened up the way for gentiles to become his followers. He started the Christian congregation by turning his attention to the nations and not just the Jews. Like I said, do some reading.

“What came 1st? Stupid or bigot”

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#5871 Oct 5, 2012
RatherBeInMissouri wrote:
<quoted text>
If sin is sin, does it make a difference if I, a lesbian, or you, a judgemental liar, should or shouldn't be with the Lord?
Or are you actually trying to turn me away from God?
It KILLS you that a lesbian can have a relationship with the Lord, doesn't it?
<quoted text>
I follow all of the 10 commandments as best I can. Do you?
BTW, homosexuality is not mentioned in the commandments.
<quoted text>
No, it actually said "malakoi," which meant effeminate, which means woman like, which IN CONTEXT of Biblical times means morally weak, easily coerced, cowardly, even materialistic. It has nothing to do with sexuality.
Another mistranslated word...
Effeminate does not = Homosexual.
Since when did "woman like" and homosexual mean the same thing?
Pattiecake58 wrote:
<quoted text>
how sad......... you dont know the difference between judging and rebuking.
i am not a liar.
oh yes all you lovers of sin perceive the truth of the bible as a lie so therefore you call me and anyone who stands on biblical truth as a liar.
thats because as the bible says YOU call good evil and evil good.
i am NOT a liar.
i am telling you the truth according to the HOLY bible.
your problem is with the scriptures not me.
and rebuking sin IS what we are called to do.
the bible tells us concerning that NOT to cast what is holy before the dogs or cast our pearls before swine lest they turn and tear us to pieces........just how do you think we are to not cast what is holy before the dogs and swine UNLESS we make a judgement call on who the dogs and swine are?
we are told in the bible to TEST THE SPIRITS to know from which they come, God or satan.
on or the other.
the battle is between good and evil and was so long before GOD created this world.......
it is spiritual warfare.
so to address your statement,
GOD says to them who sin, judgement WILL come.
i am not a judgemental liar i am a child of GOD who stands on biblical truth.
Look at you.. avoiding any kind of confrontation of anything I said in the previous post. how cute. Like a dog chasing its tail.
Since when did effeminate mean homosexual?

“What came 1st? Stupid or bigot”

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#5872 Oct 5, 2012
Pattiecake58 wrote:
<quoted text>
no it kills YOU that you can't pull that hooey with me.
NO ONE can have a relationship with the LORD if they are living a life in opposition to what GOD says.
And yet here you are!
Pattiecake58 wrote:
<the LORD tells us that NO ONE can enter into heaven if they are living as the world lives......and 1 Cor plainly tells you that NO homosexual will inherit the kingdom of GOD.
BS. The word homosexual NEVER appeared in the original scriptures! Not even a word that MEANT homosexual! You do know that, RIGHT?! Why are you avoiding this FACT?
Pattiecake58 wrote:
<anyone who says he or she knows GOD but does not keep His commandments IS a liar and the truth is not in him.
thats scriptural truth.
I do keep His commandments. All 10 of them! Do you, LIAR?!
Passing Through

South Bend, IN

#5873 Oct 5, 2012
Pattiecake58 wrote:
<quoted text>
isn't it hysterical how those who go around calling others liars all the time, are the very ones lying all the time?
Indeed. So why do you do it? You've never once refuted the proof I've given proving you a liar.
Pattiecake58 wrote:
why don't you type out that entire link deceiver..........
instead of only one paragrah to mislead with.
Because I can't quote what isn't there, you bone headed c*nt. The link you provided in post #5638 to which I replied was this one:

http://wiki.answers.com /Q/Who_were_the_first_settlers _in_America

In case you're too stupid to understand, it's not the same link as the one you cite below. The link in post #5638 was to wiki.answers.com , which is an entirely different website than your wikipedia link below.

You're proven a LIAR yet again. What a surprise. Not.
Pattiecake58 wrote:
this is THE LAST TIME i will tootle your ignorance.
Sorry, I'm not the ignorant one here; that would be you. You'd be better served tootling your rancid tw*t, you sex starved hag.
Pattiecake58 wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P ilgrims_(Plymouth_Colony)
the pilgrams came from England, settled here in 1620
when were we founded? 1776
Doesn't change the fact the Pilgrims were not the first English, much less European, settlers in America nor did they discover America as you previously claimed. But then how can we expect you to report accurate historical facts about the Pilgrims when you can't even spell the word correctly.
Passing Through

South Bend, IN

#5874 Oct 5, 2012
Pattiecake58 wrote:
<quoted text>
no it is a matter of NOT saying it to begin with.
this is a public discussion board not a porn site
You consider references to natural body functions to be pornography? You really have some major Freudian repression issues.
Pattiecake58 wrote:
there is NEVER a reason for anyone on here to use vulgarity or call people private body parts.
You aren't the arbiter of what language is or isn't allowed in a given context. I reserve civil language for civil people, not human garbage like you.
Pattiecake58 wrote:
and i have no reason to say 'number 2' on here either.
But it's OK to talk about your big hooters when describing yourself, huh?
Pattiecake58 wrote:
you miss the point as always.
this is NOT the place to vent your ugly side.
save it for those in your private life who don't find it offensive and wrong.
You seem to be under the mistaken belief you have some authority over me and my actions.
Pattiecake58 wrote:
the point is .... it SHOULD matter how you conduct yourself with others.
you might not care what you sound like when you say that...or how it makes you look.......but you should care.
Heed your own advice, c*nt. Just because you don't think your words insulting to others doesn't mean they aren't. And you use vulgar language when it suits you too, hypocrite. I even gave you links proving you used the words "f*g" and "f*ggy" as you requested and you IGNORED the post as you always do when proven to be a lying c*nt.

Here it is again: http://www.topix.com/forum/news/gay/T85ELBGC7...
Pattiecake58 wrote:
and the fact you don't is added proof of your demonic nature.
Unlike you, Piggiecake, I haven't revealed my real world identity. What anonymous people think of another anonymous poster is of no relevance.
Passing Through

South Bend, IN

#5875 Oct 5, 2012
Pattiecake58 wrote:
<quoted text>
you must be joking.
you forgot to list the book of shadows to, you know the satantic bible.........
LOL
your catholic and Mormon and Jehovahs wittness are all written by 'A' man.
the HOLY BIBLE was comprised of over 66 authors all living in different places, and times in history so that what was inspired by GOD thru those chosen prophets of GOD would FIT together in one complete WORK OF GOD.
big difference.
Lying again, I see. The content of the Catholic bible is the same as your Protestant bible. The only difference is Catholics consider the Apocrypha canonical and Protestants don't. And the Jewish bible leaves out the Christian new testament since Jews don't consider it scripture.
Passing Through

South Bend, IN

#5876 Oct 5, 2012
How I See It wrote:
<quoted text>
Anyone with half a brain knew what was being spoken of just by reading the post. You apparently don't possess even half a working brain moron.
Don't blame me for your poor English language skills. If you can't find the correct words to articulate your actual thoughts, perhaps you should seek the company of your intellectual peers at your local grade school.
Passing Through

South Bend, IN

#5877 Oct 5, 2012
How I See It wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually you are wrong once again you brain dead twit. Jesus started the Christian religion not the Jews. Get an education.
And Jesus was a Jew. Oops!

Since: Jun 09

Location hidden

#5879 Oct 5, 2012
Passing Through wrote:
<quoted text>
And Jesus was a Jew. Oops!
You are an idiot if you thing that makes a difference. The apostle Paul was a Jew and also a Roman citizen. He was a Christian. What makes you think ones ethnicity means he needs to belong to a certain religion.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#5880 Oct 5, 2012
How I See It wrote:
Rabbi means "teacher".
It's a title of respect, one could not just be called a Rabbi, one had to earn the distinction.
How I See It wrote:
He wasn't radical at all.
Huh? We've been lied to all these years? His views weren't seen as a threat to the existing Jewish religious/civic power structure?
How I See It wrote:
He simply taught the scriptures and stated his fathers purpose and how people should conduct themselves.
Odd, I always read it as him challenging the scriptures. Some he said were unimportant to man's relationship with God, others he said didn't go far enough.
How I See It wrote:
He was not a Jewish religious leader and in fact had contempt for them, referring to them as "sons of their father the devil". He opened up the way for gentiles to become his followers. He started the Christian congregation by turning his attention to the nations and not just the Jews. Like I said, do some reading.
Jesus was a Jew who taught and led other Jews in what he believed to be a better way of being Jewish. Christianity wasn't even his idea, it was just a cult that hung on in the Jewish Communities of the Empire after the Romans put down the rebellion. Then Paul came along and he used the Jewish works as nothing more than references to his version of Christianity made more palatable for the Gentile consumer.

Since: Jun 09

Location hidden

#5881 Oct 5, 2012
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>It's a title of respect, one could not just be called a Rabbi, one had to earn the distinction. <quoted text>Huh? We've been lied to all these years? His views weren't seen as a threat to the existing Jewish religious/civic power structure? <quoted text>Odd, I always read it as him challenging the scriptures. Some he said were unimportant to man's relationship with God, others he said didn't go far enough. <quoted text>Jesus was a Jew who taught and led other Jews in what he believed to be a better way of being Jewish. Christianity wasn't even his idea, it was just a cult that hung on in the Jewish Communities of the Empire after the Romans put down the rebellion. Then Paul came along and he used the Jewish works as nothing more than references to his version of Christianity made more palatable for the Gentile consumer.
You are merely a qu_er moron who knows nothing of the bible.
shaking head

AOL

#5882 Oct 5, 2012
How I See It wrote:
<quoted text>
You are merely a qu_er moron who knows nothing of the bible.
How very Christian of you! Maybe you should ask your Pastor/Minister/Preacher or whatever for help understanding what you read in the Bible, you seem to have a comprehension problem.

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#5883 Oct 5, 2012
How I See It wrote:
<quoted text>
Rabbi means "teacher". He wasn't radical at all. He simply taught the scriptures and stated his fathers purpose and how people should conduct themselves. He was not a Jewish religious leader and in fact had contempt for them, referring to them as "sons of their father the devil". He opened up the way for gentiles to become his followers. He started the Christian congregation by turning his attention to the nations and not just the Jews. Like I said, do some reading.
Now THAT is some rebuking.
Though you've got one thing wrong; Jesus was all about love, not hate. You seem to hate many individuals, so you are not following Jesus's examples.

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#5884 Oct 5, 2012
How I See It wrote:
<quoted text>
You are merely a qu_er moron who knows nothing of the bible.
Annnnd...here we go again...

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#5885 Oct 5, 2012
How I See It wrote:
You are merely a qu_er moron who knows nothing of the bible.
Thus spaketh the noted heterosexual intellectual and Christian theological scholar, who amazingly enough, is unable to disprove a single thing I said.

Can you hear me laughing now my brother?

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#5886 Oct 5, 2012
shaking head wrote:
<quoted text>
How very Christian of you! Maybe you should ask your Pastor/Minister/Preacher or whatever for help understanding what you read in the Bible, you seem to have a comprehension problem.
He should perhaps look to Jesus's teachings and correct himself.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#5887 Oct 5, 2012
Lacez wrote:
He should perhaps look to Jesus's teachings and correct himself.
Now, now you two. If Jesus would have acted like an obnoxious twelve year old, what our little friend posted to me would have been very Christlike, now wouldn't it?

“MEET KIKI -She Seeks Home”

Since: Oct 10

With Established Harem

#5888 Oct 5, 2012
RatherBeInMissouri wrote:
<quoted text>
LMAO! Hell,*I* love HL!
GROUP HUG!!!
.. there you go! It's all love, baby, it's all love ..

<< BIG SMOOCH >>
<< COME ON GUYS - GIVE US LADIES SOME HIP GRINDING >>

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#5889 Oct 5, 2012
Happy Lesbo wrote:
<quoted text>
.. there you go! It's all love, baby, it's all love ..
<< BIG SMOOCH >>
<< COME ON GUYS - GIVE US LADIES SOME HIP GRINDING >>
Hugs everywhere!
*hugs*
shaking head

AOL

#5890 Oct 5, 2012
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>Now, now you two. If Jesus would have acted like an obnoxious twelve year old, what our little friend posted to me would have been very Christlike, now wouldn't it?
but, but, but...How I See It, doesn't seem to see so good LOL.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 1 hr River Tam 45,132
News LGBT issues present Trump with loyalty test 1 hr Dr Reker s Bellhop 1
News Scientists reveal lesbians are MUCH more likely... 1 hr Dr Reker s Bellhop 4
News Gay-basher gets 2 months in jail for on-camera ... 1 hr Dr Reker s Bellhop 1
News Trans woman in Halifax questions if prejudice i... 1 hr Dr Reker s Bellhop 3
News Is your child a "prehomosexual"? Forecasting ad... (Sep '10) 3 hr Humanspirit 767
News Doritos makes rainbow chips in support of gay r... (Sep '15) 5 hr guest 1,081
News 'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15) 12 hr Carter county res... 24,770
More from around the web