So, What Is It That The Anti-Gay Grou...

So, What Is It That The Anti-Gay Groups Actually Fear?

There are 18009 comments on the lezgetreal.com story from Aug 17, 2012, titled So, What Is It That The Anti-Gay Groups Actually Fear?. In it, lezgetreal.com reports that:

What makes hate, well, hate? Given that today is something of a quiet news day, it may be nice to give ourselves a breather and think about some things.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at lezgetreal.com.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#4284 Sep 23, 2012
Marengo Jon wrote:
<quoted text>
Turn your hearing aid up, grandma.
NOBODY GIVES A RAT'S BUTT ABOUT THIS QUESTION EXCEPT FOR YOU.
Seriously, you're the worst troll ever.
Muntzinga, mangina man.
Honey, admit it, you can't answer it because it exposes your defect. Your fear of reality leads you into deeper and deeper denial.

Why are you so afraid?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#4285 Sep 23, 2012
Whisgean Zoda wrote:
<quoted text>
What "bazinga"? We're simply back to, there is no proof that gay people aren't as "good" at parenting as traditional parents. The fact that people think they aren't is nothing more than assumption.
So tell me, with all the child abuse, abortions, children put up for adoption, multiple marriages, utter lack of respect and generally shitty parenting, what exactly is so great about "traditional parenting" today anyway?
1. Look up the Cinderella Effect.

2. The most valid studies show a distinct difference between biological parents and every single other type. Common sense and children agree.

Your reasoning, "because some are bad parents, all are bad" is really childish reasoning. Maybe you should wait a few years to be on here?

Bazinga!

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

#4286 Sep 23, 2012
mram wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no fear! As the Bible says in the end times righteous will be wrong and wrong will be righteous!
All these tactics are old and tired! The Church is not to blame and have the right to stay with the Doctrine of GOD. What is your Doctrine? Name calling, doing what you want an forcing others to see it your way! Man will never change GODS word!
Yes, man has always gone off on his own wants and desires! GOD SAID it is an abomination and Jesus said he did not come to change one jot or title of GOD law!
Those who follow, Love and Keep Gods law have nothing to be ashamed of!
What people do in The darkness of night or in their own is their own is their own!
Why people feel the need to be public and demand others accept it, will never understand!
People say they want privacy and then live in public arenas!
Christians are not sorry for the word of GOD or GODS laws! No Religious Organization will go against Doctrines held for thousands of years to accommodate some long held practice GOD called an abomination. God made man and woman to create life. It cannot happen any other way!
There is no god. Do you have any rational reason for your bizarre hatred of homosexuals?

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#4289 Sep 23, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Every culture has had genetic defects of various kinds.
You were saying something about trolling???
How can a "culture" have "genetic defects" ?

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#4290 Sep 23, 2012
Lacez wrote:
<quoted text>
According to KiMare, you're out on the prowl for men.
XD
I suppose he is insecure enough in his own sexuality to claim that.

He'd be wrong, of course - not that that'd be new to him either.

Hehehe.

“It's a bathroom”

Since: Jul 07

Get over it, already

#4291 Sep 23, 2012
snyper wrote:
<quoted text>
How can a "culture" have "genetic defects" ?
Snyper, Kuntmare said it, so it MUST be true. She never posts opinions; only facts.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#4292 Sep 23, 2012
DidNotFinishSchool wrote:
<quoted text>And every culture that has existed has had cross dressers. What's your point?
snyper wrote:
<quoted text>
How can a "culture" have "genetic defects" ?
I was answering in the context of DNF'S question.

However, there are DNA distinctions within long term cultures.

Bazinga!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#4293 Sep 23, 2012
BEN STEIN: What do you think is the possibility that Intelligent Design might turn out to be the answer to some issues in genetics or in Darwinian evolution.

DAWKINS: Well, it could come about in the following way. It could be that at some earlier time, somewhere in the universe, a civilization evolved, probably by some kind of Darwinian means, probably to a very high level of technology, and designed a form of life that they seeded onto perhaps this planet. Um, now that is a possibility, and an intriguing possibility. And I suppose itÂ’s possible that you might find evidence for that if you look at the details of biochemistry, molecular biology, you might find a signature of some sort of designer.

It appears that Dawkins agrees with the possibility of aliens influencing the creation of life.

Which makes the fact that the Pentateuch (first five books of the Bible) which is attributed to Moses (given to him with the Law at the meeting on the mountain with the Alien) all the more interesting. The big bang, life from the ground, genderless life at the beginning...

Don't you agree?

Of course not, that would mean you have been proven idiots.

Bazinga!
Uve

Indio, CA

#4294 Sep 23, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Pure ignorance
Bazinga!
I think you've had enough attention for the week. All of your STUPID arguments have been answered MANY times on here and yet you fail to acknowledge them. You need to know SOMETHING about sociology before making your pointless bigoted remarks. Your Cinderella effect argument is pointless when applied to gay adoption, the premise of the study was based on 2nd heterosexual marriages and the effects on children from previous marriages. BTW your stupid radiation argument was answered too. So in other words ESAD!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#4295 Sep 23, 2012
Uve wrote:
<quoted text>
I think you've had enough attention for the week. All of your STUPID arguments have been answered MANY times on here and yet you fail to acknowledge them. You need to know SOMETHING about sociology before making your pointless bigoted remarks. Your Cinderella effect argument is pointless when applied to gay adoption, the premise of the study was based on 2nd heterosexual marriages and the effects on children from previous marriages. BTW your stupid radiation argument was answered too. So in other words ESAD!
-Most gay unions with children are step, not adoptive situations. Therefore the Cinderella Effect directly applies.

-Richard Dawkins agrees with me about the likelihood of Alien influence in creation, which only validates my assertion about the radiation, the known validity of many OT Laws, the hovering cloud/fire and the incredible prediction of Hebrew destiny.

Anal sex often involves eating shit and dying early. Seems you should be the one worrying...

Bazinga!
Uve

Indio, CA

#4296 Sep 23, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
-Most gay unions with children are step, not adoptive situations. Therefore the Cinderella Effect directly applies.
-Richard Dawkins agrees with me about the likelihood of Alien influence in creation, which only validates my assertion about the radiation, the known validity of many OT Laws, the hovering cloud/fire and the incredible prediction of Hebrew destiny.
Anal sex often involves eating shit and dying early. Seems you should be the one worrying...
Bazinga!
Not true about gay parenting, pure conjecture- prove it
Then Richard Dawkins is an idiot just like you. I'm not saying there isn't the possibility of alien life, but YOUR conclusion about radiation is silly and You've supplied NO proof. If you knew anything about spirituality the only reasonable conclusion would be glow from enlightenment - Yes I know, a hard concept for you.
Your only fantasizing about anal intercourse, either that or your doing it wrong. AND for your bigoted little one track mind, anal intercourse is not only just a male homosexual act, MANY heterosexual couples use 'the back door', especially as a means of not getting pregnant (And I know for a fact straight people that do it). Yes, I do worry, that there is SO many ignorant people in this country that can't think for themselves and have to use an Ideology book.
Bazinga up your ass!
Bob

Tenino, WA

#4297 Sep 23, 2012
The masonic illuminati plan to make homosexuality is accepted is working. A homosexuals separate themselves from GODS love. They then become the reject rebrobates who follow the antichrist right into the flames of hell. The gay is the ultimate victim of the devil and hell. Like a blind sheep being led to the slaughter.

Homosexuality is a horrible curse.

Romans 6:23 - "For the wages of sin is death... "
Bob

Tenino, WA

#4298 Sep 23, 2012
Marengo Jon wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey Bob, do you prefer circumcised, or uncircumcised d!ck?
Have to ever wondered if you are demon possessed by a foul spirit ?

Homosexuals that fail to repent, will be condemned to hell.

Leviticus 18:22 - You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination.

Leviticus 20:13 - If there is a man who lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, both of them have committed a detestable act; they shall surely be put to death. Their blood guiltiness is upon them.

Romans 1:26-27 - For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural, and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing indecent acts and receiving in their own persons the due penalty of their error.

Romans 6:23 - "For the wages of sin is death... "

I Corinthians 6:9 (NIV)- Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.

I Timothy 1:8-11 (NASB)- "But we know that the Law is good, if one uses it lawfully, realizing the fact that law is not made for a righteous person, but for those who are lawless and rebellious, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers and immoral men and homosexuals and kidnappers and liars and perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound teaching, according to the glorious gospel of the blessed God, with which I have been entrusted."
Uve

Indio, CA

#4299 Sep 23, 2012
Just for you 'BOOB'

2:27AM Monday Sep 24, 2012
661 online now
See today's paper
Subscribe

Fairfax Media

SMH
Real Estate
Cars
Jobs
Dating
Newsletters
More

The Sydney Morning Herald
NSW

NSW News
Sydney
Education
Health
Environment
The Diary
Sydney Traffic
Cars
Jobs
Real Estate
Dating

You are here: Home NSW Article
Search smh:
Search in:

smh.com .au

I'm an artist: ex-officer who posted teen photos on porn site

Date
August 28, 2012

Louise Hall
Louise Hall
Court Reporter

View more articles from Louise Hall

Follow Louise on Twitter Email Louise

inShare
Email article
Print

A former police officer who has admitted doctoring photos of teenage girls he met through a church youth group and posted them on a pornographic website says he likes to think of himself as an "artist".

Wayne Paul Mason, 42, is charged with more than 50 child sex and pornography charges after one of his alleged victims found on a website explicit photos of herself and other girls taken by him nearly a decade earlier.

Mr Mason, who was an officer with the NSW Police between 1997 and 2003, has pleaded not guilty.

The prosecution claims Mr Mason had sexual relationships with at least two 14- and 15-year-old girls he met through his role as a youth group leader and karate teacher at a Baptist Church in Sydney's south-west.
Advertisement

In a 2010 police interview played to a NSW District Court jury today, Mr Mason said he only flirted and engaged in "romantic talk" with one of the girls until she reached the age of consent.

He said a sexual relationship began when she was 16 but even then the couple faced a "stigma" because he was in his 30s.

"It's suffice to say love doesn't conquer all," he said.

The Crown prosecutor, Sarah Huggett, said the woman, now in her mid 20s, entered her name into a search engine and discovered pornographic photos allegedly taken by Mr Mason when she was 15. She also found similar pictures of other young girls she recognised from the church group.

In the police interview, Mr Mason admitted taking the photos of the woman during their four-year relationship.

"Of course; she was my girlfriend," he said. "I like to call myself a bit of an artist."

But he claimed he had doctored some of the other photos found on the website. He said he placed pictures of the girls' faces on the bodies of "random" women in sexually explicit poses.

Asked if he was sexually gratified by the images, he said: "No, it was more the ability to make people think it was real. I enjoy that they think it's real. Maybe it's an artist thing."

The charges date back to 1996 when Mr Mason allegedly kissed the 14- and 15-year-old younger sister of a woman he was dating.

Mr Mason allegedly preyed on the teenagers, showering them with attention, gifts and love letters before they agreed to various sex acts with him, including being photographed in sexual poses.

However, because the girls were under 16 at the time they could not give consent, Ms Huggett said.

Often, Mason was in a position of authority as their youth group leader or karate teacher, which aggravated the offences, she said.

The trial continues.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/im-an-artist-exoffi...

“It's a bathroom”

Since: Jul 07

Get over it, already

#4300 Sep 23, 2012
Uve wrote:
<quoted text>
Not true about gay parenting, pure conjecture- prove it
Then Richard Dawkins is an idiot just like you. I'm not saying there isn't the possibility of alien life, but YOUR conclusion about radiation is silly and You've supplied NO proof. If you knew anything about spirituality the only reasonable conclusion would be glow from enlightenment - Yes I know, a hard concept for you.
Your only fantasizing about anal intercourse, either that or your doing it wrong. AND for your bigoted little one track mind, anal intercourse is not only just a male homosexual act, MANY heterosexual couples use 'the back door', especially as a means of not getting pregnant (And I know for a fact straight people that do it). Yes, I do worry, that there is SO many ignorant people in this country that can't think for themselves and have to use an Ideology book.
Bazinga up your ass!
Kuntmare loves to paint with very broad, general strokes. Zhe tends to forget that many women use anal as a means to:

1. retain their "virginity", and
2. prevent pregnancy.

Personally, I think zhe secretly craves some back door loving.

“MEET KIKI -She Seeks Home”

Since: Oct 10

With Established Harem

#4301 Sep 23, 2012
mram wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no fear! As the Bible says in the end times righteous will be wrong and wrong will be righteous!
All these tactics are old and tired! The Church is not to blame and have the right to stay with the Doctrine of GOD. What is your Doctrine? Name calling, doing what you want an forcing others to see it your way! Man will never change GODS word!
Yes, man has always gone off on his own wants and desires! GOD SAID it is an abomination and Jesus said he did not come to change one jot or title of GOD law!
Those who follow, Love and Keep Gods law have nothing to be ashamed of!
What people do in The darkness of night or in their own is their own is their own!
Why people feel the need to be public and demand others accept it, will never understand!
People say they want privacy and then live in public arenas!
Christians are not sorry for the word of GOD or GODS laws! No Religious Organization will go against Doctrines held for thousands of years to accommodate some long held practice GOD called an abomination. God made man and woman to create life. It cannot happen any other way!
.. what a child you are. Daddy said, "Eat your vegetables or go to your room hungry, your choice." Does that ring a bell? Your religion has left you intellectually, emotionally and spiritually stunted ..

.. your beliefs are based on obedience, dependence and an inferiority complex - that man is sinful defective filth, unable to do any good or succeed unless he obeys daddy ..

.. like a child, you believe everything in the bible is true because god said it and that settles it. Oh, lucky you! You were chosen to become his messenger, to proclaim his message of love ..

.. he told you to tell people what filthy, sinful abominations they are, to threaten them with a place where torture is eternal. Remember the hell of your childhood when you went to bed hungry? God replaced your daddy and you must obey him ..

.. you believe a homicidal, omnipotent man somewhere in the galaxy watches over you, protects you, judges you 24/7 and punishes or rewards you. You're like a child who believes Santa kept a list of naughty and nice. Are you a good little boy because it's honorable, right or do you just want that bright shiny tricycle when you die ??..

.. your love of god is immature and ego centered, done for your benefit, not for your love object ..

.. this type of infantile love promotes division and unhappiness. You scapegoat gays, people who do not believe as you do and atheists. You get to call them immoral, lovers of sin and make their lives difficult by heaping shame on them just like your daddy in the sky does to you. That scores brownie points and ensures your salvation ..

.. now, be a good little boy - go eat your vegetables ..

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#4302 Sep 23, 2012
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean the evidence that anal sex is inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning? I've already proved that.
Or that homosexuality is a genetic defect? I've proved that too.
All you have is really, really idiotic denial.
Bazinga!
<quoted text>
Actually, I have.
All you've done is deny and ask diversionary questions.
Apparently one of your problems is comprehension. Anal sex does not just have "chances of harming", as the Doctor said, "The only way to completely avoid anal sex risks is to abstain from anal sex." Ever hear that stated about natural, normal sex?
All this begs the question, how in hell does anyone get a septic system confused with a playground???
Bazinga!
Actually you haven't...in this comment you didn't even address the other things that you didn't even give any real proof of.

As I said, there is a RISK of being harmed, you are not DEFINITELY harmed. Same thing with vaginal sex, there is a RISK of getting harmed in that as well.

No one but you, hun, no one but you...

“Psalms 27:14 HOPE! ”

Since: Dec 11

Cincinnati, Ohio

#4303 Sep 23, 2012
boooots wrote:
<quoted text>
Patty, I don't know how many of your posts Mona has read, but for those of us that have read many thousand of them, I think it is a pretty safe bet to make a general comment on you and your character. You pretty openly expose your true self every time you post here.
THAT IS GOOD! i want my true character to shine forth.
i am a Christian
i am a child of GOD
and i am moral minded
and PROUD OF IT.

“Psalms 27:14 HOPE! ”

Since: Dec 11

Cincinnati, Ohio

#4304 Sep 23, 2012
Happy Lesbo wrote:
<quoted text>
.. you'll find the Bible in the same section as the Tao Te Ching, Book of Mormon, Koran and Bhagavad Gita. If they're all non-fiction, everyone can become a Mormon Hindu Muslim Buddhist ..
they are all in the religion section.

which is a true fact, they are all 'religions'
but only one of them is the RIGHT way.

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#4305 Sep 23, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Damn dumb and off the chart dumb.
Bazinga!
I'm guessing you didn't understand what I meant by "2 seater?"
See, it means you have two holes that items can be inserted within, below the waist. I wonder, when you pee, do you pee out of both your dick and your vag?
If you want to use vulgar statements that don't make sense, I'll use vulgarity to describe you. By the way, please answer the question I asked at the end of the previous paragraph (these are the types of questions you are asking).

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Gay sex - disgusts Allah and causes earthquakes... 1 hr Magic Utah Uwear 5
News Alabama Supreme Court annuls its ruling on lesb... 1 hr Magic Utah Uwear 4
News Christians Must Unite Now Against Gay Bullies a... 2 hr zen 31
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 2 hr Terra Firma 36,244
News Tennessee GSA Supporters Rally While Hate-Group... 2 hr betterfacts 14
News Anti-Gay Jehovah's Witness Cartoon Tells Kids T... 3 hr Tony Price 77 2,092
News Maroon 5 scrap North Carolina shows 4 hr Retired SOF 22
News 'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15) 6 hr River Tam 11,856
News Feds' transgender guidance provokes fierce back... 6 hr An NFL Fan 995
More from around the web