I have, polygamy, by defintion seeks greater protection of the law for three or more people to enter into a single marriage.Could you stop being an idiot for a few minutes and list them? You can't list them and you can't stop being an idiot.
Learn to count.
Would you care to quit being an idiot an indicate how this has any relevance to the topic at hand?
Face it, Wondering, you are too stupid to defend your idiotic notion that disclosing anti-gay donors subjects them to "illegal harassment," a claim that has been disprove by the fact that such donors were disclosed in around 12 states, and no such harassment occurred. So, instead you return to this idiotic and off topic drivel, which merely exposes the depths of your stupidity and lack of comprehension of basic concepts like counting.
Polygamy seeks to include more people in one marriage, ergo greater protection. 2 = 2 3 or more > 2. This isn't rocket science, kiddo.
Wondering, I have time and time again. Anyone with a modicum of intelligence would understand that polygamy, by definition seeks greater protection of the law for three or more people to enter into one marriage.You don't. If you did you would list these "greater protections."
You can't, you fail.
Would you care to return to the topic at hand, or continue to make a fool of yourself by offering hopelessly off topic babble that doesn't even have any relevance to same sex marriage, much less disclosing the identity of donors to anti-gay marriage political campaigns?