'Somebody must stand up to homosexual...

'Somebody must stand up to homosexuals' - Stewart

There are 491 comments on the The Gleaner story from Aug 25, 2013, titled 'Somebody must stand up to homosexuals' - Stewart. In it, The Gleaner reports that:

A member of the local clergy is charging that Jamaican churches are in religious and spiritual turmoil on the issue of homosexuality.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Gleaner.

Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#443 Oct 6, 2013
Neil An Blowme wrote:
<quoted text>
WOW! Your reading comprehension is ZERO. I have NEVER in my entire life seen anybody as hopeless as you are.
So polygamy should be illegal because Frankie's reading comprehension is ZERO?

Well I guess it's better than your old justification for denying marriage equality. Which was "it's illegal". As in polygamy should be illegal because it's illegal. That one was funny! This one is just desperation and frustration.
Neil An Blowme

Hoboken, NJ

#444 Oct 6, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Great argument!
Do you even know what the argument is about, tardo?
Neil An Blowme

Hoboken, NJ

#445 Oct 6, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
If that were true, you have gotten all angry and upset by someone who is brain dead. What does that say about your brain?
Alright fruitloops. Think about that. Relax, then go to NY and get married! Enjoy. Why are you still here whining?
Angry and upset?

ahahahahhaha
ahahahhahahaha
ahahahhahahaha

At some barely literate fool like you?

hahahahaha
ahhahahahaha
ahhahahaha

I feel sorry for you going through life unable to comprehend what you read, and feeling SO badly about yourself that you feel the need to LIE. scientist..... sure you are.....
Neil An Blowme

Hoboken, NJ

#446 Oct 6, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
So polygamy should be illegal because Frankie's reading comprehension is ZERO?
Well I guess it's better than your old justification for denying marriage equality. Which was "it's illegal". As in polygamy should be illegal because it's illegal. That one was funny! This one is just desperation and frustration.
Who was talking about polygamy, dumbass? The conversation was about 'special' rights.

Way to prove that you're a total dunce.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#447 Oct 6, 2013
Neil An Blowme wrote:
<quoted text> Do you even know what the argument is about, tardo?
Yes. Do you?
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#448 Oct 6, 2013
Neil An Blowme wrote:
<quoted text>
Angry and upset?
ahahahahhaha
ahahahhahahaha
ahahahhahahaha
At some barely literate fool like you?
hahahahaha
ahhahahahaha
ahhahahaha
I feel sorry for you going through life unable to comprehend what you read, and feeling SO badly about yourself that you feel the need to LIE. scientist..... sure you are.....
"I'm not angry or upset." He angrily posted in a long psycho rant full of fake laughter and capitalization.

Again we are back to your dopey ad hominem. Get a real argument.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#449 Oct 6, 2013
Neil An Blowme wrote:
<quoted text>
Who was talking about polygamy, dumbass? The conversation was about 'special' rights.
Way to prove that you're a total dunce.
You asked what special rights were you asking for. I told you. Now you're mad. Too funny!
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#450 Oct 6, 2013
Neil An Blowme wrote:
<quoted text>
Who was talking about polygamy, dumbass? The conversation was about 'special' rights.
Way to prove that you're a total dunce.
I was talking about polygamy dumb ass. If you don't want to talk about it, don't. Easy! But then don't get mad and talk about it. It's a simple concept really.
Neil An Blowme

Hoboken, NJ

#451 Oct 7, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
You asked what special rights were you asking for. I told you. Now you're mad. Too funny!
Oh, I see now.... we're asking for the special right of polygamy. Is THAT what you're trying to suggest, oh stupid one?
Neil An Blowme

Hoboken, NJ

#452 Oct 7, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I was talking about polygamy dumb ass. If you don't want to talk about it, don't. Easy! But then don't get mad and talk about it. It's a simple concept really.
A.D.D. to the max..........
Neil An Blowme

Hoboken, NJ

#453 Oct 7, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
"I'm not angry or upset." He angrily posted in a long psycho rant
hellooooooooooo...... can you read at all????????

(quote) I'm not angry or upset.(end quote)

Where did you see that quote? Your brain is so fried up you can't even read.
Neil An Blowme

Hoboken, NJ

#455 Oct 7, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I was talking about polygamy dumb ass. If you don't want to talk about it, don't. Easy! But then don't get mad and talk about it. It's a simple concept really.
Then why did you respond to my post about 'special' rights?

I know why: YOU CAN'T READ.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#456 Oct 7, 2013
Neil An Blowme wrote:
<quoted text>
A.D.D. to the max..........
No substance to the max.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#457 Oct 7, 2013
Neil An Blowme wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, I see now.... we're asking for the special right of polygamy. Is THAT what you're trying to suggest, oh stupid one?
Polyamory is an acceptable topic in a discussion of sexuality. Your attempts to censor it away speak volumes.

Even if I were stupid, that's not an argument against equality. Try harder.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#458 Oct 7, 2013
Neil An Blowme wrote:
<quoted text>
hellooooooooooo...... can you read at all????????
(quote) I'm not angry or upset.(end quote)
Where did you see that quote? Your brain is so fried up you can't even read.
I was paraphrasing. You are angry and upset. Saying "No I'm not" isn't an argument. It's just dumb.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#459 Oct 7, 2013
Neil An Blowme wrote:
<quoted text>
hellooooooooooo...... can you read at all????????
Hi! Sure I can read. How about yourself?
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#460 Oct 7, 2013
Neil An Blowme wrote:
<quoted text>
Then why did you respond to my post about 'special' rights?
I know why: YOU CAN'T READ.
I'm allowed to respond to any post I want. Glad it makes you mad. Real glad!
Neil An Blowme

Hoboken, NJ

#461 Oct 7, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm allowed to respond to any post I want. Glad it makes you mad. Real glad!
Still haven't replace your Ouija board, eh Miss Cleo?
Neil An Blowme

Hoboken, NJ

#462 Oct 7, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I was paraphrasing. You are angry and upset. Saying "No I'm not" isn't an argument. It's just dumb.
Well you sure would know all about DUMB.

I can see that you are angry and mad for looking like an illiterate imbecile on Topix.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#463 Oct 7, 2013
Neil An Blowme wrote:
<quoted text>
Still haven't replace your Ouija board, eh Miss Cleo?
You still have absolutely no argument, Miss Ad Hominem.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
What Causes Boys To Turn Gay? 8 min Calvin 1
News Body politics: Just how important are looks to ... 18 min Calvin 10
News What would Jesus say about same-sex marriage? (Jul '15) 35 min Wisdom of Ages 18,934
News GOP lawmakers attempt to define gay marriage as... 35 min Calvin 7
News Atlanta City Council no longer has an openly ga... 1 hr Wondering 6
News Same-sex couple allegedly told they don't 'mirr... 1 hr FART SNIFF 30
News Rethinking gay marketability 1 hr Caleb 1
More from around the web