GOP debate: Romney, Santorum grilled ...

GOP debate: Romney, Santorum grilled on gay rights

There are 5 comments on the CW2 Colorado KWGN-TV story from Jan 8, 2012, titled GOP debate: Romney, Santorum grilled on gay rights. In it, CW2 Colorado KWGN-TV reports that:

Mitt Romney was reminded Sunday morning on the NBC/Facebook debate stage of a pledge he made in 1984, that he would "be a voice in the Republican Party to foster anti-discimination efforts" in the gay community.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CW2 Colorado KWGN-TV.

Since: Nov 09

Columbus OH

#1 Jan 8, 2012
Opposing "Same Sex Marriage" is discrimination pure and simple. It is treating Gay and Lesbian individuals that are legally married as second class citizens.
Gay in Bethlehem

Fort Wayne, IN

#2 Jan 8, 2012
"GRILLED"?!?

I'm glad Romney only needs to answer questions he wants to answer - because, as president, he'll get that choice...

And for Santorum... what did the moderator expect him to respond with to "What if your son were gay?"??? Unless you're a drunken moron, your answer will most likely reflect his - regardless of the truth. It's a stupid hypothetical, with an equally stupid answer. IF it did happen, I suspect him embracing his son and pulling a Cheney....As much as I dislike him, I genuinely feel he's a family man,..he's just too stupid to realize this CAN include gays.

The moderators should really include stats with these kinds of questions so that they can't just give Santorum-style answers of "...nobody should be discriminated against", while pretty much stating there's no reason for ENDA since this would be special treatment. Or give specific scenarios for DADT to prevent Santorum from stupidly claiming ...no one should involve others in their private sex-lives - ignoring that there's a double standard there. "Man talking about a trip with his wife" - OK!, "Man talking about a trip with his husband" ...might as well be talking about sex-positions.

If anything, I think the questions made Santorum look good and gay rights groups look like whiny jerks

“IMHO....”

Since: Jan 08

Here and there

#3 Jan 8, 2012
You simply cannot use logic to debate people who are incapable of logic. But it is important to realize that these heterosexist fools actually think LGBT citizens aren't discriminated against and have "full rights" now.
Schlaflys Semi Closet Son

Philadelphia, PA

#4 Jan 8, 2012
Romney never did get pinned down. It's easy: If the right wing freeeks and liars think there is a federal Constitutional right for married couples to use birth control (Griswold) then the freeeks have just agreed there is a right to privacy in the Constitution.

But they can't admit that due to Roe and marriage equality and even Lawrence. So Romney kept weaving.

He's really slimy, so it comes naturally. You can see Ex Sen. Frothy Lube squirm more when he is confronted.

Also, contrary to the post above, Santorum would not pull a Cheney if he had a glbt child. Santorum would mouth love while trying to squash the child's sexuality. Not even Cheney was that vile.

Since: Dec 07

Location hidden

#5 Jan 8, 2012
Weel except for the "drunken" part of "drunken moron", I think you described Santorum to a "T".
Gay in Bethlehem wrote:
"GRILLED"?!?
I'm glad Romney only needs to answer questions he wants to answer - because, as president, he'll get that choice...
And for Santorum... what did the moderator expect him to respond with to "What if your son were gay?"??? Unless you're a drunken moron, your answer will most likely reflect his - regardless of the truth. It's a stupid hypothetical, with an equally stupid answer. IF it did happen, I suspect him embracing his son and pulling a Cheney....As much as I dislike him, I genuinely feel he's a family man,..he's just too stupid to realize this CAN include gays.
The moderators should really include stats with these kinds of questions so that they can't just give Santorum-style answers of "...nobody should be discriminated against", while pretty much stating there's no reason for ENDA since this would be special treatment. Or give specific scenarios for DADT to prevent Santorum from stupidly claiming ...no one should involve others in their private sex-lives - ignoring that there's a double standard there. "Man talking about a trip with his wife" - OK!, "Man talking about a trip with his husband" ...might as well be talking about sex-positions.
If anything, I think the questions made Santorum look good and gay rights groups look like whiny jerks

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News How Franklin Graham took the reins from his leg... 1 hr youll shoot your ... 6
News 'Teen Mom 2's' David Eason fired by MTV after a... 2 hr Milton 7
News Court rules California bakeries may REFUSE to d... 3 hr Wondering 52
News The Latest: Gay pride parade backers eye suit o... 3 hr Wondering 4
News Lebanese State Security Member Arrested on Susp... 3 hr Myron 2
News Jeremy Corbyn: Same-sex sex education should be... 3 hr Myron 1
News This homophobic magistrate was just paid $325,0... 3 hr Wondering 37
The Spectrum Cafe (Dec '07) 16 hr GodSmacked 27,404
News Man charged with threatening Riverview church o... 16 hr Rose_NoHo 67
More from around the web