Gay marriage law 'could mean the end of adultery being grounds for divorce'

Dec 18, 2012 | Posted by: Rick in Kansas | Full story: www.dailymail.co.uk

Lawyers claim an unfaithful husband could use the courts to block his wife from divorcing them for adultery because same-sex couples are to be treated differently.

Comments
341 - 348 of 348 Comments Last updated Jan 30, 2013
First Prev
of 18
Next Last
Jane Dodo

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#357
Jan 25, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

straight shooter wrote:
<quoted text>
not me, there isn't one...
Not me, either.

straight shooter wrote:

<quoted text>
what does that say about a fundamental right to marry any consenting adult you wish?
turns out we as society can and do encourage certain family types, and deny others irrelevant of love or desire to marry, eh?
**********

So then why did you bring it up? It looks like you were merely being purposefully incendiary, again. You make a statement that isn't true and then start an argument over it.
straight shooter

Bellows Falls, VT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#358
Jan 28, 2013
 
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text> Not me, either.
straight shooter wrote:
<quoted text>
what does that say about a fundamental right to marry any consenting adult you wish?
turns out we as society can and do encourage certain family types, and deny others irrelevant of love or desire to marry, eh?
**********
So then why did you bring it up? It looks like you were merely being purposefully incendiary, again. You make a statement that isn't true and then start an argument over it.
if you weren't as dumb as you are, you would see a RHETORICAL QUESTION and the answer...

your silly attempt to be "purposefully incendiary" failed again.

so we AGREE there is no fundamental right to gay marriage, right?
straight shooter

Bellows Falls, VT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#359
Jan 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

eJohn wrote:
<quoted text>
So, in other words, "I can't provide a supportable, government-based reason to deny marriage equality, it's just animus on my part, but I'm not man enough to admit when I'm wrong."
How about we just leave it at that since it's painfully obvious that that's the case?
no. because you play stupid games like the "in other words" game on display here, you are simply not worth it...

“Marriage Equality”

Since: Dec 07

Lakeland, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#360
Jan 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

straight shooter wrote:
<quoted text>
no. because you play stupid games like the "in other words" game on display here, you are simply not worth it...
Here's a solution. Instead of claiming I'm playing stupid word games, how about you provide a supportable, government-based reason to deny marriage equality??

Wouldn't that stop my "stupid word games" right then and there?

Oh, yeah. You can't, because there IS no valid reason to deny equal rights, is there? Go figure!
straight shooter

Bellows Falls, VT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#361
Jan 29, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

eJohn wrote:
<quoted text>
Here's a solution. Instead of claiming I'm playing stupid word games, how about you provide a supportable, government-based reason to deny marriage equality??
gay realtionships are different and thus are not entitled to the same recognition.
Done.
now ignore it again and continue with your word games..
eJohn wrote:
<quoted text>

Wouldn't that stop my "stupid word games" right then and there?
obviously not.

you start from a position of being entitled, and so you will hear no argument to the contrary...
Jane Dodo

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#362
Jan 29, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

straight shooter wrote:
<quoted text>
gay realtionships are different and thus are not entitled to the same recognition.
Is that your professional opinion? Not too worried about disbarment, are ya?

“Marriage Equality”

Since: Dec 07

Lakeland, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#363
Jan 30, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

straight shooter wrote:
<quoted text>
gay realtionships are different and thus are not entitled to the same recognition.
Done.
now ignore it again and continue with your word games..
<quoted text>
obviously not.
you start from a position of being entitled, and so you will hear no argument to the contrary...
Okay. Not ignoring your continued attempts at smokescreens...

"Plumbers are different from electricians, therefore they are not entitled to the same recognition under the law."

"Women are different than men, therefore they are not entitled to the same recognition under the law."

"Bio families are different than blended families, therefore they are not entitled to the same recognition under the law."

"People that like broccoli are different than people that don't like broccoli, therefore they are not entitled to the same recognition under the law."

How are THOSE ridiculous statements any less ridiculous than yours?

And, yes, as American citizens, we DO start from a position of entitled. Entitled to equal rights and equal treatment under the law. So unless you can provide a supportable, government based reason to classify same-sex couples differently than opposite sex couples, you're just jerking yourself off here, aren't you?
Jane Dodo

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#364
Jan 30, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Judge Stephen Reinhardt, in the court’s 128-page opinion, wrote that “although the Constitution permits communities to enact most laws they believe to be desirable, it requires that there be at least a legitimate reason for the passage of a law that treats different classes of people differently. There was no such reason that Proposition 8 could have been enacted.”

SS look!!! Lookey, lookey! The judge ruled there's no legitimate reason for Prop 8! Isn't that how you would spin it? It's called consistency.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

First Prev
of 18
Next Last
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

42 Users are viewing the Gay/Lesbian Forum right now

Search the Gay/Lesbian Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 2 min Terry rigsby 49,001
Biggest Gay Lies 3 min Frankie Rizzo 1,229
CO Baker Found Guilty for Denying Gay Couple We... (Dec '13) 9 min Subliminal 16,206
Losing Streak Lengthens for Foes of Gay Marriage 29 min Frankie Rizzo 2,742
Jaid 29 min PuffnStuff 1
Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 46 min The_Box 2,626
The Coming Christian Revolt 48 min Liam R 268
Gay marriage (Mar '13) 54 min Bruno 52,928
Texas: Gay-marriage ban best for children 1 hr Fa-Foxy 77
•••
•••