Anger over TV 'paedophile list'

Nov 8, 2012 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Hillingdon Times

Television show This Morning is facing a possible investigation after presenter Phillip Schofield brandished a list of alleged paedophiles during a live TV interview with David Cameron.

Comments (Page 2)

Showing posts 21 - 40 of62
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
gibbs

Manchester, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#26
Nov 9, 2012
 

Judged:

1

I can read wrote:
<quoted text>
Strange that someone from the nation which invented 'cheerleading'.
Do you also have lapdancing clubs where all the girls are pre teen?
well to be honest,ICR should hope the authorities are not monitoring this site.
sick bastard.
clinton babtiste

Manchester, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27
Nov 9, 2012
 

Judged:

1

I can read wrote:
<quoted text>
Strange that someone from the nation which invented 'cheerleading'.
Do you also have lapdancing clubs where all the girls are pre teen?
"i'm getting the word.....nonce!"

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#28
Nov 9, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

I can read wrote:
<quoted text>
Strange that someone from the nation which invented 'cheerleading'.
Do you also have lapdancing clubs where all the girls are pre teen?
you always find it in yourself to go even lower don't you ICR.

FILTH.
I can read

Falkirk, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29
Nov 9, 2012
 
supersonic boom wrote:
<quoted text>
You chose to pick up on something irrelevant ICR.
Where is your condemnation in this case?
I chose to pick up on what you posted. I take it you'd like to pretend it was irrelevant?
I can read

Falkirk, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#30
Nov 9, 2012
 

Judged:

1

mike the nonce wrote:
<quoted text>
you always find it in yourself to go even lower don't you ICR.
FILTH.
Lets see. I claimed that dressing up pre pubsecent girls as sex objects and having them dance provocatively is wrong.

You apparently disagree.

I wonder why.
I can read

Falkirk, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#31
Nov 9, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

Actually, I think mike might be too dumb to realise why he has feelings like this.

Maybe someone else should tell him what people who support sexualising pre-teens are called.

“... from a ...”

Since: Mar 09

GREAT HEIGHT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#32
Nov 9, 2012
 
supersonic boom wrote:
Peter Tatchell, the head of Stonewall didn't exactly help the gay case did he?
"Peter Tatchell's call to lower the age of consent to 14 is disgusting. Sex is for adults."
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/davidlindse...
The problem is with the report and the spin.

The age of consent issue has to do with how the courts will handle cases of teen erotoc and sexual behavior ... WITH EACH OTHER.

At present, a teenaged hetero couple getting caught with their pants down is treated, barring other factors, mostly as "kids will be kids". But if it's a gay teen couple, it's very different.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#33
Nov 9, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

supersonic boom wrote:
What you are suggesting leaves young males in the hands of older predator gay men without any comeback.
Perhaps all gay men are paedos after all?
Dear, if you had bothered to read what Tatchell was actually proposing, you would have found out where what you just said is as far from the truth as you can possibly get. He was proposing something which exists in this country in a number of states, a Romeo and Juliet law which decriminalizes sexual behaviors between young people. Yes, he suggests lowering the age of consent to 14, but only for those people who are no more than 5 years older than them. The age of consent would remain at 16 for everyone else. But why let anything as trivial as the facts get in the way of a really good anti-gay hissy fit?

Since: Sep 10

Earth

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34
Nov 9, 2012
 
Sheik Yerbouti wrote:
<quoted text>
NoQ blows goats and I have proof!!
And even then, he needs date rape drugs to do it.

NoIQ is more like it.

“... from a ...”

Since: Mar 09

GREAT HEIGHT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#35
Nov 9, 2012
 
I can read wrote:
Actually, I think mike might be too dumb to realise why he has feelings like this.
Maybe someone else should tell him what people who support sexualising pre-teens are called.
"sexualising pre-teens" ???

“... from a ...”

Since: Mar 09

GREAT HEIGHT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36
Nov 9, 2012
 
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>Dear, if you had bothered to read what Tatchell was actually proposing, you would have found out where what you just said is as far from the truth as you can possibly get. He was proposing something which exists in this country in a number of states, a Romeo and Juliet law which decriminalizes sexual behaviors between young people. Yes, he suggests lowering the age of consent to 14, but only for those people who are no more than 5 years older than them. The age of consent would remain at 16 for everyone else. But why let anything as trivial as the facts get in the way of a really good anti-gay hissy fit?
As I understand it, in most cases, the age spread for the older partner is 3-4 yrs. The reasoning involves the likelihood of the pair being HS classmates.

“... from a ...”

Since: Mar 09

GREAT HEIGHT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37
Nov 9, 2012
 
supersonic boom wrote:
<quoted text>
What you are suggesting leaves young males in the hands of older predator gay men without any comeback.
Perhaps all gay men are paedos after all?
You aren't reading accurately and with comprehension.

“... from a ...”

Since: Mar 09

GREAT HEIGHT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#38
Nov 9, 2012
 
supersonic boom wrote:
<quoted text>
Better than blowing young teenagers legally.
Unless you're another young teen.

THAT's what this is about. Not adults.

“... from a ...”

Since: Mar 09

GREAT HEIGHT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#39
Nov 9, 2012
 
I can read wrote:
<quoted text>
I pointed out how dodgy it was to have a national pastime which involved sexualising pre teen girls and getting them to dance prevocatively.
Apparently you think that's standing up for predatory men.
Care to explain what you meant?
Otherwise you look like a bit of an idiot.
" ... a national pastime which involved sexualising pre teen girls and getting them to dance prevocatively..."

Where is this, exactly?
I can read

Falkirk, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40
Nov 9, 2012
 
snyper wrote:
<quoted text>
" ... a national pastime which involved sexualising pre teen girls and getting them to dance prevocatively..."
Where is this, exactly?
It's exactly in the United States of molestation.

“... from a ...”

Since: Mar 09

GREAT HEIGHT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#41
Nov 9, 2012
 
I can read wrote:
<quoted text>
It's exactly in the United States of molestation.
Where, specifically? Any links?

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#42
Nov 9, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

International Child Rapist wrote:
<quoted text>
Lets see. I claimed that dressing up pre pubsecent girls as sex objects and having them dance provocatively is wrong.
You apparently disagree.
I wonder why.
wrong.

you claimed:
"sexualising pre teen girls and getting them to dance prevocatively."

a disturbing statement ,but a statement which goes a long way in explaining your empathy with the Muslim child grooming gangs of the UK.
BE ADVISED,if YOU think a pre-teen girl CAN dance PROVOCATIVELY you have serious problems and should not be around pre-teen girls.

the fact that you think children are ABLE to dance in a PROVOCATIVE fashion speaks volumes about your attitude towards children,you should seek help before you harm some one.

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#44
Nov 10, 2012
 

Judged:

1

I can read wrote:
Actually, I think mike might be too dumb to realise why he has feelings like this.
Maybe someone else should tell him what people who support sexualising pre-teens are called.
are you real?

ill tell you what a man(?)who thinks a preteen child can be "provocative" are called ,it is PAEDOPHILE and you admit you find preteen girls doing their cheerleader routine "provocative"?

be advised weirdo, when normal people see cheerleaders that's ALL they see children doing something they enjoy,were as when you see cheerleaders you see CHILDREN DANCING PROVOCATIVELY

you are a wrongun and getting wronger by the day.

“I'll give you Oogie Boogie”

Since: Oct 12

Halloween Town

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#45
Nov 10, 2012
 

Judged:

2

1

I can read wrote:
<quoted text>
It's exactly in the United States of molestation.
What meds are you on?

Who are you to say that to Americans, when you ALWAYS come down the side of paedophiles in the UK?

You never fail, ICR. It's clear as day where you're coming from.

“I'll give you Oogie Boogie”

Since: Oct 12

Halloween Town

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#46
Nov 10, 2012
 

Judged:

1

What the bloody hell is this about?

http://tinyurl.com/ajgrhnt

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 21 - 40 of62
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

55 Users are viewing the Gay/Lesbian Forum right now

Search the Gay/Lesbian Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Why Are We Being Forced To Accept Homosexuality? (Feb '12) 3 min Absolutely 303
Gay marriage (Mar '13) 4 min Terra Firma 39,948
The gay cafe for GLBT, friends and family (Oct '09) 14 min Roger 66,973
B: The Forgotten Letter in LGBT 19 min Roger 32
Lesbian police chief with 20 years service is s... 41 min Sir Andrew 31
Proudly Representing the 'B' in LGBT: Let's Hea... 1 hr Absolutely 12
Justices may decide if vendors can snub gay wed... 1 hr DNF 2,261
•••
•••
•••
•••