Anger over TV 'paedophile list'

Nov 8, 2012 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Hillingdon Times

Television show This Morning is facing a possible investigation after presenter Phillip Schofield brandished a list of alleged paedophiles during a live TV interview with David Cameron.

Comments
1 - 20 of 62 Comments Last updated May 29, 2013
First Prev
of 4
Next Last

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#1 Nov 9, 2012
I guess they don't have anything resembling a "Megan's Law" over there.

Since: Sep 10

Earth

#2 Nov 9, 2012
As always, more "roboblogger" bullshit. This "article" has nothing to do with gays, so why is it posted here? Pedophiles are disproportionately heterosexual compared to the population.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#5 Nov 9, 2012
P_Smith wrote:
As always, more "roboblogger" bullshit. This "article" has nothing to do with gays, so why is it posted here? Pedophiles are disproportionately heterosexual compared to the population.
The word gay appears in the text, of course in the wonderful world of their cross posting program, that means we must be interested in it. It's a computer program, it's only as bright as the people who run it.

“Fly low, fly fast.”

Since: Apr 07

East Midlands, UK

#6 Nov 9, 2012
I can see a witch hunt going on here in the UK. Innocent people will lose everything and the guilty may well get away with their crimes.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#7 Nov 9, 2012
snyper wrote:
I guess they don't have anything resembling a "Megan's Law" over there.
They do, they also have pro-active libel laws, the press is seen as having a duty to let people respond to such accusations before they make them.

“Fly low, fly fast.”

Since: Apr 07

East Midlands, UK

#8 Nov 9, 2012
Peter Tatchell, the head of Stonewall didn't exactly help the gay case did he?

"Peter Tatchell's call to lower the age of consent to 14 is disgusting. Sex is for adults."
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/davidlindse...

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#10 Nov 9, 2012
supersonic boom wrote:
Peter Tatchell, the head of Stonewall didn't exactly help the gay case did he?
"Peter Tatchell's call to lower the age of consent to 14 is disgusting. Sex is for adults."
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/davidlindse...
"Don't criminalise young sex:
Like it or not, people under the age of 16 have sex the current law of consent doesn't protect them, it persecutes them"

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/liber...
Uve

Desert Hot Springs, CA

#12 Nov 9, 2012
NoQ wrote:
<quoted text>
You fking Queers like your boys young. Fking Perverts
You would know. POS
I can read

Edinburgh, UK

#14 Nov 9, 2012
NoQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Yea, I do know, you perverted Fa$$ots like boys as young as you can get them. It's a no wonder you freaks want to lower the consent age to 8 yrs old.
Strange that someone from the nation which invented 'cheerleading'.

Do you also have lapdancing clubs where all the girls are pre teen?
Sheik Yerbouti

Pennington, NJ

#15 Nov 9, 2012
NoQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Yea, I do know, you perverted Fa$$ots like boys as young as you can get them. It's a no wonder you freaks want to lower the consent age to 8 yrs old.
You're just mad because you got kicked out of nambla!
Sheik Yerbouti

Pennington, NJ

#16 Nov 9, 2012
NoQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Because there's a lot of Queer Pedophiles, and most likely that was what was on his list.
NoQ blows goats and I have proof!!
WestCoaster

Los Angeles, CA

#17 Nov 9, 2012
Oh, those poor goats

“Fly low, fly fast.”

Since: Apr 07

East Midlands, UK

#18 Nov 9, 2012
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>"Don't criminalise young sex:
Like it or not, people under the age of 16 have sex the current law of consent doesn't protect them, it persecutes them"
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/liber...
What you are suggesting leaves young males in the hands of older predator gay men without any comeback.

Perhaps all gay men are paedos after all?

“Fly low, fly fast.”

Since: Apr 07

East Midlands, UK

#19 Nov 9, 2012
Sheik Yerbouti wrote:
<quoted text>
NoQ blows goats and I have proof!!
Better than blowing young teenagers legally.

“Fly low, fly fast.”

Since: Apr 07

East Midlands, UK

#20 Nov 9, 2012
I can read wrote:
<quoted text>
Strange that someone from the nation which invented 'cheerleading'.
Do you also have lapdancing clubs where all the girls are pre teen?
As for you ICR, I can't believe you're standing up for predatory men.

Well, perhaps I can after all.
I can read

Edinburgh, UK

#21 Nov 9, 2012
supersonic boom wrote:
<quoted text>
As for you ICR, I can't believe you're standing up for predatory men.
Well, perhaps I can after all.
I pointed out how dodgy it was to have a national pastime which involved sexualising pre teen girls and getting them to dance prevocatively.

Apparently you think that's standing up for predatory men.

Care to explain what you meant?

Otherwise you look like a bit of an idiot.
uraknob

Milton Keynes, UK

#22 Nov 9, 2012
supersonic boom wrote:
<quoted text>
As for you ICR, I can't believe you're standing up for predatory men.
Well, perhaps I can after all.
WOW! ICR supporting men who like to have sex with children ! NO WAY!

I CAN NOT BELIEVE THAT!

OH HOLD ON ..........
uraknob

Milton Keynes, UK

#23 Nov 9, 2012
I can read wrote:
<quoted text>
Strange that someone from the nation which invented 'cheerleading'.
Do you also have lapdancing clubs where all the girls are pre teen?
EWWWWWWW!!!!!!
how wrong would it be to allow ICR to attend ANY event at which there are young cheerleaders participating?
maybe. if you strapped him onto a sack truck and made him wear an hockey mask,but you would still be taking a risk.

“Fly low, fly fast.”

Since: Apr 07

East Midlands, UK

#24 Nov 9, 2012
I can read wrote:
<quoted text>
I pointed out how dodgy it was to have a national pastime which involved sexualising pre teen girls and getting them to dance prevocatively.
Apparently you think that's standing up for predatory men.
Care to explain what you meant?
Otherwise you look like a bit of an idiot.
You chose to pick up on something irrelevant ICR.

Where is your condemnation in this case?
uraknob

Milton Keynes, UK

#25 Nov 9, 2012
I can read wrote:
<quoted text>
I pointed out how dodgy it was to have a national pastime which involved sexualising pre teen girls and getting them to dance prevocatively.
Apparently you think that's standing up for predatory men.
Care to explain what you meant?
Otherwise you look like a bit of an idiot.
just to be sure

you find pre-teen cheerleaders provocative?

you are seriously disturbing.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

First Prev
of 4
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Is Vladimir Putin Another Adolf Hitler? 46 min PUTIN a NAZI PIG 903
3 states, plaintiffs want Supreme Court to hear... 1 hr Fa-Foxy 7
California Takes a Stand Against Gay and Trans ... 1 hr Dubya 42
7 Surprising Ways Your Company Can Still Discri... 2 hr NE Jade 3
Supreme Court: Was gay marriage settled in 1972... 2 hr TomInElPaso 541
Single Women Raise Gay Sons: Pat Robertson short 2 hr Fa-Foxy 21
Gay marriage (Mar '13) 2 hr Pietro Armando 54,871
Biggest Gay Lies 3 hr Dwayne 1,678
Gay Marriage Vs. the First Amendment 6 hr dduttonnc 398
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

Gay/Lesbian People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••