UK & World News: Ministers publish gay marriage bill

Jan 25, 2013 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Chronicle Live

The legislation is likely to provoke ferocious debate in the House of Commons, where a significant number of Conservative MPs are opposed to same-sex marriage.

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 7 of7
Gays Run the World

Alpharetta, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Jan 25, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Reg wrote:
Homosexual 'marriage' is a complete fraud.
It has been overwhelmingly rejected by homosexuals as an actual practice in every country that allows it, and studies have shown that most such 'marriages' aren't even exclusive arrangements.
No homosexual relationship shares the reasons for government involvement in real marriage. No child is ever born as a direct result and no such relationship can provide a child with a father and mother. Homosexual 'marriage,' where legal, isn't even a basic building block of homosexual society, much less of society as a whole. There is no standardized format for homosexual 'marriages,' and no economically unequal genders are involved.
Why not forget about disenfranchising others in order for force your concocted, failed philosophy into law? Why not try a little live and let live?
We fixed that 9 years ago
http://makeitequal.org/

Since: Apr 08

Chagrin Falls, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Jan 25, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

Anyone who is opposed to same-sex marriages doesn't need to have one.

Since: Oct 10

San Francisco

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Jan 25, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Reg wrote:
Why not try a little live and let live?
Why not practice what you preach, hypocrite?
Rainbow Kid

Alpharetta, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Jan 25, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Reg wrote:
<quoted text>I'm not the one trying to disenfranchise citizens in order to force a concocted, failed redefinition of marriage into law.
Glad to see none of your homofascists thought you could refute even one of the points I made.
Malarkey!
.
We've had legal gay marriage for 9 years already
http://makeitequal.org/
.
Not one single breeder marriage has ever been disenfranchised because of gay marriage

“Equality First”

Since: Jan 09

St. Louis, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Jan 25, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Reg wrote:
<quoted text>I'm not the one trying to disenfranchise citizens in order to force a concocted, failed redefinition of marriage into law.
Glad to see none of your homofascists thought you could refute even one of the points I made.
How come you never answer the glaring question when you post this drivel? How are you "disenfranchised" when my spouse and I marry in another state?

“Unconvinced”

Since: Nov 09

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Jan 25, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

1

Reg wrote:
I'm not the one trying to disenfranchise citizens in order to force a concocted, failed redefinition of marriage into law.
Glad to see none of your homofascists thought you could refute even one of the points I made.
Those poor, disenfranchised citizens! Because of our selfish efforts, they can no longer... well, you know, they're disenfranchised from... being... having... wait, what now? What can't they do, exactly?

Since: Oct 10

San Francisco

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
Jan 25, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Reg wrote:
<quoted text>I'm not the one trying to disenfranchise citizens in order to force a concocted, failed redefinition of marriage into law.
Glad to see none of your homofascists thought you could refute even one of the points I made.
I know your attention span is short for anything beyond cut and paste, David, so I'll number these for you. Try to concentrate, and read slowly.

1. Yes, you are indeed the one trying to disenfranchise citizens, and you're doing it by attempting to equate your religious beliefs with law. This is unconstitutional.

2. I don't have any homofascists, but I have no doubt you know what they thought, as they exist entirely in your "mind."

3. Your so-called points have been refuted here countless times, and you know it. You're lying again, and Jesus doesn't like that.

4. Why don't you answer Ralph's and Edmond's questions? If you can post the same claptrap day after day, why won't you back it up?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 1 - 7 of7
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••