Obama’s Shifts May Affect U.S. Legal ...

Obama’s Shifts May Affect U.S. Legal Plan on Gay Marriage

There are 4 comments on the www.nytimes.com story from Feb 4, 2013, titled Obama’s Shifts May Affect U.S. Legal Plan on Gay Marriage. In it, www.nytimes.com reports that:

Mr. Verrilli has until the end of the month to file a brief in the California case. Paul D. Clement, a former solicitor general who represents House Republicans defending the 1996 federal law, said he detected some paradoxes in Mr. Verrilli’s predicament. “It will be interesting in the end,” Mr. Clement said dryly at a Georgetown University Law Center forum last week, “if the litigation position of the Justice Department and the president’s position kind of realign.”

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.nytimes.com.

TomInElPaso

“Impeach the reality show actor”

Since: Dec 08

El Paso, TX

#1 Feb 4, 2013
"Thomas C. Goldstein, the publisher of Scotusblog and a lawyer who argues frequently before the Supreme Court, said the justices were not the only relevant audience for a brief from the Obama administration’s top appellate lawyer.

“Part of what is going on in the Inaugural Address and part of what would happen in a brief like that is a statement of what’s morally right and wrong,” he said.“It could matter to Americans much more than it matters to the Supreme Court.”

Nuff said.

“equality for ALL means ALL”

Since: Jan 07

Fort Lauderdale FL

#2 Feb 4, 2013
It will be interesting to see what he says at the State of the Union.
Rainbow Kid

Alpharetta, GA

#3 Feb 4, 2013
TomInElPaso wrote:
"Thomas C. Goldstein, the publisher of Scotusblog and a lawyer who argues frequently before the Supreme Court, said the justices were not the only relevant audience for a brief from the Obama administration’s top appellate lawyer.
“Part of what is going on in the Inaugural Address and part of what would happen in a brief like that is a statement of what’s morally right and wrong,” he said.“It could matter to Americans much more than it matters to the Supreme Court.”
Nuff said.
The H8'er's side is pretty wobbly
.
Morality is too abstract to have legal bearing

Since: Apr 08

Cleveland, OH

#6 Feb 5, 2013
Rainbow Kid wrote:
<quoted text>
The H8'er's side is pretty wobbly
.
Morality is too abstract to have legal bearing
Especially when that morality is wobbly itself. Claiming homophobia is moral is no different than claiming racism is moral.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Spectrum Cafe (Dec '07) 1 hr NE Muffin 28,143
News Correction: Conversion Therapy Ban-California s... 1 hr Morph Munchkin Trunt 25
Jade's Miserable Pathetic Weekend 2 hr NE Juicy Snapper 6
News Tennessee pastor sues city after they kick him ... 2 hr DeDominicis 85
News Supreme Court sides with Colorado baker on same... 3 hr sly mongoose 182
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 4 hr Respect71 62,811
News US top court rules for baker in gay wedding cak... 4 hr Shirvell s Shrivel 601