However court rules, gay marriage deb...

However court rules, gay marriage debate won't end

There are 2351 comments on the NewsCenter 25 story from Mar 28, 2013, titled However court rules, gay marriage debate won't end. In it, NewsCenter 25 reports that:

However the Supreme Court rules after its landmark hearings on same-sex marriage, the issue seems certain to divide Americans and states for many years to come.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at NewsCenter 25.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#1126 Apr 8, 2013
Get That Fool wrote:
<quoted text>
Ummmmm, very few...most do not.....
<quoted text>
Racists blacks???? Do they have their own kkk????
Yes, they're called "evangelical christians".

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#1127 Apr 8, 2013
Get That Fool wrote:
<quoted text>
Peer reviewed and published in scientific journal for all posterity..."Get that Fool".....
And subsequently found to be an invalid study as admitted by even Regnerus himself.
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#1128 Apr 8, 2013
Get That Fool wrote:
<quoted text>
Peer reviewed and published in scientific journal for all posterity..."Get that Fool".....
Yes. A peer-review that will FOREVER be the textbook example of fraud.

http://chronicle.com/blogs/percolator/controv...

Controversial Gay-Parenting Study Is Severely Flawed, Journal’s Audit Finds

The peer-review process failed to identify significant, disqualifying problems with a controversial and widely publicized study that seemed to raise doubts about the parenting abilities of gay couples, according to an internal audit scheduled to appear in the November issue of the journal, Social Science Research, that published the study.
Francisco dAnconia

Montpelier, VT

#1129 Apr 8, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
And subsequently found to be an invalid study as admitted by even Regnerus himself.
http://www.ncfpc.org/stories/120711s2.html

"
Special Report - July 11, 2012
Eighteen social scientists from a variety of universities have issued a letter defending a major new national study that found “numerous, consistent differences” between the young adult children of same-sex parents and those raised in intact families. The letter is in response to criticism from the mainstream media and homosexual advocacy groups about the New Family Structures Study (NFSS), an ongoing, federally funded study led by sociologist Mark Regnerus at the University of Texas at Austin. The letter defending the Regernus study was issued June 20 by 18 scholars, including Peter Arcidiacono, an economics professor at Duke University, Professor Peter Uhlenberg, a sociology professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and W. Bradford Wilcox, director of the National Marriage Project at the University of Virginia, among others.

1.“Limitations” in prior research on same-sex parenting that have generally been ignored by the media.“The vast majority of studies published before 2012 on this subject have relied upon small, non-representative samples that do not represent children in typical gay and lesbian families in the United States,” the letter points out.“By contrast, Regnerus relies on a large, random, and representative sample of more than 200 children raised by parents who have had same-sex relationships, comparing them to a random sample of more than 2,000 children raised in heterosexual families, to reach his conclusions.”

2. Other studies of children from same-sex parent families, including recent studies in the Netherlands and Sweden, have also found high levels of family instability. This point in the letter addresses one of the main criticisms of the Regnerus study, which is that the study sample compared “young adults from gay and lesbian families that experienced high levels of family instability to young adults from stable heterosexual married families.” While the letter acknowledges that,“this is not an ideal comparison,” it notes,“what his critics fail to appreciate is that Regnerus chose his categories on the basis of young adults’ characterizations of their own families growing up, and the young adults whose parents had same-sex romantic relationships also happened to have high levels of instability in their families of origin.” The letter continues,“Regnerus should not be faulted for drawing a random, representative sample of young-adult children of parents who have had same-sex romantic relationships and also happened to have experienced high levels of family instability growing up.”

3. Another study published in June in the Journal of Marriage and Family reached parallel conclusions to those in the Regnerus study. That study found that “children in same-sex parent families scored lower than their peers” in married-biological parent families “on two academic outcomes, and that these baseline differences can probably be attributed in part to higher levels of family instability in same-sex families, compared to intact, biological married families…” According to the letter,“The parallels between the findings in this study and Regnerus’s study call into question the…claim that the Regnerus study ‘gets everything wrong.’”

“To be clear: We do not think that these new studies settle the nation’s ongoing debate about gay parenting, same-sex marriage, and the welfare of children,” the letter concludes, noting that same-sex parenting research is still in its earliest stages.“But we think that the Regnerus study, which is one of the first to rely on a large, random, and representative sample of children from parents who have experienced same-sex relationships, has helped to inform the ongoing scholarly and public conversation about same-sex families in America.”
Francisco dAnconia

Montpelier, VT

#1130 Apr 8, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>Yes. A peer-review that will FOREVER be the textbook example of fraud.
http://chronicle.com/blogs/percolator/controv...
Controversial Gay-Parenting Study Is Severely Flawed, Journal’s Audit Finds
The peer-review process failed to identify significant, disqualifying problems with a controversial and widely publicized study that seemed to raise doubts about the parenting abilities of gay couples, according to an internal audit scheduled to appear in the November issue of the journal, Social Science Research, that published the study.
you mean some people folded under the huge social pressures brought to bear by your agenda?

color me not very shocked...
Sgt Common Sense

Fairfield, CT

#1131 Apr 8, 2013
Francisco dAnconia wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.ncfpc.org/stories/120711s2.html
"
..........hogwash..........
The NCFPC, now there's an unbiased opinion!

~sarcasm off

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#1132 Apr 8, 2013
Francisco dAnconia wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.ncfpc.org/stories/120711s2.html
"
Special Report - July 11, 2012
Eighteen social scientists from a variety of universities have issued a letter defending a major new national study that found “numerous, consistent differences” between the young adult children of same-sex parents and those raised in intact families. The letter is in response to criticism from the mainstream media and homosexual advocacy groups about the New Family Structures Study (NFSS), an ongoing, federally funded study led by sociologist Mark Regnerus at the University of Texas at Austin. The letter defending the Regernus study was issued June 20 by 18 scholars, including Peter Arcidiacono, an economics professor at Duke University, Professor Peter Uhlenberg, a sociology professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and W. Bradford Wilcox, director of the National Marriage Project at the University of Virginia, among others.
1.“Limitations” in prior research on same-sex parenting that have generally been ignored by the media.“The vast majority of studies published before 2012 on this subject have relied upon small, non-representative samples that do not represent children in typical gay and lesbian families in the United States,” the letter points out.“By contrast, Regnerus relies on a large, random, and representative sample of more than 200 children raised by parents who have had same-sex relationships, comparing them to a random sample of more than 2,000 children raised in heterosexual families, to reach his conclusions.”
2. Other studies of children from same-sex parent families, including recent studies in the Netherlands and Sweden, have also found high levels of family instability. This point in the letter addresses one of the main criticisms of the Regnerus study, which is that the study sample compared “young adults from gay and lesbian families that experienced high levels of family instability to young adults from stable heterosexual married families.” While the letter acknowledges that,“this is not an ideal comparison,” it notes,“what his critics fail to appreciate is that Regnerus chose his categories on the basis of young adults’ characterizations of their own families growing up, and the young adults whose parents had same-sex romantic relationships also happened to have high levels of instability in their families of origin.” The letter continues,“Regnerus should not be faulted for drawing a random, representative sample of young-adult children of parents who have had same-sex romantic relationships and also happened to have experienced high levels of family instability growing up.”
3. Another study published in June in the Journal of Marriage and Family reached parallel conclusions to those in the Regnerus study. That study found that “children in same-sex parent families scored lower than their peers” in married-biological parent families “on two academic outcomes, and that these baseline differences can probably be attributed in part to higher levels of family instability in same-sex families, compared to intact, biological married families…” According to the letter,“The parallels between the findings in this study and Regnerus’s study call into question the…claim that the Regnerus study ‘gets everything wrong.’”
“To be clear: We do not think that these new studies settle the nation’s ongoing debate about gay parenting, same-sex marriage, and the welfare of children,” the letter concludes, noting that same-sex parenting research is still in its earliest stages.“But we think that the Regnerus study, which is one of the first to rely on a large, random, and representative sample of children from parents who have experienced same-sex relationships, has helped to inform the ongoing scholarly and public conversation about same-sex families in America.”
The study had nothing to do with same-sex couples raising kids.
Francisco dAnconia

Montpelier, VT

#1133 Apr 8, 2013
Sgt Common Sense wrote:
<quoted text>
The NCFPC, now there's an unbiased opinion!
~sarcasm off
you must have missed this in your race to attack the source:
"eighteen social scientists from a variety of universities"
Francisco dAnconia

Montpelier, VT

#1134 Apr 8, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
The study had nothing to do with same-sex couples raising kids.
psst, just like many of the studies on which you would rely...

any take on those common errors in YOUR studies?
that self-selected, self-reported garbage...

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#1135 Apr 8, 2013
Francisco dAnconia wrote:
<quoted text>
psst, just like many of the studies on which you would rely...
any take on those common errors in YOUR studies?
that self-selected, self-reported garbage...
Nope, there are numerous studies of same-sex couples raising kids; just not many on married same-sex couples yet because we've only been getting married for the past 9 years.

“You Get My Truth Here!”

Since: May 09

Nonya!

#1136 Apr 8, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope, there are numerous studies of same-sex couples raising kids; just not many on married same-sex couples yet because we've only been getting married for the past 9 years.
Then you admit these studies have to be flawed, since these supposed studies started decades ago....
Francisco dAnconia

Montpelier, VT

#1137 Apr 8, 2013
Get That Fool wrote:
<quoted text>
Then you admit these studies have to be flawed, since these supposed studies started decades ago....
psst, age is only a detractor for studies with which they disagree...

as is hand selecting, self reporting, single parenting etc...
in short, every critique they make is found in every study they support...

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#1138 Apr 8, 2013
Get That Fool wrote:
<quoted text>
Then you admit these studies have to be flawed, since these supposed studies started decades ago....
Same-sex couples have been raising kids for decades.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#1139 Apr 8, 2013
Francisco dAnconia wrote:
<quoted text>
psst, age is only a detractor for studies with which they disagree...
as is hand selecting, self reporting, single parenting etc...
in short, every critique they make is found in every study they support...
Nope, just same-sex couples raising kids; that's the only criteria.

Since: Mar 11

Minnesota's North Coast

#1140 Apr 8, 2013
Get That Fool wrote:
<quoted text>
Then you admit these studies have to be flawed, since these supposed studies started decades ago....
a couple does not need to be married to raise a child...

“You Get My Truth Here!”

Since: May 09

Nonya!

#1141 Apr 8, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text> a couple does not need to be married to raise a child...
...and a person's hands need not be on the steering wheel to make a car move....doesn't mean that's what people should do does it???

“You Get My Truth Here!”

Since: May 09

Nonya!

#1142 Apr 8, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, they're called "evangelical christians".
Really??? Must be a 'new' kind of black kkk....

“You Get My Truth Here!”

Since: May 09

Nonya!

#1143 Apr 8, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
The study had nothing to do with same-sex couples raising kids.
Of course it doesn't...

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#1144 Apr 8, 2013
Get That Fool wrote:
<quoted text>
Really??? Must be a 'new' kind of black kkk....
Yep, and they're as racist & bigoted as most white evangelicals.

Must be the religion which has poisoned their minds & hearts.

“You Get My Truth Here!”

Since: May 09

Nonya!

#1145 Apr 8, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
And subsequently found to be an invalid study as admitted by even Regnerus himself.
Where's the retraction???

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News 'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... 11 min whogivesaratsbehind 9,110
News Justicea s gay marriage order halts licenses in... 19 min PC Principal 338
News New research says sex education ignores gay and... 37 min Prep-for-Dep 1,242
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 1 hr lides 30,771
News Ask Amy: I'm a gay teen, and my family says hor... 2 hr Doyle Dole 62
News Venue owners appeal fine for denying lesbian co... 2 hr lides 29
Choose not to be gay 3 hr cpeter1313 480
More from around the web