Local Fox news anchor forced to apologize after calling Rachel Maddow an "angry young man"

Full story: WNUS-FM Vienna

The comment happened roughly one month ago, just after the debate between Vice President Joe Biden and Republican vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan An anchor for Fox affiliate WXIX-TV in Cincinnati is apologizing after calling MSNBC anchor Rachel Maddow an "angry young man" on her Facebook page.
Comments
61 - 80 of 269 Comments Last updated Dec 6, 2012

Since: Dec 08

El Paso, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64
Nov 14, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

2

You liar!

The "whiteface drawing" and calling him Obammy are about as racist as you can get.

You're a frigging liar and scum of this earth.

PIG FACED MAGGOT
Fa-Foxy wrote:
<quoted text>
I've never attacked him for his race. I've only attacked him for being a PROUD Marxist-Leninist-Stalinist.

Since: Dec 08

El Paso, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#65
Nov 14, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Sounds to me like some jerk got his ass thrown out of Mexico.

You trolls change names more often than you do your underwear.
3OHY wrote:
<quoted text>
So, now we have an expanded list of perverts on Topix defending NAMBLA desires for younger children, sometimes outright promoting them...
RustyS
snyper
NorCal Native
responder
EdmondWA
Rose_NoHo
The real and only question is how many times has Rose been arrested for soliciting minors?
3OHY

San Jose, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#66
Nov 14, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Mona Lott wrote:
<quoted text>
LIAR. When did ANY of those posters defend NAMBLA?
http://www.topix.com/forum/us/politics/TKHC28...
3OHY

San Jose, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67
Nov 14, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Mona Lott wrote:
<quoted text>
But he's not a PROUD Marxist-Leninist-Stalinist. That's YOUR opinion, which is not based in fact. And your feeble minded attempt at trying to smear him isn't working. We realize it's just you trying to get attention. You don't like Democrats, that's fine. But making up LIES about them makes you look stupid.
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/Articles/T...
NoMoreUSA

Woodleaf, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#68
Nov 14, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
You're just upset you still have a black president.
<quoted text>
God doesn't exist.
Really time for folks to grow up and accept that.
<quoted text>
What do you miss most about was once this country?
Slavery? Jim Crow laws? The denial of women the vote or abortion rights? The slaughter of the Natives? I wish one of you con dumbs would tell us what was so good about the "good ol' days".
<quoted text>
LOLSER!
I guess you didn;t read the part you so conviently left out. That post was NOT...again NOT for liberal filth such as yourslef. It was for former real USA citizens, not anti-Amerikan filth. Did you get that part that time? Go back and re-read that again.
...ok, now that that part has sunk in, you destroyed one Country, and by God you will not be allowed into another. You also will not be taking over a great many States, because they are now filing for sucession, and rightfully so. You may have detrioyed the Uniion, and ruined most of the landscape, but for some of the States, they are taking their land back, and if you get in their way? They'll just burn ya...quite luitersly? YEAH! With gas, with dielsel, with incinerators, or whatever they have to.
You fucking liberal filth have NO fucking clue...you never have, but the best part of all? Now you will finally learn something for the first time in your life...you're gonna learn how to suffer a very painful death, and more than a few of the people that are left there to do it might just decide to enjoy it and make it a slow one for ya.
That makes me soooo very happy.:-)

“Unconvinced”

Since: Nov 09

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#69
Nov 14, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

3OHY wrote:
Ahhh, so your context matters and mine doesn't.
To see some of your queer buddies either proposing lowering the age of consent, defending those proposing the age of consent, attacking those opposed to those proposing lowering the age of consent, or simply deflecting away from those proposing lowering the age of consent (so it doesn't become an issue queers need to address in public), peruse the following Topix board...
http://www.topix.com/forum/us/politics/TKHC28...
There you will find queers doing exactly what you now claim to be a lie. You probably won't address that you're wrong, because these queers are your friends... RustyS, snyper, NorCal Native, responder, et.al. Those paying attention know already that queer publications have long proposed lowering the age of consent and freer access to children, so either it is you lying, or you're simply out of touch with the so-called "community" to which you claim allegiance and defend.
Honesty will eventually settle on you and you will have to admit you hang with some real perverts. This renewed and more public proposal of lowering the age of consent and easier access to children and the sexualizing of families with young children is an example of how queers will never be satisfied with any gain, acceptance, or normalized view of them, which defines a sociopath. They will always want more, because they are freaks and incapable of controlling their sickness. Never fulfilled, never content, they must destroy and continue to destroy because they hate who they are.
HAH! Whatever. You're a freaking liar.

I'll admit, you actually had me worried for a minute, I had no idea what kind of lasciviousness I would find on your link. You made it sound like lowering the age of consent was the hot topic of the day, and that everyone was on board.

In the five whole pages on that thread, there was ONE guy who said ANYTHING about lowering the age of consent, this RustyS person. No friend of mine, never met him, we've never spoken.

There were only two other people to even MENTION age of consent (besides you). One was Mona Lott, a frequent poster, who told RustyS "A screw has rusted loose in your head." Hardly supportive. The other person was "responder" who said "Awesome, can't wait for the Girl Scout strippers....LOL".

GIRL scout strippers. GIRLS. Go bitch about the perversion of gay people elsewhere. Heterosexuals rule that arena.

Based on this steaming pile of nothingness, in your post #59 here you arbitrarily added my name to a list of "perverts on Topix defending NAMBLA desires for younger children, sometimes outright promoting them".

You are caught up in your own web of lies. You'd be hard pressed to demonstrate where I, or anyone else, was "defending" NAMBLA, or promoting ANY kind of sex with children. Even RustyS was vague and incomplete about what he meant. I happen to think that the age of consent is fine where it is.

You have no real knowledge about the people you malign. You clearly rely on the cartoon stereotypes that are fed to you. RustyS is a single person with a singular point of view, one that is no doubt shared by many more straight people than gay. Pick up a newspaper once in a while, and look at all the little girls molested or killed by heterosexual males. Look at how disturbingly often this is done by their own fathers. There are freaks in the world, both gay and straight, but it's a desperate and transparent move for you to try to paint ALL gay people with that brush.
3OHY

San Jose, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#70
Nov 14, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

EdmondWA wrote:
<quoted text>
HAH! Whatever. You're a freaking liar.
I'll admit, you actually had me worried for a minute, I had no idea what kind of lasciviousness I would find on your link. You made it sound like lowering the age of consent was the hot topic of the day, and that everyone was on board.
In the five whole pages on that thread, there was ONE guy who said ANYTHING about lowering the age of consent, this RustyS person. No friend of mine, never met him, we've never spoken.
There were only two other people to even MENTION age of consent (besides you). One was Mona Lott, a frequent poster, who told RustyS "A screw has rusted loose in your head." Hardly supportive. The other person was "responder" who said "Awesome, can't wait for the Girl Scout strippers....LOL".
GIRL scout strippers. GIRLS. Go bitch about the perversion of gay people elsewhere. Heterosexuals rule that arena.
Based on this steaming pile of nothingness, in your post #59 here you arbitrarily added my name to a list of "perverts on Topix defending NAMBLA desires for younger children, sometimes outright promoting them".
You are caught up in your own web of lies. You'd be hard pressed to demonstrate where I, or anyone else, was "defending" NAMBLA, or promoting ANY kind of sex with children. Even RustyS was vague and incomplete about what he meant. I happen to think that the age of consent is fine where it is.
You have no real knowledge about the people you malign. You clearly rely on the cartoon stereotypes that are fed to you. RustyS is a single person with a singular point of view, one that is no doubt shared by many more straight people than gay. Pick up a newspaper once in a while, and look at all the little girls molested or killed by heterosexual males. Look at how disturbingly often this is done by their own fathers. There are freaks in the world, both gay and straight, but it's a desperate and transparent move for you to try to paint ALL gay people with that brush.
Now that you've finally responded with what appears to be non-support of NAMBLA issues, it's only fair your name be removed from the list.

The issue on the other board is the supportive posts to the NAMBLA guy and the attacks on me for complaining about the lack of opposition amongst gays to the NAMBLA guy. You queers don't get it... by silence, humor, or outright support, it's all support. Your attempt to say there is no sub-text in these pervert's posts and reactions is absurd.

You will find me opposing assaults on gays maligned and pre-judged even by their own on other boards. Gays have a right to be perverted, but they don't have a right to continuously use any and all apparent successes in their civil status to increase the slick propaganda common in the gay community of diminishing family standards and imposing sex on children. You may live in a bubble, but gay publications and currently gays on Topix do this.
3OHY

San Jose, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#71
Nov 14, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

If even Mona Lott responds to these sick morons with severe criticism, you have to know there is slick intent in their posts, commonly generated by their conspiratorial use of various chat mechanisms to dream up their continued and expanded assaults on morality. These sick people are the ones posting pictures of having sex with feces and children on other boards, yet the more constrained homosexuals (ha) come to their defense as they proliferate their expansion of amoral concepts to the general public.

Commonly pathological liars, gays will claim such as "never spoken with him", which doesn't include texts and such they share to foul the Internet with their continued assaults.
Uve

Desert Hot Springs, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#72
Nov 14, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Juanpaul wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks for the funny line "#1 highest rated show" made my day !
I thought it was the 'great christian nation'. See..they do want to change it to a theocracy.. submit or die, just like in the Muslim world.
Uve

Desert Hot Springs, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#73
Nov 14, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

2

3OHY wrote:
<quoted text>
Now that you've finally responded with what appears to be non-support of NAMBLA issues, it's only fair your name be removed from the list.
The issue on the other board is the supportive posts to the NAMBLA guy and the attacks on me for complaining about the lack of opposition amongst gays to the NAMBLA guy. You queers don't get it... by silence, humor, or outright support, it's all support. Your attempt to say there is no sub-text in these pervert's posts and reactions is absurd.
You will find me opposing assaults on gays maligned and pre-judged even by their own on other boards. Gays have a right to be perverted, but they don't have a right to continuously use any and all apparent successes in their civil status to increase the slick propaganda common in the gay community of diminishing family standards and imposing sex on children. You may live in a bubble, but gay publications and currently gays on Topix do this.
Generalizations+Misinformation +Bigotry+Arrogance = ASSTROLL
3OHY

San Jose, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#74
Nov 14, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Uve wrote:
<quoted text>
Generalizations+Misinformation +Bigotry+Arrogance = ASSTROLL
You're just as guilty as the rest and intellectually dishonest. By attacking those opposed to the NAMBLA agenda, you side yourself with that agenda.

You have some nerve talking about generalizations. To you, charity given to dig wells is anti-gay because some people in Nigeria are vehemently opposed to your perversions. You'd rather see people die of dysentery if they, like 99% of the humans on Earth (Christian, atheist, whatever), find your maladjustments more threatening as you impose propaganda in classrooms.
Mona Lott

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#75
Nov 14, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Marxism, Stalin-ism and Leninism is so passe. People who bring up that nonsense are out of touch with reality.
Thank you
Mona Lott

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#77
Nov 14, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

2

3OHY wrote:
<quoted text>
Now that you've finally responded with what appears to be non-support of NAMBLA issues, it's only fair your name be removed from the list.
The issue on the other board is the supportive posts to the NAMBLA guy and the attacks on me for complaining about the lack of opposition amongst gays to the NAMBLA guy. You queers don't get it... by silence, humor, or outright support, it's all support. Your attempt to say there is no sub-text in these pervert's posts and reactions is absurd.
You will find me opposing assaults on gays maligned and pre-judged even by their own on other boards. Gays have a right to be perverted, but they don't have a right to continuously use any and all apparent successes in their civil status to increase the slick propaganda common in the gay community of diminishing family standards and imposing sex on children. You may live in a bubble, but gay publications and currently gays on Topix do this.
SQUAWK
Mona Lott

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#78
Nov 14, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

3OHY wrote:
Was that bogus link supposed to mean something?
Mona Lott

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#79
Nov 14, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

3OHY wrote:
<quoted text>
You're just as guilty as the rest and intellectually dishonest. By attacking those opposed to the NAMBLA agenda, you side yourself with that agenda.
You have some nerve talking about generalizations. To you, charity given to dig wells is anti-gay because some people in Nigeria are vehemently opposed to your perversions. You'd rather see people die of dysentery if they, like 99% of the humans on Earth (Christian, atheist, whatever), find your maladjustments more threatening as you impose propaganda in classrooms.
Had a rough time in logic class, didn't ya?

Detecting illogical reasoning
and weak argumentation

As a critical reader, you need to be able to recognise and analyse instances of illogical reasoning and weak argumentation. A critical reader needs to be able to detect writers trying to disguise weak content by the clever use of argumentative form, purely to persuade the reader of the validity of their argument.
Here are some common uses of illogical reasoning and weak argumentation.

Straw Arguments
Circular arguments
False analogies
Either-or assumptions
Jumping to Unjustified Conclusions
Misuse of Statistics

“ WOOF !”

Since: Nov 12

33.00, -111.51

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#80
Nov 14, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Uve wrote:
<quoted text>
Generalizations+Misinformation +Bigotry+Arrogance = ASSTROLL
The Obamaniac is here ?
Uve

Desert Hot Springs, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#81
Nov 14, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

3OHY wrote:
<quoted text>
You're just as guilty as the rest and intellectually dishonest. By attacking those opposed to the NAMBLA agenda, you side yourself with that agenda.
You have some nerve talking about generalizations. To you, charity given to dig wells is anti-gay because some people in Nigeria are vehemently opposed to your perversions. You'd rather see people die of dysentery if they, like 99% of the humans on Earth (Christian, atheist, whatever), find your maladjustments more threatening as you impose propaganda in classrooms.
It's not your opposition to NAMBLA that I'm attacking..it's your self-righteous bigotry. Again your making generalizations about me and others like me that are incorrect. You think your giving money to help people with things like dysentery, when in actually all your doing is promoting some bigoted organization that donates money political causes like the 'Kill the Gays' bill in Uganda. I find you extremely bigoted, ignorant and you have exactly the kind of damaging ideas that children need to educated (what you think is propaganda) against. I don't need your acceptance but I'll be damned if I'll let you call me perverted because of some warped moral code that YOU have and then try and compare me to a child molester. F'K YOU!
3OHY

San Jose, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#82
Nov 14, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Exposing the intellectual depravity of Uve's posts asserting that companies with some Christian principles are avidly funding the killing of gays because their charitable outreach to dig wells goes to countries where gays are occasionally killed is not illogical. It addresses the dishonesty of those who've separated themselves from the historical norms of humanity at all levels. Commonly, those with such dishonest intellectualism will embrace increasingly polarized views and sometimes concepts of logical fallacies they cannot comprehend.

“Obama Shames the USA”

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#83
Nov 14, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

An Angry young man!!! That's classic. I LOVE it. It's absolutely fantastic. Democrats have no sense of humor. All they got right now is Benghazi..
An angry young man!!!..Perfect LOL
If you can't take a joke, go take a shit.
lolol

Albuquerque, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#84
Nov 14, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

I would think in this day and age of in-your-face gayness that maddow would be strutting proudly being seen as a male which she spends her life trying to emulate. i'm confused, do lesbians NOT want to be perceived as males now ?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

54 Users are viewing the Gay/Lesbian Forum right now

Search the Gay/Lesbian Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
Smoking is Even Worse For HIV-Positive People 3 min Sir Andrew 33
Lift U.S. ban on blood donations by gay men 3 min Chance 20
Chick-fil-A Vallejo Location Faces Opposition 5 min so long sammie 193
Idaho 'Add the 4 Words' activists are sentenced 21 min Zeke 17
Biggest Gay Lies 27 min dbg 1,187
Gay marriage (Mar '13) 33 min eyeful 52,346
The Coming Christian Revolt 47 min Ted Haggard s Masseur 115
Fired Editor Sues for His Religious Freedom to ... 3 hr Sir Andrew 12
Losing Streak Lengthens for Foes of Gay Marriage 4 hr Frankie Rizzo 2,552
•••
•••