Local Fox news anchor forced to apologize after calling Rachel Maddow an "angry young man"

Full story: WNUS-FM Vienna

The comment happened roughly one month ago, just after the debate between Vice President Joe Biden and Republican vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan An anchor for Fox affiliate WXIX-TV in Cincinnati is apologizing after calling MSNBC anchor Rachel Maddow an "angry young man" on her Facebook page.
Comments
201 - 220 of 269 Comments Last updated Dec 6, 2012

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#231
Nov 17, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Brad wrote:
<quoted text>
You would be correct if the liberal urban legend of not having a Congressional majority were true.
But,,you would be wrong,like so many other uninformed libs.
Aw, your no true Scotsman fallacy again.
heh

Saint Louis, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#232
Nov 19, 2012
 
luv Sarah Palin wrote:
You see adults prefer facts and unbias news while kids and pot legalizing hippies prefer lib news.
Didn't Palin say on FOX that people should be able to smoke pot in their own house? Is she a hippy?

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#235
Nov 19, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

Yeah the Retarded Troll wrote:
<quoted text>
how long since the sex change operation ?
I could have saved you some money with my chainsaw
Oh, and now the "christian love" you right wingers are so good at displaying. Normally stereotypes are completely off base, but in your case, they're spot on.
alan

Maringouin, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#236
Nov 27, 2012
 

Judged:

3

2

Sheik Yerbouti wrote:
<quoted text>
You may think they're looney but they WON so suck it up sissy boy! Loser!!
seems that youre just another fruit from the liberal fruit tree that seems to grow in Pa.you and crapola must 69 each other?maddow is after all a (fellow)american like you?

“Stop the liberal madness”

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#237
Dec 2, 2012
 

Judged:

4

3

2

Mona Lott wrote:
<quoted text>
The "free gifts" as you incorrectly call them, went to people in RED STATES, you moron.
Shouldn't you have figured out by now that Bill O'Reiley doesn't know what he's talking about? No? You really ARE stupid.
To his credit, Bobby Jindal, the Republican governor of Louisiana some have touted as a presidential contender in 2016, has repudiated Romney’s “big gift” analysis as “absolutely wrong” and divisive. In an interview with Politico, Jindal said,“we cannot be, we must not be, the party that simply protects the rich so they get to keep their toys.”
Jindal is right. As long as the Republican party continues to construe basic human rights as frivolous and expensive perks — while construing “liberty” as the freedom of the wealthy to amass larger and larger fortunes — it will be rewarded with more losses in presidential campaigns.
Why my dear, do I sense that you might be contemplating coming on board?

Thank you for the political "advice" but the GOP comeback is already on course .

You know darn well that Romney blew the election when he put aside real conservatives and got off to a bad start when he did not invite Sarah to the GOP convention.

You could not be more clueless, as one of my favorite journalist likes to say "The Spin stops here".

“Stop the liberal madness”

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#238
Dec 2, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

spud wrote:
<quoted text>Sorry to hear you really think Rachel's really a man. It's really surprising to hear you turned like a dog on her. You're the reason we want illegals removed from this country. You have no loyalty.
Deporting Tom would go a long way in Obama reaching out to republicans.

I would pay for his deportation myself on the condition he never be allowed to return.

“Stop the liberal madness”

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#239
Dec 2, 2012
 

Judged:

3

2

2

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
BS. Romney lost the election because he insulted every Black and Latino person in the US.(As well as others) O'Reilly is just another con dumb who doesn't want to deal with that.
As ill informed as you are, I do think you know that Bill O'Reilly has the HIGHEST ratings and watched by countless of us.

Your problem with him is that he calls you libs out when you try to stop Christmas celebrations .

When you and Mona are reading about Justin Bieber the rest of us are reading one of Oreilly's books .

You are one of the smarter libs (Please HELP Mona) but your source of information is bias and incorrect.

Since: Jan 12

Port Richey, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#240
Dec 2, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

luv Sarah Palin wrote:
<quoted text>
I could have sworn he was a man but now it looks like he isn't. My future daughter in law is a fan of this Maddow and it looks like this leftist has a commie trance over the youth and if you bad mouth "him" they stick up like rabid dogs for their male/female leader.
Sure looks like a male to me but what do I know I live in reality.
http://www.google.com/imgres...
I could have sworn you were human but I was wrong Ha-Ha your problem is your and AH always been a AH you'll be a AH till the day you die a AH so go fart somewhere else

Since: Dec 08

El Paso, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#241
Dec 2, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

You finished eating all that crow evidently and have moved on to your usual bullcrap.

How's it feel letting the world know what a loser you are?
luv Sarah Palin wrote:
<quoted text>
Deporting Tom would go a long way in Obama reaching out to republicans.
I would pay for his deportation myself on the condition he never be allowed to return.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#242
Dec 2, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

luv Sarah Palin wrote:
<quoted text>
As ill informed as you are, I do think you know that Bill O'Reilly has the HIGHEST ratings and watched by countless of us.
Your problem with him is that he calls you libs out when you try to stop Christmas celebrations .
When you and Mona are reading about Justin Bieber the rest of us are reading one of Oreilly's books .
You are one of the smarter libs (Please HELP Mona) but your source of information is bias and incorrect.
How's Sarah Palin's election coming? How about Santorum?

Oh that's right. They both lost.

Sorry for your loss.
TheTroll Stopper

Roanoke, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#245
Dec 2, 2012
 
just another guy wrote:
I can't see why she would apologize to Madcow over that. That was just plain funny.
I suppose you think pulling the wings off of flies is also funny. Sez a lot about you.

Since: Jan 08

Thailand

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#246
Dec 2, 2012
 

Judged:

2

1

1

luv Sarah Palin wrote:
<quoted text>
As ill informed as you are, I do think you know that Bill O'Reilly has the HIGHEST ratings and watched by countless of us.
Your problem with him is that he calls you libs out when you try to stop Christmas celebrations .
When you and Mona are reading about Justin Bieber the rest of us are reading one of Oreilly's books .
You are one of the smarter libs (Please HELP Mona) but your source of information is bias and incorrect.
Ah, the clueless bitch is back. I don't know why you even think you have anything to add to the political discourse except that you lost and along with ditch digger Bill you're blaming the "gifts" Democrats promised their voters. What a hypocrite. How much did Romney promise his rich buddies in tax free revenue? "True conservatives" don't use their power to put down those they don't like, and "true conservatives" wouldn't havent' started 2 wars and then LOWER taxes like a real fiscal retard. GOP, you're nothing but a bunch of greedy old people, fascists, and idiots. You can "luv" Sarah Palin all you want; it just shows your moronic IQ.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#248
Dec 2, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

2

just another guy wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok, "fiscal retard" (another example from the left of how they portray themselves as compassionate and then insult people ), anyone who knows economics knows reducing tax rates increases tax revenue.
Which economics is that? Reagan's voodoo economics?
NoQ

New York, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#250
Dec 3, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Juanpaul wrote:
<quoted text>You again, you must love me huh ? you follow me everywhere.
What's up Dumbo???

“Stop the liberal madness”

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#251
Dec 3, 2012
 

Judged:

4

3

2

Fa-Foxy wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree. The Professional Left has personally attacked people on the right for years, but they're so tin-skinned, they get apoplectic if someone does the same thing to them.
Liberals are Evil. PURE EVIL.
Yes liberals are evil who try to silence anyone who dare defy them.

They attack Coulter and countless other conservatives but if you dare say a word about the that fella Maddow they scream.

Since: Dec 08

El Paso, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#252
Dec 3, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

We've had these low rates for years now. Just where are the jobs and improved economy? The actual result has been richer rich, less middle class and more poverty.

Those facts blow a really big craphole in your economic philosophy. Trickle down turns yellow and smells a lot like piss.
just another guy wrote:
<quoted text>
If you study economics that is what has happened any time tax rates are reduced. It would still be true if obama did it. Of course that would not fit with his class warfare agenda.

“Equality First”

Since: Jan 09

St. Louis, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#253
Dec 3, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

just another guy wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok, "fiscal retard" (another example from the left of how they portray themselves as compassionate and then insult people ), anyone who knows economics knows reducing tax rates increases tax revenue.
Hey, if that is true, taken to the natural conclusion, if we get rid of taxes all-together, then the economy will never have a recession or depression, right? If you think that is true, review the historical data on recessions and depressions before the U.S. had an income tax. The issue is not lesser or more taxes all the time, but when and by how much should the tax either go up or down. I would contend that any time our leaders get us into wars, justified or not, that taxes should go up to pay for them. And taxes should not come down in a time of war. And since W. decided to not only start wars, but to not pay for them, and then trump that by lowering taxes, it is time to raise them until these wars are paid for, in full. And people like me, who pay no income tax, but have a decent income, should be required to pay some taxes.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254
Dec 3, 2012
 
luv Sarah Palin wrote:
<quoted text>
As ill informed as you are, I do think you know that Bill O'Reilly has the HIGHEST ratings and watched by countless of us.
Your problem with him is that he calls you libs out when you try to stop Christmas celebrations .
When you and Mona are reading about Justin Bieber the rest of us are reading one of Oreilly's books .
You are one of the smarter libs (Please HELP Mona) but your source of information is bias and incorrect.
I'm not questioning O'Reilly's ratings. And AFAIK, people are free to celebrate Christmas.
Justin Bieber? Nah, he looks too much like a little boy. I like men...

Since: Jan 08

Thailand

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#255
Dec 3, 2012
 

Judged:

3

2

2

just another guy wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok, "fiscal retard" (another example from the left of how they portray themselves as compassionate and then insult people ), anyone who knows economics knows reducing tax rates increases tax revenue.
Your stupidity shows no bounds. So tell me, oh right wing nut job, how the tax cuts and 2 wars left the economy? I seem to recall an economic melt down in 2008 that almost led to a world wide depression. The absolute greed of the GOP just about did the economy in, but never mind, they'll keep preaching tax free greed for the super rich by a different name. Why don't you get your GED?!
AzAdam

Mesa, AZ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#257
Dec 4, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

just another guy wrote:
<quoted text>
Was that meltdown because the tax rate cuts ? Yea those evil rich 1 % were so greedy and had their tax rates cut so they could hoard more of their money.
"In fact, IRS data show that the richest 1% paid $84 billion more in taxes in 2007 than they had in 2000 — that’s a 23% increase — even though their average tax rate went down.
What’s more, their share of the overall income tax burden grew, climbing from 37% in 2000 to 40% in 2007.
At the other end of the spectrum, the bottom half of taxpayers paid $6 billion less in income taxes in 2007 than they had seven years earlier — a 16% drop — and their share of the total income tax burden dropped from 3.9% to 2.9%."
That's because the wealthiest became wealthier and the poorest became poorer. If the top 2% hold 50% of the wealth, why are they only paying 40% of the taxes?

I just want the wealthiest to pay the same effective tax rate as I pay. That's a lot more than 15% if you were wondering.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••