College Course Lumps Homosexuality, R...

College Course Lumps Homosexuality, Rape, Murder

There are 46 comments on the New Hampshire Public Radio - story from Sep 10, 2012, titled College Course Lumps Homosexuality, Rape, Murder. In it, New Hampshire Public Radio - reports that:

Gay and lesbian alumni of Franciscan University of Steubenville in Ohio are troubled by the course description for a social work program class.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at New Hampshire Public Radio -.

First Prev
of 3
Next Last
Omni Impotent

United States

#1 Sep 10, 2012
Pedophilia should be included also.

“ TRUTH : NOT EXPEDIENCE”

Since: Nov 07

town near Jax, Fl

#2 Sep 10, 2012
Omni Impotent wrote:
Pedophilia should be included also.
You're right! You are mentally impotent.
Omni Impotent

United States

#3 Sep 10, 2012
Catholic created gay wrote:
<quoted text>
You're right! You are mentally impotent.
There is an ulterior motive for my alias. Since the homosexual mind is intractable, a gay can never be self-effacing. So when a gay accuses me of being a closet case, I can simply point to my alias as proof that I could not be gay.

“Married 6/17/08”

Since: Feb 07

Porterville, CA

#4 Sep 10, 2012
IMHO The "University" should be given a clear choice by the accrediting agency, clean up their act or lose accreditation.

“Unconvinced”

Since: Nov 09

Seattle, WA

#5 Sep 10, 2012
Omni Impotent wrote:
There is an ulterior motive for my alias. Since the homosexual mind is intractable, a gay can never be self-effacing. So when a gay accuses me of being a closet case, I can simply point to my alias as proof that I could not be gay.
Nobody called you gay. He said you were mentally impotent. You are protesting WAYYYYY too much, about things which weren't even said.
Shrink Wrapped

United States

#6 Sep 10, 2012
EdmondWA wrote:
<quoted text>
Nobody called you gay. He said you were mentally impotent. You are protesting WAYYYYY too much, about things which weren't even said.
I never said that he said that I was gay. But he made a disparaging reference to my alias, so I explained it's derivation. You are protesting WAYYYYY too much, about things which weren't even said.

Lililth_Satans_B ore

Since: May 12

Bellevue, WA

#7 Sep 10, 2012
Omni Impotent wrote:
<quoted text>
There is an ulterior motive for my alias. Since the homosexual mind is intractable, a gay can never be self-effacing. So when a gay accuses me of being a closet case, I can simply point to my alias as proof that I could not be gay.
the only morazz mind on here is yours loser
Omni Impotent

United States

#8 Sep 10, 2012
Lililth_Satans_Wh_ore wrote:
<quoted text> the only morazz mind on here is yours loser
Lillith Honey, Halloween is coming up. You gonna give out tricks again, instead of treats? Remember, put a mask on so you don't scare people.

“Unconvinced”

Since: Nov 09

Seattle, WA

#9 Sep 10, 2012
Shrink Wrapped wrote:
I never said that he said that I was gay. But he made a disparaging reference to my alias, so I explained it's derivation. You are protesting WAYYYYY too much, about things which weren't even said.
Oh, is that what happened? And here I had it all wrong.

I thought that first, you tried to wrongly conflate an adult's desire for imposing sexual power over minors, with the sexual attraction between consenting adults. How ridiculous of me!

Then, it seemed like you baldly asserted that a gay person's mind can never be changed, and that gay people can never be self-effacing. This tired old fag would disagree, but I'd be open to new evidence.

Lastly, I could have sworn that you acted quickly to deflect anyone possibly calling you gay, asserting that some letters on a computer screen make it functionally impossible. If only all of us "intractable" homosexuals had known that by choosing just the right screen name, we'd be tractable!

If only I had agreed with you in the first place, and admitted that grown-ups overpowering children is JUST LIKE grown-ups falling in love with other grown-ups. How foolish of me.
Button up Your Vestment

Alpharetta, GA

#10 Sep 10, 2012
The school should be closed
.
There is no place in civilized society for neo-KKK training schools
Shrink Wrapped

United States

#11 Sep 10, 2012
EdmondWA wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, is that what happened? And here I had it all wrong.
I thought that first, you tried to wrongly conflate an adult's desire for imposing sexual power over minors, with the sexual attraction between consenting adults. How ridiculous of me!
Then, it seemed like you baldly asserted that a gay person's mind can never be changed, and that gay people can never be self-effacing. This tired old fag would disagree, but I'd be open to new evidence.
Lastly, I could have sworn that you acted quickly to deflect anyone possibly calling you gay, asserting that some letters on a computer screen make it functionally impossible. If only all of us "intractable" homosexuals had known that by choosing just the right screen name, we'd be tractable!
If only I had agreed with you in the first place, and admitted that grown-ups overpowering children is JUST LIKE grown-ups falling in love with other grown-ups. How foolish of me.
Damn, I think I used the wrong word a few posts back. I used "self effacing" when I meant "self-deprecating". Damn I am stupid!
Eddy, you tried to disprove my point by referring to yourself as a "tired old fag". You're not being self-deprecating, you're simply being factual. Your logic is flawed, but at least your writing is eloquent.
Educating Teachers

Minneapolis, MN

#12 Sep 10, 2012
Omni Impotent wrote:
Pedophilia should be included also.
The American Psychological Association tends to agree w/ your conclusion, albeit 10 years from now when it's more politically palatable to publicize/advocate to Democrat politicians their 'research' to formulate the recommended public policy that will net Jerry Sandusky a hefty lawsuit settlement from the state of Pennsylvania for bigoted hateful intolerant persecution of a homosexual and wrongful imprisonment.
The endgame for homosexuals is to have unfettered access to other peoples' children, the same as when the homosexuals proudly included NAMBLA in their parades up until the lesbians said queer male pedos would hinder their access to other peoples' little girls.
The history of queers hasn't changed throughout the centuries and millenia; their focus on fetishizing/sexualizing children and mania to be around kids hasn't changed and won't any time soon, for obvious reasons.

Since: Dec 08

Toronto, ON, Canada

#13 Sep 10, 2012
Omni Impotent wrote:
Pedophilia should be included also.
They cover the proper techniques for that in their courses on social work with children.
Rainbow Kid

Alpharetta, GA

#14 Sep 10, 2012
Educating Teachers wrote:
<quoted text>The American Psychological Association tends to agree w/ your conclusion, albeit 10 years from now when it's more politically palatable to publicize/advocate to Democrat politicians their 'research' to formulate the recommended public policy that will net Jerry Sandusky a hefty lawsuit settlement from the state of Pennsylvania for bigoted hateful intolerant persecution of a homosexual and wrongful imprisonment.
The endgame for homosexuals is to have unfettered access to other peoples' children, the same as when the homosexuals proudly included NAMBLA in their parades up until the lesbians said queer male pedos would hinder their access to other peoples' little girls.
The history of queers hasn't changed throughout the centuries and millenia; their focus on fetishizing/sexualizing children and mania to be around kids hasn't changed and won't any time soon, for obvious reasons.
Christians start'em young
http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lam749CWGy1...
hi hi

Philadelphia, PA

#15 Sep 10, 2012
Shrink Wrapped wrote:
<quoted text>
Damn, I think I used the wrong word a few posts back. I used "self effacing" when I meant "self-deprecating". Damn I am stupid!
Eddy, you tried to disprove my point by referring to yourself as a "tired old fag". You're not being self-deprecating, you're simply being factual. Your logic is flawed, but at least your writing is eloquent.
And *YOU* are an expert in aristotelian logic?

W.

o.

w.

Right, lemme go see if anyone *wants to buy a bridge* called the Golden Gate. Christ.
hi hi

Philadelphia, PA

#16 Sep 10, 2012
Educating Teachers wrote:
<quoted text>The American Psychological Association tends to agree w/ your conclusion, albeit 10 years from now when it's more politically palatable to publicize/advocate to Democrat politicians their 'research' to formulate the recommended public policy that will net Jerry Sandusky a hefty lawsuit settlement from the state of Pennsylvania for bigoted hateful intolerant persecution of a homosexual and wrongful imprisonment.
The endgame for homosexuals is to have unfettered access to other peoples' children, the same as when the homosexuals proudly included NAMBLA in their parades up until the lesbians said queer male pedos would hinder their access to other peoples' little girls.
The history of queers hasn't changed throughout the centuries and millenia; their focus on fetishizing/sexualizing children and mania to be around kids hasn't changed and won't any time soon, for obvious reasons.
Yet no court case concerning gay rights in the last several years has accepted any of this as factual -- not even remotely.

Oh, that's right! This is because the antigay *won't daaaare* to bring this into court. In fact, according to several accredited news sources, they *studiously avoided eeeeever* making the slightest mention of such things.

Know what, though?

If one last person among your ilk *has a backbone*-- including some of the attorney who mouth off like whores -- they are *welcome as the United States is wide and free* to bring what YOU say here into COURTS OF LAW ...

... and see what happens.

Funny they won't do that.

Why is that?...
Junior Esquire

United States

#17 Sep 10, 2012
hi hi wrote:
<quoted text>
And *YOU* are an expert in aristotelian logic?
W.
o.
w.
Right, lemme go see if anyone *wants to buy a bridge* called the Golden Gate. Christ.
"hi hi", you mentioned elsewhere that you are a judge, and that you try to be "fair".
Do you recuse yourself from any civil rights cases involving homosexuality? Because you prove repeatedly how extremely biased you are regarding this subject.
hi hi

Philadelphia, PA

#18 Sep 10, 2012
Junior Esquire wrote:
<quoted text>
"hi hi", you mentioned elsewhere that you are a judge, and that you try to be "fair".
Do you recuse yourself from any civil rights cases involving homosexuality? Because you prove repeatedly how extremely biased you are regarding this subject.
Hey question, go to the internet, look up an article called "Will “Evolving” Supreme Court Uphold Gay Marriage?" and read it in its entirety, paying special attention to what:

JUSTICE

SCALIA

has to say. Go do this and then answer a question, because I want to *WATCH YOU* answer this question and make sense:

Ready?

Should Justice Scalia be *recusing himself from gay rights cases* when he said LAST MONTH what he said about gay people?

Tell me, straight to me on this board, you to me, and I will *watch you do it*, that Scalia *SHOULD NOT* recuse himself from these cases but that a pro-gay judge should.

Your turn.

Let's see *what you say*.

Go.
Junior Esquire

United States

#19 Sep 10, 2012
hi hi wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey question, go to the internet, look up an article called "Will “Evolving” Supreme Court Uphold Gay Marriage?" and read it in its entirety, paying special attention to what:
JUSTICE
SCALIA
has to say. Go do this and then answer a question, because I want to *WATCH YOU* answer this question and make sense:
Ready?
Should Justice Scalia be *recusing himself from gay rights cases* when he said LAST MONTH what he said about gay people?
Tell me, straight to me on this board, you to me, and I will *watch you do it*, that Scalia *SHOULD NOT* recuse himself from these cases but that a pro-gay judge should.
Your turn.
Let's see *what you say*.
Go.
OK. My turn. But first, since you do not deny being a judge, does that confirm that you are indeed a judge? Yes or No?
Educating Teachers

Minneapolis, MN

#20 Sep 10, 2012
hi hi wrote:
<quoted text>
Yet no court case concerning gay rights in the last several years has accepted any of this as factual -- not even remotely.
Oh, that's right! This is because the antigay *won't daaaare* to bring this into court. In fact, according to several accredited news sources, they *studiously avoided eeeeever* making the slightest mention of such things.
Know what, though?
If one last person among your ilk *has a backbone*-- including some of the attorney who mouth off like whores -- they are *welcome as the United States is wide and free* to bring what YOU say here into COURTS OF LAW ...
... and see what happens.
Funny they won't do that.
Why is that?...
It may surprise you to learn that prospective educators, pretty much every government employee, has a duty to report to responsible authorities what they believe in good faith to be instances of adult homosexual pedophiles to be preying homosexually on little kids, yet again.

All the reputable peer-reviewed studies show unequivocally that homosexuals are far and away more likely to molest children than the rare and sick non-homosexual-pedophile.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Pope says Church should ask forgiveness from ga... 6 min South Knox Hombre 7
News Sanders: Don't blame Islam for Orlando shooting 7 min ImFree2Choose 927
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 8 min Pietro Armando 37,407
News Justicea s gay marriage order halts licenses in... 10 min Pietro Armando 342
News Columbus veteran, ousted for sexual orientation... 21 min Duke for Mayor 13
News Pentagon Ends Transgender Ban 35 min Sneaky Pete 4
News New survey doubles the estimate of transgender ... 1 hr Here is what I 4
News Obama: Notion that being armed would have saved... 1 hr WasteWater 991
News 'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15) 2 hr Frankie Rizzo 13,162
More from around the web