Discriminatory bill needs a veto
The First Amendment protects freedom of association. It's a stretch, however, to suggest that it blesses groups that use taxpayer dollars to associate exclusively with those who share discriminatory beliefs.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at hamptonroads.com.
Since: Mar 09
#1 Feb 19, 2013
From the opinion ...
" ... Taxpayers should not be required to support groups that don't open membership to all classes of taxpayers. Such groups are permitted to exist, but if the groups demand purity through exclusivity, they should do so on their members' own dimes ... "
#2 Feb 19, 2013
“Together for 24, legal for 5”
Since: Sep 07
#3 Feb 19, 2013
You can hope and pray, prostate yourself toward Mecca, self-flagellate, present burnt offerings, sacrifice virgins, or perform whatever other magical summons you will. Governor Ultrasound is looking forward to signing this bill.
Add your comments below
|Bronx man cuffed after he hurls gay slurs, cane...||3 min||Roderick||3|
|Memorial Day With BIG BOSS MAN||4 min||Roderick||6|
|Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13)||8 min||Frankie Rizzo||49,348|
|NE Jade's Homosexual OCD Thread||18 min||Roderick||1|
|What would Jesus say about same-sex marriage? (Jul '15)||28 min||Frankie Rizzo||6,103|
|Ruling: Refusal to print gay pride shirts not d...||39 min||wtf||255|
|'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15)||55 min||Frankie Rizzo||25,642|
|The gay cafe for GLBT, friends and family (Oct '09)||14 hr||Frankie Rizzo||69,531|
Find what you want!
Search Gay/Lesbian Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC