Paul Ryan promises hate group that he'll fight equality

[Lacez]

Wondering wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't care what you think is valid.

It's false, you can't prove otherwise. You are lying and you think we won't catch you lying.

News flash: we always catch your lies, because you lie all the time.

[Wondering]

Lacez wrote:

<quoted text>
It's false, you can't prove otherwise. You are lying and you think we won't catch you lying.
News flash: we always catch your lies, because you lie all the time.

Do you help with household expenses or are you sponging 100% off of your parents?

[Lacez]

Wondering wrote:

<quoted text>
Look, stupid Canadian, here's what I said:
"I have kids and enjoy so many government benefits that you can't because you can't have your own kids."
You can draw any conclusions you wish from that.

It's not my conclusions, you're saying that you believe no one should marry unless they currently have kids. There's no other way to ensure their marriage produces children, unless they already have kids. You don't support sterile marriage, elderly marriage, nor gay marriage.

This is what you are saying by opposing marriage without kids, Wonderbread.

[Lacez]

Wondering wrote:

<quoted text>
Actually, I did explain myself, you just don't have the capacity to understand.

You said "use your logic."
Sorry, Wonderbread, but that isn't even close to explaining yourself.

[Lacez]

Wondering wrote:

<quoted text>
Do you help with household expenses or are you sponging 100% off of your parents?

Does your old folks home really allow you this much time on the computer, or are you stealing extra hours?

You are lying, otherwise you'd be able to back up your claims with credible sources.

[Wondering]

Lacez wrote:

<quoted text>
It's not my conclusions, you're saying that you believe no one should marry unless they currently have kids.

Where did I say that? Trust me, only in your tiny mind.

[Wondering]

Lacez wrote:

<quoted text>
Does your old folks home really allow you this much time on the computer, or are you stealing extra hours?
You are lying, otherwise you'd be able to back up your claims with credible sources.

Actually, I own a very nice home in a very desirable neighborhood.
Do you help with your parent's household expenses or are you 100% sponge?
My guess is you're 100% sponge or you'd be saying otherwise. Get a job, loser.

[Unbelievable]

Wondering wrote:

<quoted text>
Where did I say that? Trust me, only in your tiny mind.

I can't believe you two are still having this conversation. Different subject but same argument. I haven't been on here in months and her you still are! Did you change each other's Indus yet? Ha ha

[Unbelievable]

How did minds turn into Indus??

[John from Texas]

Jane Dough wrote:

<quoted text>
I hope this good advice was directed at everyone. I think anyone who watches this thread can see mounds of hate on BOTH sides....

Yes it was directed at everyone. We'll never understand completely the other side, but we all have common ground to build upon. We ought to consider that.

[Lacez]

Wondering wrote:

<quoted text>
Where did I say that? Trust me, only in your tiny mind.

Again, by saying that you oppose marriage equality because gay people cant have children (which is false and you know it) you are claiming that you need kids to marry.

Wonderbread, you continue to amuse me with your stupidity.

[Lacez]

Wondering wrote:

<quoted text>
Actually, I own a very nice home in a very desirable neighborhood.
Do you help with your parent's household expenses or are you 100% sponge?
My guess is you're 100% sponge or you'd be saying otherwise. Get a job, loser.

Actually, I just prefer not to make personal information public.
That's called being smart, for offering up all your information online is a stupid idea.

If you had any validity in your claims at all, you'd be able to back it up. You've not yet been able to, ergo, you have no validity or credibility.

[Wondering]

Lacez wrote:

<quoted text>
Actually, I just prefer not to make personal information public.
That's called being smart, for offering up all your information online is a stupid idea.
If you had any validity in your claims at all, you'd be able to back it up. You've not yet been able to, ergo, you have no validity or credibility.

Have you ever heard of Google? If you thought you could prove me wrong you would have tried already. You can't.

[lides]

Jane Dough wrote:

<quoted text>
totally clueless.
<quoted text>
there is no other way you put things...
and I have played pete and repeat long enough, I am now fully bored of you.
troll on troller.

Jane, did the legislature decide that they would act to ensure that children were raised by two biological parents?

Did the legislature decide to pass legislation allowing same sex marriage?

Is Hernandez v Robels still the law of the land in NY state?

What kind of moron cites a court case that has been superseded by an act of the legislature?

[Lacez]

Wondering wrote:

<quoted text>
Have you ever heard of Google? If you thought you could prove me wrong you would have tried already. You can't.

Actually, I know there is no credible source backing you up, googling it would result in time wasted on my part. Why would I waste my time looking for something I know doesn't exist?

When you make a claim, it's your job to prove it's true, not anyone else's job. See, I could claim there are purple elephants with wings flying around New York, then tell you to look it up. It obviously isn't true and you'd certainly be wasting your time on trying to prove it.

[ToManyLaws]

Hate and bigotry and racism...THE FOUNDATION OF THE GOP AND THE CHRISTIANS...

[Quest]

Wondering wrote:

<quoted text>
Have you ever heard of Google? If you thought you could prove me wrong you would have tried already. You can't.

So, you are saying that you know you can't back up your own claims, but won't admit it.

As always.

[FP]

ToManyLaws wrote:

PAUL OPPOSES CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS??????????Yep typical nazi fascist GOP slug..........RELIGION DOESNT GIVE YOU RIGHTS TO ATTACK OTHERS RIGHTS.....

Btw ,, The NAZI were socialist not fascist ,,

[FP]

Why do only Christians get singled out Never hear the bashing of Islam ,,, they behead homosexuals. That's because the radical left have aligned with Islam on a world wide scale. How's the Arab spring working out for ya now after the "secular" group Muslim brotherhood decided to have dictatorship in Egypt LOLOL

[ToManyLaws]

FP wrote:

<quoted text>
Btw ,, The NAZI were socialist not fascist ,,

No the Nazi,s were a mix of socialist and fascist mostly fascist though....Your welcome for me educating you.