Will Gay Marriage Pit Church Against ...

Will Gay Marriage Pit Church Against Church?

There are 16097 comments on the news.yahoo.com story from Apr 27, 2009, titled Will Gay Marriage Pit Church Against Church?. In it, news.yahoo.com reports that:

The trouble they see is not just an America where general support for gay marriage will have driven a wedge between churches and the world, but between churches themselves.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at news.yahoo.com.

The Worlds Biggest Lie

Pittsfield, MA

#12538 Apr 6, 2013
Noah wrote:
<quoted text>I agree. It is partly the liberal media. Gays hate children, because they were abused as children. Part of the problem is programming, like for instance you said priests, when it was gays who infiltrated the priesthood to pervert it and molest children. There are so many children who are raped and abused by adopted gay parents, but the media does not report it and CPS is afraid of being labeled bigots.
If two 25 year old black straight men wished to adopt two 15 year old blonde white girls, it would never happen.
For this govt to force this upon our youth should be a crime. I don't care what anyone thinks, the gd jews that puppet our govt are behind this with the sick minded liberals that call themselves 'Christains/Catholics.
There could be proven no God at all and all religions could vanish in an instant but as human beings we are still left with the choices of what is right and what is wrong and sodomy between two men is simply disturbing, and that is being modest. With the preposterous concept of ss parenting I call it child traficking.
These no good sob's have been destroying our society extensively since the 60's. Don't get me wrong, it's certainly not only gays, it's the people in high places profiting from this crap that should be put away. They have been corrupting our society in many many was, but this is outragious.

There will come a day
And that day is near.
The Worlds Biggest Lie

Pittsfield, MA

#12539 Apr 6, 2013
Garlic man wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't impress me.
Either God exists or he doesn't.
What diaper head snyper doesn't understand is by his pathetic rationalizing for no God at all in order to make his homosexual argument whole, is that there is no such thing of anything in life as we know it as being "wrong" at all.
ANYTHING goes, by his argument.
Whatta fool.
Liberalism is indeed a mental illness. eVeRyWhErE

Since: Dec 09

Chicago, IL

#12540 Apr 6, 2013
snyper wrote:
<quoted text>
That was loaded with fallacies.
You also ignored the problem I proposed.
Do I have to show the logic step by step, or can you try to work it out on your own (instead of reverting to Sunday School platitudes)?
What problem? If you're referring to your question, "Can God create anything He cannot utterly destroy?" , as "the problem you proposed", I didn't find it a problem. The only problem now is the problem you're becoming. But I'm not ignoring it,...yet.
Though you claim my logic is flawed and my comment is loaded with fallacies, you've so far refused to identify or point them out specifically and further discuss it . Therefore I assume you can't - you just continue to boastfully imply your intellectual competence while demonstrating none.
So be it.
The American Genocide

Pittsfield, MA

#12541 Apr 6, 2013
janeebee wrote:
<quoted text>
What problem? If you're referring to your question, "Can God create anything He cannot utterly destroy?" , as "the problem you proposed", I didn't find it a problem. The only problem now is the problem you're becoming. But I'm not ignoring it,...yet.
Though you claim my logic is flawed and my comment is loaded with fallacies, you've so far refused to identify or point them out specifically and further discuss it . Therefore I assume you can't - you just continue to boastfully imply your intellectual competence while demonstrating none.
So be it.
Maybe it's because I NEVER read your post to begin with. Maybe it's because I've read hundreds of snypers posts and needed not to scroll up from the poster who addressed one of topixes many sexually deranged people with an appetite to be around young children. This, despite the fact gays by their own relationship 'naturally' abrogated the ability to conceive a child entirely. How disturbing and defective of you.
The American Genocide

Pittsfield, MA

#12542 Apr 6, 2013
My apologies.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#12543 Apr 6, 2013
Garlic man wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't impress me.
Either God exists or he doesn't.
A lack of verifiable evidence is a factoid that does not lead to proof.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#12544 Apr 6, 2013
Garlic man wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't care who you are and I didn't ask about your identity. You, however asked for mine and I answered.
Are you really this stupid?
No, but you sure are.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#12545 Apr 6, 2013
janeebee wrote:
<quoted text>
What problem? If you're referring to your question, "Can God create anything He cannot utterly destroy?" , as "the problem you proposed", I didn't find it a problem. The only problem now is the problem you're becoming. But I'm not ignoring it,...yet.
Though you claim my logic is flawed and my comment is loaded with fallacies, you've so far refused to identify or point them out specifically and further discuss it . Therefore I assume you can't - you just continue to boastfully imply your intellectual competence while demonstrating none.
So be it.
The only way you did not "find it a problem" was by applying the Straw Man fallacy; i.e. you turned the question into something other than what I said in order to defeat what you created.

Again, same problem in a more classic vein: Can God create a weight that he cannot lift?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#12546 Apr 6, 2013
The American Genocide wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe it's because I NEVER read your post to begin with. Maybe it's because I've read hundreds of snypers posts and needed not to scroll up from the poster who addressed one of topixes many sexually deranged people with an appetite to be around young children. This, despite the fact gays by their own relationship 'naturally' abrogated the ability to conceive a child entirely. How disturbing and defective of you.
Nice rant.

U Mad or something?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#12547 Apr 6, 2013
Garlic man wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL! You say that because of your "great powers" or because you believe that the Christian God doesn't exist, even though you can't prove it? LOL!
I said he didn't know the Christian God. Your reading comprehension skills are sadly limited.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#12548 Apr 6, 2013
Garlic man wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't impress me.
Either God exists or he doesn't.
Your puny God doesn't exist anymore. My God ate your God for breakfast yesterday.
Duhhhhh

Pittsfield, MA

#12549 Apr 6, 2013
snyper wrote:
<quoted text>
A lack of verifiable evidence is a factoid that does not lead to proof.
I think the entire existence of the universe qualifies as evidence and points out the fact you are an idiot. Consistently liberally stupid and morally corrupting.
No harm no foul, right diaper?
The American Genocide

Pittsfield, MA

#12550 Apr 6, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Nice rant.
U Mad or something?
Not mad at all. In fact I enjoy your consistently short replies because you can rarely refute anything I say. I notice you do the same with respect to other topics that others waste their time addressing you on.
The American Genocide

Pittsfield, MA

#12551 Apr 6, 2013
Only a sexually deranged liberal could point out the different colors of ones skin or sexual behavior and claim they should be paid for it or provided 'special rights' and point out those objecting to such policies as being hateful/racist/or bigoted.
What a disgrace they really are.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#12552 Apr 6, 2013
The American Genocide wrote:
<quoted text>
Not mad at all. In fact I enjoy your consistently short replies because you can rarely refute anything I say. I notice you do the same with respect to other topics that others waste their time addressing you on.
R U Mad?

Your previous post was nothing but a series of fallacies and false stereotypes. ROTFLMAO

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#12553 Apr 6, 2013
The American Genocide wrote:
Only a sexually deranged liberal could point out the different colors of ones skin or sexual behavior and claim they should be paid for it or provided 'special rights' and point out those objecting to such policies as being hateful/racist/or bigoted.
What a disgrace they really are.
Sexually deranged liberals? That's both a stereotype and fallacy. FYI, one of the most prestigious and Conservative Lawyers in our country is before the Supreme Court making the case for equality.

Not special rights, fundamental rights of citizens as proscribed in the 14th amendment to the Constitution.

BTW, your "sexually deranged liberal" statement is a bigoted statement. If the shoe fits, wear it.

“Seriously guys...”

Since: May 12

Regina

#12554 Apr 7, 2013
snyper wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, unlike sexual orientation, religion is a chosen lifestyle which needs to be indoctrinated ... literally.
I think American Dad said it best. "People don't choose to be gay, but they DO choose to be Democrats!"

Or Republicans, or fundamentalist whackjobs.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#12555 Apr 7, 2013
snyper wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, unlike sexual orientation, religion is a chosen lifestyle which needs to be indoctrinated ... literally.
Religion is present in every single culture. It is accepted and embraced by the vast majority of those cultures.

Calling ss couples 'married'? Never.

Smile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#12556 Apr 7, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Sexually deranged liberals? That's both a stereotype and fallacy. FYI, one of the most prestigious and Conservative Lawyers in our country is before the Supreme Court making the case for equality.
Not special rights, fundamental rights of citizens as proscribed in the 14th amendment to the Constitution.
BTW, your "sexually deranged liberal" statement is a bigoted statement. If the shoe fits, wear it.
Ss couples do not equate to marriage.

At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.

ss couples can't be 'married'. It is impossible.

It is visibly obvious they are only ever a senselessly duplicated half of marriage. A desecration of sacred design. A barren imposter relationship that is always a devastating deprivation of family imposed on a child for the sake of an illusion. A violent imitation of sexual intimacy.

There is nothing, at any level that equates a ss couple to marriage.

Smile.

“What, me worry?”

Since: Mar 09

I'm a racist caricature!

#12557 Apr 7, 2013
Moses wrote:
<quoted text>Still no legally valid justification for changing and altering the meaning of marriage, to include same sex couples. Ain't that something?
By the way, when did this prohibition begin? The only case that can be made is in California, where the justices allowed it for a mimute and then it was prohibited.
Now, please explain your legally valid justification to change marriage to include same sex, but not adult incest, child incest, bestiality, polygamy and pedophilia.
If you justification is consent, then that is just an opinion. If your justification is the moral concept of family and parenting, then that is a moral opinion like same sex couples.
You got nothing. Sorry!
It doesn't matter when it began. The subjugation of blacks started before the Constitution was even drafted. So what? Their rights were eventually realized, as was the right to marry outside of one's race.

The slippery slope argument was also used in the dissent to the Loving v. Virginia case. Would you include inter-racial marriage as part of the slippery slope as was done in the dissent?

Consent is not an opinion. Morality is irrelevant.

When you're ready to present a legally valid justification for prohibiting same-sex marriage, you let us know, mmkay?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Gay couple, devout baker take cake fight to hig... 5 min EdmondWA 67
News Ten Commandments judge faces runoff in Alabama ... 23 min DebraE 328
if you are homosexual... 30 min Papa 3
News What would Jesus say about same-sex marriage? (Jul '15) 36 min DebraE 14,758
Are YOU Homosexually Sad??? 1 hr Brown Dog 4
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 2 hr June VanDerMark 58,413
Your homosexual joke of a life 2 hr Jabar 2
News Former OKC Mayor blames homosexuality for moral... 3 hr mr gleeble 116
The Spectrum Cafe (Dec '07) 5 hr GodSmacked 26,914
Roy Moore.....Just Another Hypocrite 10 hr Wondering 411
More from around the web