Gingrich, Romney Slam Court's Rejection of Gay Marriage Ban
Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Wall Street Journal.
Since: Jan 10
#1 Feb 7, 2012
Funny that Mitt wants judges to uphold the Constitution concerning marriage between a man and a woman but:
In 2004, a lot of controversy began to swirl around the topic of marriage as homosexual marriage entered the news once again. In 1999, the Vermont Supreme Court ordered that the state must make accommodations for gay unions, bringing the issue into the public eye. Vermont created civil unions as a result. In 2004, the Massachusetts Supreme Court went a step further, and ruled that the state must accommodate not just an institution equal to marriage, as civil union was designed to be, but that gay marriage itself must be offered in the state. Subsequently, mayors in New York and California began to offer gay marriage in their towns and cities, citing civil rights concerns. Those opposed to gay marriage began to urge that an amendment to the Constitution be created to define marriage as being between a man and a woman only. Opponents of the amendment pointed to the failed Prohibition Amendment as a reason why such social issues should stay out of the Constitution. In the absence of any such amendment, however, marriage is not mentioned in the Constitution at any point.
Add your comments below
|Anxiety in America up since Donald Trump became...||13 min||jonjedi||31|
|Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13)||27 min||Terra Firma||46,279|
|'Reading a book can't turn you gay,' say author...||1 hr||Wondering||18|
|Perry blasts election of 1st gay Texas A&M stud...||2 hr||jonjedi||3|
|Doritos makes rainbow chips in support of gay r... (Sep '15)||2 hr||guest||1,326|
|Man Beat 2 Transgender Women Who Tried to Enter...||3 hr||Mona||40|
|'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15)||3 hr||carter county res...||25,230|
Find what you want!
Search Gay/Lesbian Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC