Skull Valley lawmaker wants both side...

Skull Valley lawmaker wants both sides of climate change taught to students

There are 1632 comments on the Verde Independent story from Feb 5, 2013, titled Skull Valley lawmaker wants both sides of climate change taught to students. In it, Verde Independent reports that:

Saying students are getting only one side of the debate, a state senator wants to free teachers to tell students why they believe there is no such thing human-caused "global warming.' The proposal by Sen.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Verde Independent.

“When you treat people as they ”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#1601 Oct 29, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
So you admit you are on here to pick at people, pass time, make fun of people because your life is boring. Interesting.
Why are you attempting to put your words in my mouth? Such ignorance.

I said and I WILL REPEAT

“I am here for the fun, and I am enjoying myself by highlighting your stupidity and deliberate (or otherwise) ignorance”

Where does that say my life is boring?

FUN is not boring – tell me, why are you here of are you just being hypocritical – as usual?

“When you treat people as they ”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#1602 Oct 29, 2013
Complete christian ignorance

“BET DAP”

Level 4

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#1603 Oct 29, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
So you admit you are on here to pick at people, pass time, make fun of people because your life is boring. Interesting.
no need for pot on this "comedy channel". The idiotic humor provided by you and yours is more than enough for laughs.

“BET DAP”

Level 4

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#1604 Oct 29, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
I am here for the fun, and I am enjoying myself by highlighting your stupidity and deliberate (or otherwise) ignorance.
your superiority complex is pretty transparent. You trying to kid yourself? It's not working with me.

“When you treat people as they ”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#1605 Oct 29, 2013
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>your superiority complex is pretty transparent. You trying to kid yourself? It's not working with me.
Oh sorry, do you think I have a superiority complex? Nope, must be your inferiority complex seeing things and a truly unique light
litesong

Everett, WA

#1606 Oct 29, 2013
ratdownthemiddle wrote:
.....your superiority complex is pretty transparent......
Its clear as a ringing school bell, that people don't have to be complex to be superior to "ratdownthemiddle", "middleofthedownwronggull y".

"ratdownthemiddle", "middleofthedownwronggull y" has no science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra, or pre-calc for its poorly or non-earned hi skule DEE-plooomaa.

DEAD is the knowledge of "ratdownthemiddle", "middleofthedownwronggull y".

I'm glad "ratdownthemiddle", "middleofthedownwronggull y" never learns.

Its clear as a ringing school bell.

“BET DAP”

Level 4

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#1607 Oct 29, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh sorry, do you think I have a superiority complex? ht
evidence points in that direction.

“BET DAP”

Level 4

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#1608 Oct 29, 2013
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
Its clear as a ringing school bell, that people don't have to be complex to be superior to "ratdownthemiddle", "middleofthedownwronggull y".
"ratdownthemiddle", "middleofthedownwronggull y" has no science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra, or pre-calc for its poorly or non-earned hi skule DEE-plooomaa.
DEAD is the knowledge of "ratdownthemiddle", "middleofthedownwronggull y".
I'm glad "ratdownthemiddle", "middleofthedownwronggull y" never learns.
Its clear as a ringing school bell.
essentially the same post on three threads!
Lol
Are you stalking me, miss unoriginal?
Do something with your life, fktard.
You're wasting co2 by posting the same repetitive inane shyt....or do you not care about that?

“When you treat people as they ”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#1609 Oct 29, 2013
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>evidence points in that direction.
What evidence?

Must be your inferiority complex seeing things and a truly unique light

“BET DAP”

Level 4

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#1610 Oct 29, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
What evidence?
Must be your inferiority complex seeing things and a truly unique light
lol...if that's your opinion, son, it's all your own.
Just like your opinion of the UN not having corruption issues.
I doubt evidence is relevant to someone like you, jmo.
:-D
litesong

Everett, WA

#1611 Oct 29, 2013
ratdownthemiddle wrote:
essentially the same post on three threads!
....... the same repetitive....
Accuracy is far more important than original errors in toxic topix business, oil, energy & re-pubic-lick-un AGW denier PEE-R propagandistic strategies.

Its clear as a ringing school bell, that people don't have to be complex to be superior to "ratdownthemiddle", "middleofthedownwronggull y".

"ratdownthemiddle", "middleofthedownwronggull y" has no science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra, or pre-calc for its poorly or non-earned hi skule DEE-plooomaa.

DEAD is the knowledge of "ratdownthemiddle", "middleofthedownwronggull y".

I'm glad "ratdownthemiddle", "middleofthedownwronggull y" never learns.

Its clear as a ringing school bell.

“It is what it is”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#1612 Oct 29, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Why are you attempting to put your words in my mouth? Such ignorance.
I said and I WILL REPEAT
“I am here for the fun, and I am enjoying myself by highlighting your stupidity and deliberate (or otherwise) ignorance”
Where does that say my life is boring?
FUN is not boring – tell me, why are you here of are you just being hypocritical – as usual?
I am not putting words in your mouth. I am going by what you said
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>I am here for the fun, and I am enjoying myself by highlighting your stupidity and deliberate (or otherwise) ignorance.
So I will repeat what I said "So you admit you are on here to pick at people, pass time, make fun of people because your life is boring. Interesting."

If this is what you do for fun, as you claim in your comment, your life must be boring. I can think of many many other things to do for fun.

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Level 10

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#1613 Oct 30, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
Nope, you make your arguments based on ignorance and profit
How is looking at the experimental record, "ignorance and profit"? What do you mean by 'profit' and is it bad?

.
ChristineM wrote:
Chris does understand the issue and climate change mitigation experiments are a red herring.
What's the most compelling experiment you've found for climate change mitigation.

.
ChristineM wrote:
A series of links prove you wrong but you are welcome to lie all you want if that’s what lines your pockets
The point is that I have provided multiple sources of evidence and you have not, logically I win No because they are irrelevant and not what you stated anyway. What you actually said was “Don't fear, Mother Nature likes it. There's no experimental evidence otherwise.” And that report was one of several that prove you wrong. The article was called "Climate myths: Human CO2 emissions are too tiny to matter" as you rightly said however you appear to misunderstand (or ignore) the first two words “Climate myths” However that is not what you asked for, I provided evidence that you lied when you said “Don't fear, Mother Nature likes it. There's no experimental evidence otherwise.” By providing links to SEVERAL such experiments.
^^^Not one of Chris's links were to an experimental test of climate change mitigation.

.
ChristineM wrote:
This is about Ocean acidification as well as several other related topics but good of you to omit the first report, that just shows how you are grasping at straws and willing to ignore facts.
The ocean acidification experiment says nothing about climate or even man made CO2. There's never been a test on CO2 where some is added or removed from the atmosphere and we see an overall increase or decrease in atmospheric CO2 content.

“When you treat people as they ”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#1614 Oct 30, 2013
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>lol...if that's your opinion, son, it's all your own.
Just like your opinion of the UN not having corruption issues.
I doubt evidence is relevant to someone like you, jmo.
:-D
Funny that, that’s exactly what opinions are, I did not believe you were intelligent enough to understand that and you have proved me correct with yet again

You provided evidence from quarter of a century ago, but at least you think you are up to date. And as they say, It’s the thought that counts

“When you treat people as they ”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#1615 Oct 30, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
I am not putting words in your mouth. I am going by what you said
<quoted text>
So I will repeat what I said "So you admit you are on here to pick at people, pass time, make fun of people because your life is boring. Interesting."
If this is what you do for fun, as you claim in your comment, your life must be boring. I can think of many many other things to do for fun.
Nope, you are going by your interpretation of what I say and penning that interpretation which is a fooking long way from what I said.

Yet I see you are on here producing about 20% more posts than I do. Could this be perhaps because you think topix it’s boring or is it because you are just a hypocritical moron?

“When you treat people as they ”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#1616 Oct 30, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>How is looking at the experimental record, "ignorance and profit"? What do you mean by 'profit' and is it bad?
.
<quoted text>What's the most compelling experiment you've found for climate change mitigation.
.
<quoted text>^^^Not one of Chris's links were to an experimental test of climate change mitigation.
.
<quoted text>The ocean acidification experiment says nothing about climate or even man made CO2. There's never been a test on CO2 where some is added or removed from the atmosphere and we see an overall increase or decrease in atmospheric CO2 content.
You do not look at the experimental record so why are you lying? You have proven that you do not look at the experimental record by ignoring the myriad links provided to experimental reports and data that have been offered to you. Nothing wrong with earning a living but profiting at the expense of disease, misery and human life is not only bad it is sick.

Do you really have problems reading or are you just thick? My guess is both.

Actually YOU DID NOT ASK for climate change mitigation experiments as I have shown you before and actually provided you with a link to and quote from your VERY OWN POST. It really does not matter how much you lie about it, it will make no difference to fact.

Now you are moving the goalposts again. However I have provided links to 2 experiments that added CO2 to local biosphere’s and the results are NOT what you wanted to see to the extent you have claimed they are not expeiments.

P.S. Man made CO2 is exactly the same as natural CO2, there is no chemical difference so what the fook are you trying to make an irrelevant and deliberately obfuscating distinction for?

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Level 10

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#1617 Oct 30, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
You do not look at the experimental record so why are you lying? You have proven that you do not look at the experimental record by ignoring the myriad links provided to experimental reports and data that have been offered to you. Nothing wrong with earning a living but profiting at the expense of disease, misery and human life is not only bad it is sick. Do you really have problems reading or are you just thick? My guess is both. Actually YOU DID NOT ASK for climate change mitigation experiments as I have shown you before and actually provided you with a link to and quote from your VERY OWN POST. It really does not matter how much you lie about it, it will make no difference to fact.
Now you are moving the goalposts again. However I have provided links to 2 experiments that added CO2 to local biosphere’s and the results are NOT what you wanted to see to the extent you have claimed they are not expeiments.
P.S. Man made CO2 is exactly the same as natural CO2, there is no chemical difference so what the fook are you trying to make an irrelevant and deliberately obfuscating distinction for?
I've ONLY asked for an experimental test of climate change mitigation or man made catastrophic climate change theory, not "experiments that added CO2 to local biosphere’s". The issue is experimental tests on climate, don't blame me you have no experimental record to justify your misguided policies.

“When you treat people as they ”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#1618 Oct 30, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>I've ONLY asked for an experimental test of climate change mitigation or man made catastrophic climate change theory, not "experiments that added CO2 to local biosphere’s". The issue is experimental tests on climate, don't blame me you have no experimental record to justify your misguided policies.
Let me ONCE AGAIN point you to YOUR OWN post

http://www.topix.com/forum/news/evolution/TVP...

You made a statement that contradicted experimental facts, i.e. you lied and were proven to have lied.

Nope, I am blaming you for deliberate ignorance in deliberately ignoring the data. There is never any excuse for deliberate ignorance – ever.

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Level 10

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#1619 Oct 30, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
Let me ONCE AGAIN point you to YOUR OWN post
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/evolution/TVP...
You made a statement that contradicted experimental facts, i.e. you lied and were proven to have lied.
Nope, I am blaming you for deliberate ignorance in deliberately ignoring the data. There is never any excuse for deliberate ignorance – ever.
If Chris believes she has found an experiment that shows what Mother Nature likes or dislikes; that's her problem. Face reality, nature is impersonal.

“When you treat people as they ”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#1620 Oct 30, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>If Chris believes she has found an experiment that shows what Mother Nature likes or dislikes; that's her problem. Face reality, nature is impersonal.
The experiment(s) are there, no need to believe

Or is it that you are now saying that plants are not natural?

Just because you choose to ignore the evidence is your problem, and no one else’s

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 2 min IB DaMann 74,683
News Why Atheist Richard Dawkins Supports Religious ... 10 min replaytime 112
News It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09) 24 min replaytime 161,944
Mathematicians PROVED evolution IMPOSSIBLE! 1 hr Nemesis 285
News The Odds of Evolution Are Zero 3 hr Science 2
News 300,000 year-old "early Homo sapiens" sparks de... 3 hr Science 24
How can we prove God exists, or does not? (May '15) 6 hr Will 499
More from around the web