Skull Valley lawmaker wants both side...

Skull Valley lawmaker wants both sides of climate change taught to students

There are 1632 comments on the Verde Independent story from Feb 5, 2013, titled Skull Valley lawmaker wants both sides of climate change taught to students. In it, Verde Independent reports that:

Saying students are getting only one side of the debate, a state senator wants to free teachers to tell students why they believe there is no such thing human-caused "global warming.' The proposal by Sen.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Verde Independent.

“I started out with nothing”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#1372 Jun 13, 2013
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>where did you get that "concept"?
I don't mind if the little urchin responds!! I think it's hilarious every time he does. Especially with the creative lacking cut/paste response that says I DON'T deserve a response. Poor little goober just can't help himself. An Internet troll with a serious addiction. Lol
The fact that it is WRITTEN in the TOCs gives us a clue

If you donít mind then why are you being such a wimp and winging about it?

And why are you responding then claiming Kyle does not deserve a response? Contradiction here I think?

Have you ever considered that many people on here consider you to be nothing more than a troll with a serious addiction?

“What's your story? Nevermind.”

Level 2

Since: Apr 13

none of my business.

#1373 Jun 13, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
The fact that it is WRITTEN in the TOCs gives us a clue
If you donít mind then why are you being such a wimp and winging about it?
And why are you responding then claiming Kyle does not deserve a response? Contradiction here I think?
Have you ever considered that many people on here consider you to be nothing more than a troll with a serious addiction?
DITTO!! Have you ever considered that many people on here consider you to be nothing more than a troll with a serious addiction?

“BET DAP”

Level 4

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#1374 Jun 13, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
The fact that it is WRITTEN in the TOCs gives us a clue
If you donít mind then why are you being such a wimp and winging about it?
And why are you responding then claiming Kyle does not deserve a response? Contradiction here I think?
Have you ever considered that many people on here consider you to be nothing more than a troll with a serious addiction?
i didn't say 'kyle' did not deserve a response!! LOL

it amuses me that "kyle" states that i don't....but then responds.

do you not understand the concept??

no....i have not considered how i'm viewed on this forum, nor do i care.

comprehension problems, chrissy?

“I started out with nothing”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#1375 Jun 13, 2013
GLXGT wrote:
<quoted text>
DITTO!! Have you ever considered that many people on here consider you to be nothing more than a troll with a serious addiction?
You have every right to consider and to write what you want, that is the nature of a public thread. However my posts have always contained sufficient content on a variety of subject to realise that if people want to call be a troll then perhaps itís because they are clueless, have nothing and are projecting. Ring any bells?

“I started out with nothing”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#1376 Jun 13, 2013
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>i didn't say 'kyle' did not deserve a response!! LOL
it amuses me that "kyle" states that i don't....but then responds.
do you not understand the concept??
no....i have not considered how i'm viewed on this forum, nor do i care.
comprehension problems, chrissy?
I just looked back thorough the last few days and yes you are repeatedly whinging about Kyle and to Kyle

His post may not be original, they may not contain valid content but he, just like you is perfectly entitled to post exactly what he wantís to post so long as it is not grossly offensive or illegal.

Well the fact that you donít care certainly explains a lot and shows in you post, but who cares?

Say emid, who is chrissy? Perhaps you get off on misogynous abuse but my avatar makes it plain even for one of your limited intellect that my name is Christine

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Level 10

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#1377 Jun 13, 2013
Still no experimental test of climate change mitigation.

When will they learn?
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#1378 Jun 13, 2013
We have learned absolutely that fossil fuels and their combustion prodects are toxic, carcinogenic, and radioactive.

We have learned definitely that man-made greenhouse gases like fossil fuels combustion products have been changing our global climate dangerously.

We have learned certainly that life on land and in oceans are suffering more and more from the global climate change.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#1379 Jun 13, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
We have learned absolutely that fossil fuels and their combustion prodects are toxic, carcinogenic, and radioactive.
We have learned definitely that man-made greenhouse gases like fossil fuels combustion products have been changing our global climate dangerously.
We have learned certainly that life on land and in oceans are suffering more and more from the global climate change.
We have learned absolutely that fossil fuels and their combustion prodects are toxic, carcinogenic, and radioactive.

We have learned definitely that man-made greenhouse gases like fossil fuels combustion products have been changing our global climate dangerously.

We have learned certainly that the living on land and in oceans suffer helplessly more and more from the global climate change.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#1380 Jun 13, 2013
Ocean acidification due to increasing
atmospheric carbon dioxide

http://coralreef.noaa.gov/aboutcrcp/strategy/...

“I started out with nothing”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#1381 Jun 14, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
Still no experimental test of climate change mitigation.
When will they learn?
Still ignoring the experimental observations and sdata on climate change mitigation I see. But what can we expect from some dimwit whose avatar claims he loves CO2 and who denies physical evidence. From what I see you have now passed from basic stupid and dived headlong into deliberate ignorance bolstered by lies

Here you go, 318000 scholarly papers containing experimental method, detail, data, acts, law, decisions, aims and actions concerning climate change mitigation

http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar...

Feel free to browse at will, you may educate yourself (Ohh sorry, I did not mean to make a funny out of your lack of education)

Now of course you can deny that those papers exist but denial in the face of the proof offered by 318000 papers simply means you are talking total bollocks

The problem here is that there are no experimental test on climate change mitigation that confirms your stupid ignorance so you have to lie about it.

If lying is all you have then be a man, grow a set of balls and admit you are a liar

“I started out with nothing”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#1382 Jun 14, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
Ocean acidification due to increasing
atmospheric carbon dioxide
http://coralreef.noaa.gov/aboutcrcp/strategy/...
Good paper, thanks. Of particular interest to such deniers as Brian_G is the fact that it is an international/worldwide experiment of the type he denies exists.
LessHypeMoreFact

Toronto, Canada

#1384 Jun 14, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Good paper, thanks. Of particular interest to such deniers as Brian_G is the fact that it is an international/worldwide experiment of the type he denies exists.
HE will still deny it's existence. It's what he does. It is ALL that he does.

“I started out with nothing”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#1385 Jun 14, 2013
LessHypeMoreFact wrote:
<quoted text>
HE will still deny it's existence. It's what he does. It is ALL that he does.
Of course he will, he has done before and I am sure he will do it again but the point is that then some of us can laugh at his deliberate ignorance

“BET DAP”

Level 4

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#1386 Jun 14, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
I just looked back thorough the last few days and yes you are repeatedly whinging about Kyle and to Kyle
His post may not be original, they may not contain valid content but he, just like you is perfectly entitled to post exactly what he wantís to post so long as it is not grossly offensive or illegal.
Well the fact that you donít care certainly explains a lot and shows in you post, but who cares?
Say emid, who is chrissy? Perhaps you get off on misogynous abuse but my avatar makes it plain even for one of your limited intellect that my name is Christine
lol....miscreant blatherer.
litesong

Everett, WA

#1387 Jun 14, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
.... his deliberate ignorance
Its ('lyin' brian') deliberate ignorance began with its failure to take science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra & pre-calc in its proudly held but poorly earned high skule DEE-plooomaa. Its profound lack of science interest began even before it reached hi skule.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Level 10

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#1388 Jun 14, 2013
LessHypeMoreFact wrote:
HE will still deny it's existence. It's what he does. It is ALL that he does.
I don't deny the existence of a paper with any random title; an experimental test of climate change mitigation published in a peer reviewed journal is the element that doesn't exist.

All I do is point out the facts of the scientific method. You're the one promoting untested pseudoscience.
Sandy

Minneapolis, MN

#1389 Jun 15, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>I don't deny the existence of a paper with any random title; an experimental test of climate change mitigation published in a peer reviewed journal is the element that doesn't exist.
All I do is point out the facts of the scientific method. You're the one promoting untested pseudoscience.
Dear Brian_G,
This book appears to qualify as an example of what you are searching for:
http://afrsweb.usda.gov/SP2UserFiles/Place/64...
-dont drink the koolaid
imagine2011

Southaven, MS

#1390 Jun 15, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>We have learned absolutely that fossil fuels and their combustion prodects are toxic, carcinogenic, and radioactive.
We have learned definitely that man-made greenhouse gases like fossil fuels combustion products have been changing our global climate dangerously.
We have learned certainly that the living on land and in oceans suffer helplessly more and more from the global climate change.
Do you think the radiation from the testing of nuclear bombs could have anything to do with climate change?
Kyle

Wabash, IN

#1391 Jun 16, 2013
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>... cut/paste response that says I DON'T deserve a response.
That's correct, you DON'T deserve a response; that's the whole point. You don't deserve a response because you're an a-hole, a pathological liar, and a troll that repeats proven lies endlessly, never acknowledges refutations, and refuses to support his claims or retract them.
Kyle

Wabash, IN

#1392 Jun 16, 2013
imagine2011 wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you think the radiation from the testing of nuclear bombs could have anything to do with climate change?
No. Don't think for a minute that your ignorance represents a reason to dismiss the science.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 24 min Chimney1 168,944
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 45 min thetruth 19,789
News Aliens and evolution (Jun '12) 49 min thetruth 6,221
News It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09) 50 min kenedy njoroge 141,835
has science finally debunked the 'god' myth? Fri Paul Porter1 13
How can we prove God exists, or does not? Jul 2 Paul Porter1 197
How would creationists explain... (Nov '14) Jul 2 Paul Porter1 561
More from around the web