Scientific Theories. Lets look at tho...

“It is what it is”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#41 Jan 10, 2014
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Irony meter go boom.
Perhaps one day evolution may well be scientifically falsified. But it ain't yet. And certainly won't be by creationists like you in the near (or far) future.
Seriously bub, what do you hope to accomplish by whining to us on here just because the entire science community doesn't pay attention to you? Even the other fundies don't. If it's to stroke your martyr complex and ego, congrats.
Irony meter? Is that not some fictional meter that you keep bringing up? Just some simple thing someone made up but yet you abide by? Are you a paid spokesmen for topix? They way you run around and rant on every thread, bring old dead threads back to life I am beginning to think so.

Level 6

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

#42 Jan 11, 2014
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text> The record of false flag operations around the world and in the US is actually quite extensive and I understand why you're completely ignorant about it. You are the hapless victim of imposed ignorance and senseless indoctrination.
No dice Shubee-doobie

Have your false flag operations. Have your 911. I dont even care if you think that Pearl Harbour was an American / Zionist conspiracy. Hey, take the Fed too. And polio vaccines. And the gold standard. And Roswell. Have it all.

You still cannot thereby demonstrate that the theory of evolution and the evidence accumulated for it and the lack of evidence against it is a conspiracy.

Level 6

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

#43 Jan 11, 2014
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
Irony meter? Is that not some fictional meter that you keep bringing up? Just some simple thing someone made up but yet you abide by? Are you a paid spokesmen for topix? They way you run around and rant on every thread, bring old dead threads back to life I am beginning to think so.
We live in hope that one day you understand what an irony meter measures.
The Dude

Macclesfield, UK

#44 Jan 11, 2014
replaytime wrote:
Irony meter? Is that not some fictional meter that you keep bringing up? Just some simple thing someone made up but yet you abide by?
Yes, lucky guess.
replaytime wrote:
Are you a paid spokesmen for topix? They way you run around and rant on every thread, bring old dead threads back to life I am beginning to think so.
It's very rare for me to comment on an old thread which hasn't been posted on for many many months. So rare in fact that I can't remember the last time I've done that, if at all.

However I've noticed you seem to like to pop outta nowhere just to make an aimless rant at me every now and then while not even bothering to discuss the thread topic at hand. But hey, if it makes ya feel better.(shrug)
Level 6

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#45 Jan 11, 2014
Chimney1 wrote:
No dice Shubee-doobie
Shubee-doobie is not exactly correct. I am an advocate of juicing cannabis, not smoking it.
Level 6

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#46 Jan 11, 2014
Chimney1 wrote:
Have your false flag operations. Have your 911. I dont even care if you think that Pearl Harbour was an American / Zionist conspiracy. Hey, take the Fed too. And polio vaccines. And the gold standard. And Roswell. Have it all.
If you don't have the courage to admit the obvious, such as the implications of a large number of unanimous, sober, eyewitness testimonies of molten metal and explosions at the WTC on 9/11, then you couldn't possibly have the inclination to recognize devolution.
Level 6

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#47 Jan 11, 2014
Chimney1 wrote:
You still cannot thereby demonstrate that the theory of evolution and the evidence accumulated for it and the lack of evidence against it is a conspiracy.
I have never said or implied that the theory of evolution is a conspiracy. However, I am on record saying that I agree with Darwin’s four postulates as described in the graduate level text by Scott Freeman and Jon C. Herron (2004), Evolutionary Analysis 4th Edition.
The Dude

Macclesfield, UK

#48 Jan 12, 2014
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text> I have never said or implied that the theory of evolution is a conspiracy. However, I am on record saying that I agree with Darwin’s four postulates as described in the graduate level text by Scott Freeman and Jon C. Herron (2004), Evolutionary Analysis 4th Edition.
You're also on record for lying and twisting any scientific concept to support your anti-science theology. And for garnering attention here because no-one will pay attention to you anywhere else. This is why no-one takes you seriously.
Level 6

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#49 Jan 13, 2014
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text> I have never said or implied that the theory of evolution is a conspiracy. However, I am on record saying that I agree with Darwin’s four postulates as described in the graduate level text by Scott Freeman and Jon C. Herron (2004), Evolutionary Analysis 4th Edition.
Still no reply from Chimney1. That's really not surprising. He prefers to embrace his many errors.

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#50 Jan 13, 2014
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text>Still no reply from Chimney1. That's really not surprising. He prefers to embrace his many errors.
Or, since it's about 4am in Dubai -- where he lives for now -- he MAY just be sleeping.

Dumbass.

“It is what it is”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#51 Jan 13, 2014
Kong_ wrote:
<quoted text>
Or, since it's about 4am in Dubai -- where he lives for now -- he MAY just be sleeping.
Dumbass.
if you look he replied to chimney on Sat. So the little matter of 4am is irrelevant since days have passed. Who is the dumbass now?

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#52 Jan 13, 2014
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
if you look he replied to chimney on Sat. So the little matter of 4am is irrelevant since days have passed. Who is the dumbass now?
Yup. That would be me.

My apologies, Shoob. My bad (this time).

I saw your most recent post (of about an hour ago), and didn't see the one posted previously that was dated Sunday.

Despite this, I'm sure Chim has a suitable response for you.

Level 6

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

#53 Jan 13, 2014
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text> If you don't have the courage to admit the obvious, such as the implications of a large number of unanimous, sober, eyewitness testimonies of molten metal and explosions at the WTC on 9/11, then you couldn't possibly have the inclination to recognize devolution.
I am not commenting about the validity of "truther" 911 theories.

I am pointing out that even if they are valid (which I doubt), that they are in no measure evidence for any conspiracy to deny the evidence against evolution. There is no evidence against evolution for the far more obvious reason that evolution is correct and it happened according to all lines of evidence from the fossil record, embryology, bio-geography, atavisms, ERVs, ubiquitous proteins, pseudogenes, and laboratory experiments (eg genetic recovery of C. elegans falsifying Sanford, for starters).

Your devolution on the other hand is nonsense. It does not concur with the fossil record. So instead of abandoning your incorrect theory (as Feynman would urge you to do), you concoct a grand conspiracy.

Self aggrandising delusion is your forte.

Level 6

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

#54 Jan 13, 2014
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text>Still no reply from Chimney1. That's really not surprising. He prefers to embrace his many errors.
And you still prefer to think that HIV does not cause AIDS.

You are delusional, and only worth arguing with up to a point.

For example, you do not understand the pointlessness of mathematizing Sanford's debunked hypothesis...as if polishing a turd can turn it into a diamond.

And your grasp on logic is weak enough that you present truther 911 conspiracy theories as evidence that another conspiracy spanning 150 years, multiple antagonistic regimes, and academic institutions all over the world...

Level 6

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

#55 Jan 13, 2014
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text> I have never said or implied that the theory of evolution is a conspiracy. However, I am on record saying that I agree with Darwin’s four postulates as described in the graduate level text by Scott Freeman and Jon C. Herron (2004), Evolutionary Analysis 4th Edition.
You use the language of postulates, theorums, and axioms...all misapplied when discussing science. But you hope that it sounds learned.

You are wrong.

Try adding:

Empirical
Hypothesis
Testability
Faslifiability
Theory
Fact

to your limited lexicon.

“It is what it is”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#56 Jan 14, 2014
Kong_ wrote:
<quoted text>
Yup. That would be me.
My apologies, Shoob. My bad (this time).
I saw your most recent post (of about an hour ago), and didn't see the one posted previously that was dated Sunday.
Despite this, I'm sure Chim has a suitable response for you.
Nah Kong I don't think you are a dumbass. just giving you shyt like you would give me.
TRUTH SEEKER

Gulfport, MS

#57 Jan 14, 2014
Chimney1 wrote:
<quoted text>
911 Truther videos are not evidence in a forum about a supposed 150 year conspiracy to support evolution and suppress any evidence to the contrary.
Since you have just asked if you are as crazy as Jesus and now present "evidence" of one conspiracy as evidence of another far bigger one, then I have to say, yes, you are nuts. Now it looks to me that you have found refuge in conspiracy theories to explain to yourself why nobody is taking your "brilliant" ideas seriously.
Its so much easier for a crazy man to believe that everyone else is a dumb dupe to a conspiracy of Masters pulling the puppet strings, than to accept that quite possibly, his own ideas are just plain wrong and THAT is why people are ignoring them.
So you don't think there could be conspiracy?

Level 6

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

#58 Jan 14, 2014
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
if you look he replied to chimney on Sat. So the little matter of 4am is irrelevant since days have passed. Who is the dumbass now?
I am not so slavishly devoted to topix that I wont take a few days off.

Shubee has long since reached the point where the only way he can validate his attack on evolution is by resorting to a grandiose conspiracy theory. They all seem to end up there in the end, willing to believe anything no matter how outlandish so long as they don't have to accept evolution. "There is no evidence for my claims because somebody hid it!!!"

The somebodies being scientists all over the world for the last 150 years, each of them knowing that if they ever managed to reveal this secret evidence and debunk evolution they would be world famous.

Shubee's intelligence has merely allowed him to develop a more elaborate veil of self delusion and his ego knows no limits.

Meanwhile, real scientists continue to dig out fossils and research into the genome and the evidence for evolution just keeps accumulating. Falsification remains possible at every step, but has never happened. That is to be expected when a theory happens to be true.

Level 6

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

#59 Jan 14, 2014
TRUTH SEEKER wrote:
<quoted text>So you don't think there could be conspiracy?
I don't think a conspiracy on the scale of the alleged 911 truther claims, which would involve a close knit cabal of men holding the reigns of power in the USA for a few short years, is even remotely comparable to the kind of conspiracy that would be required to hide evidence against evolution for 150 years across multiple countries, regimes, and ideologies, for a theory under open attack all that time from well funded religious groups and even governments, not to mention every aspect of the theory being under academic scrutiny and criticism until well supported by the evidence.

The 911 conspiracy stretches credulity.
An evolution conspiracy simply flies off the edge of reality.

Level 6

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

#60 Jan 14, 2014
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text> Shubee-doobie is not exactly correct. I am an advocate of juicing cannabis, not smoking it.
Either way would get you locked up for 5 years over here.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 2 hr Subduction Zone 74,878
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 2 hr Republican Destru... 221,487
News It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09) 3 hr MADRONE 161,970
Is Creationism and Intelligent Design debunked ... 3 hr pshun2404 217
Mathematicians PROVED evolution IMPOSSIBLE! 4 hr David Jay Jordan 297
News Why Atheist Richard Dawkins Supports Religious ... 7 hr Subduction Zone 130
News 30 years after Edwards v. Aguillard: Why creati... 7 hr Al Caplan 4
More from around the web