And that pattern is simply change over time. So evolution is not contradicting nature. You are saying life changes over time except when it does not. This is a violation of the law of non-contradiction.Genetics don't violate the law of non-contradiction because nature governs it and nature does not contradict itself! Genetics, fossils etc., follows the same pattern within nature because nature governs all.
You have not been able to demonstrate your claim and instead argued using definitions which contradict nature. This is a violation of the law of non-contradiction.Once again, the law of non-contradiction is a threat to the theory of evolution because majority of the information presented to represent the theory of evolution is in violation of the law of non-contradiction!
You are not using the scientific method because you are not testing anything. You have merely chosen a restrictive label of the term "species" and assumed that biology is bound by non-existent abstract concepts. Your "interpretations" are meaningless without testing. You could "interpret" that it's all evidence of the Cosmic Sheep of Dimension Zog being the source of nature. There is nothing in nature that contradicts that. However to claim the interpretation makes use of empricism and the scientific method would be a lie. Hence it violates the law of non-contradiction.You have the scientific method for empirical evidence and I have the scientific method to test the information you present from interpreting the empirical evidence.
In your case you claim Goddidit with magic and UFO's dropped off new species at regular 1 million year intervals in a manner that made it LOOK like life evolved on this planet and life changes except when it doesn't, therefore evolution is wrong. Your claim is a violation of the law of non-contradiction. The fact you are contradicting the law of non-contradiction is a violation of the law of non-contradiction. Therefore you have violated the law of non-contradiction. If you violate the law of non-contradiction then your hypothesis must be discarded as it is a violation of the law of non-contradiction because nothing must violate the law of no-contradiction.