So you take evolutionist claims out of context (note that not one of them, who by the way you ALREADY claimed "don't know anything anyway", are claiming their work falsifies evolution), claim a reduction of variation indicates a reversal, which in itself would not prevent evolution occurring beforehand, and claim that evolution is wrong because evolution is correct because it's PRECISLEY what you need in order for Genesis and Flood "theories" to work.<quoted text>
Look Gilette, This has gotten to the point where you evos do not even know what you are saying or what you are talking about.
I have no doubt that you can provide mountains of woffle about regions and advantage and bla bla. It changes from day to day and is all flavour of the month.
It is to be sucked up by the gullible.
Here is some more..
Epistasis has substantial impacts on evolution, in particular, the rate of adaptation. We generated combinations of beneficial mutations that arose in a lineage during rapid adaptation of a bacterium whose growth depended on a newly introduced metabolic pathway. The proportional selective benefit for three of the four loci consistently decreased when they were introduced onto more fit backgrounds. These three alleles all reduced morphological defects caused by expression of the foreign pathway. A simple theoretical model segregating the apparent contribution of individual alleles to benefits and costs effectively predicted the interactions between them. These results provide the first evidence that patterns of epistasis may differ for within- and between-gene interactions during adaptation and that diminishing returns epistasis contributes to the consistent observation of decelerating fitness gains during adaptation.
These data support models in which negative epistasis contributes to declining rates of adaptation over time.
Hence the variations are limited, not increased, with the accumulation of beneficial mutations Great then, all the talk about beneficial mutations is also as clear as mud...not that any evo or nature or TOE knows exactly what is beneficial at any time because we all know survival of the fittest is rubbish. It is more about survival of the luckiest.
Let me be clear. TOE is as clear as mud and that is the basis for evos saying they 'know' TOE is 'right'.
You were saying something about knowing more than us, and that evolution was all over the map? Have you checked your own house recently?